|
#6
| |||
| |||
| File Repair failed for you? Can you explain more? I found that the Repair seemed to hang -- "not responding" -- and, after quite a while, Repair finished. Is that what you saw? I should mention that I concluded that I had data corruption and it disappared after moving to M07 -- Michael Gordon MVP "Rex B" <rex[at]wmautomotive.com> wrote in message news:12hqe4g4j75ct60[at]corp.supernews.com... - quote - > Dick Watson wrote: > > > > 3. Have you tried doing a "repair"? > > > I'm not familiar with that. > > > File|Repair has several repair methods, but I wouldn't expect miracles. > I found that, tried it, would not allow me to do it for reasons I don't > understand. > > > Were I you, I'd consider the Nuke-The-Bills method supplied in M07. My > > file had serious performance and stability issues under M06. Once A LOT > > of work for the aforementioned "repair" was completed under M07, I've had > > great improvements in both performance and stability. The method is not > > without its complications, but they may be worth it to you. See > > http://umpmfaq.info/faqdb.php?q=187. > I will take a look at that. > You didn't mention, IIRC, what edition > > you are using; > 2006 Deluxe > you might want to try this using the Deluxe trial version to > > see if it might be worth the change to M07. Note that I didn't say > > "upgrade". The prime reason I changed to M07 was the performance and > > stability benefits afforded by Nuke-The-Bills. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| I struggled with doing that for my 100+ bills. The gain was dramatic. Recreating the bills took about four hours using techniques--primarily the remote desktop use of one app so that I could have two versions on the same screen simultaneously to copy bill info from the pre-nuked M0x file to the post nuked M07 file. I've surely saved that much time that I would have spent watching Money think since I did it. I think the referenced item, and my prior post, speaks for itself as to the issues with going down this path. If the performance is enough of an issue to you, you might consider it, but suit yourself entirely. I'm just pointing out a choice you do have. One way to test is to just do the nuke then play with the file without adding any scheduled bills back in. Even in that state, the gain in performance I saw was immediate and readily apparent elsewhere in the application. "Rex B" <rex[at]wmautomotive.com> wrote in message news:12hqeenhism3r8d[at]corp.supernews.com... - quote - > Dick Watson wrote: > > Were I you, I'd consider the Nuke-The-Bills method supplied in M07. > That wipes out all the scheduled bills. > I'm not going to re-enter 400 recurring bills again. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Dick Watson wrote: - quote - > Were I you, I'd consider the Nuke-The-Bills method supplied in M07.
That wipes out all the scheduled bills.I'm not going to re-enter 400 recurring bills again. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Dick Watson wrote: - quote - > > > 3. Have you tried doing a "repair"?
I found that, tried it, would not allow me to do it for reasons I don't> > I'm not familiar with that. > File|Repair has several repair methods, but I wouldn't expect miracles. understand. - quote - > Were I you, I'd consider the Nuke-The-Bills method supplied in M07. My file
I will take a look at that.> had serious performance and stability issues under M06. Once A LOT of work > for the aforementioned "repair" was completed under M07, I've had great > improvements in both performance and stability. The method is not without > its complications, but they may be worth it to you. See > http://umpmfaq.info/faqdb.php?q=187. You didn't mention, IIRC, what edition - quote - > you are using;
2006 Deluxeyou might want to try this using the Deluxe trial version to - quote - > see if it might be worth the change to M07. Note that I didn't say > "upgrade". The prime reason I changed to M07 was the performance and > stability benefits afforded by Nuke-The-Bills. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Comments inline. "Rex B" <rex[at]wmautomotive.com> wrote in message news:12hqc8qh99fudf7[at]corp.supernews.com... - quote - > > 2. In what ways is your use "non-standard"?
That alone shouldn't be much of an issue.> 100+ checking accounts? - quote - > > 3. Have you tried doing a "repair"?
File|Repair has several repair methods, but I wouldn't expect miracles.> I'm not familiar with that. - quote - > I figured the number of bills scheduled might be an issue. Operations
Were I you, I'd consider the Nuke-The-Bills method supplied in M07. My file> there take quite a while to digest. For example, I can edit a scheduled > bill, hit save, then it takes about a minute before I can go on to the > next. had serious performance and stability issues under M06. Once A LOT of work for the aforementioned "repair" was completed under M07, I've had great improvements in both performance and stability. The method is not without its complications, but they may be worth it to you. See http://umpmfaq.info/faqdb.php?q=187. You didn't mention, IIRC, what edition you are using; you might want to try this using the Deluxe trial version to see if it might be worth the change to M07. Note that I didn't say "upgrade". The prime reason I changed to M07 was the performance and stability benefits afforded by Nuke-The-Bills. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Michael Gordon, MVP wrote: - quote - > Couple of questions:
It opens to the Accounts list> 1.What page opens when Money starts, Rex? There's stuff on the Home Page > that can slow things down. - quote - > 2. In what ways is your use "non-standard"?
100+ checking accounts?- quote - > 3. Have you tried doing a "repair"?
I'm not familiar with that.- quote - > In general, the number of open accounts is large, but I can't see what that
I figured the number of bills scheduled might be an issue. Operations> should be a problem. And the number of total transactions is really rather > modest. there take quite a while to digest. For example, I can edit a scheduled bill, hit save, then it takes about a minute before I can go on to the next. |
| | |||
| |||
| Couple of questions: 1.What page opens when Money starts, Rex? There's stuff on the Home Page that can slow things down. 2. In what ways is your use "non-standard"? 3. Have you tried doing a "repair"? In general, the number of open accounts is large, but I can't see what that should be a problem. And the number of total transactions is really rather modest. -- Michael Gordon MVP "Rex B" <rex[at]wmautomotive.com> wrote in message news:12ho3vf3jpqn2c4[at]corp.supernews.com... - quote - > I'm using MS Money 2006 in a non-standard way, and it's taking way too > long to load - approaching 30 minutes. Editing bills takes about 2 > minutes per saved change > Number of accounts is about 100 > Entries per account = 3 or 4 per month, or 40 per account per year. > History is currently at about 18 months on all accounts, so I probably > have 700 transactions total. Is that the problem? IF so, I don't think I > can do anything about it. > Each account has 3 scheduled monthly "bills" on autopay, and 1 "twice a > year" bill > Is there anything I can do to make this load faster - options I can > discontinue, changes in the way I'm doing things? > -- > - - > Rex Burkheimer > WM Automotive > Fort Worth TX |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I'm using MS Money 2006 in a non-standard way, and it's taking way too long to load - approaching 30 minutes. Editing bills takes about 2 minutes per saved change Number of accounts is about 100 Entries per account = 3 or 4 per month, or 40 per account per year. History is currently at about 18 months on all accounts, so I probably have 700 transactions total. Is that the problem? IF so, I don't think I can do anything about it. Each account has 3 scheduled monthly "bills" on autopay, and 1 "twice a year" bill Is there anything I can do to make this load faster - options I can discontinue, changes in the way I'm doing things? -- - - Rex Burkheimer WM Automotive Fort Worth TX |
| Tags |
| issues, speed |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| How do I speed up performance? Mike: Money is taking forever to open... and use. I have tried archiving, but that doesn't seem to help, and it doesn't make the MNY datafile any... | Microsoft Money | 14 | 04-03-2006 07:12 AM | |
| Can I speed up Money by... Brian: I'm using Money 05. I read before that one of the reasons Money is slow is because of all the historical stock information. Is there a way to delete... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 10-21-2005 01:28 AM | |
| Money '03 D&B Archiving and Speed Jerry: After 6 months of daily receipts and payables, my Dell 2650 1.3Ghz laptop w/356Mb RAM takes 10-15 secs per entry. Once past login, W2000 Pro Task... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 07-13-2003 12:02 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |