|
#50
| |||
| |||
| On 2007-02-02, Mark Horn <mark[at]hornclan.com> wrote: - quote - > ... I wonder if I can go to the backup of the disabled file from
I went through all of my backup files from Nov 13-25. When I> Novemember and do some level of experimentation... hmmm... restored them in Money, all of them had online access enabled in Money. What I infer from this is that Money determines whether online access is enabled by something other than the file itself. So when MS disables M04's online access, I should be able to install M04 onto a clean OS, restore a previous backup of my .mny file. My hope is that on a clean OS, M04 will not have online updates disabled. In which case, I hope to be able to to import OFX files directly from my bank. This would be a step in the right direction towards keeping me on M04 instead of being forced into M07 or later. |
|
#49
| |||
| |||
| On 2007-02-01, Glyn Simpson, MVP <glyn[at]serf.org> wrote: - quote - > The option to recover accounts does not get disabled though (ie you can
I'm not convinced of this. For me, when we went through this in> import recovered accounts, but not new statements) . I'm not sure how the > mechanism works, but i'm sure it'll be something in the file as well as > online (as people will have started up Money 2004 at different times) November, my M04 online updates didn't get turned off until I did an online update. When I came back to this newsgroup to figure out what was going on, I noticed that others had been experiencing this for a couple of days. What I infer from this, is that the online activity is what triggered it. Look also at what we had to do to get it turned back on. We had to initiate direct online activity. I have a strong suspiscion that avoiding online activity can avoid getting this feature turned off. What I'm hoping is that doing this will still enable me to use OFX Web downloads from my bank. I have no way to test this, but based on the last time we went through this, I'm hopeful that this will be the case. I've looked at the OFX protocol. As far as I'm aware, it does not have any mechanisms for a bank to instruct the software as to what is and isn't allowed. The lack of this features is what prompted Intuit to extend OFX into QFX so that they could disable features in Quicken based on licensing agreements with the bank. So I'm skeptical if Microsoft will be able to disable features in Money through an OFX Web download from my bank. In any case, I'm hopeful. I wish, back in November, I would have thought to try and experiment with what did and didn't work. I'd want to try this: * install Money onto a clean OS and see if I could continue to import OFX from web statements * install Money onto a clean OS and see if I could continue to do direct connections to the bank (i.e. from w/in Money) but exclude connections to Microsoft. * copy my disabled .mny file onto the clean install and see if the disabled-ness traveled with the file or with the money installation. * If the disabled-ness traveled with the installation, then find a registry monitoring tool to figure out what changed in the install between enabled and disabled. My entire goal of this would be to continue to be able to import OFX statements from my bank's website. I fully understand no longer supporting quotes. I fully understand no longer supporting bugfixes, etc. But disabling an interaction between me and my bank is none of Microsoft's business. So my goal would be to retain that interaction. .... I wonder if I can go to the backup of the disabled file from Novemember and do some level of experimentation... hmmm... |
|
#48
| |||
| |||
| I don't think you can avoid it like this. I believe the think the import of OFX statements is disabled at 2 or 3 years, dependent on version and it could be initiated both by the client and server. The option to recover accounts does not get disabled though (ie you can import recovered accounts, but not new statements) . I'm not sure how the mechanism works, but i'm sure it'll be something in the file as well as online (as people will have started up Money 2004 at different times) -- Glyn Simpson, Microsoft MVP - Money http://money.mvps.org See http://money.mvps.org/faq/default.aspx for tips and fixes for MS Money. To send Microsoft your product wishes see http://money.mvps.org/wishes.aspx I do not respond to any unsolicited email regarding Money "Mark Horn" <mark[at]hornclan.com> wrote in message news:slrnes45qt.v29.mark[at]home.hornclan.com... - quote - > On 2006-11-20, Steve <steven_morrison69[at]hotmail.com> wrote: > > I beleive they probobly just caught wind of this issue and acted upon it > > accordingly atleast they fixed it and didnt tell everone they are SOL > > since > > technically the agreement states they can change it at any time > Sorry to follow-up to a post from over 2 months ago, but after having > thought about it for a while, I wonder whether or not MS did this > on purpose. Maybe they turned off downloads intentionally to see > how big of a problem this would create in the wild. I think that > this helps them get a handle on how many people will upgrade to M08 > when it does come out, and they permanantly turn off M04 downloads. > I also wonder, based on the way that this happened, if you can avoid > this problem by stopping downloading altogether. Then instead, you > could go to the bank's website and download the OFX files directly > from the bank. Since M04 won't have received the notice from MS > to turn itself off, you should be able to continue (in perpetuity) > to import OFX files. > If this works, I'll still lose quote downloads and the ability to do > direct billpay through my bank. But it seems to me that might be a > smaller loss in functionality than the migration from M04 to M07/M08. > $.02 |
|
#47
| |||
| |||
| On 2006-11-20, Steve <steven_morrison69[at]hotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > I beleive they probobly just caught wind of this issue and acted upon it
Sorry to follow-up to a post from over 2 months ago, but after having> accordingly atleast they fixed it and didnt tell everone they are SOL since > technically the agreement states they can change it at any time thought about it for a while, I wonder whether or not MS did this on purpose. Maybe they turned off downloads intentionally to see how big of a problem this would create in the wild. I think that this helps them get a handle on how many people will upgrade to M08 when it does come out, and they permanantly turn off M04 downloads. I also wonder, based on the way that this happened, if you can avoid this problem by stopping downloading altogether. Then instead, you could go to the bank's website and download the OFX files directly from the bank. Since M04 won't have received the notice from MS to turn itself off, you should be able to continue (in perpetuity) to import OFX files. If this works, I'll still lose quote downloads and the ability to do direct billpay through my bank. But it seems to me that might be a smaller loss in functionality than the migration from M04 to M07/M08. $.02 |
|
#46
| |||
| |||
| On 2006-11-20, Ronald Pierce <ron[at]pierceplace.net> wrote: - quote - > Agreed - Looks like we get a reprieve with the reinstatement of
Really?> Online Services. (time passes) Woo hoo! |
|
#45
| |||
| |||
| Cool. Those are some huge data files. I'm guessing that you must be using the Business stuff a lot and that's a source of the size. At any rate, it'd be great to have a Business edition user as a regular poster. Among the regulars there's approximately Zero experience there. |
|
#44
| |||
| |||
| Cal, I just bought Money 2007 and upgraded. I wish the "we have a problem" statement came a little ealier ![]() -- Manohar Kamath "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message news:1hv3m2tn5upbvjm6qc4vaqj0vmnjpkeuct[at]4ax.com... - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, Manohar Kamath wrote: > > > I have been using Money Premium 2004 for a year or so on my new PC. Today, > > the "Online services" stopped working and the message said something about > > "Online services have expired." After talking to my bank, I realized that > > it > > was indeed MS Money online services that had expired. However, per the > > license, the services expire Sep 1, 2007 or 3 years after installation, > > whichever is earlier. I talked to MS support, but they said they don't > > support the software anymore. Anyone (MVPs, especially) have any ideas as > > to > > why this would happen, and if there is a fix. > There was an error that should be corrected now. > 1. Open Money. > 2. Do an Update Now. > 3. Close and Reopen Money. > 4. The expiration message in the Reminders section should now be > removed you should have access to online services. > Sometimes these fixes take a while to propagate. So if it does not > work immediately, try again later. |
|
#43
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:31:18 GMT, Mark Horn <mark[at]hornclan.com> wrote: - quote - > On 2006-11-20, Ronald Pierce <ron[at]pierceplace.net> wrote:
I agree - I suspect the Advanced Budget won't be around in M08.> > Saw that - You can add advanced budget back into a new file by a http > > command in the address bar (yes - it does have a use!). > Yes, I know. But the fact that they've hidden the advanced budget > does not suggest an encouraging trend. I suspect that it won't be > included in M08. - quote - > Moreover, if you look at the M07 license, they now say that they
Online Services.> can expire online services whenever they want. > So, my fear with M07 is that I'll get my budget the way that I > like it. But then be forced to M08 which won't have the budget > that I like. > > I know it's all a matter of preference/opinion than > > anything else - both will manage $$$ just fine. > True, but it makes sense to re-evaluate when my preferences are no > longer being met. Agreed - Looks like we get a reprieve with the reinstatement of - Ron |
|
#42
| |||
| |||
| Read some other thread tails on this subject. Apparently the change they made overshot the situation. They have a new update that will put you back in business until the EULA says they will expire you. "L Cramer" <lzcramer[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:M4s8h.186$vQ.157[at]newsfe03.lga... - quote - > I bought M2004 Prem in Aug 2005 from Amazon after someone on this board > pointed out its value: $12, 3 years of online service, and its > superiority to the then current offering. Well, I guess $12 for 1 year > and 2 months of service isn't too bad a deal. My Eula says: |
|
#41
| |||
| |||
| Yes, the problem is fixed. Thanks to all. It helped knowing the problem was global and would likely get fixed. "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message news:1hv3m2tn5upbvjm6qc4vaqj0vmnjpkeuct[at]4ax.com... - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, Manohar Kamath wrote: > > > I have been using Money Premium 2004 for a year or so on my new PC. Today, > > the "Online services" stopped working and the message said something about > > "Online services have expired." After talking to my bank, I realized that > > it > > was indeed MS Money online services that had expired. However, per the > > license, the services expire Sep 1, 2007 or 3 years after installation, > > whichever is earlier. I talked to MS support, but they said they don't > > support the software anymore. Anyone (MVPs, especially) have any ideas as > > to > > why this would happen, and if there is a fix. > There was an error that should be corrected now. > 1. Open Money. > 2. Do an Update Now. > 3. Close and Reopen Money. > 4. The expiration message in the Reminders section should now be > removed you should have access to online services. > Sometimes these fixes take a while to propagate. So if it does not > work immediately, try again later. |
|
#40
| |||
| |||
| In my case, Dick, I bought M2004 Prem in Aug 2005 from Amazon after someone on this board pointed out its value: $12, 3 years of online service, and its superiority to the then current offering. Well, I guess $12 for 1 year and 2 months of service isn't too bad a deal. My Eula says: "Microsoft Money 2004 Deluxe/Microsoft Money 2004 Premium/Microsoft Money 2004 Small Business: The earlier of three (3) years after your activation of the SOFTWARE PRODUCT or September 1, 2007." "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:%230b70HEDHHA.628[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... - quote - > One more Q: how'd you come by an M04 in very late 2005? Did you have it > and just not get around to trying it? (The scenario I'm considering: you > bought an open box on Ebay or some such.) I'm not saying that it wasn't > readily possible to buy a sealed M04 in late M05 nor that you are > cheating--just want the data point. > Beyond that, it's a good data point. I think we need to accumulate some > more and these this will make for an interesting test of what the EULA > means. I'm not sure, however, that it'll matter. If they want to zap the > old copies, they're going to do it. Microsoft has never been known for > being long on scruples or much concern for their users, remember. > Anybody else want to dive in with data points indicating that Online > Services expired before the EULA said they would? > "Alex Khain" <akh[at]cyber-strategy5.org> wrote in message > news:uFGRBqDDHHA.3228[at]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > > Dick Watson wrote: > > > Did you ever use the file in another M04 before that date? Say on > > > another computer or with somebody else's CD? > > > NO! I have an M11 file dated 12/29/05. That was the first time EVER that > > I messed with M'04. > > > > How about this test to figure out what's going on: Try creating a > > > File|New (i.e., an "activation date" of 11/19/2006) and see if it can > > > access online services. > > > No go. It does not update quotes (silently - no warning). And it does not > > set up online services to a bank - it does not get past the Setup Online > > Services Login step in the wizard. Hitting Next does nothing. I think > > this proves it is program-specific, not file-specific. |
|
#39
| |||
| |||
| What have they done that pleases you? I really like the fact that MSN BillPay(CheckFree) was fixed in 2007 and we now have the option to use it. I also like the fact that the look and feel of the program is more easier to use and easier on the eyes (Although alot of people dont like the webbased way now) Also like the idea that with almost every version of money more and more banks are supported The S&SB (60% budget)? I do not like the Savings and Spending budget for the main reason you loose control over alot of the items and honestly I beleive this is for people who make alot more money then me ![]() How much data do you have in Money? Currently I have about 25 files with over nine years of data in total. (Different years quarters.. etc make for the ammount of files) Largest file just hit 190Megs How many versions have you bought? I own money 99-07 currently have installed and use occasionaly except for 07 which is constantly used 03,04,05,05UK,06,07 (All small bussiness except for the 03,04 and 05UK) How long have you been using it for your day-to-day personal finances? Since version 99 (Favorite version is still 04) How dependent on it are you for managing your personal finances? I am extremely dependent on this for paying my bills and managing my debt if I lost it I would be extremely devastated Do you use the Essential * modes? Never ever liked the essential modes but have used them. Steve |
|
#38
| |||
| |||
| On 2006-11-20, Ronald Pierce <ron[at]pierceplace.net> wrote: - quote - > Saw that - You can add advanced budget back into a new file by a http
Yes, I know. But the fact that they've hidden the advanced budget> command in the address bar (yes - it does have a use!). does not suggest an encouraging trend. I suspect that it won't be included in M08. Moreover, if you look at the M07 license, they now say that they can expire online services whenever they want. So, my fear with M07 is that I'll get my budget the way that I like it. But then be forced to M08 which won't have the budget that I like. - quote - > I know it's all a matter of preference/opinion than
True, but it makes sense to re-evaluate when my preferences are no> anything else - both will manage $$$ just fine. longer being met. |
|
#37
| |||
| |||
| They conceded and fixed the error. That pleased me. And I said so. They may have called it an "improvement", but at least they addressed it fairly quickly. In some strange way, Nuke-the-Bills was a good thing. It pleased me. Enough to move to M07. Of course why it took such a brutal method--with so much manual involvement by the user--to fix problems that Money surely created in its own data set in the first place is another interesting question. They also "improved" the broken entry of scheduled Loan Payments with the M07 QFE. I was very pleased with that. I was less pleased that they "de-improved" it in the first place and shipped it this way. I also wasn't real impressed when users got feedback from Support that the RTM code was "working as designed" and its behavior was, essentially, a feature. Beyond that, I think we are definitely on a different wavelength. They want to build an application as portal site. Try to attract everybody to ads with anything it takes to attract them. If that means taking any rigor out of the product so as to reduce support costs and widen the net for potential ad viewers, that's fine with them. If they designed cars, they'd not worry about things like anti-lock brakes because "most users" are much more interested in, say, the shape of the radio knobs. I want to do personal finance management with a reasonably rigorous and capable tool but don't want to invest a huge effort in finishing my replacement Access solution. That's a tough pair of outlooks to reconcile. And you? You're a fairly recent arrival here at the newsgroup (though you may have been lurking for a long time or been here under another name). What have they done that pleases you? The S&SB (60% budget)? MEss? How much data do you have in Money? How many versions have you bought? How long have you been using it for your day-to-day personal finances? How dependent on it are you for managing your personal finances? Do you use the Essential * modes? These aren't intended to be confrontational questions. I'm just curious. My history with the product is pretty much on the record here. Yours, not so much. "Steve" <steven_morrison69[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news:OERX$EODHHA.4224[at]TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... - quote - > Can they do anything that you are pleased with? |
|
#36
| |||
| |||
| Dick, Can they do anything that you are pleased with? I beleive they probobly just caught wind of this issue and acted upon it accordingly atleast they fixed it and didnt tell everone they are SOL since technically the agreement states they can change it at any time Steve -- Steve steven_morrison69[at]hotmail.com "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:ugKXl2NDHHA.3548[at]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... - quote - > I'm surprised by two things: > 1) That they didn't catch an error that should have been easily caught > with even a rudimentary attempt at testing the boundary conditions. > 2) That they are sucking it up and saying it's an error and fixing it. > The latter improves my opinion of the Money team. The former, well, ... > "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message > news:1hv3m2tn5upbvjm6qc4vaqj0vmnjpkeuct[at]4ax.com... > > There was an error that should be corrected now. |
|
#35
| |||
| |||
| I'm surprised by two things: 1) That they didn't catch an error that should have been easily caught with even a rudimentary attempt at testing the boundary conditions. 2) That they are sucking it up and saying it's an error and fixing it. The latter improves my opinion of the Money team. The former, well, ... "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message news:1hv3m2tn5upbvjm6qc4vaqj0vmnjpkeuct[at]4ax.com... - quote - > There was an error that should be corrected now. |
|
#34
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Manohar Kamath wrote: - quote - > I have been using Money Premium 2004 for a year or so on my new PC. Today,
There was an error that should be corrected now.> the "Online services" stopped working and the message said something about > "Online services have expired." After talking to my bank, I realized that it > was indeed MS Money online services that had expired. However, per the > license, the services expire Sep 1, 2007 or 3 years after installation, > whichever is earlier. I talked to MS support, but they said they don't > support the software anymore. Anyone (MVPs, especially) have any ideas as to > why this would happen, and if there is a fix. 1. Open Money. 2. Do an Update Now. 3. Close and Reopen Money. 4. The expiration message in the Reminders section should now be removed you should have access to online services. Sometimes these fixes take a while to propagate. So if it does not work immediately, try again later. |
|
#33
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:38:09 GMT, Mark Horn <mark[at]hornclan.com> wrote: - quote - > On 2006-11-19, Ronald Pierce <ron[at]pierceplace.net> wrote:
as I thought I had another year!> > Have you actually purchased/reviewed Q2007? > I have been running the Money 07 eval in parallel for about a > month now. I installed the eval last month, but didn't invest much time in it - - quote - > > I have been happy with M2004 - it's comfortable - but I never really
command in the address bar (yes - it does have a use!).> > liked the Budgeting + Bills - I would love to seem the bills as a easy > > reference in the budget area, but not directly tied to the amounts. I > > understand that others don't think like I do - so tough on me if I > > don't like it. > Well, the good news (for you) is that in M07 they have a budget that > isn't hard linked to bills/deposits. MS appears to be moving away > from the budget that we used to in M04. Our budget (now called the > "advanced budget") isn't available unless you previously used it. Saw that - You can add advanced budget back into a new file by a http - quote - > > Anyway - do you have thoughts to share on Q2007?
was a tough choice sitching to M2000 from Q1999. I haven't wanted to> I haven't tried Q07 yet. However, I did eval Q04 & Q05. My biggest > issue with both of them was the budget. I happen to be one of > the people who likes the fact that money automatically links the > scheduled bills/deposits into the budget. It makes managing the > budgeted amounts very easy. Just manage the scheduled bills & > deposits. In Q I had to maintain the amount of my electric bill, > my mortgage payment, my internet bill, and everything else, in > two places. > I would be completely fine with "importing" the values from the bills > and then allowing them to be modified vs. the hard linking that the > M04 budget has. But Q didn't have the import. And what's worse > (for me at least) is that Money's new budget appears to be going > away from any sort of link to the bills & deposits. So Money > has degraded itself to be exactly as annoying to me as Quicken. > And moreover, Money has provided an incentive for me to swtich to > a different product than the one that I was perfectly happy with. I agree about the incentive, although it's always a tough choice. It bother going back. Can't take the the effort lightly. The ironic thing is that the budget for Q1999 wasn't very good either - and that's what drove me to M2000. ![]() - quote - > I may have to try Q07...
into many. I know it's all a matter of preference/opinion than> (Search google groups for other people's reviews of the new M07 > budget.) I have been watching discussions for some time now. Just don't jump anything else - both will manage $$$ just fine. - Ron |
|
#32
| |||
| |||
| I wondered that as well. One "expired" user tried File|New--that file wouldn't get online services, either. Of course that doesn't exclude some design like "If any files get expired, set a registry flag to expire all files." "Bob Peel, MVP" <bob_peel[at]kiandra.freeserve.co.uk.INVALID> wrote in message news:eweuhOHDHHA.652[at]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... - quote - > I wonder if the .mny file has a date hidden on it and code gets > activated/downloaded to go check that? |
|
#31
| |||
| |||
| On 2006-11-19, Dick Watson <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote: - quote - > Anybody else want to dive in with data points indicating that Online
Well, I'm quite certain that I didn't purchase M04 until around> Services expired before the EULA said they would? Jan/Feb 04. I've never purchased a single copy of Money. I've always waited until CompUSA (usually) had it bundled with TaxCut. Typically, I've paid around $25 for TaxCut, TaxCut State & Money. So, I'm 100% certain that the very first time that I installed Money 2004 Deluxe is less than 3 years ago. Although I don't know the exact date. January 04 would have been the earliest and April 04 would have been the latest. (Just another data point.) |
| Tags |
| 2004, expired, money, online, preimum, services, year |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Money 2004 Small Business Online Services Expired Early Alex Khain: My Money 2004 Small Business today displayed a message that online services have expired for this version of Microsoft Money. The downloads indeed... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 11-20-2006 08:07 PM | |
| M2002 Online Services expired? Cal Learner-- MVP: In microsoft.public.money, "hacksalot" <hacksalotit'scomcasticnet> wrote: >**I should have started a new thread with this question, sorry.**... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 11-15-2006 09:56 PM | |
| online services expired in 2002-4? compitus: Hi all. using now 2002-can pay bills, download transactions and so on. Considering upgrading to 2003, or 2004-switch from one bank to other and... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 08-12-2005 05:52 AM | |
| Online banking services not liking leap year? JAC: Today, I haven't been able to successfully complete online banking transactions through Money with American Express, Citibank and US Bank. You... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 02-29-2004 11:49 PM | |
| Online services 2-year limit? TLB1203: I cannot seem to find anything on the Money website, but I purchsed a new Dell PC that came with Money 2004. I currently use Money 2001. When I... | Microsoft Money | 13 | 12-22-2003 10:21 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |