|
#2
| |||
| |||
| On Sat, 3 Nov 2007 19:18:00 -0700, gb1 wrote: - quote - > I personally would prefer that they never released money 2005 onward. Was
I agree totally. I see nothing in M08 that improves what I was doing with> very happy with 2004 but was forced to upgrade due to 3 year support window > expiring. > I find money 2007 (what I run) did not provide any value other than allowing > me to eat lunch/dinner while I wait for my transaction additions/changes to > be registerd - and this is on a fast 1 year old computer. > "Jeff M" wrote: M04. I upgraded because Fidelity only downloads transactions directly from within Money rather than downloading from the site. The same is true with Discover. Microsoft Money Users Please note that you must initiate statement downloads from your financial software, not from the Account Center. At least Discover allows one to download a xls file. I have a program for xls to qif so that I can create importable transactions for that. Fidelity does not offer downloads to xls. So, two years from now I will be faced with the same issue. Not only that, I have lost a reliable PDA money as well. My wife still uses M04 with Pocket Money and refuses to switch. However, she does not need transactions from Fidelity. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I personally would prefer that they never released money 2005 onward. Was very happy with 2004 but was forced to upgrade due to 3 year support window expiring. I find money 2007 (what I run) did not provide any value other than allowing me to eat lunch/dinner while I wait for my transaction additions/changes to be registerd - and this is on a fast 1 year old computer. "Jeff M" wrote: - quote - > I've seen a number of posts longing for a big overhaul to Money in the > near future. There was some speculation that 2008 would be the year > since in the past it was approximately every three years. I used to > be one of those individuals, always hoping for some great new > features. > I'm not so convinced any longer. I can't recall anyone being happy > with the big change from 2004 to 2005. We've now been getting minor > upgrades to the 2005 version each year and in truth, I think this is > good. If 2009 has some big overhaul, it will likely be an attempt to > even further simplify features and inevitably introduce a whole new > group of bugs/problems. > I'm relatively happy with Money Plus and I consider myself a power > user of Personal Finance Software. I am also currently running > Quicken 2008 Premier to compare its features and I still prefer Money > over Quicken in numerous ways. My vote would be for Money to continue > to address current bugs and continue to introduce one or two new > features each year and avoid the overhaul as long as possible. > Jeff |
| | |||
| |||
| Three comments inline below. "Jeff M" <jamacq[at]gmail.com> wrote in message news:1194111998.490110.239220[at]k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com... - quote - > I'm not so convinced any longer. I can't recall anyone being happy
From the PoV of an M04 user it surely wasn't a big change. What M04 user> with the big change from 2004 to 2005. wanted Essential * -- all of the "Most users prefer(tm)" talk notwithstanding? - quote - > We've now been getting minor
Sadly, you are probably right.> upgrades to the 2005 version each year and in truth, I think this is > good. If 2009 has some big overhaul, it will likely be an attempt to > even further simplify features and inevitably introduce a whole new > group of bugs/problems. - quote - > I'm relatively happy with Money Plus and I consider myself a power
Unfortunately, it seems that some of the bugs must be just too hard to fix> user of Personal Finance Software. I am also currently running > Quicken 2008 Premier to compare its features and I still prefer Money > over Quicken in numerous ways. My vote would be for Money to continue > to address current bugs and continue to introduce one or two new > features each year and avoid the overhaul as long as possible. without some fundamental re-factoring. Witness Nuke The Bills. (I've seen the kind of mold and slime that grows in code that's been in maintenance as long as this has. Trust me. It gets UGLY.) Agreed, however, that if "Essentials" is what we are going to get out of an overhaul, they would be better to skip it. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I've seen a number of posts longing for a big overhaul to Money in the near future. There was some speculation that 2008 would be the year since in the past it was approximately every three years. I used to be one of those individuals, always hoping for some great new features. I'm not so convinced any longer. I can't recall anyone being happy with the big change from 2004 to 2005. We've now been getting minor upgrades to the 2005 version each year and in truth, I think this is good. If 2009 has some big overhaul, it will likely be an attempt to even further simplify features and inevitably introduce a whole new group of bugs/problems. I'm relatively happy with Money Plus and I consider myself a power user of Personal Finance Software. I am also currently running Quicken 2008 Premier to compare its features and I still prefer Money over Quicken in numerous ways. My vote would be for Money to continue to address current bugs and continue to introduce one or two new features each year and avoid the overhaul as long as possible. Jeff |