| |||||||
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| I don't know if my last message was posted or not, but I basically replied saying I had tried the repair process and it didn't work. Well, right after sending that message, I did a Quick Repair, and apparently that time, it took. So, for the time being, my problem seems to have been solved. Strange, though, because now that I think about it, I never tried a Quick Repair, thinking this problem was too big of one to use anything less than a full repair. The full repair didn't work and removing bills data didn't seem to work (although for all I know, that might have been necessary before a Quick Repair in order to solve the problem). In any case, the Quick Repair seems to have worked. I mean I can actually match things with transactions that are already in my register, which is already bounds better than before. Thank you again for the response. "johndog" wrote: - quote - > Keli'i, > I used to have the huge problem you describe where I couldn't even use the > 'match' functionality even manually, and in fact it has come back several > time. But when this happens, I will 'repair' the file, and then the problem > goes away. > I suggest that you try the repair process and see if you can't still > manually match the transactions. (process below) > My complaint is that--even after repairing--the auto-match facility is > broken, and I wind up with two nearly identical transactions, both marked > 'E' and 'Downloaded'. I know very well that one of them was already in the > register or was a scheduled payment. In this state I can still perform the > tedious manual match. > Here is the repair process: > - First, try File-> Repair-> Quick File Repair, and see if it fixes the issue. > - Second, try the "Corruption" section at http://umpmfaq.info/faq.html. I > followed those steps myself and it cured my enormous performance issues > immediately. Excerpt: > ---------- Begin Quote ------------- > Q) Can you tell me more about the remarkable new Nuke-the-Bills miracle > repair method? > [Relevant to Money2007 (v.16)] > A) Money 2007 introduced a new File|Repair option, File|Repair Money > File|Remove all Bills data. (Insiders have been referring to this as the > Bills Be Gone method. That seems too polite for the impact it has; > Nuke-the-Bills is our favorite term here at the umpmfaq.) This addition was, > apparently, an admission that Money can't keep the scheduled bills data sane > all by itself. This option has enabled dramatic improvements in performance > and significant reductions in files size for some users. At least one user, > the author, had serious "stability issues" (i.e., it crashed a lot) under > M06 that have not been seen in M07; this may be related to fixes in M07 or > it may be related to "corruption" in the file cleaned up by Nuke-the-Bills. > ------------ End Quote ------------- > I thought there was a KB on the subject, but I can't find it. Perhaps it > was this (Step 3) > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/182608/PT-BR/. > - John > "Keli'i Martin" <Keli'i Martin[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:6CE3D4DD-7567-4533-999D-499C001ABE27[at]microsoft.com... > > This is sorta what is happening to me. I will enter a transaction > > manually > > into my register. When my transactions are downloaded, Money creates a > > brand > > new entry for the downloaded transactions, regardless of whether or not > > there > > is a manual entry that matches the downloaded entry. This is already > > different than the functionality from Money 2004, which is what I came > > from. > > > This wouldn't be a HUGE problem if not compounded with Money's current > > inability to let me match this downloaded transaction with a manually > > entered > > transaction. In Money 2004, I could click Change and be presented with a > > list of entries that are already in my register that I could then match up > > with the downloaded entry. In Money 2007, the list I am presented is not > > of > > entries that are already in my register. I am presented a list of my > > future > > bills and deposits and nothing else. I obviously don't want to match the > > downloaded entry with a future entry. So what I am left with is a > > duplicate > > entry in my register. > > > I've posted about this problem before, I have sent in an email to Support > > (have not heard back yet), but I will continue to post in this newsgroup, > > because it appears that this is not an isolated problem but one that more > > people are seeing. I would go back to Money 2004 if I could, but the > > reason > > I got 2007 is because downloading transactions stopped working, pretty > > much > > forcing me to get this product if I wanted to continue using that > > service.... > > > "johndog" wrote: > > > > I recently did the cure-all of 'Remove all bills data' and I've regularly > > > repaired my file. But I'm still seeing an issue of data not matching, > > > and > > > manually entered transactions mysteriously showing up with 'E' or > > > 'Downloaded' status. > > > > > Here's what I think is going on: > > > > > 1) I enter a bill into my register. It shows up un-reconciled. > > > 2) I download a statement from the bank, and this includes a transaction > > > that matches the bill entered in step 1 perfectly (date, amount anyway) > > > 3) I go into the register, and Money has *not* matched the downloaded to > > > the > > > existing transaction. Instead, they are both marked with an 'E', with > > > the > > > downloaded one showing up bold and the prior one not. > > > > > What??? How can my existing transaction be marked 'E' and 'Downloaded' > > > when > > > it was entered from scheduled bills??? > > > > > > > > |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| You know, I've repaired my file numerous times, even Removed Bills Data (which did nothing except make me enter all my bills and deposits in again). The problem persists. I don't understand why this is happening. I also sent an email in to Microsoft, but they have not replied yet, not even a form mail "we've received your mail and will get back to you". It's really quite annoying. I'll try the round of file repairs again, but considering it hasn't worked yet, I don't see it working this time. Thanks for the response though. "johndog" wrote: - quote - > Keli'i, > I used to have the huge problem you describe where I couldn't even use the > 'match' functionality even manually, and in fact it has come back several > time. But when this happens, I will 'repair' the file, and then the problem > goes away. > I suggest that you try the repair process and see if you can't still > manually match the transactions. (process below) > My complaint is that--even after repairing--the auto-match facility is > broken, and I wind up with two nearly identical transactions, both marked > 'E' and 'Downloaded'. I know very well that one of them was already in the > register or was a scheduled payment. In this state I can still perform the > tedious manual match. > Here is the repair process: > - First, try File-> Repair-> Quick File Repair, and see if it fixes the issue. > - Second, try the "Corruption" section at http://umpmfaq.info/faq.html. I > followed those steps myself and it cured my enormous performance issues > immediately. Excerpt: > ---------- Begin Quote ------------- > Q) Can you tell me more about the remarkable new Nuke-the-Bills miracle > repair method? > [Relevant to Money2007 (v.16)] > A) Money 2007 introduced a new File|Repair option, File|Repair Money > File|Remove all Bills data. (Insiders have been referring to this as the > Bills Be Gone method. That seems too polite for the impact it has; > Nuke-the-Bills is our favorite term here at the umpmfaq.) This addition was, > apparently, an admission that Money can't keep the scheduled bills data sane > all by itself. This option has enabled dramatic improvements in performance > and significant reductions in files size for some users. At least one user, > the author, had serious "stability issues" (i.e., it crashed a lot) under > M06 that have not been seen in M07; this may be related to fixes in M07 or > it may be related to "corruption" in the file cleaned up by Nuke-the-Bills. > ------------ End Quote ------------- > I thought there was a KB on the subject, but I can't find it. Perhaps it > was this (Step 3) > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/182608/PT-BR/. > - John > "Keli'i Martin" <Keli'i Martin[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:6CE3D4DD-7567-4533-999D-499C001ABE27[at]microsoft.com... > > This is sorta what is happening to me. I will enter a transaction > > manually > > into my register. When my transactions are downloaded, Money creates a > > brand > > new entry for the downloaded transactions, regardless of whether or not > > there > > is a manual entry that matches the downloaded entry. This is already > > different than the functionality from Money 2004, which is what I came > > from. > > > This wouldn't be a HUGE problem if not compounded with Money's current > > inability to let me match this downloaded transaction with a manually > > entered > > transaction. In Money 2004, I could click Change and be presented with a > > list of entries that are already in my register that I could then match up > > with the downloaded entry. In Money 2007, the list I am presented is not > > of > > entries that are already in my register. I am presented a list of my > > future > > bills and deposits and nothing else. I obviously don't want to match the > > downloaded entry with a future entry. So what I am left with is a > > duplicate > > entry in my register. > > > I've posted about this problem before, I have sent in an email to Support > > (have not heard back yet), but I will continue to post in this newsgroup, > > because it appears that this is not an isolated problem but one that more > > people are seeing. I would go back to Money 2004 if I could, but the > > reason > > I got 2007 is because downloading transactions stopped working, pretty > > much > > forcing me to get this product if I wanted to continue using that > > service.... > > > "johndog" wrote: > > > > I recently did the cure-all of 'Remove all bills data' and I've regularly > > > repaired my file. But I'm still seeing an issue of data not matching, > > > and > > > manually entered transactions mysteriously showing up with 'E' or > > > 'Downloaded' status. > > > > > Here's what I think is going on: > > > > > 1) I enter a bill into my register. It shows up un-reconciled. > > > 2) I download a statement from the bank, and this includes a transaction > > > that matches the bill entered in step 1 perfectly (date, amount anyway) > > > 3) I go into the register, and Money has *not* matched the downloaded to > > > the > > > existing transaction. Instead, they are both marked with an 'E', with > > > the > > > downloaded one showing up bold and the prior one not. > > > > > What??? How can my existing transaction be marked 'E' and 'Downloaded' > > > when > > > it was entered from scheduled bills??? > > > > > > > > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| On 2007-02-01, johndog <johndd[at]no-spam-bigfoot.com> wrote: - quote - > For reasons you describe, if I'm going to delete a duplicate transaction, I
How has that worked out? I would think that you run the risk of> always update the manual transaction (if necessary) and delete the > downloaded one. continually getting that deleted transaction again everytime you get new downloaded transactions. The reason I think this is that when you delete the transaction, you also delete Money's record of the OFX transaction ID. So to Money, it looks like a new transaction that's not in your register. Of course, I don't know how Money works under the covers. Does Money repeatedly download the transaction that you deleted? |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| For reasons you describe, if I'm going to delete a duplicate transaction, I always update the manual transaction (if necessary) and delete the downloaded one. - John "Mark Horn" <mark[at]hornclan.com> wrote in message news:slrnes41r6.v29.mark[at]home.hornclan.com... - quote - > Wow! I didn't experience this problem when I was testing M07. > That's a pretty annoying problem. I would think that you could just > delete the manually entered transaction. There are two pitfalls > that I can see to doing this: > 1) If your transaction has a lot of splits (e.g. a paycheck) > then you'd have to manually enter all of those splits into the > downloaded transaction. What a PITA! > 2) The "last paid" date in Bills & deposits would be wrong. > On the other hand, as long as you got the categorization correct, > your budget would be correct. You'd have budgeted $X for category Y > and you've have an entry of $X for category Y in your register. > On 2007-01-30, Keli'i Martin <Keli'i> wrote: > > This is sorta what is happening to me. I will enter a transaction > > manually > > into my register. When my transactions are downloaded, Money creates a > > brand > > new entry for the downloaded transactions, regardless of whether or not > > there > > is a manual entry that matches the downloaded entry. This is already > > different than the functionality from Money 2004, which is what I came > > from. > > > This wouldn't be a HUGE problem if not compounded with Money's current > > inability to let me match this downloaded transaction with a manually > > entered > > transaction. In Money 2004, I could click Change and be presented with a > > list of entries that are already in my register that I could then match > > up > > with the downloaded entry. In Money 2007, the list I am presented is not > > of > > entries that are already in my register. I am presented a list of my > > future > > bills and deposits and nothing else. I obviously don't want to match the > > downloaded entry with a future entry. So what I am left with is a > > duplicate > > entry in my register. > > > I've posted about this problem before, I have sent in an email to Support > > (have not heard back yet), but I will continue to post in this newsgroup, > > because it appears that this is not an isolated problem but one that more > > people are seeing. I would go back to Money 2004 if I could, but the > > reason > > I got 2007 is because downloading transactions stopped working, pretty > > much > > forcing me to get this product if I wanted to continue using that > > service.... > > > "johndog" wrote: > > > > I recently did the cure-all of 'Remove all bills data' and I've > > > regularly > > > repaired my file. But I'm still seeing an issue of data not matching, > > > and > > > manually entered transactions mysteriously showing up with 'E' or > > > 'Downloaded' status. > > > > > Here's what I think is going on: > > > > > 1) I enter a bill into my register. It shows up un-reconciled. > > > 2) I download a statement from the bank, and this includes a transaction > > > that matches the bill entered in step 1 perfectly (date, amount anyway) > > > 3) I go into the register, and Money has *not* matched the downloaded to > > > the > > > existing transaction. Instead, they are both marked with an 'E', with > > > the > > > downloaded one showing up bold and the prior one not. > > > > > What??? How can my existing transaction be marked 'E' and 'Downloaded' > > > when > > > it was entered from scheduled bills??? > > > > > > > > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Keli'i, I used to have the huge problem you describe where I couldn't even use the 'match' functionality even manually, and in fact it has come back several time. But when this happens, I will 'repair' the file, and then the problem goes away. I suggest that you try the repair process and see if you can't still manually match the transactions. (process below) My complaint is that--even after repairing--the auto-match facility is broken, and I wind up with two nearly identical transactions, both marked 'E' and 'Downloaded'. I know very well that one of them was already in the register or was a scheduled payment. In this state I can still perform the tedious manual match. Here is the repair process: - First, try File-> Repair-> Quick File Repair, and see if it fixes the issue. - Second, try the "Corruption" section at http://umpmfaq.info/faq.html. I followed those steps myself and it cured my enormous performance issues immediately. Excerpt: ---------- Begin Quote ------------- Q) Can you tell me more about the remarkable new Nuke-the-Bills miracle repair method? [Relevant to Money2007 (v.16)] A) Money 2007 introduced a new File|Repair option, File|Repair Money File|Remove all Bills data. (Insiders have been referring to this as the Bills Be Gone method. That seems too polite for the impact it has; Nuke-the-Bills is our favorite term here at the umpmfaq.) This addition was, apparently, an admission that Money can't keep the scheduled bills data sane all by itself. This option has enabled dramatic improvements in performance and significant reductions in files size for some users. At least one user, the author, had serious "stability issues" (i.e., it crashed a lot) under M06 that have not been seen in M07; this may be related to fixes in M07 or it may be related to "corruption" in the file cleaned up by Nuke-the-Bills. ------------ End Quote ------------- I thought there was a KB on the subject, but I can't find it. Perhaps it was this (Step 3) http://support.microsoft.com/kb/182608/PT-BR/. - John "Keli'i Martin" <Keli'i Martin[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:6CE3D4DD-7567-4533-999D-499C001ABE27[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > This is sorta what is happening to me. I will enter a transaction > manually > into my register. When my transactions are downloaded, Money creates a > brand > new entry for the downloaded transactions, regardless of whether or not > there > is a manual entry that matches the downloaded entry. This is already > different than the functionality from Money 2004, which is what I came > from. > This wouldn't be a HUGE problem if not compounded with Money's current > inability to let me match this downloaded transaction with a manually > entered > transaction. In Money 2004, I could click Change and be presented with a > list of entries that are already in my register that I could then match up > with the downloaded entry. In Money 2007, the list I am presented is not > of > entries that are already in my register. I am presented a list of my > future > bills and deposits and nothing else. I obviously don't want to match the > downloaded entry with a future entry. So what I am left with is a > duplicate > entry in my register. > I've posted about this problem before, I have sent in an email to Support > (have not heard back yet), but I will continue to post in this newsgroup, > because it appears that this is not an isolated problem but one that more > people are seeing. I would go back to Money 2004 if I could, but the > reason > I got 2007 is because downloading transactions stopped working, pretty > much > forcing me to get this product if I wanted to continue using that > service.... > "johndog" wrote: > > I recently did the cure-all of 'Remove all bills data' and I've regularly > > repaired my file. But I'm still seeing an issue of data not matching, > > and > > manually entered transactions mysteriously showing up with 'E' or > > 'Downloaded' status. > > > Here's what I think is going on: > > > 1) I enter a bill into my register. It shows up un-reconciled. > > 2) I download a statement from the bank, and this includes a transaction > > that matches the bill entered in step 1 perfectly (date, amount anyway) > > 3) I go into the register, and Money has *not* matched the downloaded to > > the > > existing transaction. Instead, they are both marked with an 'E', with > > the > > downloaded one showing up bold and the prior one not. > > > What??? How can my existing transaction be marked 'E' and 'Downloaded' > > when > > it was entered from scheduled bills??? > > > > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Wow! I didn't experience this problem when I was testing M07. That's a pretty annoying problem. I would think that you could just delete the manually entered transaction. There are two pitfalls that I can see to doing this: 1) If your transaction has a lot of splits (e.g. a paycheck) then you'd have to manually enter all of those splits into the downloaded transaction. What a PITA! 2) The "last paid" date in Bills & deposits would be wrong. On the other hand, as long as you got the categorization correct, your budget would be correct. You'd have budgeted $X for category Y and you've have an entry of $X for category Y in your register. On 2007-01-30, Keli'i Martin <Keli'i> wrote: - quote - > This is sorta what is happening to me. I will enter a transaction manually > into my register. When my transactions are downloaded, Money creates a brand > new entry for the downloaded transactions, regardless of whether or not there > is a manual entry that matches the downloaded entry. This is already > different than the functionality from Money 2004, which is what I came from. > This wouldn't be a HUGE problem if not compounded with Money's current > inability to let me match this downloaded transaction with a manually entered > transaction. In Money 2004, I could click Change and be presented with a > list of entries that are already in my register that I could then match up > with the downloaded entry. In Money 2007, the list I am presented is not of > entries that are already in my register. I am presented a list of my future > bills and deposits and nothing else. I obviously don't want to match the > downloaded entry with a future entry. So what I am left with is a duplicate > entry in my register. > I've posted about this problem before, I have sent in an email to Support > (have not heard back yet), but I will continue to post in this newsgroup, > because it appears that this is not an isolated problem but one that more > people are seeing. I would go back to Money 2004 if I could, but the reason > I got 2007 is because downloading transactions stopped working, pretty much > forcing me to get this product if I wanted to continue using that service.... > "johndog" wrote: > > I recently did the cure-all of 'Remove all bills data' and I've regularly > > repaired my file. But I'm still seeing an issue of data not matching, and > > manually entered transactions mysteriously showing up with 'E' or > > 'Downloaded' status. > > > Here's what I think is going on: > > > 1) I enter a bill into my register. It shows up un-reconciled. > > 2) I download a statement from the bank, and this includes a transaction > > that matches the bill entered in step 1 perfectly (date, amount anyway) > > 3) I go into the register, and Money has *not* matched the downloaded to the > > existing transaction. Instead, they are both marked with an 'E', with the > > downloaded one showing up bold and the prior one not. > > > What??? How can my existing transaction be marked 'E' and 'Downloaded' when > > it was entered from scheduled bills??? > > > > |
| | |||
| |||
| This is sorta what is happening to me. I will enter a transaction manually into my register. When my transactions are downloaded, Money creates a brand new entry for the downloaded transactions, regardless of whether or not there is a manual entry that matches the downloaded entry. This is already different than the functionality from Money 2004, which is what I came from. This wouldn't be a HUGE problem if not compounded with Money's current inability to let me match this downloaded transaction with a manually entered transaction. In Money 2004, I could click Change and be presented with a list of entries that are already in my register that I could then match up with the downloaded entry. In Money 2007, the list I am presented is not of entries that are already in my register. I am presented a list of my future bills and deposits and nothing else. I obviously don't want to match the downloaded entry with a future entry. So what I am left with is a duplicate entry in my register. I've posted about this problem before, I have sent in an email to Support (have not heard back yet), but I will continue to post in this newsgroup, because it appears that this is not an isolated problem but one that more people are seeing. I would go back to Money 2004 if I could, but the reason I got 2007 is because downloading transactions stopped working, pretty much forcing me to get this product if I wanted to continue using that service.... "johndog" wrote: - quote - > I recently did the cure-all of 'Remove all bills data' and I've regularly > repaired my file. But I'm still seeing an issue of data not matching, and > manually entered transactions mysteriously showing up with 'E' or > 'Downloaded' status. > Here's what I think is going on: > 1) I enter a bill into my register. It shows up un-reconciled. > 2) I download a statement from the bank, and this includes a transaction > that matches the bill entered in step 1 perfectly (date, amount anyway) > 3) I go into the register, and Money has *not* matched the downloaded to the > existing transaction. Instead, they are both marked with an 'E', with the > downloaded one showing up bold and the prior one not. > What??? How can my existing transaction be marked 'E' and 'Downloaded' when > it was entered from scheduled bills??? |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I recently did the cure-all of 'Remove all bills data' and I've regularly repaired my file. But I'm still seeing an issue of data not matching, and manually entered transactions mysteriously showing up with 'E' or 'Downloaded' status. Here's what I think is going on: 1) I enter a bill into my register. It shows up un-reconciled. 2) I download a statement from the bank, and this includes a transaction that matches the bill entered in step 1 perfectly (date, amount anyway) 3) I go into the register, and Money has *not* matched the downloaded to the existing transaction. Instead, they are both marked with an 'E', with the downloaded one showing up bold and the prior one not. What??? How can my existing transaction be marked 'E' and 'Downloaded' when it was entered from scheduled bills??? |
| Tags |
| correctly, downloaded, matching, nondownloaded, showing, status, transactions |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Matching downloaded transactions anti updates: I am new to money 2004 and to me its not extremely clear which transaction money is auto matching and what its matching it to. It usually displays 3... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 03-25-2005 03:17 PM | |
| Matching or accepting of downloaded transactions in 05 Brad: I FINALLY got my accounts to sync correctlyin Money 2005, however there seems to be no option for transaction matching or accepting of downloaded... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 10-17-2004 02:43 AM | |
| Matching Downloaded Transactions Richard: MM02 inists on changing the payee for downloaded transactions. How do I stop it from doing this? Let me try to explain better... I have a... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 06-26-2004 01:41 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |