|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Yes, I was referring to the balance process. Anyway, I tried reconciling those old entries and it left my account total untouched; so far, so good. I guess I'll wait until I get my next bank statement next month to see if anything is changed in a wrong way. Thanks for your help! "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, dragonwing wrote: > > That doesn't make sense, because if I clear a check, it is then officially > > subtracted from the balance, and then nothing matches. > I think we are referring to different things. I was referring to the > register column called Balance. I suspect you are referring to the > Balance process. > But your idea of experimenting with a copy is very good. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, dragonwing wrote: - quote - > That doesn't make sense, because if I clear a check, it is then officially
I think we are referring to different things. I was referring to the> subtracted from the balance, and then nothing matches. register column called Balance. I suspect you are referring to the Balance process. But your idea of experimenting with a copy is very good. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| I guess the old "backup-and-experiment" method ought to work just fine! I'll see what happens... "kaplan3jiim[at]comcast.net" wrote: - quote - > At the risk of providing a "non-expert's" thoughts: > If they never were cashed, they probably are nor marked at all in the > column for cleared/ reconciled/ etc. Unless you manually marked them. > In my experience, this does not cause any problems in balancing > against bank statements. Unless you have made some compensating > transactions (and why would you if everything is a copacetic with each > monthly reconcile), deleting them should not affect your balance. I've > done this myself on occasion. > Jim > On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 17:51:02 -0800, dragonwing > <dragonwing[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > > That doesn't make sense, because if I clear a check, it is then officially > > subtracted from the balance, and then nothing matches. > > > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > > > In microsoft.public.money, dragonwing wrote: > > > > > > I didn't make any compensating transactions, as the account balances without > > > > reference to these old entries. I'll try clearing/reconciling them and see > > > > what happens. > > > > > If the account balance in Money matches the balance that the bank > > > shows when those old check transactions are in place, then I would > > > infer that the checks did actually clear the bank. > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > > > > > > > In microsoft.public.money, dragonwing wrote: > > > > > > > > > > When I balance my account, I notice that there are a number of outstanding > > > > > > transactions from a couple of years ago: Checks that must have gotten lost or > > > > > > in any event never cleared the bank. I'd just as soon get rid of them at > > > > > > this point, but I'm not sure how to do that without messing up my account > > > > > > balance. Should I delete them? Mark them as cleared/reconciled? Mark them > > > > > > as void? Or will all those options screw up my balance? > > > > > > > > > Well, deleting or voiding would change the balance. So if the > > > > > balance is correct with them, I would tend to mark them > > > > > cleared/reconciled. If the balance is only correct now because you > > > > > made compensating transactions, my preference would be to Void them. > > > > > That way there is some record, but it does not affect balances. Then > > > > > adjust any compensating entry. Ideally you could get rid of all of > > > > > your compensating entries. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| At the risk of providing a "non-expert's" thoughts: If they never were cashed, they probably are nor marked at all in the column for cleared/ reconciled/ etc. Unless you manually marked them. In my experience, this does not cause any problems in balancing against bank statements. Unless you have made some compensating transactions (and why would you if everything is a copacetic with each monthly reconcile), deleting them should not affect your balance. I've done this myself on occasion. Jim On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 17:51:02 -0800, dragonwing <dragonwing[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: - quote - > That doesn't make sense, because if I clear a check, it is then officially > subtracted from the balance, and then nothing matches. > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > In microsoft.public.money, dragonwing wrote: > > > > I didn't make any compensating transactions, as the account balances without > > > reference to these old entries. I'll try clearing/reconciling them and see > > > what happens. > > > If the account balance in Money matches the balance that the bank > > shows when those old check transactions are in place, then I would > > infer that the checks did actually clear the bank. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > > > > > In microsoft.public.money, dragonwing wrote: > > > > > > > > When I balance my account, I notice that there are a number of outstanding > > > > > transactions from a couple of years ago: Checks that must have gotten lost or > > > > > in any event never cleared the bank. I'd just as soon get rid of them at > > > > > this point, but I'm not sure how to do that without messing up my account > > > > > balance. Should I delete them? Mark them as cleared/reconciled? Mark them > > > > > as void? Or will all those options screw up my balance? > > > > > > > Well, deleting or voiding would change the balance. So if the > > > > balance is correct with them, I would tend to mark them > > > > cleared/reconciled. If the balance is only correct now because you > > > > made compensating transactions, my preference would be to Void them. > > > > That way there is some record, but it does not affect balances. Then > > > > adjust any compensating entry. Ideally you could get rid of all of > > > > your compensating entries. > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| That doesn't make sense, because if I clear a check, it is then officially subtracted from the balance, and then nothing matches. "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, dragonwing wrote: > > I didn't make any compensating transactions, as the account balances without > > reference to these old entries. I'll try clearing/reconciling them and see > > what happens. > If the account balance in Money matches the balance that the bank > shows when those old check transactions are in place, then I would > infer that the checks did actually clear the bank. > > > Thanks! > > > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > > > In microsoft.public.money, dragonwing wrote: > > > > > > When I balance my account, I notice that there are a number of outstanding > > > > transactions from a couple of years ago: Checks that must have gotten lost or > > > > in any event never cleared the bank. I'd just as soon get rid of them at > > > > this point, but I'm not sure how to do that without messing up my account > > > > balance. Should I delete them? Mark them as cleared/reconciled? Mark them > > > > as void? Or will all those options screw up my balance? > > > > > Well, deleting or voiding would change the balance. So if the > > > balance is correct with them, I would tend to mark them > > > cleared/reconciled. If the balance is only correct now because you > > > made compensating transactions, my preference would be to Void them. > > > That way there is some record, but it does not affect balances. Then > > > adjust any compensating entry. Ideally you could get rid of all of > > > your compensating entries. > > > > > > > > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, dragonwing wrote: - quote - > I didn't make any compensating transactions, as the account balances without
If the account balance in Money matches the balance that the bank> reference to these old entries. I'll try clearing/reconciling them and see > what happens. shows when those old check transactions are in place, then I would infer that the checks did actually clear the bank. - quote - > Thanks! > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > In microsoft.public.money, dragonwing wrote: > > > > When I balance my account, I notice that there are a number of outstanding > > > transactions from a couple of years ago: Checks that must have gotten lost or > > > in any event never cleared the bank. I'd just as soon get rid of them at > > > this point, but I'm not sure how to do that without messing up my account > > > balance. Should I delete them? Mark them as cleared/reconciled? Mark them > > > as void? Or will all those options screw up my balance? > > > Well, deleting or voiding would change the balance. So if the > > balance is correct with them, I would tend to mark them > > cleared/reconciled. If the balance is only correct now because you > > made compensating transactions, my preference would be to Void them. > > That way there is some record, but it does not affect balances. Then > > adjust any compensating entry. Ideally you could get rid of all of > > your compensating entries. > > > > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I didn't make any compensating transactions, as the account balances without reference to these old entries. I'll try clearing/reconciling them and see what happens. Thanks! "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, dragonwing wrote: > > When I balance my account, I notice that there are a number of outstanding > > transactions from a couple of years ago: Checks that must have gotten lost or > > in any event never cleared the bank. I'd just as soon get rid of them at > > this point, but I'm not sure how to do that without messing up my account > > balance. Should I delete them? Mark them as cleared/reconciled? Mark them > > as void? Or will all those options screw up my balance? > Well, deleting or voiding would change the balance. So if the > balance is correct with them, I would tend to mark them > cleared/reconciled. If the balance is only correct now because you > made compensating transactions, my preference would be to Void them. > That way there is some record, but it does not affect balances. Then > adjust any compensating entry. Ideally you could get rid of all of > your compensating entries. |
| | |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, dragonwing wrote: - quote - > When I balance my account, I notice that there are a number of outstanding
Well, deleting or voiding would change the balance. So if the> transactions from a couple of years ago: Checks that must have gotten lost or > in any event never cleared the bank. I'd just as soon get rid of them at > this point, but I'm not sure how to do that without messing up my account > balance. Should I delete them? Mark them as cleared/reconciled? Mark them > as void? Or will all those options screw up my balance? balance is correct with them, I would tend to mark them cleared/reconciled. If the balance is only correct now because you made compensating transactions, my preference would be to Void them. That way there is some record, but it does not affect balances. Then adjust any compensating entry. Ideally you could get rid of all of your compensating entries. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| When I balance my account, I notice that there are a number of outstanding transactions from a couple of years ago: Checks that must have gotten lost or in any event never cleared the bank. I'd just as soon get rid of them at this point, but I'm not sure how to do that without messing up my account balance. Should I delete them? Mark them as cleared/reconciled? Mark them as void? Or will all those options screw up my balance? Thank you! |
| Tags |
| rid, transactions |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Ending Cash Balance in Investment Transactions Register vs Cash Transactions Mark: I have a balancing problem. The ending cash balance on the Investment Transactions register and the Cash Transactions register for the same... | Microsoft Money | 8 | 08-26-2004 02:04 PM | |
| Investment Transactions not appearing in Cash Transactions Jim F: The Cash Transactions register is missing items that are present in the Investment Transactions register, causing the month-end money balance to... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 02-07-2004 05:59 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |