|
#59
| |||
| |||
| To add new lines for additional lines off the form? No. At least not on the US Tax Estimator. "Apr" <noreply[at]mail.com> wrote in message news:u%23YwAlnDHHA.4952[at]TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... - quote - > In the tax estimator, it is possible to rename / add "Form Line" under > the "Tax Form" heading? |
|
#58
| |||
| |||
| New threads for new topics is always a good idea. "Apr" <noreply[at]mail.com> wrote in message news:%2331S9foDHHA.348[at]TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... - quote - > I have a couple of postings already online, which I had put on hold, > whilst dealing with this setup. If I have further queries, I was going to > continue on my previous postings even if they are a 'not very recent' > unless you suggest a new posting is more preferable as they are lower down > in the list of postings in this newsgroup. |
|
#57
| |||
| |||
| Thank you. I have a couple of postings already online, which I had put on hold, whilst dealing with this setup. If I have further queries, I was going to continue on my previous postings even if they are a 'not very recent' unless you suggest a new posting is more preferable as they are lower down in the list of postings in this newsgroup. If so, then please let me know. "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:uQhLmmeDHHA.4832[at]TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... - quote - > Thanks for the feedback and glad we could help. Post back as you learn and > encounter new questions. > "Apr" <noreply[at]mail.com> wrote in message > news:ehC0kXbDHHA.4256[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > > Ok thanks very much for your help. You've been extremely helpful and > > patient and I appreciate your help. > > > I've wanted to learn how Money works for a while now and it's starting to > > make lots more sense. > > > I'll continue with my next task in Money and look forward to my results. > > )) |
|
#56
| |||
| |||
| I would change that to PAY back with what you learn, as you encounter new questions from others. Forums like this always need knowledgeable people to answer questions. -- Chris Cowles Gainesville, FL "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:uQhLmmeDHHA.4832[at]TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... - quote - > Thanks for the feedback and glad we could help. Post back as you learn > and encounter new questions. |
|
#55
| |||
| |||
| In the tax estimator, it is possible to rename / add "Form Line" under the "Tax Form" heading? "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:eIOt2meDHHA.4992[at]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... - quote - > The only difference between Split and Paycheck/Payslip is the added > ability to have the layer of metadata about before/after tax expenses in > the Paycheck/Payslip. Other than that, Paycheck/Payslip is just a Split by > another name. > Beyond that, Split would change nothing in your case except: 1) these sign > of all you individual transaction elements would be relative to the > overall transaction. It it's a deposit, a negative sign in a split element > is flowing away. If a withdrawal, a negative sign in a split element is > flowing in. (Contrast with the behavior that varies on wages vs. > deductions tabs in the Payslip.) 2) You'd break tax estimator with regard > to before tax deductions. > "Apr" <noreply[at]mail.com> wrote in message > news:edXeMfbDHHA.4404[at]TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > > Just a thought, what if I use the Split button for the Net Pay received > > into the Chq Account. > > > How straight forward is it and would this make sense, and, be easier / > > easy? |
|
#54
| |||
| |||
| The only difference between Split and Paycheck/Payslip is the added ability to have the layer of metadata about before/after tax expenses in the Paycheck/Payslip. Other than that, Paycheck/Payslip is just a Split by another name. Beyond that, Split would change nothing in your case except: 1) these sign of all you individual transaction elements would be relative to the overall transaction. It it's a deposit, a negative sign in a split element is flowing away. If a withdrawal, a negative sign in a split element is flowing in. (Contrast with the behavior that varies on wages vs. deductions tabs in the Payslip.) 2) You'd break tax estimator with regard to before tax deductions. "Apr" <noreply[at]mail.com> wrote in message news:edXeMfbDHHA.4404[at]TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... - quote - > Just a thought, what if I use the Split button for the Net Pay received > into the Chq Account. > How straight forward is it and would this make sense, and, be easier / > easy? |
|
#53
| |||
| |||
| Thanks for the feedback and glad we could help. Post back as you learn and encounter new questions. "Apr" <noreply[at]mail.com> wrote in message news:ehC0kXbDHHA.4256[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... - quote - > Ok thanks very much for your help. You've been extremely helpful and > patient and I appreciate your help. > I've wanted to learn how Money works for a while now and it's starting to > make lots more sense. > I'll continue with my next task in Money and look forward to my results. > )) |
|
#52
| |||
| |||
| Could I use the Payslip model you suggest via the Split button? "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:%2367aYfRDHHA.4808[at]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... - quote - > ... > "Apr" <noreply[at]mail.com> wrote in message > news:OZ0dMRPDHHA.3536[at]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > > my reply inline....thank you. Also, I'm merging you comments in the > > parallel convesation with this one. ) and the end if this.> cool. > > Just refering to Reimbursed Company Admin fees now, in the following > > context: the figure is positive on the Payslip (going out the system) and > > then I goto 'Categories' > Income > double click on Wages & Salary: > > Reimbursed Company Admin fees, the entries are red and negative. This is > > the part I wanted to check with you. Should I move this to Expenses? > > > This is what I did: Pse confirm this Category Group (below) makes sense > > and sounds ok in general. I think this is right. > > > I selected Enter new category > Type "Job" > selected Expense > selected > > 'Other expenses' category. > That would work and sounds like the right general idea, but beware: If you > didn't enter Job : Reimbursed Company Admin fees but just entered Job, > then it will move Wages & Salary : Reimbursed Company Admin fees to Jobs > and the Reimbursed Company Admin fees will be lost. > > Ok, I understand it's difficult to do bother Net Pay only in parallel > > with the new payslip model. > > > > You said: The total of a Payslip is just a number--it's all already been > > > categorized on the entries on the tabs. Nothing left to categorize. > > > But this number is a number in the Cheque Account register though? It > > does make sense what you are saying total is a number as it's all been > > categorised on the tabs. > Yup. The value of "net pay" from your payslip is exactly the net of > everything on the Payslip transaction in Money. > > Regarding the Reports: as noted I have checked the 'Monthly Income and > > Expenses' report. Ok, this is good. I can all my different Payslip > > categories and it makes good sense now. Finally to me!. One final > > thing, in order for me to "see/check" the actual 'Total Net Pay', I have > > to maually take the Income:Total Wages & Salary figure and minus it from > > the Expenses relating to the Payslip, from the Report. The Report I > > chose was called "Monthly Income and Expnses". Which report calculates > > the figure for me to show me the Total Net Pay... or is it as you have > > mentioned above, it's not possible? > There won't be a standard one that does that. But, in Advanced Reports, > the Transactions By Category report can be customized to include just the > categories you use on your Payslip transactions and then set to order by > date. For each date, you will get the total of the Payslip category > entries--that should equate to Net Pay. |
|
#51
| |||
| |||
| Just a thought, what if I use the Split button for the Net Pay received into the Chq Account. How straight forward is it and would this make sense, and, be easier / easy? Thank you. "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:%2367aYfRDHHA.4808[at]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... - quote - > ... > "Apr" <noreply[at]mail.com> wrote in message > news:OZ0dMRPDHHA.3536[at]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > > my reply inline....thank you. Also, I'm merging you comments in the > > parallel convesation with this one. ) and the end if this.> cool. > > Just refering to Reimbursed Company Admin fees now, in the following > > context: the figure is positive on the Payslip (going out the system) and > > then I goto 'Categories' > Income > double click on Wages & Salary: > > Reimbursed Company Admin fees, the entries are red and negative. This is > > the part I wanted to check with you. Should I move this to Expenses? > > > This is what I did: Pse confirm this Category Group (below) makes sense > > and sounds ok in general. I think this is right. > > > I selected Enter new category > Type "Job" > selected Expense > selected > > 'Other expenses' category. > That would work and sounds like the right general idea, but beware: If you > didn't enter Job : Reimbursed Company Admin fees but just entered Job, > then it will move Wages & Salary : Reimbursed Company Admin fees to Jobs > and the Reimbursed Company Admin fees will be lost. > > Ok, I understand it's difficult to do bother Net Pay only in parallel > > with the new payslip model. > > > > You said: The total of a Payslip is just a number--it's all already been > > > categorized on the entries on the tabs. Nothing left to categorize. > > > But this number is a number in the Cheque Account register though? It > > does make sense what you are saying total is a number as it's all been > > categorised on the tabs. > Yup. The value of "net pay" from your payslip is exactly the net of > everything on the Payslip transaction in Money. > > Regarding the Reports: as noted I have checked the 'Monthly Income and > > Expenses' report. Ok, this is good. I can all my different Payslip > > categories and it makes good sense now. Finally to me!. One final > > thing, in order for me to "see/check" the actual 'Total Net Pay', I have > > to maually take the Income:Total Wages & Salary figure and minus it from > > the Expenses relating to the Payslip, from the Report. The Report I > > chose was called "Monthly Income and Expnses". Which report calculates > > the figure for me to show me the Total Net Pay... or is it as you have > > mentioned above, it's not possible? > There won't be a standard one that does that. But, in Advanced Reports, > the Transactions By Category report can be customized to include just the > categories you use on your Payslip transactions and then set to order by > date. For each date, you will get the total of the Payslip category > entries--that should equate to Net Pay. |
|
#50
| |||
| |||
| Ok thanks very much for your help. You've been extremely helpful and patient and I appreciate your help. I've wanted to learn how Money works for a while now and it's starting to make lots more sense. I'll continue with my next task in Money and look forward to my results. ))"Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:%2367aYfRDHHA.4808[at]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... - quote - > ... > "Apr" <noreply[at]mail.com> wrote in message > news:OZ0dMRPDHHA.3536[at]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > > my reply inline....thank you. Also, I'm merging you comments in the > > parallel convesation with this one. ) and the end if this.> cool. > > Just refering to Reimbursed Company Admin fees now, in the following > > context: the figure is positive on the Payslip (going out the system) and > > then I goto 'Categories' > Income > double click on Wages & Salary: > > Reimbursed Company Admin fees, the entries are red and negative. This is > > the part I wanted to check with you. Should I move this to Expenses? > > > This is what I did: Pse confirm this Category Group (below) makes sense > > and sounds ok in general. I think this is right. > > > I selected Enter new category > Type "Job" > selected Expense > selected > > 'Other expenses' category. > That would work and sounds like the right general idea, but beware: If you > didn't enter Job : Reimbursed Company Admin fees but just entered Job, > then it will move Wages & Salary : Reimbursed Company Admin fees to Jobs > and the Reimbursed Company Admin fees will be lost. > > Ok, I understand it's difficult to do bother Net Pay only in parallel > > with the new payslip model. > > > > You said: The total of a Payslip is just a number--it's all already been > > > categorized on the entries on the tabs. Nothing left to categorize. > > > But this number is a number in the Cheque Account register though? It > > does make sense what you are saying total is a number as it's all been > > categorised on the tabs. > Yup. The value of "net pay" from your payslip is exactly the net of > everything on the Payslip transaction in Money. > > Regarding the Reports: as noted I have checked the 'Monthly Income and > > Expenses' report. Ok, this is good. I can all my different Payslip > > categories and it makes good sense now. Finally to me!. One final > > thing, in order for me to "see/check" the actual 'Total Net Pay', I have > > to maually take the Income:Total Wages & Salary figure and minus it from > > the Expenses relating to the Payslip, from the Report. The Report I > > chose was called "Monthly Income and Expnses". Which report calculates > > the figure for me to show me the Total Net Pay... or is it as you have > > mentioned above, it's not possible? > There won't be a standard one that does that. But, in Advanced Reports, > the Transactions By Category report can be customized to include just the > categories you use on your Payslip transactions and then set to order by > date. For each date, you will get the total of the Payslip category > entries--that should equate to Net Pay. |
|
#49
| |||
| |||
| ha ha )Ok, throw it out. "Chris Cowles" <spam_magnet[at]remove-me-bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:O5mqFDRDHHA.1224[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... - quote - > Use the CD for a coaster? > "Apr" <noreply[at]mail.com> wrote in message > news:OfXPYSPDHHA.3444[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > > What do you suggest I do regarding this? |
|
#48
| |||
| |||
| .... "Apr" <noreply[at]mail.com> wrote in message news:OZ0dMRPDHHA.3536[at]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... - quote - > my reply inline....thank you. Also, I'm merging you comments in the
cool.> parallel convesation with this one. ) and the end if this.- quote - > Just refering to Reimbursed Company Admin fees now, in the following
That would work and sounds like the right general idea, but beware: If you> context: the figure is positive on the Payslip (going out the system) and > then I goto 'Categories' > Income > double click on Wages & Salary: > Reimbursed Company Admin fees, the entries are red and negative. This is > the part I wanted to check with you. Should I move this to Expenses? > This is what I did: Pse confirm this Category Group (below) makes sense > and sounds ok in general. I think this is right. > I selected Enter new category > Type "Job" > selected Expense > selected > 'Other expenses' category. didn't enter Job : Reimbursed Company Admin fees but just entered Job, then it will move Wages & Salary : Reimbursed Company Admin fees to Jobs and the Reimbursed Company Admin fees will be lost. - quote - > Ok, I understand it's difficult to do bother Net Pay only in parallel with
Yup. The value of "net pay" from your payslip is exactly the net of> the new payslip model. > > You said: The total of a Payslip is just a number--it's all already been > > categorized on the entries on the tabs. Nothing left to categorize. > But this number is a number in the Cheque Account register though? It > does make sense what you are saying total is a number as it's all been > categorised on the tabs. everything on the Payslip transaction in Money. - quote - > Regarding the Reports: as noted I have checked the 'Monthly Income and
There won't be a standard one that does that. But, in Advanced Reports, the> Expenses' report. Ok, this is good. I can all my different Payslip > categories and it makes good sense now. Finally to me!. One final > thing, in order for me to "see/check" the actual 'Total Net Pay', I have > to maually take the Income:Total Wages & Salary figure and minus it from > the Expenses relating to the Payslip, from the Report. The Report I chose > was called "Monthly Income and Expnses". Which report calculates the > figure for me to show me the Total Net Pay... or is it as you have > mentioned above, it's not possible? Transactions By Category report can be customized to include just the categories you use on your Payslip transactions and then set to order by date. For each date, you will get the total of the Payslip category entries--that should equate to Net Pay. |
|
#47
| |||
| |||
| Use the CD for a coaster? "Apr" <noreply[at]mail.com> wrote in message news:OfXPYSPDHHA.3444[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... - quote - > What do you suggest I do regarding this? |
|
#46
| |||
| |||
| What do you suggest I do regarding this? "Bob Peel, MVP" <bob_peel[at]kiandra.freeserve.co.uk.INVALID> wrote in message news:%23SOJqhODHHA.3212[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... - quote - > There isn't one! ;-) > The last UK version of Money is M2005. There has been nothing since. > -- > Regards > Bob Peel, > Microsoft MVP - Money > For UK tips & fixes see > http://support.microsoft.com/default...d=fh;EN-GB;mny. > I do not respond to any emails that I have not specifically asked for. > "Apr" <noreply[at]mail.com> wrote in message > news:%23Vf1qHNDHHA.4280[at]TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > > Ok...do you know how I should get the latest version? > > > > "Bob Peel, MVP" <bob_peel[at]kiandra.freeserve.co.uk.INVALID> wrote in > > message news:efI88MHDHHA.3812[at]TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > > > Apr, don't bother installing Tax Saver 2004. It is very specifically for > > > tax year 2004. > > > > > -- > > > Regards > > > Bob Peel, > > > Microsoft MVP - Money > > > > > For UK tips & fixes see > > > http://support.microsoft.com/default...d=fh;EN-GB;mny. > > > > > > > I do not respond to any emails that I have not specifically asked for. > > > > > "Apr" <noreply[at]mail.com> wrote in message > > > news:Oc0n0VCDHHA.4256[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > > > > In the UK... I bought Microsoft Money Finanacial Suite withe Tax Saver > > > > 2004 Deluxe, a while ago. But I haven't installed any of it yet as I > > > > trying to get sort out the my basics first.... then maybe I will instal > > > > and see what happens. )> > > > > > > "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in > > > > message news:Ob3FvweCHHA.4892[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > > > > > Here's an example. US only, though. Can't say what the UK situation > > > > > is. > > > > > > > > > http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-Mone...TF8&s=software > > > > > > > > > "Apr" <noreply[at]mail.com> wrote in message > > > > > news:ebslxzcCHHA.1196[at]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > > > > > > Whereabout is the business form in Money? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
|
#45
| |||
| |||
| my reply inline....thank you. Also, I'm merging you comments in the parallel convesation with this one. ) and the end if this."Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:%23iBFBGDDHHA.1012[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... - quote - > below.
The above is all fine. I understand that.> "Apr" <noreply[at]mail.com> wrote in message > news:uXM$UMCDHHA.4228[at]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > > Although I have a parallel coversation with you below, I just wanted to > > ask about the following anyway: > > > I moved Wages and Salary : Employes Social Security to Taxes. > > > Would I have to do the same for the following and put them under Taxes: > > Employee Tax > > Employer Social Security. > These two sound like taxes. They sure aren't something like Wages & > Salary. Remeber that beyond the Income/Expense issue, the categories and > their subcategories are there for clarity and things like reporting. If > you want to ask Money what your wage income was (total of Wages and Salary > category and all its subcategories), you probably don't want that number > artificially reduced by taxes you paid. Likewise, if you want to know the > taxes you paid, you really want to see the taxes. Otherwise, why > categorize at all? > > Reimbursed Company Admin Fees > > Reimbursed Expenses > These don't sound like taxes. And I thought we agreed you were treating > money you receive for the second one was some form of Income. > > When I checked the above Categories for the above they are all Negative. > > You advised that negative flows into the system earlier. I dont under > > this is the case here? Just trying to piece everthing together. > Negative in what context? A negative entry on a despoit is a withdrawal. A > negative entry on a Wages Tab of a Payslip is a withdrawal--money leaving > you and going somewhere. A negative entry on a Deductions tab of a Payslip > is a deposit--money coming your way. Just refering to Reimbursed Company Admin fees now, in the following context: the figure is positive on the Payslip (going out the system) and then I goto 'Categories' > Income > double click on Wages & Salary: Reimbursed Company Admin fees, the entries are red and negative. This is the part I wanted to check with you. Should I move this to Expenses? This is what I did: Pse confirm this Category Group (below) makes sense and sounds ok in general. I think this is right. I selected Enter new category > Type "Job" > selected Expense > selected 'Other expenses' category. - quote - > > For Gross Pay and Invoice Reconcillation, under each Category, the are
Got it. It makes sense to me. Thanks.> > all Positive. (Which, I belive is contrary to you explanation... > > earlier..). Something wrong here? > > > For Reimbursed Company Admin Fees and Reimbursed Expenses, > I'm getting really confused what's what and on what tab. See above. > Summary (why don't you check and see if you can test each entry on your > payslip against this): > * positive numbers on the Wages tab are money you are receiving--these > should be in categories that are Income categories > * positive numbers on deductions tabs (Before Tax, Taxes, After Tax) are > money you are spending--these should be in Expense categories > * negative numbers on deductions tabs are money you are receiving--these > should be in Income categories - quote - > Another attempt at summary: > All three elements must be tested to make sure they are consistent. 1) > Which tab? 2) What is sign of value? and 3) Is Category assigned to income > or expense? In response to our other parallel conversation: Ok, I understand it's difficult to do bother Net Pay only in parallel with the new payslip model. - quote - > You said: The total of a Payslip is just a number--it's all already been
But this number is a number in the Cheque Account register though? It does> categorized on the entries on the tabs. Nothing left to categorize. make sense what you are saying total is a number as it's all been categorised on the tabs. Regarding the Reports: as noted I have checked the 'Monthly Income and Expenses' report. Ok, this is good. I can all my different Payslip categories and it makes good sense now. Finally to me!. One final thing, in order for me to "see/check" the actual 'Total Net Pay', I have to maually take the Income:Total Wages & Salary figure and minus it from the Expenses relating to the Payslip, from the Report. The Report I chose was called "Monthly Income and Expnses". Which report calculates the figure for me to show me the Total Net Pay... or is it as you have mentioned above, it's not possible? Thank you for all your assistance, again. ) |
|
#44
| |||
| |||
| There isn't one! ;-) The last UK version of Money is M2005. There has been nothing since. -- Regards Bob Peel, Microsoft MVP - Money For UK tips & fixes see http://support.microsoft.com/default...d=fh;EN-GB;mny. I do not respond to any emails that I have not specifically asked for. "Apr" <noreply[at]mail.com> wrote in message news:%23Vf1qHNDHHA.4280[at]TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... - quote - > Ok...do you know how I should get the latest version? > "Bob Peel, MVP" <bob_peel[at]kiandra.freeserve.co.uk.INVALID> wrote in > message news:efI88MHDHHA.3812[at]TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > > Apr, don't bother installing Tax Saver 2004. It is very specifically for > > tax year 2004. > > > -- > > Regards > > Bob Peel, > > Microsoft MVP - Money > > > For UK tips & fixes see > > http://support.microsoft.com/default...d=fh;EN-GB;mny. > > > > I do not respond to any emails that I have not specifically asked for. > > > "Apr" <noreply[at]mail.com> wrote in message > > news:Oc0n0VCDHHA.4256[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > > > In the UK... I bought Microsoft Money Finanacial Suite withe Tax Saver > > > 2004 Deluxe, a while ago. But I haven't installed any of it yet as I > > > trying to get sort out the my basics first.... then maybe I will instal > > > and see what happens. )> > > > > "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in > > > message news:Ob3FvweCHHA.4892[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > > > > Here's an example. US only, though. Can't say what the UK situation is. > > > > > > > http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-Mone...TF8&s=software > > > > > > > "Apr" <noreply[at]mail.com> wrote in message > > > > news:ebslxzcCHHA.1196[at]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > > > > > Whereabout is the business form in Money? > > > > > > > > > > > |
|
#43
| |||
| |||
| Ok...do you know how I should get the latest version? "Bob Peel, MVP" <bob_peel[at]kiandra.freeserve.co.uk.INVALID> wrote in message news:efI88MHDHHA.3812[at]TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... - quote - > Apr, don't bother installing Tax Saver 2004. It is very specifically for > tax year 2004. > -- > Regards > Bob Peel, > Microsoft MVP - Money > For UK tips & fixes see > http://support.microsoft.com/default...d=fh;EN-GB;mny. > I do not respond to any emails that I have not specifically asked for. > "Apr" <noreply[at]mail.com> wrote in message > news:Oc0n0VCDHHA.4256[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > > In the UK... I bought Microsoft Money Finanacial Suite withe Tax Saver > > 2004 Deluxe, a while ago. But I haven't installed any of it yet as I > > trying to get sort out the my basics first.... then maybe I will instal > > and see what happens. )> > > "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in > > message news:Ob3FvweCHHA.4892[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > > > Here's an example. US only, though. Can't say what the UK situation is. > > > > > http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-Mone...TF8&s=software > > > > > "Apr" <noreply[at]mail.com> wrote in message > > > news:ebslxzcCHHA.1196[at]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > > > > Whereabout is the business form in Money? > > > > > > |
|
#42
| |||
| |||
| Apr, don't bother installing Tax Saver 2004. It is very specifically for tax year 2004. -- Regards Bob Peel, Microsoft MVP - Money For UK tips & fixes see http://support.microsoft.com/default...d=fh;EN-GB;mny. I do not respond to any emails that I have not specifically asked for. "Apr" <noreply[at]mail.com> wrote in message news:Oc0n0VCDHHA.4256[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... - quote - > In the UK... I bought Microsoft Money Finanacial Suite withe Tax Saver > 2004 Deluxe, a while ago. But I haven't installed any of it yet as I > trying to get sort out the my basics first.... then maybe I will instal > and see what happens. )> "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in > message news:Ob3FvweCHHA.4892[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > > Here's an example. US only, though. Can't say what the UK situation is. > > > http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-Mone...TF8&s=software > > > "Apr" <noreply[at]mail.com> wrote in message > > news:ebslxzcCHHA.1196[at]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > > > Whereabout is the business form in Money? > > |
|
#41
| |||
| |||
| same "Apr" <noreply[at]mail.com> wrote in message news:%23WAMNGCDHHA.4372[at]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... - quote - > thank you .. below is my reply:
As noted, if you show transactions by Payee and do not show the split> "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in > message news:uIWFiXBDHHA.3604[at]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > > you know the drill. > > > The Payslip "Category" isn't a Category at all. It's just a fancy thing > > like Split or Loan Payment that is a way to subdivide a transaction into > > its components--those components are what is categorized. So, you can > > report on the categories like Taxes : Employee's Social Security. But the > > "Payslip" net is just what's left, positive or negative, from the sum of > > all of the components in the Payslip transaction. It's not a separately > > categorized amount. If you really want to report on these net amounts > > (they don't mean much by themselves, but sometime this is handy) try, > > say, using a special Payee name just for these deposits and then report > > Transactions for just that Payee name without the split information. Make > > sense? > Yes it does and I have created a report. I selected Transactions by Payee > and selected my Payee. It appears to given me just the 'Total Wages & > Salary' although I wanted to see the Payslip Total, somewhere. The thing > is I dont get what I really want which is the Total Net Pay so I can > compare it to my paper-payslip. information, all you'll get is the bottom line, net deposited, total of each of the payslips. It won't say Total Net Pay. If you really want, put that in the Memo field. Then you can show transactions that have thext "Total Net Pay". Beyond that, I'm running out of ways to get you there. If you just want a word processing report that looks like your paychecks, perhaps Excel or Word would be a better choice. - quote - > A thought, it's not possible to track the Total Net Pay via an account? I
Accounts in Money are things like Checking and Savings. Categories are not> took a look at setting up a new account but couldn't find anything > relevant. Accounts and vice versa. - quote - > The problem is that prior to this Payslip model I was just entering the
Sorry. You can have one or the other. Both will be hard.> pay received under Wages & Salary: Net Pay. This is why I was HOPING to > see my Payslip 'Total Net Pay' figure in this category. Pse see below... - quote - > > Well, first of all, you cannot rename the tab, if that's what you are
So you are going to skip separately collecting the amounts for the elements> > suggesting. If you'd rather not track the individual elements of Wages & > > Salary : Basic Pay, Wages & Salary : Holiday Pay, and Wages & Salary : > > Net Profit Bonus line by line, then, by all means, create a category > > Wages & Salary : Gross Payments. Either works. > Ok that's great. I will rename to Gross Payments. of Gross Payments? OK. - quote - > > But if you might ever want to know totals for an of the elements of Gross
Answers previous question.> > Payments, washing out that detail when you enter the data will prove to > > be a problem. But you can't enter/categorize both all of the things that > > make up the "Gross Payments" and enter the "Gross Payments". Money will > > compute the equivalent of "Gross Payments"--it'll be the total of the > > Wages tab. > This is ok as I can't imagine need this breakdown. - quote - > > As noted above, "Total Net Pay" is not a category--it's a subtotal of
Running out of answers here...> > things already categorized. You can't report it directly. But you can get > > to it this way: you can create a report with all of the categories > > involved in the payslips--and they must be unique to the payslips--and > > the total value shown on that report will equal the total value of your > > payslip(s) for the date range involved. > Pse see above comment within this msg. - quote - > I could switch back to just Net Pay tracking but it's nice to have the
Yup. Otherwise it's sure been a lot of trouble for naught.> breakdown..... - quote - > > Here's the biggie: If you enter all ten items and then enter another line
I'm trying to say that everything on the tabs will be added together and> > of the "Net Wages" subtotal as its own category, you will end up with the > > amount doubled up. > I had my original method, where I was just tracking the Total Net Pay, > under Wages & Salary: Net Pay. Are you saying that because I have Net Pay > and some setup with the new Payslip model, the 'Total Wages & Salary' > amount will be wrong. Just by looking at the Report, it the Total Wages & > Salary is including the Gross Pay which we had for the new model (I've > done 2 months using the new model). that amount is what the entire payslip transaction will add to the account youu put it in. You can think of this as Net Pay. But you can't categorize that total that way. It just doesn't compute. The total of a Payslip is just a number--it's all already been categorized on the entries on the tabs. Nothing left to categorize. Here's another way to try to make sense of it: imagine you entered one separate transaction for EACH line on each tab of your payslip in your checking account. The balance of the account after all of those transactions is the new corerct balance. But there would be no "Net Pay" transaction. - quote - > You have explaind this well. Thank you. So in conclusion, based on my
I'm saying if you want to report a line that says "Total Net Pay" as a> above comments, I think you/I are suggesting/have concluded that I should > just track my Total Net Pay only. From what I can see, the Report > function doesn't appear to show me what I am looking for either, the > amount I am paid every month unless I did something wrong. Category, that will not make any sense if you categorize the components that sum up to Total Net Pay. I don't know what report you were using nor how you set it up but I do know these things: 1) The total shown at the bottom of the Payslip dialog WILL BE THE SAME as your Total Net Pay once you have all the data on all the tabs. 2) The amount of the Payslip transaction added to the balance of the account you deposit it in WILL BE THE SAME as your Total Net Pay. 3) If you track the elements of your net pay correctly in Payslips and then define a report to show the total of all of these elements for the date of the payslip the total amount shown on that report WILL BE THE SAME as your Total Net Pay. That's three places to check it. The first two should be checked when you enter the data then you can skip going to check the third. See my other post from the same time for an alternate way to see/report "Total Net Pay". - quote - > > Expense are money flowing out from assets or liabilities. In Money you
Yup. So many postings, so little proofreading. But you pass the "Catch The> > use Expense Categories to explain this money flow. Say you add $100.00 > > (too lazy to go find a pound symbol--go with me in dollars) to Expense's > > pile of money (somebody else in the world just got your $100.00) and > > subtract $100.00 from your checking account (you just got richer). These > > two add to $0. > Did you mean I just got 'poorer' in this scenario?... Instructor's Mistake" Test. |
|
#40
| |||
| |||
| below. "Apr" <noreply[at]mail.com> wrote in message news:uXM$UMCDHHA.4228[at]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... - quote - > Although I have a parallel coversation with you below, I just wanted to
These two sound like taxes. They sure aren't something like Wages & Salary.> ask about the following anyway: > I moved Wages and Salary : Employes Social Security to Taxes. > Would I have to do the same for the following and put them under Taxes: > Employee Tax > Employer Social Security. Remeber that beyond the Income/Expense issue, the categories and their subcategories are there for clarity and things like reporting. If you want to ask Money what your wage income was (total of Wages and Salary category and all its subcategories), you probably don't want that number artificially reduced by taxes you paid. Likewise, if you want to know the taxes you paid, you really want to see the taxes. Otherwise, why categorize at all? - quote - > Reimbursed Company Admin Fees
These don't sound like taxes. And I thought we agreed you were treating> Reimbursed Expenses money you receive for the second one was some form of Income. - quote - > When I checked the above Categories for the above they are all Negative.
Negative in what context? A negative entry on a despoit is a withdrawal. A> You advised that negative flows into the system earlier. I dont under > this is the case here? Just trying to piece everthing together. negative entry on a Wages Tab of a Payslip is a withdrawal--money leaving you and going somewhere. A negative entry on a Deductions tab of a Payslip is a deposit--money coming your way. - quote - > For Gross Pay and Invoice Reconcillation, under each Category, the are all
I'm getting really confused what's what and on what tab. See above.> Positive. (Which, I belive is contrary to you explanation... earlier..). > Something wrong here? > For Reimbursed Company Admin Fees and Reimbursed Expenses, Summary (why don't you check and see if you can test each entry on your payslip against this): * positive numbers on the Wages tab are money you are receiving--these should be in categories that are Income categories * positive numbers on deductions tabs (Before Tax, Taxes, After Tax) are money you are spending--these should be in Expense categories * negative numbers on deductions tabs are money you are receiving--these should be in Income categories Another attempt at summary: All three elements must be tested to make sure they are consistent. 1) Which tab? 2) What is sign of value? and 3) Is Category assigned to income or expense? |
| Tags |
| edit, payslip, series |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Help: scheduled investment series entry - can't enter without quantity bugs: I upgraded from money 2004 to 2006 and found that Microsoft change the way I enter data into scheduled investment series. In 2004 I can only enter... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 06-05-2006 08:48 PM | |
| Broken Loan Series? MikeSh: My house loan payment some times gets out of sync with the bill payment series. (I think Money occasionally misses the match after downloading my... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 11-13-2005 03:07 AM | |
| Edit Single Bill Series : I'm trying to edit bill series in the 2004 trial version. I can't edit single bills. How can you correct? | Microsoft Money | 2 | 11-22-2003 07:05 PM | |
| Series EE Savings Bonds Michael: I'm using Money 2004 Deluxe. I added two Series EE Savings Bonds by following the directions. Is there any way to track their current value? ... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 11-10-2003 12:21 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |