|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Transfer really mess up the capital gains estimator in Money -- a known problem. However, there is a step short of dusting off the old abacus: if you did the transfer correctly (beginning with TransferOut instead of TransferIn), then the data exported to tax programs should have the correct basis. -- Michael Gordon "W'" <W[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:EF430DFC-3B7E-4F13-902E-56642859BB78[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > The problem does not involve downloads at all; the transactions in > question > were around before I started to download. > The problem is that M06 doesn't keep track of the basis at all very well. > I've now seen several cases of this, after scratching my head a few times. > Of > course, there is no problem if all the transactions are in a single > account. > (Seems to be a test hole in the software.) > Also, some of the equities I've looked at have been sold in a different > account, sometimes after several account transfers. When this occurs, M06 > seems to lock the transactions (like a transfer) in such a way that when > you > try to change it, the software either pops up a "you can't do that" > window, > or actually thinks there is an error and takes me to the MS webpage, where > it > says they don't know whats wrong. It's kind of amusing if it wasn't taking > so > much time checking the software. > Back to the abacus, I guess. > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > In microsoft.public.money, W' wrote: > > > > Commentary: why put all this baggage on a piece of software and then > > > never > > > test it out? The cap gains estimator is a prime example.... > > > > > I transferred stock from Ameritrade to Interactive Brokers a couple of > > > years > > > ago and still own the bulk of this stock. I thought I would play with > > > the cap > > > gains estimator with the hope of learning something. Each lot is listed > > > there > > > but they all have the acquisition date of the date I made the transfer > > > and > > > each share has zero basis! If I go to the original account and examine > > > the > > > details within the reallocate lots pop-up, I see that M06 thinks each > > > lot > > > being transferred has a non-zero basis. > > > The workaround back then would have been to > > Disable online access. > > Rename and change FI in account details/settings. > > Enable online access. > > > It would, however, be a lot of work to try to do it now. What you > > might try in a copy of your file is to delete the transfers in and > > out, and then right-click a Buy in the old account, and to a > > CutAndPaste to the new. Leave the dividends in the old account. > > Consider this an experiment that I have not tried, so remember to > > use a copy of your file. > > > > > > Am I the only one who sees a problem here? > > > > > Famous last words: does anybody at MS actually use their own software? > > > Things are probably not as bleak as it seems. If you generate a TXF > > file for your schedule D, I expect it to have the original basis and > > acquire date. You might generate a fake sell, and test that out. > > > This is not to say that it is not a problem. > > > > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| I don't think downloads from brokerages is my problem (see my subsequent post). But I feel for you regarding the mutual funds. I've noticed that when the funds were having trouble after the crash, they tended to merge, spin off, what ever; if you don't look closely, your basis for the successor shares will be way off. The mergers, etc. seem to make their Morningstar ratings look good (by jetisoning the crash data), but it doesn't make me any more money! "Marilyn & Bob" wrote: - quote - > I am totally guessing here, but do you download your information? If so, do > you know where Money gets its Basis information from? If the downloads > affect what Money knows, it is possible that your new broker treated the > data as a transfer with no cost: ($0 basis) and that information was > imported into Money and overrode your prior tansactions. > (non Money example) The transfer accounting between brokerage houses is not > very good. My mother has a closed end Kemper Municipal Bond Investment > Trust with Shearson which over the years redeemed bonds in the portfolio > resulting in Return of Capital Payments reducing the basis. This investment > was transferred to Fidelity two years ago. When the Trust was liquidated > this year, she got $4000 and Fidelity reported capital loss of $16000 as it > showed the original basis and none of the ROC payments made when the account > was with Shearson. (The real capital gain/loss should actually have been > around $0) > -- > Peace, > BobJ > "W'" <W[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:7C59D60D-8FAE-43B1-BC15-6334FE36C6D0[at]microsoft.com... > > Commentary: why put all this baggage on a piece of software and then never > > test it out? The cap gains estimator is a prime example.... > > > I transferred stock from Ameritrade to Interactive Brokers a couple of > > years > > ago and still own the bulk of this stock. I thought I would play with the > > cap > > gains estimator with the hope of learning something. Each lot is listed > > there > > but they all have the acquisition date of the date I made the transfer and > > each share has zero basis! If I go to the original account and examine > > the > > details within the reallocate lots pop-up, I see that M06 thinks each lot > > being transferred has a non-zero basis. > > > Am I the only one who sees a problem here? > > > Famous last words: does anybody at MS actually use their own software? |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| The problem does not involve downloads at all; the transactions in question were around before I started to download. The problem is that M06 doesn't keep track of the basis at all very well. I've now seen several cases of this, after scratching my head a few times. Of course, there is no problem if all the transactions are in a single account. (Seems to be a test hole in the software.) Also, some of the equities I've looked at have been sold in a different account, sometimes after several account transfers. When this occurs, M06 seems to lock the transactions (like a transfer) in such a way that when you try to change it, the software either pops up a "you can't do that" window, or actually thinks there is an error and takes me to the MS webpage, where it says they don't know whats wrong. It's kind of amusing if it wasn't taking so much time checking the software. Back to the abacus, I guess. "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, W' wrote: > > Commentary: why put all this baggage on a piece of software and then never > > test it out? The cap gains estimator is a prime example.... > > > I transferred stock from Ameritrade to Interactive Brokers a couple of years > > ago and still own the bulk of this stock. I thought I would play with the cap > > gains estimator with the hope of learning something. Each lot is listed there > > but they all have the acquisition date of the date I made the transfer and > > each share has zero basis! If I go to the original account and examine the > > details within the reallocate lots pop-up, I see that M06 thinks each lot > > being transferred has a non-zero basis. > The workaround back then would have been to > Disable online access. > Rename and change FI in account details/settings. > Enable online access. > It would, however, be a lot of work to try to do it now. What you > might try in a copy of your file is to delete the transfers in and > out, and then right-click a Buy in the old account, and to a > CutAndPaste to the new. Leave the dividends in the old account. > Consider this an experiment that I have not tried, so remember to > use a copy of your file. > > > Am I the only one who sees a problem here? > > > Famous last words: does anybody at MS actually use their own software? > Things are probably not as bleak as it seems. If you generate a TXF > file for your schedule D, I expect it to have the original basis and > acquire date. You might generate a fake sell, and test that out. > This is not to say that it is not a problem. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Marilyn & Bob wrote: - quote - > I am totally guessing here, but do you download your information? If so, do
The basis in Money is not downloaded. It is based on the> you know where Money gets its Basis information from? transactions in the registers. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, W' wrote: - quote - > Commentary: why put all this baggage on a piece of software and then never
The workaround back then would have been to> test it out? The cap gains estimator is a prime example.... > I transferred stock from Ameritrade to Interactive Brokers a couple of years > ago and still own the bulk of this stock. I thought I would play with the cap > gains estimator with the hope of learning something. Each lot is listed there > but they all have the acquisition date of the date I made the transfer and > each share has zero basis! If I go to the original account and examine the > details within the reallocate lots pop-up, I see that M06 thinks each lot > being transferred has a non-zero basis. Disable online access. Rename and change FI in account details/settings. Enable online access. It would, however, be a lot of work to try to do it now. What you might try in a copy of your file is to delete the transfers in and out, and then right-click a Buy in the old account, and to a CutAndPaste to the new. Leave the dividends in the old account. Consider this an experiment that I have not tried, so remember to use a copy of your file. - quote - > Am I the only one who sees a problem here?
Things are probably not as bleak as it seems. If you generate a TXF> Famous last words: does anybody at MS actually use their own software? file for your schedule D, I expect it to have the original basis and acquire date. You might generate a fake sell, and test that out. This is not to say that it is not a problem. |
| | |||
| |||
| I am totally guessing here, but do you download your information? If so, do you know where Money gets its Basis information from? If the downloads affect what Money knows, it is possible that your new broker treated the data as a transfer with no cost: ($0 basis) and that information was imported into Money and overrode your prior tansactions. (non Money example) The transfer accounting between brokerage houses is not very good. My mother has a closed end Kemper Municipal Bond Investment Trust with Shearson which over the years redeemed bonds in the portfolio resulting in Return of Capital Payments reducing the basis. This investment was transferred to Fidelity two years ago. When the Trust was liquidated this year, she got $4000 and Fidelity reported capital loss of $16000 as it showed the original basis and none of the ROC payments made when the account was with Shearson. (The real capital gain/loss should actually have been around $0) -- Peace, BobJ "W'" <W[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:7C59D60D-8FAE-43B1-BC15-6334FE36C6D0[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > Commentary: why put all this baggage on a piece of software and then never > test it out? The cap gains estimator is a prime example.... > I transferred stock from Ameritrade to Interactive Brokers a couple of > years > ago and still own the bulk of this stock. I thought I would play with the > cap > gains estimator with the hope of learning something. Each lot is listed > there > but they all have the acquisition date of the date I made the transfer and > each share has zero basis! If I go to the original account and examine > the > details within the reallocate lots pop-up, I see that M06 thinks each lot > being transferred has a non-zero basis. > Am I the only one who sees a problem here? > Famous last words: does anybody at MS actually use their own software? |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Commentary: why put all this baggage on a piece of software and then never test it out? The cap gains estimator is a prime example.... I transferred stock from Ameritrade to Interactive Brokers a couple of years ago and still own the bulk of this stock. I thought I would play with the cap gains estimator with the hope of learning something. Each lot is listed there but they all have the acquisition date of the date I made the transfer and each share has zero basis! If I go to the original account and examine the details within the reallocate lots pop-up, I see that M06 thinks each lot being transferred has a non-zero basis. Am I the only one who sees a problem here? Famous last words: does anybody at MS actually use their own software? |
| Tags |
| cap, estimator, gains, m06, useless |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Capital Gains Estimator very buggy. Phil M: One of my accounts (Schwab) crashes the program when I run Capital Gains Estimator. (I repaired my file and I tried it on another computer...still... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 10-11-2006 03:20 PM | |
| Capital Gains Estimator (Tax Estimator) Jeff M: The Tax Estimator in Money 2006 is showing capital gains for funds sold in retirement accounts. I've checked the documentation and supposedly if... | Microsoft Money | 7 | 12-18-2005 06:15 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |