|
#4
| |||
| |||
| The "1" I put by my reply was intended to indicate that my answer was for your first question which has nothing to do with spinoffs. Also, I was referring to the results I get in the performance reports, not in the portfolio. "jeff" wrote: - quote - > After years of pointing out ongoing inconsistencies to MS with Money's > performance reporting I'm ready to give up! > 1- Move an investment from one account to another and money uses the move > date, not the purchase date, to calculate performance returns. > 2- Spin offs use the spin off date, not purchase date, to calculate > performance returns. Think the same problem with a merger. > 3- Still haven't figured out what the consolidated account performance > figures mean. > 4- No way to input wrap fee costs to an account to calculate net performance > returns. > 5- No calculation regarding commission costs to determine Brokerage cost > impact on overall returns. > 6- Money Market/Cash- ? Performance not calculated if MM returns are not > considered from an investment even though there are dividends/interest. > The good news is the $ calculations seem to be accurate, but how do you use > any of the performance reporting to compare performance to indices or any of > the other performance benchmarks publically available? > I’m not sure Quicken does anything different. I’m trying to find out if > others have the same problem and if there are any workarounds that get past > the issues. > Comments? |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| To add insult to injury the support guy I talked with was no stranger to the problem- said its been around for a long time... and so far ignored! Think I'll look at UltraSoft's MoneyLink. I have no problem with excel so this may be an answer. Thanks for the info! "Myrna Larson" wrote: - quote - > From my point of view, it's even worse! We had investments in municipal income > trusts: the trust buys a basket of bonds with various maturity dates, then > sells shares to investors. The investor gets monthly interest payments, and > when a bond matures, principal is returned to the investors. Money's > calculation of absolute dollar return and % return are correct. BUT... when it > comes to annualized return, they ignore the return of principal transactions, > so the investment shows, e.g. POSITIVE dollar and percent return, but NEGATIVE > annualized return -- an absolute absurdity! I reported this for at least 3-4 > years, and nobody at MS is interested in fixing it. > My solution was to use UltraSoft's MoneyLink Excel add-in to pull the data > into an Excel worksheet and do my own calculations. But if you don't use > Excel, this probably isn't of much help to you. > On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 05:33:00 -0700, jeff <jeff[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > The difficulty is- no matter which report- Money uses the incorrect date for > > its calculation. I.E. I have Altriain in an account. Altria had a spin off > > earlier this year. If I run the "Performance by Type" report from 01/01/01 > > to the day before the spin off I get 2.38% Rate of Return and 11.31% Annual > > Return. The figures change respectively to 10.90% and 56.79% if I run the > > same report from 01/01/07 to the spin off date- one day later. > > > Another example. If I change the date on the Portfolio Manager screen to the > > day before the spin off, the account I have Altria in shows an Ann. Ret of > > 71.2%. Add one more day (date of the spin off) and the Ann. Ret is now > > 1284.4%. > > > Unfortunately, I have not found any performance figures correct throughout > > Money if the calculations contain an investment that has a spin off or any > > other action that results in a changed date. > > > What bothers me is the correct dates are still available, just not used!! I > > have pointed the problem out to MS for several years now and still no > > resolution so I'm looking for a work around. > > > "Wally" wrote: > > > > 1. You can get around this by creating a performance report that is not > > > grouped by account. This seems to give an accurate performance figure. > > > Also, if you give the date range equivalent to the time that an investment > > > was in a particular account, it will give the correct performance figures > for > > > that date range even if your report is grouped by account. > > > > > "jeff" wrote: > > > > > > After years of pointing out ongoing inconsistencies to MS with Money's > > > > performance reporting I'm ready to give up! > > > > > > > 1- Move an investment from one account to another and money uses the move > > > > date, not the purchase date, to calculate performance returns. > > > > > > > 2- Spin offs use the spin off date, not purchase date, to calculate > > > > performance returns. Think the same problem with a merger. > > > > > > > 3- Still haven't figured out what the consolidated account performance > > > > figures mean. > > > > > > > 4- No way to input wrap fee costs to an account to calculate net > performance > > > > returns. > > > > > > > 5- No calculation regarding commission costs to determine Brokerage cost > > > > impact on overall returns. > > > > > > > 6- Money Market/Cash- ? Performance not calculated if MM returns are not > > > > considered from an investment even though there are dividends/interest. > > > > > > > > > > The good news is the $ calculations seem to be accurate, but how do you > use > > > > any of the performance reporting to compare performance to indices or any > of > > > > the other performance benchmarks publically available? > > > > > > > I’m not sure Quicken does anything different. I’m trying to find out if > > > > others have the same problem and if there are any workarounds that get > past > > > > the issues. > > > > > > > > > > Comments? > > > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| From my point of view, it's even worse! We had investments in municipal income trusts: the trust buys a basket of bonds with various maturity dates, then sells shares to investors. The investor gets monthly interest payments, and when a bond matures, principal is returned to the investors. Money's calculation of absolute dollar return and % return are correct. BUT... when it comes to annualized return, they ignore the return of principal transactions, so the investment shows, e.g. POSITIVE dollar and percent return, but NEGATIVE annualized return -- an absolute absurdity! I reported this for at least 3-4 years, and nobody at MS is interested in fixing it. My solution was to use UltraSoft's MoneyLink Excel add-in to pull the data into an Excel worksheet and do my own calculations. But if you don't use Excel, this probably isn't of much help to you. On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 05:33:00 -0700, jeff <jeff[at]discussions.microsoft.comwrote: - quote - > Hi, > The difficulty is- no matter which report- Money uses the incorrect date for > its calculation. I.E. I have Altriain in an account. Altria had a spin off > earlier this year. If I run the "Performance by Type" report from 01/01/01 > to the day before the spin off I get 2.38% Rate of Return and 11.31% Annual > Return. The figures change respectively to 10.90% and 56.79% if I run the > same report from 01/01/07 to the spin off date- one day later. > Another example. If I change the date on the Portfolio Manager screen to the > day before the spin off, the account I have Altria in shows an Ann. Ret of > 71.2%. Add one more day (date of the spin off) and the Ann. Ret is now > 1284.4%. > Unfortunately, I have not found any performance figures correct throughout > Money if the calculations contain an investment that has a spin off or any > other action that results in a changed date. > What bothers me is the correct dates are still available, just not used!! I > have pointed the problem out to MS for several years now and still no > resolution so I'm looking for a work around. > "Wally" wrote: > > 1. You can get around this by creating a performance report that is not > > grouped by account. This seems to give an accurate performance figure. > > Also, if you give the date range equivalent to the time that an investment > > was in a particular account, it will give the correct performance figures for > > that date range even if your report is grouped by account. > > > "jeff" wrote: > > > > After years of pointing out ongoing inconsistencies to MS with Money's > > > performance reporting I'm ready to give up! > > > > > 1- Move an investment from one account to another and money uses the move > > > date, not the purchase date, to calculate performance returns. > > > > > 2- Spin offs use the spin off date, not purchase date, to calculate > > > performance returns. Think the same problem with a merger. > > > > > 3- Still haven't figured out what the consolidated account performance > > > figures mean. > > > > > 4- No way to input wrap fee costs to an account to calculate net performance > > > returns. > > > > > 5- No calculation regarding commission costs to determine Brokerage cost > > > impact on overall returns. > > > > > 6- Money Market/Cash- ? Performance not calculated if MM returns are not > > > considered from an investment even though there are dividends/interest. > > > > > > > The good news is the $ calculations seem to be accurate, but how do you use > > > any of the performance reporting to compare performance to indices or any of > > > the other performance benchmarks publically available? > > > > > I’m not sure Quicken does anything different. I’m trying to find out if > > > others have the same problem and if there are any workarounds that get past > > > the issues. > > > > > > > Comments? > > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Hi, The difficulty is- no matter which report- Money uses the incorrect date for its calculation. I.E. I have Altriain in an account. Altria had a spin off earlier this year. If I run the "Performance by Type" report from 01/01/01 to the day before the spin off I get 2.38% Rate of Return and 11.31% Annual Return. The figures change respectively to 10.90% and 56.79% if I run the same report from 01/01/07 to the spin off date- one day later. Another example. If I change the date on the Portfolio Manager screen to the day before the spin off, the account I have Altria in shows an Ann. Ret of 71.2%. Add one more day (date of the spin off) and the Ann. Ret is now 1284.4%. Unfortunately, I have not found any performance figures correct throughout Money if the calculations contain an investment that has a spin off or any other action that results in a changed date. What bothers me is the correct dates are still available, just not used!! I have pointed the problem out to MS for several years now and still no resolution so I'm looking for a work around. "Wally" wrote: - quote - > 1. You can get around this by creating a performance report that is not > grouped by account. This seems to give an accurate performance figure. > Also, if you give the date range equivalent to the time that an investment > was in a particular account, it will give the correct performance figures for > that date range even if your report is grouped by account. > "jeff" wrote: > > After years of pointing out ongoing inconsistencies to MS with Money's > > performance reporting I'm ready to give up! > > > 1- Move an investment from one account to another and money uses the move > > date, not the purchase date, to calculate performance returns. > > > 2- Spin offs use the spin off date, not purchase date, to calculate > > performance returns. Think the same problem with a merger. > > > 3- Still haven't figured out what the consolidated account performance > > figures mean. > > > 4- No way to input wrap fee costs to an account to calculate net performance > > returns. > > > 5- No calculation regarding commission costs to determine Brokerage cost > > impact on overall returns. > > > 6- Money Market/Cash- ? Performance not calculated if MM returns are not > > considered from an investment even though there are dividends/interest. > > > > The good news is the $ calculations seem to be accurate, but how do you use > > any of the performance reporting to compare performance to indices or any of > > the other performance benchmarks publically available? > > > I’m not sure Quicken does anything different. I’m trying to find out if > > others have the same problem and if there are any workarounds that get past > > the issues. > > > > Comments? > |
| | |||
| |||
| 1. You can get around this by creating a performance report that is not grouped by account. This seems to give an accurate performance figure. Also, if you give the date range equivalent to the time that an investment was in a particular account, it will give the correct performance figures for that date range even if your report is grouped by account. "jeff" wrote: - quote - > After years of pointing out ongoing inconsistencies to MS with Money's > performance reporting I'm ready to give up! > 1- Move an investment from one account to another and money uses the move > date, not the purchase date, to calculate performance returns. > 2- Spin offs use the spin off date, not purchase date, to calculate > performance returns. Think the same problem with a merger. > 3- Still haven't figured out what the consolidated account performance > figures mean. > 4- No way to input wrap fee costs to an account to calculate net performance > returns. > 5- No calculation regarding commission costs to determine Brokerage cost > impact on overall returns. > 6- Money Market/Cash- ? Performance not calculated if MM returns are not > considered from an investment even though there are dividends/interest. > The good news is the $ calculations seem to be accurate, but how do you use > any of the performance reporting to compare performance to indices or any of > the other performance benchmarks publically available? > I’m not sure Quicken does anything different. I’m trying to find out if > others have the same problem and if there are any workarounds that get past > the issues. > Comments? |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| After years of pointing out ongoing inconsistencies to MS with Money's performance reporting I'm ready to give up! 1- Move an investment from one account to another and money uses the move date, not the purchase date, to calculate performance returns. 2- Spin offs use the spin off date, not purchase date, to calculate performance returns. Think the same problem with a merger. 3- Still haven't figured out what the consolidated account performance figures mean. 4- No way to input wrap fee costs to an account to calculate net performance returns. 5- No calculation regarding commission costs to determine Brokerage cost impact on overall returns. 6- Money Market/Cash- ? Performance not calculated if MM returns are not considered from an investment even though there are dividends/interest. The good news is the $ calculations seem to be accurate, but how do you use any of the performance reporting to compare performance to indices or any of the other performance benchmarks publically available? I’m not sure Quicken does anything different. I’m trying to find out if others have the same problem and if there are any workarounds that get past the issues. Comments? |
| Tags |
| calculations, giving, performance |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Giving up on Money it is too buggy. Brad: After using money since 1999 and getting upgrades each year I am giving up. It is just too buggy, once you have a bad transaction in the system it... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 06-02-2005 11:33 PM | |
| Keeps giving me trial Eric: Hello. I had previously used the trial (deluxe) 2005 version for a few days before deleting it and reverting to 2003. I changed my mind a few days... | Microsoft Money | 6 | 03-28-2005 05:32 PM | |
| Giving up on 2005 Twarp6: 05 messed everything up, spent over a week w/tech support and still does not work right--duplicate accounts,no E-pay, false accounts in bill-pay... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 10-23-2004 05:48 PM | |
| I'm giving quicken a shot Bart: I'm a long time user of Money (since 1997) currently using Money 2004 Deluxe. I started using Money mainly because it was preloaded on my first... | Microsoft Money | 8 | 08-27-2004 04:25 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |