Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Microsoft Money

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #2  
Old 11-04-2007, 02:28 PM
MikeV06
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Money Overhaul

On Sat, 3 Nov 2007 19:18:00 -0700, gb1 wrote:

- quote -

> I personally would prefer that they never released money 2005 onward. Was
> very happy with 2004 but was forced to upgrade due to 3 year support window
> expiring.
> I find money 2007 (what I run) did not provide any value other than allowing
> me to eat lunch/dinner while I wait for my transaction additions/changes to
> be registerd - and this is on a fast 1 year old computer.
> "Jeff M" wrote:


I agree totally. I see nothing in M08 that improves what I was doing with
M04. I upgraded because Fidelity only downloads transactions directly from
within Money rather than downloading from the site. The same is true with
Discover.

Microsoft Money Users
Please note that you must initiate statement downloads from your financial
software, not from the Account Center.

At least Discover allows one to download a xls file. I have a program for
xls to qif so that I can create importable transactions for that. Fidelity
does not offer downloads to xls.

So, two years from now I will be faced with the same issue. Not only that,
I have lost a reliable PDA money as well. My wife still uses M04 with
Pocket Money and refuses to switch. However, she does not need transactions
from Fidelity.
  #1  
Old 11-04-2007, 01:18 AM
gb1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: Money Overhaul

I personally would prefer that they never released money 2005 onward. Was
very happy with 2004 but was forced to upgrade due to 3 year support window
expiring.

I find money 2007 (what I run) did not provide any value other than allowing
me to eat lunch/dinner while I wait for my transaction additions/changes to
be registerd - and this is on a fast 1 year old computer.

"Jeff M" wrote:

- quote -

> I've seen a number of posts longing for a big overhaul to Money in the
> near future. There was some speculation that 2008 would be the year
> since in the past it was approximately every three years. I used to
> be one of those individuals, always hoping for some great new
> features.
> I'm not so convinced any longer. I can't recall anyone being happy
> with the big change from 2004 to 2005. We've now been getting minor
> upgrades to the 2005 version each year and in truth, I think this is
> good. If 2009 has some big overhaul, it will likely be an attempt to
> even further simplify features and inevitably introduce a whole new
> group of bugs/problems.
> I'm relatively happy with Money Plus and I consider myself a power
> user of Personal Finance Software. I am also currently running
> Quicken 2008 Premier to compare its features and I still prefer Money
> over Quicken in numerous ways. My vote would be for Money to continue
> to address current bugs and continue to introduce one or two new
> features each year and avoid the overhaul as long as possible.
> Jeff

 
Old 11-03-2007, 11:55 PM
Dick Watson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Money Overhaul

Three comments inline below.

"Jeff M" <jamacq[at]gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1194111998.490110.239220[at]k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
- quote -

> I'm not so convinced any longer. I can't recall anyone being happy
> with the big change from 2004 to 2005.


From the PoV of an M04 user it surely wasn't a big change. What M04 user
wanted Essential * -- all of the "Most users prefer(tm)" talk
notwithstanding?

- quote -

> We've now been getting minor
> upgrades to the 2005 version each year and in truth, I think this is
> good. If 2009 has some big overhaul, it will likely be an attempt to
> even further simplify features and inevitably introduce a whole new
> group of bugs/problems.


Sadly, you are probably right.

- quote -

> I'm relatively happy with Money Plus and I consider myself a power
> user of Personal Finance Software. I am also currently running
> Quicken 2008 Premier to compare its features and I still prefer Money
> over Quicken in numerous ways. My vote would be for Money to continue
> to address current bugs and continue to introduce one or two new
> features each year and avoid the overhaul as long as possible.


Unfortunately, it seems that some of the bugs must be just too hard to fix
without some fundamental re-factoring. Witness Nuke The Bills. (I've seen
the kind of mold and slime that grows in code that's been in maintenance as
long as this has. Trust me. It gets UGLY.) Agreed, however, that if
"Essentials" is what we are going to get out of an overhaul, they would be
better to skip it.

  #-1  
Old 11-03-2007, 04:46 PM
Jeff M
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Money Overhaul

I've seen a number of posts longing for a big overhaul to Money in the
near future. There was some speculation that 2008 would be the year
since in the past it was approximately every three years. I used to
be one of those individuals, always hoping for some great new
features.

I'm not so convinced any longer. I can't recall anyone being happy
with the big change from 2004 to 2005. We've now been getting minor
upgrades to the 2005 version each year and in truth, I think this is
good. If 2009 has some big overhaul, it will likely be an attempt to
even further simplify features and inevitably introduce a whole new
group of bugs/problems.

I'm relatively happy with Money Plus and I consider myself a power
user of Personal Finance Software. I am also currently running
Quicken 2008 Premier to compare its features and I still prefer Money
over Quicken in numerous ways. My vote would be for Money to continue
to address current bugs and continue to introduce one or two new
features each year and avoid the overhaul as long as possible.

Jeff

 

Tags
money, overhaul


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:53 PM.