|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Money has a downloadable trial version. Install it and see if it solves your problems. It may or may not. If you are happy with the trial, DO NOT pay to register it. Instead buy the retail CD and install it over the trial. This will save you a lot of problems if you have trouble with the installation or need to reinstall the product. -- Peace, BobJ "Cindy" <Cindy[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:17B9BEBD-08F4-4F9B-AD18-06EA9CA4E015[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > In microsoft.public.money, Cindy wrote: > > > > I have been using Quicken for many years but have become so frustrated > > > over > > > the downloading of deposits when updating through bank. Quicken admits > > > it's > > > a problem but no fix. The only thing they suggest is to manually put in > > > all > > > deposits directly into the Quicken program. I'm not happy with that > > > idea and > > > am thinking about switching to Microsofts Money 2007. Can anyone tell > > > me if > > > when downloading transactions from your bank if the Money program gets > > > it > > > right? Does the deposits download into the program without hassles? I > > > need > > > to know if it's worth it to switch and this is a big deal to me. > > > It can vary from bank to bank. Credit cards and brokers tend to be > > better than banks in this regard. > > > On http://www.microsoft.com/money/bankonline.aspx those institutions > > that do not say "third party" in the description tend to be more > > consistently good. > I already checked and I can download to either Quicken or Money. I just > need to know if Money as this same problem as Quicken does and if it's > worth > the change. I tend to forget to update and to have to manually put in all > the deposits takes too much time and hassle so I'm hoping that Microsofts > Money program is better. > > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Cindy wrote: - quote - > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > In microsoft.public.money, Cindy wrote: > > > > I have been using Quicken for many years but have become so frustrated over > > > the downloading of deposits when updating through bank. Quicken admits it's > > > a problem but no fix. The only thing they suggest is to manually put in all > > > deposits directly into the Quicken program. I'm not happy with that idea and > > > am thinking about switching to Microsofts Money 2007. Can anyone tell me if > > > when downloading transactions from your bank if the Money program gets it > > > right? Does the deposits download into the program without hassles? I need > > > to know if it's worth it to switch and this is a big deal to me. > > > It can vary from bank to bank. Credit cards and brokers tend to be > > better than banks in this regard. > > > On http://www.microsoft.com/money/bankonline.aspx those institutions > > that do not say "third party" in the description tend to be more > > consistently good. > I already checked and I can download to either Quicken or Money. I just > need to know if Money as this same problem as Quicken does and if it's worth > the change. I tend to forget to update and to have to manually put in all > the deposits takes too much time and hassle so I'm hoping that Microsofts > Money program is better. There is a free trial of Money 2007 Deluxe available. http://www.microsoft.com/money/Produ...s.aspx?pid=003 You could try running in parallel for a while. Note that Money 2007 should be able to convert a Quicken 2006 file and before, but not Quicken 2007. There is generally a version lag in that capability. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Why don't you mention the bank(s) in question on this forum and seek others' experiences with them in particular, as it seems to depend on the bank. I have had good experience with USAA FSB, for example. |
| | |||
| |||
| "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, Cindy wrote:
I already checked and I can download to either Quicken or Money. I just> > I have been using Quicken for many years but have become so frustrated over > > the downloading of deposits when updating through bank. Quicken admits it's > > a problem but no fix. The only thing they suggest is to manually put in all > > deposits directly into the Quicken program. I'm not happy with that idea and > > am thinking about switching to Microsofts Money 2007. Can anyone tell me if > > when downloading transactions from your bank if the Money program gets it > > right? Does the deposits download into the program without hassles? I need > > to know if it's worth it to switch and this is a big deal to me. > It can vary from bank to bank. Credit cards and brokers tend to be > better than banks in this regard. > On http://www.microsoft.com/money/bankonline.aspx those institutions > that do not say "third party" in the description tend to be more > consistently good. need to know if Money as this same problem as Quicken does and if it's worth the change. I tend to forget to update and to have to manually put in all the deposits takes too much time and hassle so I'm hoping that Microsofts Money program is better. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Cindy wrote: - quote - > I have been using Quicken for many years but have become so frustrated over
It can vary from bank to bank. Credit cards and brokers tend to be> the downloading of deposits when updating through bank. Quicken admits it's > a problem but no fix. The only thing they suggest is to manually put in all > deposits directly into the Quicken program. I'm not happy with that idea and > am thinking about switching to Microsofts Money 2007. Can anyone tell me if > when downloading transactions from your bank if the Money program gets it > right? Does the deposits download into the program without hassles? I need > to know if it's worth it to switch and this is a big deal to me. better than banks in this regard. On http://www.microsoft.com/money/bankonline.aspx those institutions that do not say "third party" in the description tend to be more consistently good. |
| Tags |
| quicken, switching |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Contemplating switching back to Quicken Jake: I've been using MSMoney 2007 for a couple months.. I've been a Quicken user for 10+ years prior. I like some features of MS Money but despise... | Microsoft Money | 36 | 12-17-2006 08:34 PM | |
| switching computers jack: I purchased money 2004 over the internet about 18 months ago. It was downloaded and I was not sent any disks. I want to put 2004 on my new pc, but... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 10-20-2005 02:38 AM | |
| switching to quicken Jack: Can anyone give me a reason not to switch to quicken. I hate money 2005 with a passion. It has too many adds, does everthing wrong, rounds my... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 02-21-2005 10:59 PM | |
| Switching from Quicken arlburn: I've used Quicken Home & business for years but want to try Money. Which version of Money should I buy? Will Money Premium be sufficient for... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 02-28-2004 12:47 AM | |
| Switching to Money 2004 Deluxe from Quicken Deluxe 2001 fcf: The Money package specifically excludes Quicken 2001 from the list of Quicken Versions that Money 2004 will successfully convert from. My... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 11-30-2003 07:11 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |