|
#9
| |||
| |||
| At least it's well-stated. I have no personal interest, but suggest you request they support at least OFX download from the web site, not the older QIF. I assume that's what they refer to by 'the alternate Quicken update'. -- Chris Cowles Gainesville, FL <zvasvari[at]gmail.com> wrote in message news:1163139320.849460.307260[at]k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... - quote - > I contacted HSBC NA about this topic and pointed to them the Microsoft > web site. There response was basically that not enough customers used > DirectConnect: |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| I contacted HSBC NA about this topic and pointed to them the Microsoft web site. There response was basically that not enough customers used DirectConnect: "Thank you for your recent e-mail to HSBC's Internet Banking unit. We apologize for the previous response you have received. We appreciate you taking time to provide feedback on the decision to discontinue support of the 'DirectConnect' feature within HSBC Personal Internet Banking. This feature has been in place since 2000 and we can confirm that this decision was not taken lightly. Although financial management programs such as Quicken and Money are valued, the 'direct-connect' feature has not been widely adopted amongst our customers and the number of active users has continued to reduce, despite it being one of the few free services in the marketplace. The security and regulatory aspects continue to be challenging and we believe that it will become increasingly difficult to exercise our responsibilities for customer privacy and transactional integrity when we control neither the authentication nor the interaction itself. After long consideration of these issues together with the ongoing cost implications for our customers, we felt that this was perhaps the right time to withdraw the service. We can assure you that we will continue to support the alternate Quicken update via a download from our Internet banking service. We understand that this will be a disappointment but hope that the value you place upon our other services will convince you to continue your banking with us. In the meantime, HSBC is committed to placing a premium on the security and integrity of your online banking needs. We thank you for your comments regarding our Internet Banking service and trust that the above has gone some way to explaining the rationale behind this change. Our Premier Customer Service Center is always available, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to meet all of your banking needs. Please e-mail us by clicking 'BankMail' in the gray navigation bar on the left or call 1-888-662-HSBC (1-888-662-4722), and speak with one of our professionals. Sincerely, <Name WithheldPremier Customer Service Specialist" google[at]thepavliks.com wrote: - quote - > Apparently Microsoft does have a way to meet the regulations but HSBC > doesn't want to use them. > I'm a little annoyed that just a week ago I was forced to update to > Money 2007 because 2004 was being dropped and then this comes up? > > From MS website.... > Multi-factor Authentication > Many of our financial institution partners have requested information > on how Microsoft would respond to the FFIEC guidance regarding > Authentication in Internet Banking Environment, which was released > 10/12/2005. Microsoft was a key participant in the OFX Consortium's > recent work to add additional authentication methods to the OFX > specifications. The consortium has released a preliminary draft of > additions to the OFX specifications at http://www.ofx.net. These > revisions will be released in new specifications, 1.03, 2.03 and 2.1 > sometime in early summer 2006. > Money 2007 will support sending the new <CLIENTUID> identified in these > new specifications to OFX servers that support either the OFX 1.03 or > the 2.03 specifications. If you are interested in adding support for > this tag in Money, please contact the Microsoft Money OFX Certification > Team. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Fair enough. I guess I'm more annoyed that they tooled me into an upgrade that I apparently wasn't going to be able to make use of. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| In their defense, there may be other constraints in their systems, about which we know nothing. I'm guessing that's not the case, but we don't know that it's not. -- Chris Cowles Gainesville, FL <google[at]thepavliks.com> wrote in message news:1162838511.881369.303340[at]m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com... - quote - > Apparently Microsoft does have a way to meet the regulations but HSBC > doesn't want to use them. > I'm a little annoyed that just a week ago I was forced to update to > Money 2007 because 2004 was being dropped and then this comes up? > > From MS website.... > Multi-factor Authentication > Many of our financial institution partners have requested information > on how Microsoft would respond to the FFIEC guidance regarding > Authentication in Internet Banking Environment, which was released > 10/12/2005. Microsoft was a key participant in the OFX Consortium's > recent work to add additional authentication methods to the OFX > specifications. The consortium has released a preliminary draft of > additions to the OFX specifications at http://www.ofx.net. These > revisions will be released in new specifications, 1.03, 2.03 and 2.1 > sometime in early summer 2006. > Money 2007 will support sending the new <CLIENTUID> identified in these > new specifications to OFX servers that support either the OFX 1.03 or > the 2.03 specifications. If you are interested in adding support for > this tag in Money, please contact the Microsoft Money OFX Certification > Team. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Apparently Microsoft does have a way to meet the regulations but HSBC doesn't want to use them. I'm a little annoyed that just a week ago I was forced to update to Money 2007 because 2004 was being dropped and then this comes up? - quote - > From MS website.... Multi-factor Authentication Many of our financial institution partners have requested information on how Microsoft would respond to the FFIEC guidance regarding Authentication in Internet Banking Environment, which was released 10/12/2005. Microsoft was a key participant in the OFX Consortium's recent work to add additional authentication methods to the OFX specifications. The consortium has released a preliminary draft of additions to the OFX specifications at http://www.ofx.net. These revisions will be released in new specifications, 1.03, 2.03 and 2.1 sometime in early summer 2006. Money 2007 will support sending the new <CLIENTUID> identified in these new specifications to OFX servers that support either the OFX 1.03 or the 2.03 specifications. If you are interested in adding support for this tag in Money, please contact the Microsoft Money OFX Certification Team. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| It's part of FFIEC regulations, see here: http://www.nemertes.com/banks_droppi...ew_regulations ING added some questions "color of first car, name of pet" etc, about a dozen in total, and now Direct Connect works again. HSBC decided to just dump direct connect. When I called them they said "indefinitely". I'm scrambling to find a new bank that will support it now! We need to start a list somewhere. I'm thinking Wikipedia. rjb wrote: - quote - > So, how do we get the largest bank in the world, HSBC, and the largest > software company in the world, Microsoft, to collaborate to influence and > satisfy requirements of consumers and regulators. Sounds like this impacts > all banks. How do we get the issue to the Microsoft Money product manager? > "Michael J. Blazin" wrote: > > The Patriot Act, Sarbanes-Oxley and other legislation were combined into > > guidelines to FDIC insured institutions in 2005 for assessing risk of > > on-line banking operations. Banks received specific instructions that user > > id/password combinations, single factor, were no longer sufficient. At > > least one other factor was required. That additional factor could be > > something that the user could recognize as pre-selected by the user. Site > > Key is one direction a bank could use. Other banks chose other options. > > Eventually the requirement may expand to making the factors different types > > (certificates, passwords, cards, biometrics) > > What has any of that got to do with a conspiracy? > > > <johnbusc[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:1162518984.473524.149280[at]e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com... > > > Site Key (et. al.) is merely anti-phishing and hardly "part of the > > > Patriot Act". But if conspiracy theories are your thing, go for it! > > > > > JB > > > > > On Nov 2, 8:44 pm, "Michael J. Blazin" <mjbla...[at]swbell.net> wrote: > > > > It's more likely 3 factor verification. I believe it's part of the > > > > Patriot > > > > Act. Banks added another verification point like BAC's Site Key > > > > (visually > > > > verify your pre-selected icon after you enter ID, but before entering > > > > your > > > > password). > > > > > > > "Dave427337" <Dave427...[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in > > > > messagenews:A6AB5909-B8D9-47EB-A622-E141CEEDC3CB[at]microsoft.com... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just got off the phone with HSBC. They say that on 12/10/2006 they > > > > > will > > > > > not accept direct connect banking from Microsoft Money. Meaning you > > > > > will > > > > > not > > > > > be able to send electronic payments or download transactions directly > > > > > into > > > > > Money. Something about federal legislation requiring three passwords > > > > > versus > > > > > Money's two. > > > > > Does anyone know more about this?- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted > > > > > text - > > > > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| So, how do we get the largest bank in the world, HSBC, and the largest software company in the world, Microsoft, to collaborate to influence and satisfy requirements of consumers and regulators. Sounds like this impacts all banks. How do we get the issue to the Microsoft Money product manager? "Michael J. Blazin" wrote: - quote - > The Patriot Act, Sarbanes-Oxley and other legislation were combined into > guidelines to FDIC insured institutions in 2005 for assessing risk of > on-line banking operations. Banks received specific instructions that user > id/password combinations, single factor, were no longer sufficient. At > least one other factor was required. That additional factor could be > something that the user could recognize as pre-selected by the user. Site > Key is one direction a bank could use. Other banks chose other options. > Eventually the requirement may expand to making the factors different types > (certificates, passwords, cards, biometrics) > What has any of that got to do with a conspiracy? > <johnbusc[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:1162518984.473524.149280[at]e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com... > > Site Key (et. al.) is merely anti-phishing and hardly "part of the > > Patriot Act". But if conspiracy theories are your thing, go for it! > > > JB > > > On Nov 2, 8:44 pm, "Michael J. Blazin" <mjbla...[at]swbell.net> wrote: > > > It's more likely 3 factor verification. I believe it's part of the > > > Patriot > > > Act. Banks added another verification point like BAC's Site Key > > > (visually > > > verify your pre-selected icon after you enter ID, but before entering > > > your > > > password). > > > > > "Dave427337" <Dave427...[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in > > > messagenews:A6AB5909-B8D9-47EB-A622-E141CEEDC3CB[at]microsoft.com... > > > > > > > > > > I just got off the phone with HSBC. They say that on 12/10/2006 they > > > > will > > > > not accept direct connect banking from Microsoft Money. Meaning you > > > > will > > > > not > > > > be able to send electronic payments or download transactions directly > > > > into > > > > Money. Something about federal legislation requiring three passwords > > > > versus > > > > Money's two. > > > > Does anyone know more about this?- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted > > > > text - > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| The Patriot Act, Sarbanes-Oxley and other legislation were combined into guidelines to FDIC insured institutions in 2005 for assessing risk of on-line banking operations. Banks received specific instructions that user id/password combinations, single factor, were no longer sufficient. At least one other factor was required. That additional factor could be something that the user could recognize as pre-selected by the user. Site Key is one direction a bank could use. Other banks chose other options. Eventually the requirement may expand to making the factors different types (certificates, passwords, cards, biometrics) What has any of that got to do with a conspiracy? <johnbusc[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1162518984.473524.149280[at]e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com... - quote - > Site Key (et. al.) is merely anti-phishing and hardly "part of the > Patriot Act". But if conspiracy theories are your thing, go for it! > JB > On Nov 2, 8:44 pm, "Michael J. Blazin" <mjbla...[at]swbell.net> wrote: > > It's more likely 3 factor verification. I believe it's part of the > > Patriot > > Act. Banks added another verification point like BAC's Site Key > > (visually > > verify your pre-selected icon after you enter ID, but before entering > > your > > password). > > > "Dave427337" <Dave427...[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in > > messagenews:A6AB5909-B8D9-47EB-A622-E141CEEDC3CB[at]microsoft.com... > > > > > > I just got off the phone with HSBC. They say that on 12/10/2006 they > > > will > > > not accept direct connect banking from Microsoft Money. Meaning you > > > will > > > not > > > be able to send electronic payments or download transactions directly > > > into > > > Money. Something about federal legislation requiring three passwords > > > versus > > > Money's two. > > > Does anyone know more about this?- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted > > > text - |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Site Key (et. al.) is merely anti-phishing and hardly "part of the Patriot Act". But if conspiracy theories are your thing, go for it! JB On Nov 2, 8:44 pm, "Michael J. Blazin" <mjbla...[at]swbell.net> wrote: - quote - > It's more likely 3 factor verification. I believe it's part of the Patriot > Act. Banks added another verification point like BAC's Site Key (visually > verify your pre-selected icon after you enter ID, but before entering your > password). > "Dave427337" <Dave427...[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in messagenews:A6AB5909-B8D9-47EB-A622-E141CEEDC3CB[at]microsoft.com... > > I just got off the phone with HSBC. They say that on 12/10/2006 they will > > not accept direct connect banking from Microsoft Money. Meaning you will > > not > > be able to send electronic payments or download transactions directly into > > Money. Something about federal legislation requiring three passwords > > versus > > Money's two. > > Does anyone know more about this?- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text - |
| | |||
| |||
| It's more likely 3 factor verification. I believe it's part of the Patriot Act. Banks added another verification point like BAC's Site Key (visually verify your pre-selected icon after you enter ID, but before entering your password). "Dave427337" <Dave427337[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:A6AB5909-B8D9-47EB-A622-E141CEEDC3CB[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > I just got off the phone with HSBC. They say that on 12/10/2006 they will > not accept direct connect banking from Microsoft Money. Meaning you will > not > be able to send electronic payments or download transactions directly into > Money. Something about federal legislation requiring three passwords > versus > Money's two. > Does anyone know more about this? |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I just got off the phone with HSBC. They say that on 12/10/2006 they will not accept direct connect banking from Microsoft Money. Meaning you will not be able to send electronic payments or download transactions directly into Money. Something about federal legislation requiring three passwords versus Money's two. Does anyone know more about this? |
| Tags |
| bank, connect, direct, hsbc |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Re-download transactions via direct connect? Cal Learner-- MVP: In microsoft.public.money, johndog wrote: >I have Money 2007 connect to my brokerage via Direct Connect, and >(presumably) due to some file... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 10-31-2006 12:07 AM | |
| Changing from Web Connect to Direct Connect Download mattwolrad: Im using Money 2005 and my Financial Institution just changed from Web Download to Direct Download for investments. Is there anyway for me to use my... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 10-14-2006 04:20 AM | |
| Online Banking via Direct Connect Mitch: I am a long-time, now frustrated, Money user who is looking for a new online bank that allows me to take advantage of Money's full capabilities. ... | Microsoft Money | 7 | 06-13-2004 11:55 PM | |
| Bank of America Direct Connect Joe: I find it hard to believe that Money doesn't do a two direct connection with Bank of America, yet Quicken does. Even if Microsoft had to use the... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 01-18-2004 11:00 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |