|
#25
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Jonathan Altman wrote: - quote - > The MMDA security does not appear anywhere between <POSLIST> and </POSTLIST> (actually <POSLIST> and </POSTLIST> don't appear either, what actually shows
Another test that might be simpler that wading thru OFX files is to> up is <INVPOSLIST> and </INVPOSTLIST> , but i assume that's the same). create a new empty test file with File-> New. Name it something like test1.mny. Click Decline during the process, and then tell it to skip setup. Then file-> Import that OFX file, letting Money create a new Investment account. See what comes in during that process, paying special attention to whatever is not a known non-MM holding. |
|
#24
| |||
| |||
| PMJI, especially since I have no experience with sweep accounts or even with downloaded MMF accounts (I manually input all my MMF transactions). BUT I do get automated downloads from a Dreyfus Bond fund. I have discovered that when a dividend is declared and reinvested it shows up first as an Add Shares (and not a Buy or Reinvest Dividend) in my downloaded transactions just like your problem. However, if I simply don't accept the Add Shares transaction, but leave it there, after another download a day or two, it changes to (or rather is replaced by) a Revinvest Dividend transaction which I then accept. If you have not done so, I would suggest waiting out your problem for a few days and see what happens. -- Peace, BobJ "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message news:d8ds13l5o3kopm7ejpsqkounhlhu17l27j[at]4ax.com... - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, Jonathan Altman wrote: > > > > <BAL> > > > <NAME> MoneyMarketBalance</NAME> > > > <DESC> MoneyMarketBalance</DESC> > > > <BALTYPE> DOLLAR</BALTYPE> > > > <VALUE> 6304.6</VALUE> > > > <DTASOF> 20070405120000</DTASOF> > > > </BAL> > > > > Look again at the section between <POSLIST> and </POSLIST> , and > > > search on the number of shares. The position information will be > > > surrounded by a <POSSTOCK> </POSSTOCK> pair, or a <POSMF> </POSMF> > > pair (or something else). What set of tags is used? > > > > The MMDA security does not appear anywhere between <POSLIST> and > > </POSTLIST> > (actually <POSLIST> and </POSTLIST> don't appear either, what actually > > shows > > up is <INVPOSLIST> and </INVPOSTLIST> , but i assume that's the same). > > > The only 2 places where the MMDA seems to appear are: > > 1) <AVAILCASH> 6304.6</AVAILCASH> and > > 2) as noted above, > > <BAL> > <NAME> MoneyMarketBalance</NAME> > <DESC> MoneyMarketBalance</DESC> > <BALTYPE> DOLLAR</BALTYPE> > <VALUE> 6304.6</VALUE> > <DTASOF> 20070405120000</DTASOF> > </BAL> Thanks. It was worth checking again. It would have been easy to > miss, since there is no text in that section that would identify the > security; there is the CUSIP and the amount. The amount would vary > depending on when the file was from, but the amount should be fairly > distinctive. Mutual fund balances are usually to three decimal > places, and stocks to zero. > > > Is there any way to just completely eliminate the old security that Money > > was originally associating transactions for MMDA1 with so that when it > > sees > > transactions for MMDA1 now it will let me specify the new money market > > security that i created and gave the MMDA1 symbol to? > No. The closest you can get is using that specially-made OFX file. |
|
#23
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Jonathan Altman wrote: - quote - > > > <BAL> > > <NAME> MoneyMarketBalance</NAME> > > <DESC> MoneyMarketBalance</DESC> > > <BALTYPE> DOLLAR</BALTYPE> > > <VALUE> 6304.6</VALUE> > > <DTASOF> 20070405120000</DTASOF> > > </BAL> > > Look again at the section between <POSLIST> and </POSLIST> , and
miss, since there is no text in that section that would identify the> > search on the number of shares. The position information will be > > surrounded by a <POSSTOCK> </POSSTOCK> pair, or a <POSMF> </POSMF> > pair (or something else). What set of tags is used? > The MMDA security does not appear anywhere between <POSLIST> and </POSTLIST> (actually <POSLIST> and </POSTLIST> don't appear either, what actually shows > up is <INVPOSLIST> and </INVPOSTLIST> , but i assume that's the same). > The only 2 places where the MMDA seems to appear are: > 1) <AVAILCASH> 6304.6</AVAILCASH> and > 2) as noted above, > <BAL> <NAME> MoneyMarketBalance</NAME> <DESC> MoneyMarketBalance</DESC> <BALTYPE> DOLLAR</BALTYPE> <VALUE> 6304.6</VALUE> <DTASOF> 20070405120000</DTASOF> </BAL Thanks. It was worth checking again. It would have been easy to security; there is the CUSIP and the amount. The amount would vary depending on when the file was from, but the amount should be fairly distinctive. Mutual fund balances are usually to three decimal places, and stocks to zero. - quote - > Is there any way to just completely eliminate the old security that Money
No. The closest you can get is using that specially-made OFX file.> was originally associating transactions for MMDA1 with so that when it sees > transactions for MMDA1 now it will let me specify the new money market > security that i created and gave the MMDA1 symbol to? |
|
#22
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > <BAL> > <NAME> MoneyMarketBalance</NAME> > <DESC> MoneyMarketBalance</DESC> > <BALTYPE> DOLLAR</BALTYPE> > <VALUE> 6304.6</VALUE> > <DTASOF> 20070405120000</DTASOF> > </BAL> Look again at the section between <POSLIST> and </POSLIST> , and > search on the number of shares. The position information will be > surrounded by a <POSSTOCK> </POSSTOCK> pair, or a <POSMF> </POSMF> pair (or something else). What set of tags is used? The MMDA security does not appear anywhere between <POSLIST> and </POSTLIST(actually <POSLIST> and </POSTLIST> don't appear either, what actually shows up is <INVPOSLIST> and </INVPOSTLIST> , but i assume that's the same). The only 2 places where the MMDA seems to appear are: 1) <AVAILCASH> 6304.6</AVAILCASH> and 2) as noted above, <BAL<NAME> MoneyMarketBalance</NAME<DESC> MoneyMarketBalance</DESC<BALTYPE> DOLLAR</BALTYPE<VALUE> 6304.6</VALUE<DTASOF> 20070405120000</DTASOF</BAL Is there any way to just completely eliminate the old security that Money was originally associating transactions for MMDA1 with so that when it sees transactions for MMDA1 now it will let me specify the new money market security that i created and gave the MMDA1 symbol to? |
|
#21
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Jonathan Altman wrote: - quote - > Thanks for your continued help on this issue. We've gotten technical enough
search on the number of shares. The position information will be> that I'm not completely sure I'm answering your questions correctly here, but > after looking at the OFX log, i think (although i'm not sure) that the MMDA > security is being treated as a stock. I couldn't actually find anything that > looked like either of the examples you gave (i saw the a bunch of code that > looked like what you wrote out, but it all pertained to the other securities > in my account), but the reason i think it's being treated as a stock is that > i couldn't find any use of MFINFO (or MF anything for that matter); the only > place where money fund information showed up was in a section that read: > <BAL> <NAME> MoneyMarketBalance</NAME> <DESC> MoneyMarketBalance</DESC> <BALTYPE> DOLLAR</BALTYPE> <VALUE> 6304.6</VALUE> <DTASOF> 20070405120000</DTASOF> </BAL Look again at the section between <POSLIST> and </POSLIST> , and surrounded by a <POSSTOCK> </POSSTOCK> pair, or a <POSMF> </POSMFpair (or something else). What set of tags is used? - quote - > I'm happy to include the full OFX log if that's helpful, although i'm a > little sensitive to posting personal information like that to a public > bulletin board. Please let me know if this is sufficient information or if > there are any other steps you'd like me to take. |
|
#20
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Jonathan Altman wrote: - quote - > > The method 2 is to not have any transactions for the MMF in the
While I agree, the difference is not all that great to me.> > register. Just let the cash balance represent the swept funds. > Got it. I think i'd prefer not to do this - showing the buys/sells is more > accurate. - quote - > I'll try what you suggest below...although we're getting pretty
Thanks. If it helps, I see this being useful to others.> technical here...is there no way to just permanently remove the old stock > altogether and permanently, rather than try to trick Money into "forgetting" > it? - quote - > Also, in light of the process you describe, will i be able to change the
That would be done individually in the register entry.> AddShares to a Buy? Because even if I get the transaction to correctly > associate itself with the new MMDA security, i want it to Buy, not Add so > that my cash balance is accurate. - quote - > > Ideally you would get that other real MMF. I don't know how
Submitted "other" for "real". I think the difference has to do with> > important you are to TDA, but you might be surprised. > Worth noting here, for Ameritrade users, that I'm pretty sure the MMDA is in > fact a "real" MMF. Why they choose to call it an MMDA i have no idea, but i > think this issue has to do with how the security is being treated by Money > rather than how it is treated by the financial community (SIPC, FDIC, etc.) how they enter the data into the OFX, and I think that is close to your statement. Money follows the OFX. |
|
#19
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > The method 2 is to not have any transactions for the MMF in the
Got it. I think i'd prefer not to do this - showing the buys/sells is more> register. Just let the cash balance represent the swept funds. accurate. I'll try what you suggest below...although we're getting pretty technical here...is there no way to just permanently remove the old stock altogether and permanently, rather than try to trick Money into "forgetting" it? Also, in light of the process you describe, will i be able to change the AddShares to a Buy? Because even if I get the transaction to correctly associate itself with the new MMDA security, i want it to Buy, not Add so that my cash balance is accurate. - quote - > Ideally you would get that other real MMF. I don't know how
Worth noting here, for Ameritrade users, that I'm pretty sure the MMDA is in> important you are to TDA, but you might be surprised. fact a "real" MMF. Why they choose to call it an MMDA i have no idea, but i think this issue has to do with how the security is being treated by Money rather than how it is treated by the financial community (SIPC, FDIC, etc.) |
|
#18
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Jonathan Altman wrote: - quote - > Can you remind me how to do the other kind of sweep (we've exchanged enough
Sorry about the magnitude of it all.> messages here that i'm no longer sure). - quote - > To answer your questions:
The method 2 is to not have any transactions for the MMF in the> -If i were to accept the add shares transaction that Money wants to create, > i would effectively be double-counting since i would have both teh cash > balance and the add shares, but no purchase of MMDA shares (and hence no > reduction in cash balance). I avoided this by voiding the add shares > transaction before it ever got entered and then setting up a purchase > transaction. But I'd like to avoid having to do this every time there's a > cash deposit followed by an MMDA sweep. register. Just let the cash balance represent the swept funds. - quote - > Ideally I'd just like Money to
Ideally you would get that other real MMF. I don't know how> recognize the add shares as a purchase instead of an add shares. Anything i > can pull from the OFX to provide you information on how to change this? > -I did confirm that Money thinks the security it is working with here is a > stock by looking at the details. I don't know how or why it did this, but as > i said before, it seems to have resurrected the security that i deleted (it > didn't ask me to define the security that it wanted to add shares of, even > though in theory that security no longer exists in money and its ticker has > been assigned to the new security i created). important you are to TDA, but you might be surprised. OK. Here is the method that I *hope* will make any AddShares be for an MMF. It is still going to be less than ideal I think. Make sure of your backup situation, in case you want to undo something. The plan is that you make Money associate that "stock" with something else with a different (fake) CUSIP. Then when Money want to add shares of something next it will not remember what the CUSIP was associated with. It will ask if that something is already in your file under a different name. You will then say it is really the MMF that you have created. Based on what you have posted regarding your OFX file, there is nothing observed to tie the position to a stock rather than an MMF. Disassociate Stock from Money Download The purpose of this is disassociate a security from the download process. The problem this cures is that Money associates downloaded stock by CUSIP. Renaming and/or changing the symbol is not sufficient to appear as a different security. Create dis_sk.ofx by cutting and pasting the portions between the Begin and End lines (below) into a file named dis_sk.ofx. I suggest making an extra copy of your Money file as a precaution. File-> Import dis_sk.ofx into Money Select the appropriate Account from the list. Select the institution as the actual institution that holds the account. You should get the "You have n statements to read" screen. The account you just imported into should show the name account name followed by (1). Click that name. You should get the pop-up that says "Money found the following investment in your brokerage statement:". Select "This investment is already in my investment portfolio with a different name. I use the following investment in my investment portfolio to track this investment:". From the drop-down list, choose the stock you are trying to get rid of. Click Next. When you get the "Are you sure xxxxx is the same investment as yyyy?", click Yes. If you get the screen that says "Do you want to change the ticker symbol for xxxx in Money from yyyy to zzzz to match the statement, I suggest you click Yes. Get the screen that says "The positions reported on nn/nn/nn statement don't match those in you Money account. Do you want to update your account to match the statement?". I would select No, but it is up to you. Click Finish. Now download from your broker for real. Feel free to suggest improvements to this procedure. ========================Begin dis_sk.ofx======================== OFXHEADER:100 DATA:OFXSGML VERSION:102 SECURITY:NONE ENCODING:USASCII CHARSET:1252 COMPRESSION:NONE OLDFILEUID:NONE NEWFILEUID:NONE <OFX<SIGNONMSGSRSV1 <SONRS<STATUS<CODE> 0 <SEVERITY> INFO <MESSAGE> SUCCESS </STATUS<DTSERVER> 20040302 <LANGUAGE> ENG <DTPROFUP> 20030403 <DTACCTUP> 20040201 </SONRS> </SIGNONMSGSRSV1<INVSTMTMSGSRSV1 <INVSTMTTRNRS<TRNUID> ZzzzA1 <STATUS<CODE> 0 <SEVERITY> INFO <MESSAGE> Success so far with stock modification of symbol and CUSIP </STATUS <INVSTMTRS<DTASOF> 20040221 <CURDEF> USD <INVACCTFROM<BROKERID> YourBrokerOrZzzzA2 <ACCTID> YourAccountOrZzzzA3 </INVACCTFROM <INVPOSLIST <POSSTOCK<INVPOS<SECID<UNIQUEID> ZzzzA4 <UNIQUEIDTYPE> CUSIP </SECID<HELDINACCT> CASH <POSTYPE> LONG <UNITS> 0.0000 <UNITPRICE> 42.840 <MKTVAL> 0.000 <DTPRICEASOF> 20041102000000.000[-5:EST] </INVPOS</POSSTOCK </INVPOSLIST </INVSTMTRS</INVSTMTTRNRS</INVSTMTMSGSRSV1 <SECLISTMSGSRSV1<SECLIST <STOCKINFO<SECINFO<SECID<UNIQUEID> ZzzzA4 <UNIQUEIDTYPE> CUSIP </SECID<SECNAME> ZzzzA4 Dissassocated stock <TICKER> ZzzzA </SECINFO</STOCKINFO </SECLIST</SECLISTMSGSRSV1</OFX =========================END dis_sk.ofx ======================== Note. If you re-use this proceure on the same file, you will probably need to change all occurances of Zzzz to a different string. |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > If you were to always select to not have Money adjust your positions > during download processing, I think you could use what I described > as method 2: swept funds are just implied by the cash balance in the > cash transactions register. You would do that continually. If you > ever forgot, then you could just delete/void any AddShares or > RemoveShares that are generated. With the AddShares in place, is > Money double-counting the value of your cash holdings somehow? > There is a way that I think should disassociate that position data > from old. The hope would be then that the AddShares and RemoveShares > generated were at least for a proper MMF type. Can you confirm that > Money thinks this is a stock by right-clicking one of those > AddShares and looking at the details? > The need would become moot if you were switched to the other type of > sweep. Even then, it would be nice to continue to define the > solution for the almost-a-MMF sweep. Can you remind me how to do the other kind of sweep (we've exchanged enough messages here that i'm no longer sure). To answer your questions: -If i were to accept the add shares transaction that Money wants to create, i would effectively be double-counting since i would have both teh cash balance and the add shares, but no purchase of MMDA shares (and hence no reduction in cash balance). I avoided this by voiding the add shares transaction before it ever got entered and then setting up a purchase transaction. But I'd like to avoid having to do this every time there's a cash deposit followed by an MMDA sweep. Ideally I'd just like Money to recognize the add shares as a purchase instead of an add shares. Anything i can pull from the OFX to provide you information on how to change this? -I did confirm that Money thinks the security it is working with here is a stock by looking at the details. I don't know how or why it did this, but as i said before, it seems to have resurrected the security that i deleted (it didn't ask me to define the security that it wanted to add shares of, even though in theory that security no longer exists in money and its ticker has been assigned to the new security i created). - quote - > To collect a log of the OFX download continually, see
I'll look at this and set it up if there are particular things you'd like me> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/911941/en-us. Use the method where > you use the Provlogs.reg file. ot pull from the OFX log. |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Jonathan Altman wrote: - quote - > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote:
If you were to always select to not have Money adjust your positions> > In microsoft.public.money, Jonathan Altman wrote: > > > > What i ended up doing with the TD Ameritrade issue was just going back and > > > manually creating duplicates of all of the MMDA transactions but coded as a > > > new money market security. I then deleted the original transactions, deleted > > > the original MMDA security entirely and changed the symbol on the manually > > > created security to MMDA1 (the symbol that had previously been used by the > > > electronically generated money market fund which had erroneously been coded > > > as a stock (or so we think)). I haven't yet had any new transactions to > > > download, but my hope is that since i changed the security's symbol to match > > > the one that had been created, everything will work smoothly. I'll let you > > > know if that's not the case for any reason. > > > OK. I am curious if you do get such entries. > Unfortunately this didn't work as planned. I've now had a new MMDA > transaction download and somehow what occurred is that rather than > identifying the MMDA security that i created, Money somehow resurrected the > old MMDA security that i had deleted. Furthermore, rather than treating the > purchase of the MMDA (as a result of sweeping some dividend income) as a > "buy", Money treated it as an "add shares." So two problems here: i) Money is > adding, not buying and ii) it's adding shares of the old (i thought no longer > existant) security which is a stock, not a money market fund. Please let me > know how to fix this as it's going to be a major annoyance for all future > Ameritrade MMDA transactions (which happen a lot as a result of dividend > sweeping). during download processing, I think you could use what I described as method 2: swept funds are just implied by the cash balance in the cash transactions register. You would do that continually. If you ever forgot, then you could just delete/void any AddShares or RemoveShares that are generated. With the AddShares in place, is Money double-counting the value of your cash holdings somehow? There is a way that I think should disassociate that position data from old. The hope would be then that the AddShares and RemoveShares generated were at least for a proper MMF type. Can you confirm that Money thinks this is a stock by right-clicking one of those AddShares and looking at the details? The need would become moot if you were switched to the other type of sweep. Even then, it would be nice to continue to define the solution for the almost-a-MMF sweep. - quote - > > > I would set leave that registry setting set so that you collect
To collect a log of the OFX download continually, see> > logs. You may never need to use them, but if you have a lot of free > > disk space, it can be of use. The downside is that it would clutter > > up the folder where you have your .mny file. So you could > > discontinue the logging if that is a bother. > > I'm not sure i understand how to do this. I created the logs that i was > working with before by holding control-shift during an update process. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/911941/en-us. Use the method where you use the Provlogs.reg file. <snip |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, Jonathan Altman wrote:
Unfortunately this didn't work as planned. I've now had a new MMDA> > What i ended up doing with the TD Ameritrade issue was just going back and > > manually creating duplicates of all of the MMDA transactions but coded as a > > new money market security. I then deleted the original transactions, deleted > > the original MMDA security entirely and changed the symbol on the manually > > created security to MMDA1 (the symbol that had previously been used by the > > electronically generated money market fund which had erroneously been coded > > as a stock (or so we think)). I haven't yet had any new transactions to > > download, but my hope is that since i changed the security's symbol to match > > the one that had been created, everything will work smoothly. I'll let you > > know if that's not the case for any reason. > OK. I am curious if you do get such entries. transaction download and somehow what occurred is that rather than identifying the MMDA security that i created, Money somehow resurrected the old MMDA security that i had deleted. Furthermore, rather than treating the purchase of the MMDA (as a result of sweeping some dividend income) as a "buy", Money treated it as an "add shares." So two problems here: i) Money is adding, not buying and ii) it's adding shares of the old (i thought no longer existant) security which is a stock, not a money market fund. Please let me know how to fix this as it's going to be a major annoyance for all future Ameritrade MMDA transactions (which happen a lot as a result of dividend sweeping). - quote - > I would set leave that registry setting set so that you collect
I'm not sure i understand how to do this. I created the logs that i was> logs. You may never need to use them, but if you have a lot of free > disk space, it can be of use. The downside is that it would clutter > up the folder where you have your .mny file. So you could > discontinue the logging if that is a bother. working with before by holding control-shift during an update process. - quote - > > > I'm not sure i understand all of the nuances of difference betweeen the 3 > > money market fund treatments you outlined in your message, but if this all > > works once i start downloading i'll be content with the set up i have. > No need to follow that. The main point is that there is more than > one right way. > > > Last question on this topic (at least for now), then is: you mentioned that > > Ameritrade might offer a fund that would both pay higher interest and work > > better with Money. Any idea what to ask for if i were to call client services? > You could ask for a "different" MMF, but I think it would be the > "institutional" one, if you get it. You would probably want to wait > until the problem crops up again. Perhaps you will only get a single > transaction for interest or dividend per month now. > > > Thanks for all the help on this so far. I have a some other questions on > > other issues, but i'll post them as separate strings to keep things organized. |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| the computer i use for microsoft money is different from the one i have at my office, so i'll have to go through this process over the weekend. i'll post something once i've had a chance to go through the steps you've outlined. |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Jonathan Altman wrote: - quote - > I don't understand what you mean when you say you're not dealing with that.
The former. I meant that I am not currently in the same boat. I have> Are you saying you don't encounter the same issue or you're no longer > attempting at address this issue by posting responses? experience with very similar things, but I am not using that sweep at TDA, so I am not currently dealing with that particular problem. So I am not in the position of successfully or unsuccessfully dealing with that same issue. - quote - > I only referenced the
OK. That's clear. It's a good paradigm to include the BUYs and> prior conversation because it is an issue that every Ameritrade user has > encountered if they had an account prior to last September and kept it open > once Ameritrade put a money market account in place. I'd certainly appreciate > any help you can provide in sorting this out as it would make my account > tracking in Money much more user-friendly and accurate. Please let me know > how i can help in describing the problem and working towards a solution. > Apologies if the description below is overly basic or in any way unclear, i'm > just trying to be as accurate and detailed as possible. Happy to clarify as > necessary. > What happens, mechanically, is that every time there is a deposit to cash > (dividend, etc.) there is a transaction downloaded which increases the cash > balance. There is then a second transaction showing a purchase of the MMDA > security (money market fund, sweep account, whatever we want to call it) > which obviously reduces the cash balance by the same amount. SELLs. The biggest downside that I see of having that fund as a stock would largely be a whole lot of bogus schedule D entries. You could minimize the other downsides by manually setting the price to $1 if it was not already that way. See below. - quote - > Per your earlier
What I would like to see is how that fund is currently described in> responses to this message string, ideally i'd like to code the money market > account as a money market account, instead of a stock (which is what it is > currently set to be - this was the default and i didn't catch it beforehand). > I'm running into two problems there, though: > 1) I can't change the type of security once it's set. I'd be happy to delete > the MMDA investment and manually recreate all of the relevant transactions, > but before i do that, i want to understand how to deal with the following: > 2) I have a long series of cash transactions in this account prior to the > date when Ameritrade instituted a money market sweep account. Given this I'm > not sure how to avoid confusion between the true cash account and the sweep > account. > Finally, since any future downloads are likely to consist of this > multiple-transaction structure (dividend deposited to cash, cash used to buy > money market security), how do i ensure that whatever i set up with work > appropriately with these downloads. the OFX download. If it is describe as a stock, and if the transactions are represented as <BUYSTOCK> and <SELLSTOCK> rather than <BUYSMF> and <SELLMF> , it may not be possible to simply change that over. There still could be a happy outcome, but let's check the details. To collect a log of the OFX download, see http://support.microsoft.com/kb/911941/en-us. With Money 2004, I think you can use the method described at the top as well as the simpler method shown for Money 2001 and earlier at the bottom. Then edit that log file with a text editor such as Notepad. Find the description of the security in question near the bottom of the file. Here are two examples: ================A MoneyFund================================= <MFINFO<SECINFO<SECID<UNIQUEID> 941550105 <UNIQUEIDTYPE> CUSIP </SECID<SECNAME> (CMFMZ) TDAM MONEY MARKET PORTFOLIO (SWEEP) <TICKER> CMFMZ </SECINFO</MFINFO=====================A Stock================================== <STOCKINFO<SECINFO<SECID<UNIQUEID> 594918104 <UNIQUEIDTYPE> CUSIP </SECID<SECNAME> MICROSOFT CORP <TICKER> MSFT </SECINFO</STOCKINFO ================================================== ============= Figure out whether that security is currently downloaded as a stock or as a fund. "MF" does double duty, and applies to Money Funds and Mutual Funds. Note that if you had transactions of the first example, each transaction would contain this line: <UNIQUEID> 941550105 It is the UNIQUEID that ties together the transactions with the descriptions. Based on what you are seeing, we can discuss a potential solution. - quote - > Thanks |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| I don't understand what you mean when you say you're not dealing with that. Are you saying you don't encounter the same issue or you're no longer attempting at address this issue by posting responses? I only referenced the prior conversation because it is an issue that every Ameritrade user has encountered if they had an account prior to last September and kept it open once Ameritrade put a money market account in place. I'd certainly appreciate any help you can provide in sorting this out as it would make my account tracking in Money much more user-friendly and accurate. Please let me know how i can help in describing the problem and working towards a solution. Apologies if the description below is overly basic or in any way unclear, i'm just trying to be as accurate and detailed as possible. Happy to clarify as necessary. What happens, mechanically, is that every time there is a deposit to cash (dividend, etc.) there is a transaction downloaded which increases the cash balance. There is then a second transaction showing a purchase of the MMDA security (money market fund, sweep account, whatever we want to call it) which obviously reduces the cash balance by the same amount. Per your earlier responses to this message string, ideally i'd like to code the money market account as a money market account, instead of a stock (which is what it is currently set to be - this was the default and i didn't catch it beforehand). I'm running into two problems there, though: 1) I can't change the type of security once it's set. I'd be happy to delete the MMDA investment and manually recreate all of the relevant transactions, but before i do that, i want to understand how to deal with the following: 2) I have a long series of cash transactions in this account prior to the date when Ameritrade instituted a money market sweep account. Given this I'm not sure how to avoid confusion between the true cash account and the sweep account. Finally, since any future downloads are likely to consist of this multiple-transaction structure (dividend deposited to cash, cash used to buy money market security), how do i ensure that whatever i set up with work appropriately with these downloads. Thanks |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Jonathan Altman <Jonathan Altman[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: - quote - > I'm several months behind here. I also have Ameritrade and money 2004 and
I am not dealing with that, but I am wondering what the current> have been wrestling with the same issue on the MMDA/MMF (they're the same > thing, it's just semantics). When i initially downloaded the MMDA > transactions, Money treated the MMDA as a stock. I can't seem to change the > investment type to money market, so i'm not sure how to fix this. Gregg (or > others), i'm curious how you handled this, especially since i have a lot of > cash transactions that predate the creation of the MMDA account. What's the > best solution? situation is. What do you download today from TD Ameritrade regarding your sweep account? Are there transactions downloaded each time you have a dividend etc? Or is there some kind of monthly transaction downloaded? What kind of transactions? |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| I'm several months behind here. I also have Ameritrade and money 2004 and have been wrestling with the same issue on the MMDA/MMF (they're the same thing, it's just semantics). When i initially downloaded the MMDA transactions, Money treated the MMDA as a stock. I can't seem to change the investment type to money market, so i'm not sure how to fix this. Gregg (or others), i'm curious how you handled this, especially since i have a lot of cash transactions that predate the creation of the MMDA account. What's the best solution? "GreggC" wrote: - quote - > Thanks Chris, you're reply makes a lot of sense, I think I'll take your > advise and leave the switch to an MMDA as a cash account > "Chris Cowles" wrote: > > Regardless of all the banter about what a MMDA is and if/how it differs > > from a MMF, I'd just ignore the transactions. In Money, just leave the > > cash/mmf/mmda balance in the Cash account. When/if you get earnings from > > the cash/mmda/mmf account, they'll just get deposited. > > > If you choose not to ignore the sweep transactions, every time you make a > > transaction in the account, you'll have to buy or sell the cash/mmda/mmf > > holdings first, then use the proceeds for the transaction that instigated > > the trade. > > > If you ignore the sweep transactions, earnings > > (dividends/interest/whatever) will deposit into your Cash account in Money. > > You'll show the total income in your portfolio views, but not as a rate of > > return. I do that for my Fidelity accounts. Dividends on FDRXX are > > deposited, but buys and sells are not. (That's how Fidelity transaction > > downloads work, as well.) > > > If you're not so obsessed with whether your 'cash' is actually in cash or > > the funds you describe, it works fine. If you really want Money to show the > > balance in MMDA shares vs cash, you have to do a lot of work. To me, > > there's little value in doing so. > > -- > > Chris Cowles > > Gainesville, FL > > > > "GreggC" <GreggC[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > > news:0D28E613-56CA-45A2-BE69-DE0BF288463E[at]microsoft.com... > > > As per TD Ameritrade: > > > > > What is a Money Market Deposit Account (MMDA)? > > > |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Thanks Chris, you're reply makes a lot of sense, I think I'll take your advise and leave the switch to an MMDA as a cash account "Chris Cowles" wrote: - quote - > Regardless of all the banter about what a MMDA is and if/how it differs > from a MMF, I'd just ignore the transactions. In Money, just leave the > cash/mmf/mmda balance in the Cash account. When/if you get earnings from > the cash/mmda/mmf account, they'll just get deposited. > If you choose not to ignore the sweep transactions, every time you make a > transaction in the account, you'll have to buy or sell the cash/mmda/mmf > holdings first, then use the proceeds for the transaction that instigated > the trade. > If you ignore the sweep transactions, earnings > (dividends/interest/whatever) will deposit into your Cash account in Money. > You'll show the total income in your portfolio views, but not as a rate of > return. I do that for my Fidelity accounts. Dividends on FDRXX are > deposited, but buys and sells are not. (That's how Fidelity transaction > downloads work, as well.) > If you're not so obsessed with whether your 'cash' is actually in cash or > the funds you describe, it works fine. If you really want Money to show the > balance in MMDA shares vs cash, you have to do a lot of work. To me, > there's little value in doing so. > -- > Chris Cowles > Gainesville, FL > "GreggC" <GreggC[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:0D28E613-56CA-45A2-BE69-DE0BF288463E[at]microsoft.com... > > As per TD Ameritrade: > > > What is a Money Market Deposit Account (MMDA)? |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Regardless of all the banter about what a MMDA is and if/how it differs from a MMF, I'd just ignore the transactions. In Money, just leave the cash/mmf/mmda balance in the Cash account. When/if you get earnings from the cash/mmda/mmf account, they'll just get deposited. If you choose not to ignore the sweep transactions, every time you make a transaction in the account, you'll have to buy or sell the cash/mmda/mmf holdings first, then use the proceeds for the transaction that instigated the trade. If you ignore the sweep transactions, earnings (dividends/interest/whatever) will deposit into your Cash account in Money. You'll show the total income in your portfolio views, but not as a rate of return. I do that for my Fidelity accounts. Dividends on FDRXX are deposited, but buys and sells are not. (That's how Fidelity transaction downloads work, as well.) If you're not so obsessed with whether your 'cash' is actually in cash or the funds you describe, it works fine. If you really want Money to show the balance in MMDA shares vs cash, you have to do a lot of work. To me, there's little value in doing so. -- Chris Cowles Gainesville, FL "GreggC" <GreggC[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:0D28E613-56CA-45A2-BE69-DE0BF288463E[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > As per TD Ameritrade: > What is a Money Market Deposit Account (MMDA)? |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, GreggC wrote: - quote - > As per TD Ameritrade: http://www.investorwords.com/5665/mo...t_account.html> What is a Money Market Deposit Account (MMDA)? has a definition also. Good luck. - quote - > A Money Market Deposit Account (MMDA) is a cash sweep vehicle that earns > equal or greater interest on cash balances than it otherwise would in a > brokerage account when the money is not currently invested in securities. > Learn more about interest rates for Money Market Deposit Accounts. > If you have an MMDA, the available cash balance in your brokerage account is > automatically moved, or swept, into this account each day where it earns > interest at an equal or higher rate than it would in a TD AMERITRADE > brokerage account. The cash is automatically moved back into your brokerage > account when you place an order or request a withdrawal. > Balance information for an MMDA will appear in the Balance and Positions > area of the Web site. It will also appear on your monthly statement under the > heading Money Market Deposit Account Activity. > Balances in a Money Market Deposit Account is held at TD Bank USA, N.A., an > affiliate of TD AMERITRADE, where it is protected by The Federal Deposit > Insurance Corporation(FDIC) for up to $100,000 in non-retirement accounts and > up to $250,000 for IRAs and certain other retirement accounts.* > The FDIC insures money based on the account owner, not the individual > account. This means that if you have more than one account at TD Bank > (including certificates of deposit) the FDIC covers the combined value of > these accounts. If you hold an MMDA, please make sure you know the extent of > your FDIC coverage and that you monitor your entire deposit at TD Bank, > including the money held in the MMDA, to make sure it does not exceed that > limit. > Cash held in an MMDA is part of your buying power, which means you can use > it any time to place an order for a security you intend to hold overnight. > However, the balance in an MMDA is not included in day trade buying power, > which means it can't be used to purchase securities you intend to sell that > same day. If your account gets flagged as a pattern day trader, cash you hold > in an MMDA will be automatically moved into TD AMERITRADE Cash. Learn more > about how pattern day trader accounts are flagged. > The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insures > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > In microsoft.public.money, GreggC wrote: > > > > Cal - My apologies for the lack of clarity. I had used "money market deposit > > > account" as the subject line. I had assumed any readers would make the > > > connection to MMDA. > > > Then take the opportunity to be clear. Are you using that term to > > make a distinction from a MMF? > > > The term "Money market deposit account" doesn't come up very often. > > > > > > > > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > > > > > In microsoft.public.money, GreggC wrote: > > > > > > > > TD Ameritrade has opened an MMDA for me and moved all the cash previously > > > > > held by them for trading into this account. The balance in this account will > > > > > earn interest or dividends. > > > > > > > > > How do I best handle this change in MM04 > > > > > > > I assume that what you call MMDA is what most people call a Money > > > > Market Fund -- MMF. If you don't mean that, say so. You can do that > > > > at Portfolio-> AddAnInvestment. If you do that, enter 0 for the > > > > quantity. > > > > > > > If you have not yet downloaded transactions that involve the MMF, > > > > then first create the Money Market investment in Money 2004 before > > > > you download. > > > > > > > If you have already defined this security via download or otherwise, > > > > check in the investment Details to confirm it is set up as > > > > InvestmentType:MoneyMarket. If it is set up as a mutual fund, I > > > > suggest some action. If you can readily restore to a point before > > > > that security was defined, do so. Otherwise check back for a > > > > potential fix. > > > > > > > I suggest you set up the account for online access from Money. > > > > Download the transactions, and see what you get. You may need to do > > > > something initially, but it should work nicely thereafter. Expect > > > > there to be an initial Buy of the MMF. Then expect Buy and Sell > > > > transactions of the fund. The cash account will contain $0 except > > > > when there are trades yet to be settled. That makes it very handy to > > > > recognize when the balance is off. > > > > > > > If, on the other hand, you are against downloading, say so. > > > > > > > |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| As per TD Ameritrade: What is a Money Market Deposit Account (MMDA)? A Money Market Deposit Account (MMDA) is a cash sweep vehicle that earns equal or greater interest on cash balances than it otherwise would in a brokerage account when the money is not currently invested in securities. Learn more about interest rates for Money Market Deposit Accounts. If you have an MMDA, the available cash balance in your brokerage account is automatically moved, or swept, into this account each day where it earns interest at an equal or higher rate than it would in a TD AMERITRADE brokerage account. The cash is automatically moved back into your brokerage account when you place an order or request a withdrawal. Balance information for an MMDA will appear in the Balance and Positions area of the Web site. It will also appear on your monthly statement under the heading Money Market Deposit Account Activity. Balances in a Money Market Deposit Account is held at TD Bank USA, N.A., an affiliate of TD AMERITRADE, where it is protected by The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation(FDIC) for up to $100,000 in non-retirement accounts and up to $250,000 for IRAs and certain other retirement accounts.* The FDIC insures money based on the account owner, not the individual account. This means that if you have more than one account at TD Bank (including certificates of deposit) the FDIC covers the combined value of these accounts. If you hold an MMDA, please make sure you know the extent of your FDIC coverage and that you monitor your entire deposit at TD Bank, including the money held in the MMDA, to make sure it does not exceed that limit. Cash held in an MMDA is part of your buying power, which means you can use it any time to place an order for a security you intend to hold overnight. However, the balance in an MMDA is not included in day trade buying power, which means it can't be used to purchase securities you intend to sell that same day. If your account gets flagged as a pattern day trader, cash you hold in an MMDA will be automatically moved into TD AMERITRADE Cash. Learn more about how pattern day trader accounts are flagged. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insures "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, GreggC wrote: > > Cal - My apologies for the lack of clarity. I had used "money market deposit > > account" as the subject line. I had assumed any readers would make the > > connection to MMDA. > Then take the opportunity to be clear. Are you using that term to > make a distinction from a MMF? > The term "Money market deposit account" doesn't come up very often. > > > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > > > In microsoft.public.money, GreggC wrote: > > > > > > TD Ameritrade has opened an MMDA for me and moved all the cash previously > > > > held by them for trading into this account. The balance in this account will > > > > earn interest or dividends. > > > > > > > How do I best handle this change in MM04 > > > > > I assume that what you call MMDA is what most people call a Money > > > Market Fund -- MMF. If you don't mean that, say so. You can do that > > > at Portfolio-> AddAnInvestment. If you do that, enter 0 for the > > > quantity. > > > > > If you have not yet downloaded transactions that involve the MMF, > > > then first create the Money Market investment in Money 2004 before > > > you download. > > > > > If you have already defined this security via download or otherwise, > > > check in the investment Details to confirm it is set up as > > > InvestmentType:MoneyMarket. If it is set up as a mutual fund, I > > > suggest some action. If you can readily restore to a point before > > > that security was defined, do so. Otherwise check back for a > > > potential fix. > > > > > I suggest you set up the account for online access from Money. > > > Download the transactions, and see what you get. You may need to do > > > something initially, but it should work nicely thereafter. Expect > > > there to be an initial Buy of the MMF. Then expect Buy and Sell > > > transactions of the fund. The cash account will contain $0 except > > > when there are trades yet to be settled. That makes it very handy to > > > recognize when the balance is off. > > > > > If, on the other hand, you are against downloading, say so. > > > > |
| Tags |
| account, deposit, market, money |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Tracking Money Market Account Interest Earned in Money 2002. JMI: Hello, I needed to know if there was a way for Money 2002 (version that shipped with Works 2002) to track the interest I earn on my Money Market... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 10-13-2006 12:14 PM | |
| Stock sale to Money Market in same investment account? Randy: Using Money 2005 Deluxe If I record a sale of a stock or fund, and the funds go directly to a money market account held at that same firm, there... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 07-19-2005 04:42 PM | |
| SYmbol for money market used in investment cash account Alan Holzhausen: My Fidelity Investments account has a cash account that uses a money market fund for the cash. When I downlaod from Fidelity now, I get a new... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 03-07-2004 09:21 PM | |
| How to set up a Term-deposit account Aru: Hi Does any one know "How to set up a Term-deposit account ? ". Should "Term deposit" (or Fix deposit) account regarded as "Bank account" or... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 12-30-2003 12:54 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |