|
#15
| |||
| |||
| With some accounts, Wachovia charges if you download from within Money. But, if you initiate the download from the website, then there's no charge. -- Michael Gordon <amiyagupta[at]gmail.com> wrote in message news:1176003245.781598.294660[at]y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... - quote - > Does WAMU charge for their download service? |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| Man that sucks...i totally agree...Recently I upgraded from money 2004 to MSmoney 2007 deluxe...to tell the truth if i hadn't run into that glitch about changing your password with hotmail ...which was connected to my passport...which was connected to my MSmoney....i'm not sure if i would have upgraded or not...in the end to resolve my being locked out of my program and not wanting to lose all of my financial data for the past 5 years...i upgraded to msmoney 2007 which claimed to have resolved that issue....tadaaaaa.....it worked...I'm still here!!! ![]() anyways...BofA thought it would be a pretty cool thing to do some upgrades to their online banking system or whatever!!! all i can say is that bank needs to do some damn unit testing before they actually fully implement something live....in other words...work out the kinks before you shove it to your customers! i still hate the fact that i don't have the option to download any of my transactions on my credit cards....i have to wait till the beginning of the next statement period...then this months electronic statement will be available for download....sucks...but i'm toughin it out....i preferred to have the same option that the savings and checking accts have...either download the whole statement or a specific date range...guess that was too hard for them.... its a pisser to have to bend to their will when we are letting them have our money and them making interest and loans on our money which they have in the bank...i swear everyone in the world or the U.S. should just boycot all their banks and goto them and say....i want to withdraw all my money NOW!!! and everyone takes out all their money on the same day....and keeps it for a week....would be a funny to see how the banks react.... anyways...gotta study some more anatomy... later "Steve" wrote: - quote - > It is so interesting that we are becoming a society willing to pay to avoid > advertising - which I suspect is the case here. Since I don't want to use > their Bill Pay site AND I want to use a more integrated tool for my needs > AND I don't want their advertisers in my face - I have to pay to avoid them. > But we do it with Sirius Satellite Radio, Cable TV, on-line newsletters (of > print version over-loaded with ads), etc... I get sooooo tired of the > advertising barrage....... > I still don't see a valid need for charging me to get to my own financial > data. By me using Money (or Quicken) I am actually saving them work and > making their job easier yet I have to pay THEM for the privilege. What are > we coming too? > Thanks for the help an the information. > Steve > "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in > message news:O3KCObeZHHA.3628[at]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > > Sad, isn't it? If Yodlee and CashEdge are the answer to much of anything, > > I'd love to know what the question was. > > > "Marilyn & Bob" <Privacy[at]nospam.please> wrote in message > > news:Or6l7CeZHHA.3984[at]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > > > This seems to be a growing trend as Money (and Quicken) are now limiting > > > the downloads to their software to two years. It seems like the banks > > > and MS/Intuit seem to be in a race of who can provide the least service > > > for the Money. > > |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| "Mike" <mmcdaniel1960[at]comcast.net> wrote in message news:1173807594.630297.60600[at]p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com... - quote - > No fees at Chase... It's been a positive experience.
Investigate Amsouth, now Regents. |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| "Sam" <sam[at]nospam.com> wrote in message news:43EJh.7345$B7.5139[at]bigfe9... - quote - > "Steve" <steve.lundwall_AT_state.tn.us> wrote in message
in checking, Savings, and loan service.> news:eoBgs1YZHHA.4620[at]TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > > Well, one of the reasons I switched to wachovia two years ago from Wells > > Fargo was the free access to my own money data using Microsoft Money. Now > > Wachovia is going to start charging $5.95 per month starting in April. > > They have my money, are using it to fund loans and yet they want to > > charge me to simply communicate data. (Yes, I pay bill with it but they > > don't charge their customers for on-line bill pay which does the same > > thing.) > > > So, what other bnks are out there that still have free access to accounts > > using Microsoft Money? Thanks. > > > Steve > > > > Bank of America charges 9.95 a month for "enhanced" online services that > allow Money to update. but there are no charges for the web site > including bill pay. However if you get the mega-deluxe account, and there > are ways to get it free if you have certain minimum balances, loans, > etc... it's free. Correct, the limits for free enhanced online (auto download) is combined 5K Art |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| It is so interesting that we are becoming a society willing to pay to avoid advertising - which I suspect is the case here. Since I don't want to use their Bill Pay site AND I want to use a more integrated tool for my needs AND I don't want their advertisers in my face - I have to pay to avoid them. But we do it with Sirius Satellite Radio, Cable TV, on-line newsletters (of print version over-loaded with ads), etc... I get sooooo tired of the advertising barrage....... I still don't see a valid need for charging me to get to my own financial data. By me using Money (or Quicken) I am actually saving them work and making their job easier yet I have to pay THEM for the privilege. What are we coming too? Thanks for the help an the information. Steve "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:O3KCObeZHHA.3628[at]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... - quote - > Sad, isn't it? If Yodlee and CashEdge are the answer to much of anything, > I'd love to know what the question was. > "Marilyn & Bob" <Privacy[at]nospam.please> wrote in message > news:Or6l7CeZHHA.3984[at]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > > This seems to be a growing trend as Money (and Quicken) are now limiting > > the downloads to their software to two years. It seems like the banks > > and MS/Intuit seem to be in a race of who can provide the least service > > for the Money. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| WAIT! this fee is easily avoided! You didn't see the asterisk, check at the bottom: * Customers who access Wachovia Online Banking directly through personal financial management software and have an active Crown Select, Crown Classic, Crown Banking, Crown Access, Crown Regular, Crown Interest, Custom Banking, Performance Banking or Command Asset Program will not be charged. I have a Crown account, it's easy to change your account to that, there are no fees to change, and there are only advcantages to having that type of account. They can probably change your account to that over the phone, I went in to the local branch and had it changed. I have found their people to be very friendly and competent. No reason to change OR start paying the fee! "Steve" <steve.lundwall_AT_state.tn.us> wrote in message news:eoBgs1YZHHA.4620[at]TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... - quote - > Well, one of the reasons I switched to wachovia two years ago from Wells > Fargo was the free access to my own money data using Microsoft Money. Now > Wachovia is going to start charging $5.95 per month starting in April. > They have my money, are using it to fund loans and yet they want to charge > me to simply communicate data. (Yes, I pay bill with it but they don't > charge their customers for on-line bill pay which does the same thing.) > So, what other bnks are out there that still have free access to accounts > using Microsoft Money? Thanks. > Steve |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Sad, isn't it? If Yodlee and CashEdge are the answer to much of anything, I'd love to know what the question was. "Marilyn & Bob" <Privacy[at]nospam.please> wrote in message news:Or6l7CeZHHA.3984[at]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... - quote - > This seems to be a growing trend as Money (and Quicken) are now limiting > the downloads to their software to two years. It seems like the banks and > MS/Intuit seem to be in a race of who can provide the least service for > the Money. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| I guess what I said in my previous post was that Chase was doing the exact same thing. The only difference is that they continue to offer the free service to legacy customers. HSBC also dropped their automatic (1st party) download service into Money (free or paid) last December, although you can still download manually from their website. This seems to be a growing trend as Money (and Quicken) are now limiting the downloads to their software to two years. It seems like the banks and MS/Intuit seem to be in a race of who can provide the least service for the Money. -- Peace, BobJ "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:%234UuGVdZHHA.2448[at]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... - quote - > It's a policy that seems quite counter to the notion of progressively > providing access to customer data from tools like Money. It seems as > though Wachovia is doing something specifically contrary the interests of > Money users and, hence, to Money and programs like it. Given all of the > hoopla surrounding this downloaded data thing, this seems to confirm my > perception that the banks--or at least this solitary one--would prefer NOT > to support these modes of operation since they deprive the FIs of access > to their customers' eyeballs and mouse clicks. > "Michael Gordon" <gordonm[at]denison.edu> wrote in message > news:%23Livo%23cZHHA.1296[at]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > > Huh? Not sure what you're saying, Dick. > > > "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in > > message news:eUZie8cZHHA.4684[at]TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > > > Talk about getting with the program. > > > > > "Michael Gordon" <gordonm[at]denison.edu> wrote in message > > > news:Op9K%23ycZHHA.4616[at]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > > > > As I read the info at Wachovia, the charge will be imposed if you > > > > initiate the download from within Money. However, if you do it manually > > > > (download from the web site, then import into Money), then there won't > > > > be a charge. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| It's a policy that seems quite counter to the notion of progressively providing access to customer data from tools like Money. It seems as though Wachovia is doing something specifically contrary the interests of Money users and, hence, to Money and programs like it. Given all of the hoopla surrounding this downloaded data thing, this seems to confirm my perception that the banks--or at least this solitary one--would prefer NOT to support these modes of operation since they deprive the FIs of access to their customers' eyeballs and mouse clicks. "Michael Gordon" <gordonm[at]denison.edu> wrote in message news:%23Livo%23cZHHA.1296[at]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... - quote - > Huh? Not sure what you're saying, Dick. > "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in > message news:eUZie8cZHHA.4684[at]TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > > Talk about getting with the program. > > > "Michael Gordon" <gordonm[at]denison.edu> wrote in message > > news:Op9K%23ycZHHA.4616[at]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > > > As I read the info at Wachovia, the charge will be imposed if you > > > initiate the download from within Money. However, if you do it manually > > > (download from the web site, then import into Money), then there won't > > > be a charge. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Huh? Not sure what you're saying, Dick. -- Michael Gordon "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:eUZie8cZHHA.4684[at]TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... - quote - > Talk about getting with the program. > "Michael Gordon" <gordonm[at]denison.edu> wrote in message > news:Op9K%23ycZHHA.4616[at]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > > As I read the info at Wachovia, the charge will be imposed if you > > initiate the download from within Money. However, if you do it manually > > (download from the web site, then import into Money), then there won't be > > a charge. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Talk about getting with the program. "Michael Gordon" <gordonm[at]denison.edu> wrote in message news:Op9K%23ycZHHA.4616[at]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... - quote - > As I read the info at Wachovia, the charge will be imposed if you initiate > the download from within Money. However, if you do it manually (download > from the web site, then import into Money), then there won't be a charge. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Chase, at least in NYC, charges $9.95 per month for Money access for all accounts opened after August 2005 ($6.95 if you keep a combined balance of over $75,000 in all your Chase Savings and Investment accounts), so it is not of any use to a new customer. -- Peace, BobJ "Mike" <mmcdaniel1960[at]comcast.net> wrote in message news:1173807594.630297.60600[at]p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com... - quote - > No fees at Chase... It's been a positive experience. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| As I read the info at Wachovia, the charge will be imposed if you initiate the download from within Money. However, if you do it manually (download from the web site, then import into Money), then there won't be a charge. -- Michael Gordon "Steve" <steve.lundwall_AT_state.tn.us> wrote in message news:eoBgs1YZHHA.4620[at]TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... - quote - > Well, one of the reasons I switched to wachovia two years ago from Wells > Fargo was the free access to my own money data using Microsoft Money. Now > Wachovia is going to start charging $5.95 per month starting in April. > They have my money, are using it to fund loans and yet they want to charge > me to simply communicate data. (Yes, I pay bill with it but they don't > charge their customers for on-line bill pay which does the same thing.) > So, what other bnks are out there that still have free access to accounts > using Microsoft Money? Thanks. > Steve |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Steve" <steve.lundwall_AT_state.tn.us> wrote in message news:eoBgs1YZHHA.4620[at]TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... - quote - > Well, one of the reasons I switched to wachovia two years ago from Wells
Bank of America charges 9.95 a month for "enhanced" online services that> Fargo was the free access to my own money data using Microsoft Money. Now > Wachovia is going to start charging $5.95 per month starting in April. > They have my money, are using it to fund loans and yet they want to charge > me to simply communicate data. (Yes, I pay bill with it but they don't > charge their customers for on-line bill pay which does the same thing.) > So, what other bnks are out there that still have free access to accounts > using Microsoft Money? Thanks. > Steve allow Money to update. but there are no charges for the web site including bill pay. However if you get the mega-deluxe account, and there are ways to get it free if you have certain minimum balances, loans, etc... it's free. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Thanks. That might work but I'm in Nashville, TN. They aren't around here so they don't have any ATM's around. What I don't spend in on-line fees I'd spend in ATM fees. Guess I should have been more specific. Thanks anyway. Steve "Mike" <mmcdaniel1960[at]comcast.net> wrote in message news:1173807594.630297.60600[at]p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com... - quote - > No fees at Chase... It's been a positive experience. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Well, one of the reasons I switched to wachovia two years ago from Wells Fargo was the free access to my own money data using Microsoft Money. Now Wachovia is going to start charging $5.95 per month starting in April. They have my money, are using it to fund loans and yet they want to charge me to simply communicate data. (Yes, I pay bill with it but they don't charge their customers for on-line bill pay which does the same thing.) So, what other bnks are out there that still have free access to accounts using Microsoft Money? Thanks. Steve |
| Tags |
| access, charging, money, wachovia |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| I lost access to my money files. How can I regain access? lilola8: I've been using Money 2003 since 2003. I decided to upgrade and I did, but my PDA couldn't connect to Money, so I decided to go back to Money 2003.... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 04-13-2006 03:30 AM | |
| Money 2003 and Wachovia John: I am running Money 2003 and using Wachovia online to pay my bills. I received a message that Wachovia is not going to support Money 2003 soon. ... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 12-17-2005 02:40 AM | |
| Money 2006 Premium and Wachovia - Update unsuccessful Matt Welch: Until September 6, I was doing just great with Wachovia. Getting transaction updates, the works. Oddly, after that, things just broke. No more... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 09-22-2005 03:18 AM | |
| MS Money 2003 - Not Downloading Wachovia Bank statements bvasanth123@rediffmail.com: Hi, I am using Money 2003 to download bank statements. Few months back, I set up Wachovia account and was able to download the statement. When I... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 08-14-2005 01:18 AM | |
| Using Money with Wachovia online BillPay Greg: I use Money with my Wachovia checking account, and have recently signed up for their Online BillPay service. My question is: Can I use Money to... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 09-04-2003 06:30 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |