|
#4
| |||
| |||
| I don't believe it knows a Roth IRA from a Traditional either, IIRC. Re. LP and tax burden on distributions from Roth IRAs vs. Traditional IRAs: that's a great question I've never researched. My bet (without digging into it) is that it taxes them both the same and maybe not even correctly in either case. Given all of the uncertainty about future events--things like what will the tax laws and rates really be, say--I think you need to be really cautious when examining any of the data from LP. "cpa10house" <cpa10house[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:AA36A2BB-1764-4106-96F4-74AF68FB87AF[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > I hadn't looked that closely before, but I guess Money really doesn't > require > you to designate a 401(k) as either Roth or Traditional. What about Roth > IRA's vs. Traditional IRA's? > Given that, how does the Lifetime Planner handle distributions for tax > purposes out of the accounts? Does it consider all withdrawals as taxable > when withdrawn? |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| I hadn't looked that closely before, but I guess Money really doesn't require you to designate a 401(k) as either Roth or Traditional. What about Roth IRA's vs. Traditional IRA's? Given that, how does the Lifetime Planner handle distributions for tax purposes out of the accounts? Does it consider all withdrawals as taxable when withdrawn? "Dick Watson" wrote: - quote - > I'm not aware of a way to define a 401(k) account in Money as being a Roth > 401(k) to Money. > As the prior post notes, the distinction would have little meaning in Money > given how little they do with the future distributions--in terms of things > like Tax Estimator, etc--anyway. So call it a 401(k) for Money's purposes. > The fact that it's really a Roth 401(k) and Money doesn't know it won't > matter much. > Now, as to your problem specifically of having one 401(k) at FidInv that has > Roth $s and non-Roth $s: IF you download transaction data, you'll probably > have very little choice but to keep it as one merged account in Money. Even > if you don't download, if the Roth money and the non-Roth money are invested > in the same things. I think you'll have little choice but to treat it > FidInv's way. How would you enter a Dividend if FidInv just shows one lump > and you have Roth and non-Roth investments in separate Money accounts to > assign this to? Too ugly is where I get to. This is kinda like the vesting > question: when you need to know the difference FidInv will tell you. Then > you can worry separating it in Money. > Now, doing things like projected future taxes/Lifetime Planner kinds of > stuff without knowing this distinction will be hard an Money will probably > screw it up. The only solution to that is probably Excel. Excel, the Money > user's favorite add-on utility. > "Jonathan Altman" <JonathanAltman[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in > message news:5AF1B2A8-4D42-4799-B7D1-F2AC6FAAB4D8[at]microsoft.com... > > So am i reading this correctly? there is no way to create a Roth 401(k) > > account? > > > My IRA is a Roth, and i believe i have it set up as such in Money. > > > I currently have a 401(k) with Fidelity. In every year prior to 2007 i was > > making regular (non-roth) contributions, but in January of 2007 i started > > making Roth contributions. Fidelity just shows my account as one combined > > entity, but obviously the tax treatment of the two is different so even if > > Money can't understand why that's important, i'd like to be able to > > segregate > > my contributions accordingly. Should i set up a separate account for my > > Roth > > contributions or is there some way to designate that certain transactions > > as > > regular and certain as Roth? |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| I'm not aware of a way to define a 401(k) account in Money as being a Roth 401(k) to Money. As the prior post notes, the distinction would have little meaning in Money given how little they do with the future distributions--in terms of things like Tax Estimator, etc--anyway. So call it a 401(k) for Money's purposes. The fact that it's really a Roth 401(k) and Money doesn't know it won't matter much. Now, as to your problem specifically of having one 401(k) at FidInv that has Roth $s and non-Roth $s: IF you download transaction data, you'll probably have very little choice but to keep it as one merged account in Money. Even if you don't download, if the Roth money and the non-Roth money are invested in the same things. I think you'll have little choice but to treat it FidInv's way. How would you enter a Dividend if FidInv just shows one lump and you have Roth and non-Roth investments in separate Money accounts to assign this to? Too ugly is where I get to. This is kinda like the vesting question: when you need to know the difference FidInv will tell you. Then you can worry separating it in Money. Now, doing things like projected future taxes/Lifetime Planner kinds of stuff without knowing this distinction will be hard an Money will probably screw it up. The only solution to that is probably Excel. Excel, the Money user's favorite add-on utility. "Jonathan Altman" <JonathanAltman[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:5AF1B2A8-4D42-4799-B7D1-F2AC6FAAB4D8[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > So am i reading this correctly? there is no way to create a Roth 401(k) > account? > My IRA is a Roth, and i believe i have it set up as such in Money. > I currently have a 401(k) with Fidelity. In every year prior to 2007 i was > making regular (non-roth) contributions, but in January of 2007 i started > making Roth contributions. Fidelity just shows my account as one combined > entity, but obviously the tax treatment of the two is different so even if > Money can't understand why that's important, i'd like to be able to > segregate > my contributions accordingly. Should i set up a separate account for my > Roth > contributions or is there some way to designate that certain transactions > as > regular and certain as Roth? |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| So am i reading this correctly? there is no way to create a Roth 401(k) account? My IRA is a Roth, and i believe i have it set up as such in Money. I currently have a 401(k) with Fidelity. In every year prior to 2007 i was making regular (non-roth) contributions, but in January of 2007 i started making Roth contributions. Fidelity just shows my account as one combined entity, but obviously the tax treatment of the two is different so even if Money can't understand why that's important, i'd like to be able to segregate my contributions accordingly. Should i set up a separate account for my Roth contributions or is there some way to designate that certain transactions as regular and certain as Roth? "Dick Watson" wrote: - quote - > The only reason for Money to make a distinction between 401(k)/Roth 401(k) > and IRA/Roth IRA would be if it had some features for handling > distributions. It doesn't. Make a suggestion for add tax deferred account > distribution-related features and I'll vote for it. When they come back and > add that feature, I'll vote for this one. > Heck, Money can't even schedule a transaction on the 3rd Wednesday of the > month... So many suggestions, so few people at Microsoft who care. > "NW" <NW[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:F25751DF-7BCD-45FC-8DBB-1FDE5342EAFA[at]microsoft.com... > > There is not way to change accounts from 401(k) to Roth 401(k) [which is > > not > > even an option and has been out for a couple years] or to change an IRA to > > a > > Roth IRA without creating a new account. There would need to be away to > > track pre roth amount and post roth amount. |
| | |||
| |||
| The only reason for Money to make a distinction between 401(k)/Roth 401(k) and IRA/Roth IRA would be if it had some features for handling distributions. It doesn't. Make a suggestion for add tax deferred account distribution-related features and I'll vote for it. When they come back and add that feature, I'll vote for this one. Heck, Money can't even schedule a transaction on the 3rd Wednesday of the month... So many suggestions, so few people at Microsoft who care. "NW" <NW[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:F25751DF-7BCD-45FC-8DBB-1FDE5342EAFA[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > There is not way to change accounts from 401(k) to Roth 401(k) [which is > not > even an option and has been out for a couple years] or to change an IRA to > a > Roth IRA without creating a new account. There would need to be away to > track pre roth amount and post roth amount. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| There is not way to change accounts from 401(k) to Roth 401(k) [which is not even an option and has been out for a couple years] or to change an IRA to a Roth IRA without creating a new account. There would need to be away to track pre roth amount and post roth amount. ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://www.microsoft.com/communities...t.public.money |