|
#8
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > I still use Money 2002 and receive direct downloads from Vanguard and my
Interesting. Maybe I should have said Vanguard says they don't support> > bank just fine. pre-2005 Money downloads. From their website: "You can download and export up to 18 months' worth of Vanguard® transaction history into Money. After you download your data, your operating system should automatically recognize the file and import it directly into your Money records. The software will compare the new download with older information to record only new transactions and eliminate any duplicates. This service will work for Money 2005 or later." "Lynn Henderson" <lynnjunk[at]comcast.REMOVE.net> wrote in message news:OosTIe$HIHA.5132[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... - quote - > L Cramer wrote: > > Vanguard, my fund family, will allow one to bypass Money's servers and > > download and then import data directly to Money. As far as I can see my > > credit card companies will not allow a direct download. One must go > > through > > Money's or Quicken's servers. But even Vanguard doesn't support versions > > of > > Money (or Quicken) pre-2005, so the need to update doesn't change. Given > > the convenince provided here, the modest cost of updates seems reasonable > > to > > me. I'd gladly pay more if they fixed a few bugs, but understand why > > they > > can't. > > > lzc > > > "Anthony Lisanti" <ajlisanti[at]optonline.net> wrote in message > > news 0osi3th8knti2jt8p58u7vropb77g4euj[at]4ax.com...> > > > > So me connecting to my credit card company and getting updates costs > > > Microsoft money? When I contact my 401k provider, and update it costs > > > MS money? > > > > > > > You gotta bet kidding me. > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 16:07:40 -0000, "Bob Peel, MVP" > > > <bob_peel[at]kiandra.freeserve.co.uk.INVALID> wrote: > > > > > > Because the process costs $$$$ and MS is not a philanthropic > > > > institution. > > > > I still use Money 2002 and receive direct downloads from Vanguard and my > bank just fine. The only direct download I have lost was my First USA > credit card after they became Chase last year, so I have to download their > web statements. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| L Cramer wrote: - quote - > Vanguard, my fund family, will allow one to bypass Money's servers and
I still use Money 2002 and receive direct downloads from Vanguard and my> download and then import data directly to Money. As far as I can see my > credit card companies will not allow a direct download. One must go through > Money's or Quicken's servers. But even Vanguard doesn't support versions of > Money (or Quicken) pre-2005, so the need to update doesn't change. Given > the convenince provided here, the modest cost of updates seems reasonable to > me. I'd gladly pay more if they fixed a few bugs, but understand why they > can't. > lzc > "Anthony Lisanti" <ajlisanti[at]optonline.net> wrote in message > news 0osi3th8knti2jt8p58u7vropb77g4euj[at]4ax.com...> > > So me connecting to my credit card company and getting updates costs > > Microsoft money? When I contact my 401k provider, and update it costs > > MS money? > > > > You gotta bet kidding me. > > > > > > On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 16:07:40 -0000, "Bob Peel, MVP" > > <bob_peel[at]kiandra.freeserve.co.uk.INVALID> wrote: > > > > Because the process costs $$$$ and MS is not a philanthropic institution. bank just fine. The only direct download I have lost was my First USA credit card after they became Chase last year, so I have to download their web statements. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| You can look on the http://www.microsoft.com/money/bankonline.aspx page. If it says the data is available for the FI via: "Direct Services are the fastest, easiest way to connect with your financial institution and have your statements automatically downloaded into Money directly from your financial institution." Then you are getting data without going through Microsoft/Yodlee. But if it breaks you might not understand all of this and might want to contact Microsoft Support. This **does** cost Microsoft money and may be one of the reasons the want to "stop loss" by setting a certain end date when they break the functionality by definition. OTOH, if it says: "Direct Services* are the fastest, easiest way to connect with your financial institution and have your statements automatically downloaded into Money. "* This service is provided by a third party provider, not your financial institution. It is only available if you have Microsoft Money 2005 or later. You will need to use Microsoft .NET Passport in order to access your account information." Then Microsoft and the "third party provider" (Yodlee at the present writing) is in the loop. "L Cramer" <1zcra(exclude)mer[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:EbGdnfmfQsHvgLLanZ2dnUVZ_smnnZ2d[at]comcast.com... - quote - > If Dick Watson says "it depends," I'll go with his vastly superior > knowledge > on the subject of Money. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| If Dick Watson says "it depends," I'll go with his vastly superior knowledge on the subject of Money. I had a problem trading stock options through Vanguard via the internet one time and was bumped up the chain of technical reps over several weeks. The subject of Money and Quicken came up. The impression they left was clear, connection to their system by Money and Quicken was a nuisance. If they weren't dealing with software glitches, they were dealing with calls from Money users with problems who didn't know whether to blame Vanguard or Money for their difficulties. Anthony Lisanti" <ajlisanti[at]optonline.net> wrote in message news:6r1ui392e7q98b8gkats6gponb9iefn6g1[at]4ax.com... - quote - > So I'm going into MS servers to get my data? It not like connecting > directly to the banks? > On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 20:21:52 -0800, "L Cramer" > <1zcra(exclude)mer[at]yahoo.com> wrote: > > Vanguard, my fund family, will allow one to bypass Money's servers and > > download and then import data directly to Money. As far as I can see my > > credit card companies will not allow a direct download. One must go > > through > > Money's or Quicken's servers. But even Vanguard doesn't support versions > > of > > Money (or Quicken) pre-2005, so the need to update doesn't change. Given > > the convenince provided here, the modest cost of updates seems reasonable > > to > > me. I'd gladly pay more if they fixed a few bugs, but understand why they > > can't. > > > lzc > > > "Anthony Lisanti" <ajlisanti[at]optonline.net> wrote in message > > news 0osi3th8knti2jt8p58u7vropb77g4euj[at]4ax.com...> > > > > > > So me connecting to my credit card company and getting updates costs > > > Microsoft money? When I contact my 401k provider, and update it costs > > > MS money? > > > > > > > You gotta bet kidding me. > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 16:07:40 -0000, "Bob Peel, MVP" > > > <bob_peel[at]kiandra.freeserve.co.uk.INVALID> wrote: > > > > > > Because the process costs $$$$ and MS is not a philanthropic > > > > institution. > > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| It depends. Some are the one way and some are the other. "Anthony Lisanti" <ajlisanti[at]optonline.net> wrote in message news:6r1ui392e7q98b8gkats6gponb9iefn6g1[at]4ax.com... - quote - > So I'm going into MS servers to get my data? It not like connecting > directly to the banks? |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| So I'm going into MS servers to get my data? It not like connecting directly to the banks? On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 20:21:52 -0800, "L Cramer" <1zcra(exclude)mer[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Vanguard, my fund family, will allow one to bypass Money's servers and > download and then import data directly to Money. As far as I can see my > credit card companies will not allow a direct download. One must go through > Money's or Quicken's servers. But even Vanguard doesn't support versions of > Money (or Quicken) pre-2005, so the need to update doesn't change. Given > the convenince provided here, the modest cost of updates seems reasonable to > me. I'd gladly pay more if they fixed a few bugs, but understand why they > can't. > lzc > "Anthony Lisanti" <ajlisanti[at]optonline.net> wrote in message > news 0osi3th8knti2jt8p58u7vropb77g4euj[at]4ax.com...> > > > So me connecting to my credit card company and getting updates costs > > Microsoft money? When I contact my 401k provider, and update it costs > > MS money? > > > > You gotta bet kidding me. > > > > > > On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 16:07:40 -0000, "Bob Peel, MVP" > > <bob_peel[at]kiandra.freeserve.co.uk.INVALID> wrote: > > > > Because the process costs $$$$ and MS is not a philanthropic institution. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Vanguard, my fund family, will allow one to bypass Money's servers and download and then import data directly to Money. As far as I can see my credit card companies will not allow a direct download. One must go through Money's or Quicken's servers. But even Vanguard doesn't support versions of Money (or Quicken) pre-2005, so the need to update doesn't change. Given the convenince provided here, the modest cost of updates seems reasonable to me. I'd gladly pay more if they fixed a few bugs, but understand why they can't. lzc "Anthony Lisanti" <ajlisanti[at]optonline.net> wrote in message news 0osi3th8knti2jt8p58u7vropb77g4euj[at]4ax.com...- quote - > So me connecting to my credit card company and getting updates costs > Microsoft money? When I contact my 401k provider, and update it costs > MS money? > You gotta bet kidding me. > On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 16:07:40 -0000, "Bob Peel, MVP" > <bob_peel[at]kiandra.freeserve.co.uk.INVALID> wrote: > > Because the process costs $$$$ and MS is not a philanthropic institution. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| So me connecting to my credit card company and getting updates costs Microsoft money? When I contact my 401k provider, and update it costs MS money? You gotta bet kidding me. On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 16:07:40 -0000, "Bob Peel, MVP" <bob_peel[at]kiandra.freeserve.co.uk.INVALID> wrote: - quote - > Because the process costs $$$$ and MS is not a philanthropic institution. |
| | |||
| |||
| Because the process costs $$$$ and MS is not a philanthropic institution. -- Regards Bob Peel, Microsoft MVP - Money For UK tips & fixes see http://support.microsoft.com/default...d=fh;EN-GB;mny. I do not respond to any emails that I have not specifically asked for. "Anthony Lisanti" <ajlisanti[at]optonline.net> wrote in message news:66rri3p2igoohogf8p9lvj5cjg03mao67n[at]4ax.com... - quote - > Why do online services expire? I'm connecting to my bank or whatever, > it doesn't make sense and its like Microsoft forces you to update. > It's working fine why fix whats not broken? |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Why do online services expire? I'm connecting to my bank or whatever, it doesn't make sense and its like Microsoft forces you to update. It's working fine why fix whats not broken? |
| Tags |
| expire, online, services |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| online Money 2004 to expire Bill F.: In my case I've been using Money 2004 Standard. Today when I opened my MS Money a message window popped up telling me that "The online service... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 11-22-2006 01:34 AM | |
| Will online updates expire sometime with my Money 2005? kaplan3jiim@comcast.net: I've seen this mentioned in other threads but I am not sure how it applies to my situation. I'm running Money 2005 and do on line updates of just... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 10-31-2006 05:26 PM | |
| MM 2004-when I-net services expire? compitus: Hi! Know that MM 2005 got warning that Internet services will expire in 2007. How about MM 2004, anything about beeing obsolete in 2006 or so? TIA | Microsoft Money | 1 | 08-08-2005 10:55 PM | |
| Online Services Mike: I just switched from Quicken 2004 to MS Money 2006 (my bank recently discontinued their support of Quicken but supports MS Money.) The import... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 07-11-2005 05:08 PM | |
| Do Money 2002 Online Services Expire? Richard: Well do they? Or did that policy not start until Money 2003? (I have the US version). I found details for later versions at... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 06-24-2005 12:02 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |