|
#20
| |||
| |||
| "C Thomas" <CThomas[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:1A6E57D7-6233-4D96-969F-D808C84CEFF5[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > ... word on the street has it that Microsoft is abandoning Money
That part is conjecture by correspondents here, based on observation.> and/or won't be spending > much effort making it better in the future. ... We're not privy to Microsoft plans and could not share it if we were. -- Chris Cowles Gainesville, FL |
|
#19
| |||
| |||
| So it still sounds like converting to Quicken will be a pain and word on the street has it that Microsoft is abandoning Money and/or won't be spending much effort making it better in the future. Sounds like a lose/lose situation. "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, XB77 wrote: > > What does the file name link function do? > It lets you link from a transaction to a file, such as a scan or a > zip file (which can act as a folder that can hold a collection of > things). There is even a tricky way to have the transaction link to > a regular folder. |
|
#18
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, XB77 wrote: - quote - > What does the file name link function do?
It lets you link from a transaction to a file, such as a scan or azip file (which can act as a folder that can hold a collection of things). There is even a tricky way to have the transaction link to a regular folder. |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| Never mind, I believe that it must be this: NEW! Attach links to important files such as check images or scanned receipts right from transactions in the Money account register. |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| What does the file name link function do? "Marilyn & Bob" <Privacy[at]nospam.please> wrote in message news:OvOaDiqXIHA.5980[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... - quote - > M+ > -- > Peace, > BobJ > "XB77" <XB77[at]My-Deja.com> wrote in message > news:R33mj.6057$A75.5200[at]trnddc05... > > "Money did add the filename link for transactions" Was that added in M07 > > or M+? What is it? |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| M+ -- Peace, BobJ "XB77" <XB77[at]My-Deja.com> wrote in message news:R33mj.6057$A75.5200[at]trnddc05... - quote - > "Money did add the filename link for transactions" Was that added in M07 > or M+? What is it? |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| "Money did add the filename link for transactions" Was that added in M07 or M+? What is it? |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:OVTrdziXIHA.4828[at]TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... - quote - > I believe you will find Q does the same thing. And if you buy Deluxe
Intuit tech support is pricy after the first 90 days, where MS support> it gets you two years. Note also that the new online services policy > shipped with M+ suggests a possible future subscription offering or > some such for that. is free. Some may find MS support wanting but I've generally been satisfied on the occasions I've spoken to someone. I have no experience with Intuit tech support and cannot make comparisons. -- Chris Cowles Gainesville, FL |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| I believe you will find Q does the same thing. And if you buy Deluxe it gets you two years. Note also that the new online services policy shipped with M+ suggests a possible future subscription offering or some such for that. Oh, and I update all my accounts manually. I use money to help me manage my finances, not to capture transaction data from the banks' PoV. "C Thomas" <CThomas[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news 405FB2F-9C86-4C45-9F03-B746E7715B10[at]microsoft.com...- quote - > Well, now that MS turns off your automatic update capability every year, > you > are forced to upgrade every year. So what other option do I have but to > go > to quicken in November? I don't want to update my accounts manually...why > use Money if you have to do that. |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Well, now that MS turns off your automatic update capability every year, you are forced to upgrade every year. So what other option do I have but to go to quicken in November? I don't want to update my accounts manually...why use Money if you have to do that. "C Thomas" wrote: - quote - > I guess when my next forced upgrade of Money comes around (Nov 2008), I'll > have to look at what it will take to migrate everything over to Quicken. > Sometimes you pick the winner, sometimes you don't. > "Dick Watson" wrote: > > The preponderance of evidence suggests they are tired of playing. > > > "C Thomas" <C Thomas[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > > news 46C107F-00F8-4165-A23C-725DC707C851[at]microsoft.com...> > > So, does Microsoft want to lead or follow Quicken? > > > |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Migration looks to be a pretty significant hurdle. Sticking with Money may be possible for quite some time--unless you really are hard over for added features in Q. Note that Money did add the filename link for transactions to keep up with Q. And it is entirely possible Microsoft will surprise me and roll out the Money we've all wished for in fall of 2008 as Money Plus Plus or something. We really don't know here. All we can do is watch what happens and try to infer their direction. "C Thomas" <CThomas[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:9EC6F901-9284-4151-8D65-216CC66866CA[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > I guess when my next forced upgrade of Money comes around (Nov 2008), I'll > have to look at what it will take to migrate everything over to Quicken. > Sometimes you pick the winner, sometimes you don't. > "Dick Watson" wrote: > > The preponderance of evidence suggests they are tired of playing. > > > "C Thomas" <C Thomas[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > > news 46C107F-00F8-4165-A23C-725DC707C851[at]microsoft.com...> > > So, does Microsoft want to lead or follow Quicken? |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| I guess when my next forced upgrade of Money comes around (Nov 2008), I'll have to look at what it will take to migrate everything over to Quicken. Sometimes you pick the winner, sometimes you don't. "Dick Watson" wrote: - quote - > The preponderance of evidence suggests they are tired of playing. > "C Thomas" <C Thomas[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news 46C107F-00F8-4165-A23C-725DC707C851[at]microsoft.com...> > So, does Microsoft want to lead or follow Quicken? |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| The preponderance of evidence suggests they are tired of playing. "C Thomas" <C Thomas[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news 46C107F-00F8-4165-A23C-725DC707C851[at]microsoft.com...- quote - > So, does Microsoft want to lead or follow Quicken? |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| I think this is a necessary feature that needs to be added. You can't say an HSA is like a 401K because you can withdrawl money at any time (for health related expenses) without a penalty. Once it reaches a certain value, most HSAs allow you to put the money into an investment fund to continue building the value over the years. I'm sure you could attempt to do something with the current capabilities but if the numbers hold true this is a growing program. In a report to congress in May of 2006, there were over 3.2 Million individuals covered by an HSA in January 2006. More than 4.5 Million are estimated to now have HSAs and the number is expected to grow to over 18 Million by the year 2012. So, does Microsoft want to lead or follow Quicken? Because of the differences in a HSA and other investments, savings, etc. it would be a helpful addition to Microsoft Money! Microsoft's Benefit Package for their employees includes the option for an HSA, so this would even pay off for their own employees! Hey! Now that's a concept they should be able to get behind and I'd bet they have a few developers on the Money development team that have an HSA! "Michael J. Blazin" wrote: - quote - > It looks like the original request was more about managing the HSA as > opposed to tracking it. The complications in an HSA are determining whether > it's appropriate. The fund flows are relatively simple: essentially an > invested flexible spending account with no requirement to zero out at year > end. The appropriateness calculation is a mix of Policy 1 Premium vs. > Policy 2 lower premium offset by probability of higher incurred expenses > offset by tax advantages of higher pre-tax deductions (you get the full > impact of the contribution, not just the actual expenses) plus tax free > return on your investment. But you only do that calculation once a year. > Once you are in or out, it's that way till next year. No purpose is served > redoing the calculation. Money's purpose is to collect the info for next > year's calculation. > I've looked at HSAs several times. The premium difference is miniscule for > some reason at my firm. Consequently it's more a bet of the increased tax > advantages/investment returns vs. hopefully low medical expenses. I doubt > that anyone with dependents would chance the very high deductible. > Consequently it's likely for well-off (can afford increased pre-tax > contributions AFTER maxing out 401K, maxing out IRA, paying mortgage - not > to smart to stint on any of these for HSA), healthy, no dependents, and > young (get a chance to realize invested benefits and you can't contribute > after reaching 65). That is a small sector on the Venn diagram. Since that > was Congress's intention, that result is not surprising. > "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in > message news:e9lVyQuHIHA.1164[at]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > > There is no doubt in my mind I can collect 100% of the necessary data > > precisely and report it using existing Money features. Nothing you have > > identified as a requirement is something beyond what I'm doing today in > > Money for our HCSA (not an HSA) and 401(k)s. But suit yourself. > > > We were really discussing whether Microsoft should or will add features > > specifically tailored to _say_ HSA (since the underlying capabilities are > > 100% there already) or, maybe, to pop-up FYIs at or near certain limits or > > whatever rather than waiting for the user to look at his/her data and > > figure it out for themselves. They may. They may not. If history can guide > > us, were I you, I wouldn't hold me breath waiting for it. I'd go find the > > ways to make the tools you already have work. > > > IF this problem is as hard as you assert, nobody will use these > > accounts--I suggest this is already apparent--and if nobody uses these > > accounts, then why should Microsoft devote precious R&D investment to > > tailoring code specifically to solve a problem nobody elects to have? > > Likewise, if the problem is as hard as you suggest, it would be almost > > impossible to tailor a "one size fits all" lowest common denominator > > solution in Money to make it work for all. > > > Just my thoughts. Anybody else who thinks that the unique requirements of > > HSAs are beyond Money as it sits today is more than welcome to jump in on > > the thread. > > > "Prilosec" <purple[at]nni.net> wrote in message > > news:20C04260-4293-4932-98DF-1840E6705940[at]microsoft.com... > > > I believe you are over-simplifying an HSA to make it "fit" into an > > > existing Money account. This is a unique tax/savings setup that typically > > > requires precise tracking of spending by category (and/or class) with > > > reimbursement from the savings account to another account. There are tax > > > laws reqarding carryover, deductible, etc. > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| It looks like the original request was more about managing the HSA as opposed to tracking it. The complications in an HSA are determining whether it's appropriate. The fund flows are relatively simple: essentially an invested flexible spending account with no requirement to zero out at year end. The appropriateness calculation is a mix of Policy 1 Premium vs. Policy 2 lower premium offset by probability of higher incurred expenses offset by tax advantages of higher pre-tax deductions (you get the full impact of the contribution, not just the actual expenses) plus tax free return on your investment. But you only do that calculation once a year. Once you are in or out, it's that way till next year. No purpose is served redoing the calculation. Money's purpose is to collect the info for next year's calculation. I've looked at HSAs several times. The premium difference is miniscule for some reason at my firm. Consequently it's more a bet of the increased tax advantages/investment returns vs. hopefully low medical expenses. I doubt that anyone with dependents would chance the very high deductible. Consequently it's likely for well-off (can afford increased pre-tax contributions AFTER maxing out 401K, maxing out IRA, paying mortgage - not to smart to stint on any of these for HSA), healthy, no dependents, and young (get a chance to realize invested benefits and you can't contribute after reaching 65). That is a small sector on the Venn diagram. Since that was Congress's intention, that result is not surprising. "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:e9lVyQuHIHA.1164[at]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... - quote - > There is no doubt in my mind I can collect 100% of the necessary data > precisely and report it using existing Money features. Nothing you have > identified as a requirement is something beyond what I'm doing today in > Money for our HCSA (not an HSA) and 401(k)s. But suit yourself. > We were really discussing whether Microsoft should or will add features > specifically tailored to _say_ HSA (since the underlying capabilities are > 100% there already) or, maybe, to pop-up FYIs at or near certain limits or > whatever rather than waiting for the user to look at his/her data and > figure it out for themselves. They may. They may not. If history can guide > us, were I you, I wouldn't hold me breath waiting for it. I'd go find the > ways to make the tools you already have work. > IF this problem is as hard as you assert, nobody will use these > accounts--I suggest this is already apparent--and if nobody uses these > accounts, then why should Microsoft devote precious R&D investment to > tailoring code specifically to solve a problem nobody elects to have? > Likewise, if the problem is as hard as you suggest, it would be almost > impossible to tailor a "one size fits all" lowest common denominator > solution in Money to make it work for all. > Just my thoughts. Anybody else who thinks that the unique requirements of > HSAs are beyond Money as it sits today is more than welcome to jump in on > the thread. > "Prilosec" <purple[at]nni.net> wrote in message > news:20C04260-4293-4932-98DF-1840E6705940[at]microsoft.com... > > I believe you are over-simplifying an HSA to make it "fit" into an > > existing Money account. This is a unique tax/savings setup that typically > > requires precise tracking of spending by category (and/or class) with > > reimbursement from the savings account to another account. There are tax > > laws reqarding carryover, deductible, etc. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| There is no doubt in my mind I can collect 100% of the necessary data precisely and report it using existing Money features. Nothing you have identified as a requirement is something beyond what I'm doing today in Money for our HCSA (not an HSA) and 401(k)s. But suit yourself. We were really discussing whether Microsoft should or will add features specifically tailored to _say_ HSA (since the underlying capabilities are 100% there already) or, maybe, to pop-up FYIs at or near certain limits or whatever rather than waiting for the user to look at his/her data and figure it out for themselves. They may. They may not. If history can guide us, were I you, I wouldn't hold me breath waiting for it. I'd go find the ways to make the tools you already have work. IF this problem is as hard as you assert, nobody will use these accounts--I suggest this is already apparent--and if nobody uses these accounts, then why should Microsoft devote precious R&D investment to tailoring code specifically to solve a problem nobody elects to have? Likewise, if the problem is as hard as you suggest, it would be almost impossible to tailor a "one size fits all" lowest common denominator solution in Money to make it work for all. Just my thoughts. Anybody else who thinks that the unique requirements of HSAs are beyond Money as it sits today is more than welcome to jump in on the thread. "Prilosec" <purple[at]nni.net> wrote in message news:20C04260-4293-4932-98DF-1840E6705940[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > I believe you are over-simplifying an HSA to make it "fit" into an > existing Money account. This is a unique tax/savings setup that typically > requires precise tracking of spending by category (and/or class) with > reimbursement from the savings account to another account. There are tax > laws reqarding carryover, deductible, etc. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| I believe you are over-simplifying an HSA to make it "fit" into an existing Money account. This is a unique tax/savings setup that typically requires precise tracking of spending by category (and/or class) with reimbursement from the savings account to another account. There are tax laws reqarding carryover, deductible, etc.. I think MS has not included this so far because there are so few real HSA programs now. It was only allowed on a limited basis a few years ago and has not caught on yet, although I think it's a great idea for those who can really manage a budget. Personally, I really like the HSA concept. Most people, in my opinion, are scared off by the huge deductible amounts, but don't really see that you are covering those with your HSA. "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:%23vBd8p$GIHA.3980[at]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... - quote - > I guess I'm still not getting it. See below. > "DougW" <DougW[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:0FE47A57-3846-4FD6-92AA-2DF1AD6116E4[at]microsoft.com... > > The features that I would look for are: > > -Track the deposits into the HSA, both our individual and our company > > deposits as applicable. > Can do today. Just like for a 401k. I've been tracking tax deferred > contributions from myself and my employer for 12 years with Money. > > -Ensure there is a warning should deposits exceed the non-taxable limit > Does not do for any kind of capped contribution amount. But cerrtainly can > collect the data so you can look and see. > > -track health care expenditures out of the HSA to help with IRS audits > > should that ever be necessary. > Can do today. > > -track rollovers from year-to-year. > Can do today--though there isn't any Big Red Flag or anything. You have to > know what you'd be looking at. > > -suggest HSA deposit amounts based on prior year(s) medical expenses > > versus > > deductible, and the HSA deposit maximu. > All of the data will be there if you collect it properly for this. There > is no wizard/druid/genie. > > -Tax reporting related to HSA activity > Can report all of this today. > > -Investment tracking related to HSA deposits (could be money markets, > > CDs, > > brokerage accounts, etc). Brokerage accounts may be different than other > > brokerage accounts currently used by the Money owner. > This would be different from, say, a 401(k) account how? > > -track expenditures from the HSA by each member covered by the HSA > > against > > the individual deductible to ensure that deductibles aren't exceeded. > A very good use for classification. Indeed, I classify healthcare expenses > today (Class Who : Dick) for these kinds of purposes. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| I guess I'm still not getting it. See below. "DougW" <DougW[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:0FE47A57-3846-4FD6-92AA-2DF1AD6116E4[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > The features that I would look for are:
Can do today. Just like for a 401k. I've been tracking tax deferred> -Track the deposits into the HSA, both our individual and our company > deposits as applicable. contributions from myself and my employer for 12 years with Money. - quote - > -Ensure there is a warning should deposits exceed the non-taxable limit
Does not do for any kind of capped contribution amount. But cerrtainly cancollect the data so you can look and see. - quote - > -track health care expenditures out of the HSA to help with IRS audits
Can do today.> should that ever be necessary. - quote - > -track rollovers from year-to-year.
Can do today--though there isn't any Big Red Flag or anything. You have toknow what you'd be looking at. - quote - > -suggest HSA deposit amounts based on prior year(s) medical expenses
All of the data will be there if you collect it properly for this. There is> versus > deductible, and the HSA deposit maximu. no wizard/druid/genie. - quote - > -Tax reporting related to HSA activity
Can report all of this today.- quote - > -Investment tracking related to HSA deposits (could be money markets, CDs,
This would be different from, say, a 401(k) account how?> brokerage accounts, etc). Brokerage accounts may be different than other > brokerage accounts currently used by the Money owner. - quote - > -track expenditures from the HSA by each member covered by the HSA against
A very good use for classification. Indeed, I classify healthcare expenses> the individual deductible to ensure that deductibles aren't exceeded. today (Class Who : Dick) for these kinds of purposes. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| HSAs are more like a 401k than a Roth. The deposits, up to a limit, are excluded from taxable income (over age 55 can deposit extra). The account can later be used to pay healthcare expenses, insurance premiums, etc. without having to pay taxes on it. If used for a non-medical expense taxes would have to be paid plus a 10% penalty. If over age 65, it can be still be used for medical expenses without paying tax, or for any other purpose without paying paying the penalty, although taxes would still be payable. -- DougW "Dick Watson" wrote: - quote - > What features would those be? > Near as I can tell, the existing account models work fine. The only thing > I'm not sure about is how an HSA account should interact with Tax Estimator. > (Mostly because of ignorance about HSAs.) Aren't they treated more or less > like Roth IRAs? (I.e., no deduction to fund it, no taxes on reinvested > income, no taxes on ultimate gains when distributed if used for X purpose.) > Why not use the same tax-related detail settings as a Roth IRA? > "DougW" <DougW[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:FDE38641-4C5C-41D2-925D-6BE702A16517[at]microsoft.com... > > As far as I know, none of your products is built to handle Health Savings > > Accounts. If this is true, I suggest that you research HSAs and consider > > adding it, and the special features needed for such an investment account, > > to > > your products. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| The features that I would look for are: -Track the deposits into the HSA, both our individual and our company deposits as applicable. -Ensure there is a warning should deposits exceed the non-taxable limit -track health care expenditures out of the HSA to help with IRS audits should that ever be necessary. -track rollovers from year-to-year. -suggest HSA deposit amounts based on prior year(s) medical expenses versus deductible, and the HSA deposit maximu. -Tax reporting related to HSA activity -Investment tracking related to HSA deposits (could be money markets, CDs, brokerage accounts, etc). Brokerage accounts may be different than other brokerage accounts currently used by the Money owner. -track expenditures from the HSA by each member covered by the HSA against the individual deductible to ensure that deductibles aren't exceeded. -- DougW "Dick Watson" wrote: - quote - > What features would those be? > Near as I can tell, the existing account models work fine. The only thing > I'm not sure about is how an HSA account should interact with Tax Estimator. > (Mostly because of ignorance about HSAs.) Aren't they treated more or less > like Roth IRAs? (I.e., no deduction to fund it, no taxes on reinvested > income, no taxes on ultimate gains when distributed if used for X purpose.) > Why not use the same tax-related detail settings as a Roth IRA? > "DougW" <DougW[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:FDE38641-4C5C-41D2-925D-6BE702A16517[at]microsoft.com... > > As far as I know, none of your products is built to handle Health Savings > > Accounts. If this is true, I suggest that you research HSAs and consider > > adding it, and the special features needed for such an investment account, > > to > > your products. |
| Tags |
| feature, hsas, suggestion |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Customer suggestion Steve: Dear Microsoft, The main reason I don't use Money is because of the advertisements. It has ads for various brokerage services etc and also a lot... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 10-18-2005 11:33 AM | |
| Suggestion Money Fan: I would like to see all versions of Money capable of running efficiently on a home or small business network with the potential of supporting... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 10-29-2004 02:58 PM | |
| suggestion, please - somewhat OT, but not really Bruce: Hi all! I have been using Money 2003 and then 2004. I'm playing around with the 2005 trial for now and so far, I'm thinking about upgrading. My... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 10-03-2004 01:57 PM | |
| Where to send suggestion Tim Pingrey: Have a suggestion for a Money enhancement. Anyone know how to send it to Microsoft? Thanks | Microsoft Money | 3 | 09-02-2004 08:36 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |