|
#2
| |||
| |||
| I think there are lots of users (5%? 50%? 95%?) who are willing/want to do the full drill but who have a hard time getting to the Light Bulb Moment where they start to understand what's going on. I guess those are the ones I like helping most. Sometimes I get success. Much more rewarding than taking on yet another "My Downloaded Data Is Garbage And It's All Money's Fault" question. My $100 is ready too. Alas, nobody seems to want to take it. "Steve" <sjcohen730[at]aol.com> wrote in message news:1155082701.031881.324710[at]m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com... - quote - > Let's hope somewhere in the future the base Money product with > its good intentions is updated to fix the bugs and then sold to us > financial types who want to manage our money accurately. I'd even pay > $100 a year for a good updated program. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Dick Watson wrote: - quote - > You have hit upon two issues, both relevant to your understanding how Money
You have again done a wonderful job of explaining in detail how> and accounting work. Dick, Money CAN handle transactions. I do hope that Chris understands it all. Unfortunately, I believe most readers of this response will throw up their hands and say "I don't understand it". That is probably why Money is continually "dumbing down the product". I was an accountant until I retired so, of course, I know exactly what you are saying. I probably couldn't have said it better. But the real problem is that there are probably only 10% of Money users who really use the product as it was intended, or use only certain parts. Then they make wrong decisions and screw up their file. We hear all the complaints here. Let's hope somewhere in the future the base Money product with its good intentions is updated to fix the bugs and then sold to us financial types who want to manage our money accurately. I'd even pay $100 a year for a good updated program. Steve |
| | |||
| |||
| You have hit upon two issues, both relevant to your understanding how Money and accounting work. Take your car payment case. You have, apparently, setup the car loan as just a liability account, not a "Loan" type of liability account. You are expecting the loan payments (note that Money has a special type of "category" called Loan Payment that goes with Loan accounts; I infer this is not what you are using) to show up in, say, spending and expense reports but not twice. You are entering two Automobile:Car Payment transactions and the spending reports think this is either twice what you think you are spending or adds them up as an expense (in the Checking account) and an income (in the Liability account, reducing the liability) that net to $0. That's because you entered two transactions. So you are on the right track in your understanding. You are also on the right track re. a Transfer that moves money from the Checking account to the car loan Liability account. That's the general direction you want to go. Indeed, that's what the Money "special category" Transfer:[name of Money account] transaction is for--moving money from one of your accounts to the other. In general, Transfer is for cases that are "net worth neutral" to you like moving money from your left pocket to your right pocket. This is just such a case. But you ask: where'd the spending go? The transfer doesn't show up on Spending/Expense kinds of reports. The reason it doesn't is because the payment is (in general--another detail coming shortly) "net worth neutral." You have a stack of cash. (Say $10,000.) You have a liability hole. (Say -$5,000) You move money from the cash stack to the liability hole. (Say $500). The two stacks still add up to the same amount. (Say $10,000 + -$5,000 = $5,000 before and $9,500 + -$4,500 = $5,000 after.) That's "net worth neutral". Thus, the car payment wasn't spending. You are no worse off than you were before. So, when did you spend on the car? The day you bought it. But there is one expense associated with the payment you may not be tracking: the interest expense. Say your $500 payment is really $400 of principal reduction and $100 of Interest:Auto Loan Interest. It's not entirely net worth neutral now. The balance only declines by $400 and there needs to be, somewhere, the $100 of Interest:Auto Loan Interest expense. ($10,000 + -$5,000 = $5,000 before and $9,500 + -$4,600 = $4,900 after with -$100 of Interest:Auto Loan Interest .) So, how to account for the interest? Two possible ways from where you are and a third, maybe better, way. Way 1: just transfer the whole payment amount and, when you get the loan statement telling you how much interest they took out of the payment, put an Interest:Auto Loan Interest expense transaction in the account you have for the loan. This will bring it's liability balance back up (done) to how much you still owe. This is also how you should handle, say, credit cards. Way 2: if, say, your payment coupons list the interest amount, split the checking transaction of, say $500 into two parts, first a $400 transfer:[name of car loan account] and second a $100 Interest:Auto Loan Interest expense. Way 3 (how Money was intended to support this kinda stuff): Money has a type of liability account called a Loan Account. Loan accounts are setup with you specifying the amount of the loan, the length of the loan in number and frequency of payments, the category you want to use for the interest expense, and the total amount of the payment. (You can get all of this from the loan paperwork you signed.) From that, Money can figure out the approximate interest rate--the ways of calculating this vary slightly--and setup a scheduled "Loan Payment" special category transaction in Bills Summary for you. The cool thing about the Loan Payment "special category" transaction is that it automatically calculates the interest expense component in the transaction when you enter it and transfers the remaining portion of the payment to the loan account. One step. All neat and clean. The advantage to the scheme of accounting that recognizes the car payment expense at the point of purchase and the interest expense along the way as you make the payments is it separates the original decision to spend money on the car from the ongoing decision--forced when you took the loan--to spend money on the interest. This is a powerful tool to separate what you need to spend money on, say the car, from what you ELECTED to spend money on, say the interest expense. See if this makes sense and post back with questions. "chris" <chris[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:4B5932D6-32C8-4C66-9AF2-31CF27DFB56B[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > Actually, I have two issues, but I think they are related. > I am a little confused on entering transactions that "cross" accounts. I > realize I can either enter two seperate transactions or enter one Transfer. > However, in both cases I seem to have report issues. > As an example, > To show a payment to my car loan from my checking account, I either: > 1. Make one entry in my Checking account > 2. Make an entry in the Car Loan > In both registers, the category is the same: Automobile : Car Payment. > However, when I run a report (i.e. spending by category), the entry for > Automobile : Car Payment is duplicated. > --- or --- > 1. Enter one Transfer : Car in my checking account. > When I do this, the transactions are not included in the reports. > I apologize for the simplicity of this question. I have searched for > answers in this forum (and others), but have come up empty. > Any direction would be helpful. Thanks. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Actually, I have two issues, but I think they are related. I am a little confused on entering transactions that "cross" accounts. I realize I can either enter two seperate transactions or enter one Transfer. However, in both cases I seem to have report issues. As an example, To show a payment to my car loan from my checking account, I either: 1. Make one entry in my Checking account 2. Make an entry in the Car Loan In both registers, the category is the same: Automobile : Car Payment. However, when I run a report (i.e. spending by category), the entry for Automobile : Car Payment is duplicated. --- or --- 1. Enter one Transfer : Car in my checking account. When I do this, the transactions are not included in the reports. I apologize for the simplicity of this question. I have searched for answers in this forum (and others), but have come up empty. Any direction would be helpful. Thanks. |
| Tags |
| duplicating, reports, transactions |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Closed Acct. transactions appearing in Reports Mirthrindr: Using MS money 2006. I have checking acct. with a local bank. My mother-in-law’s (MiL) Checking and Savings accounts are at the same bank and... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 06-24-2006 09:47 PM | |
| Money 2004 is duplicating payees DB.: Anyone else having this problem? Money 2004 is creating duplicates of all my online payees. My Bank One account now shows over 1,000 payees. The... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 09-05-2005 07:37 PM | |
| missing items in transactions reports superprimenova@gmail.com: I think there seems to be a bug in money. I created a new account in MS Money 2005. and then I manually added the payee and the proper catagory.... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 02-22-2005 04:02 PM | |
| TD Waterhouse duplicating transactions Cal Learner-- MVP: In OFX downloads, the transaction ID <FITID> is supposed to be the same for a given transaction if you download it again. That way Money realizes... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 07-07-2003 12:59 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |