|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Steve, Thanks...It did help to remove most of my ccounts (Net contributions to . That made the budget make a lot more sense to me. I left thecredit card transfers that I am trying to pay off however. My credit card balances were originally "balance transfers" so there were no categories/subcategories associated with them. I also had to leave the Net contributions from: Summer Savings Account. I do not work during the summer months so this is my income. I was able to include it in my income by going to the budget settings and unchecking the account. Strange behavior, but it was the only way the account would show up as a choice under income. All the comments in this thread have been helpful, giving me other ideas on setting up my budget As for FUN, I do consider dining out in that category, along with lodging, travel, entertainment, golf, hiking, biking, etc. I have the hardest time trying to decide on the miscellaneous spending, like the bathroom organizer, or the MS Money software program. Are these fun items? Are they committed? Not really... well, maybe MS Money is committed. But a bathroomorganizer.... fun? irregular? I haven't got a handle on how to deal with all the miscellaneous things. Maybe I will start thinking of them as "fun". I don't know if I will continue with this budget in the long run. I pretty much stay on target with the Scheduled Bills and Cash Flow forecast. This has worked for me for many years. But I keep hoping to find a budget that helps me save and invest more, so I'll keep giving this one a try for now. If nothing else, it is making me look at categories and subcategories in a whole new way. Anna Steve wrote: - quote - > Anna wrote: > > I have been working on the Savings and Spending Buget. I have been > > consolidating my categories and moving them. For example, I had a > > category Automobile:Maintenance. When I put it into Committed Expenses, > > I realized some of transactions were not maintenance, but repair..like > > the $800 expense I just had on my SUV air conditioner. So I created > > another category called Automobile:Repair to put it into Irregular > > Expenses and leave Automobile:Maintenance in Committed Expenses. > > > I want the budget to work for me, but I have two problems that I am > > trying to solve. The first is determining if an expense is a Committed > > or an Irregular Expense. I am using this criteria (for now)....I ask > > myself " Is this a predictable expense (monthly, yearly) ?" then I > > list it under Committed. However, Christmas is a predictable expense, > > so is it Committed or Irregular? Same with the Vet bill... Money says > > the Vet bill should be Irregular, but it is a regular expense for me > > once a year (checkups-shots). So maybe I need to move some of my > > Irregular Expenses back to committed to allow for REALLY Irregular > > expenses like the Air Conditioner repair or the water pipe at my house > > breaking. I am WAY OVER budget for Irregular Expenses. > > > The MAIN problem I have at this point is the many transfers I have > > between accounts. Transfers are looking like expenses. Two credit cards > > I pay off each month are gas and groceries (Chase, BOA). Another credit > > card I am trying to pay off (Discover). These are transfers from > > checking to CC accounts. I can't remove the checking account from the > > budget. The help tells me to remove the credit card I pay off each > > month from the budget. But if I remove the Chase credit card that I pay > > off each month, then all the transactions (groceries, gas, etc) are > > ALSO removed from my budget. So the expense is counted twice. Once > > under the category groceries, and once under Net Contributions to > > Chase. I am totally confused at this point and looking for answers. > > > Anna > Anna, > Take a deep breath and realize that the programers that > designed this new budget were trying to help the average person to > control their spending. I believe that the mechanics they designed are > more confusing than ever. To my way of looking, ALL my income and ALL > my expenses are assigned to categories and subcategories. At the same > time ALL my income and ALL my expenses are assigned to accounts in > Money. If I allow them to be reported together within one of the > groupings in the budget, I will double up. This means that NO credit > card ACCOUNT should be included in the budget if you are using the > credit card account to record your daily expenses. You should go into > each of your budet groupings (Income, Committed, Irregular, etc. and > first of all, remove any listing that refers to accounts. You should > ONLY have categories/subcategories listed IMHO. Run a YTD report on > Income and expense by category and make sure the TOTAL numbers agree > with what the budget says for actual. Play around with the budget > groups to determine what works best for YOU. I personally don't think > the term "fun" represents dining out. I personally don't know if I will > use this new budget concept, but I'll play with it for awhile. 2007 > might be a good time to start using it officially in Money if it seems > better than the AB now available. That, by the way, is not my ideal of > a good budget either. Good luck. Steve |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Steve wrote: - quote - > Play around with the budget groups to determine what works best for YOU. I personally
I agree. I had a harder time making the AB work for me. In the new> don't thinkthe term "fun" represents dining out. version, I wish I could change (or add) groupings but I'm working with them. Granted, for the most part the specific expenses I need to track are on the relatively limited side and I'm not generally looking at the cash flow report. I Committed Expenses to hold all the payroll deductions so I can keep it collapsed (infrequent viewing). I use Irregular expenses for everything that I know I have to pay (and about how much) with any sort of interval - yearly, weekly, monthly etc. This is again where I wish I could rename groups or add additional groups. Fun is really my miscellaneous spending. Unless it's something that I want to put a specific limit on, it goes into fun which has an overall limit - like an allowance. The credit card problem is definately a catch-22. Did they assume that any card you're trying to pay down you aren't also actively using? I ran into a problem with the savings piece. I specifically set monthly savings goals ("pay myself first") thinking. The budget adds the monthly interest earned to the net contributions so it looks like I'm exceeding my savings expense. Interest is just a bonus in my way of thinking. I guess I could manually modify each month's expense limit if I want to pretty things up. I put together a giant spreadsheet to set it up originally. Being not tied to bills has helped me out since I use some of them to assist with data entry. If the amount changes, it just means I spent less on that item for the month. If it's a permanent change, it's an extra step to change the budget allocation. Since that's a rare thing for me, it's not huge data entry extra effort. - Cara |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "Anna" <rhodesbiz[at]bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:1154964629.294572.63700[at]n13g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... - quote - > The MAIN problem I have at this point is the many transfers I have
I'm having that same problem but probably for a different reason. I have a> between accounts. Transfers are looking like expenses. transfer from a checking account to a retirement account, which is being treated as an expense, which of course it isn't. - quote - > These are transfers from
Ouch! Catch-22. That sounds like a fatal flaw in the new S&S Budget. It> checking to CC accounts. I can't remove the checking account from the > budget. The help tells me to remove the credit card I pay off each > month from the budget. But if I remove the Chase credit card that I pay > off each month, then all the transactions (groceries, gas, etc) are > ALSO removed from my budget. So the expense is counted twice. Once > under the category groceries, and once under Net Contributions to > Chase. make me wonder if they did any serious field testing at all. Bruce. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Anna wrote: - quote - > I have been working on the Savings and Spending Buget. I have been
Anna,> consolidating my categories and moving them. For example, I had a > category Automobile:Maintenance. When I put it into Committed Expenses, > I realized some of transactions were not maintenance, but repair..like > the $800 expense I just had on my SUV air conditioner. So I created > another category called Automobile:Repair to put it into Irregular > Expenses and leave Automobile:Maintenance in Committed Expenses. > I want the budget to work for me, but I have two problems that I am > trying to solve. The first is determining if an expense is a Committed > or an Irregular Expense. I am using this criteria (for now)....I ask > myself " Is this a predictable expense (monthly, yearly) ?" then I > list it under Committed. However, Christmas is a predictable expense, > so is it Committed or Irregular? Same with the Vet bill... Money says > the Vet bill should be Irregular, but it is a regular expense for me > once a year (checkups-shots). So maybe I need to move some of my > Irregular Expenses back to committed to allow for REALLY Irregular > expenses like the Air Conditioner repair or the water pipe at my house > breaking. I am WAY OVER budget for Irregular Expenses. > The MAIN problem I have at this point is the many transfers I have > between accounts. Transfers are looking like expenses. Two credit cards > I pay off each month are gas and groceries (Chase, BOA). Another credit > card I am trying to pay off (Discover). These are transfers from > checking to CC accounts. I can't remove the checking account from the > budget. The help tells me to remove the credit card I pay off each > month from the budget. But if I remove the Chase credit card that I pay > off each month, then all the transactions (groceries, gas, etc) are > ALSO removed from my budget. So the expense is counted twice. Once > under the category groceries, and once under Net Contributions to > Chase. I am totally confused at this point and looking for answers. > Anna Take a deep breath and realize that the programers that designed this new budget were trying to help the average person to control their spending. I believe that the mechanics they designed are more confusing than ever. To my way of looking, ALL my income and ALL my expenses are assigned to categories and subcategories. At the same time ALL my income and ALL my expenses are assigned to accounts in Money. If I allow them to be reported together within one of the groupings in the budget, I will double up. This means that NO credit card ACCOUNT should be included in the budget if you are using the credit card account to record your daily expenses. You should go into each of your budet groupings (Income, Committed, Irregular, etc. and first of all, remove any listing that refers to accounts. You should ONLY have categories/subcategories listed IMHO. Run a YTD report on Income and expense by category and make sure the TOTAL numbers agree with what the budget says for actual. Play around with the budget groups to determine what works best for YOU. I personally don't think the term "fun" represents dining out. I personally don't know if I will use this new budget concept, but I'll play with it for awhile. 2007 might be a good time to start using it officially in Money if it seems better than the AB now available. That, by the way, is not my ideal of a good budget either. Good luck. Steve |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| I have been working on the Savings and Spending Buget. I have been consolidating my categories and moving them. For example, I had a category Automobile:Maintenance. When I put it into Committed Expenses, I realized some of transactions were not maintenance, but repair..like the $800 expense I just had on my SUV air conditioner. So I created another category called Automobile:Repair to put it into Irregular Expenses and leave Automobile:Maintenance in Committed Expenses. I want the budget to work for me, but I have two problems that I am trying to solve. The first is determining if an expense is a Committed or an Irregular Expense. I am using this criteria (for now)....I ask myself " Is this a predictable expense (monthly, yearly) ?" then I list it under Committed. However, Christmas is a predictable expense, so is it Committed or Irregular? Same with the Vet bill... Money says the Vet bill should be Irregular, but it is a regular expense for me once a year (checkups-shots). So maybe I need to move some of my Irregular Expenses back to committed to allow for REALLY Irregular expenses like the Air Conditioner repair or the water pipe at my house breaking. I am WAY OVER budget for Irregular Expenses. The MAIN problem I have at this point is the many transfers I have between accounts. Transfers are looking like expenses. Two credit cards I pay off each month are gas and groceries (Chase, BOA). Another credit card I am trying to pay off (Discover). These are transfers from checking to CC accounts. I can't remove the checking account from the budget. The help tells me to remove the credit card I pay off each month from the budget. But if I remove the Chase credit card that I pay off each month, then all the transactions (groceries, gas, etc) are ALSO removed from my budget. So the expense is counted twice. Once under the category groceries, and once under Net Contributions to Chase. I am totally confused at this point and looking for answers. Anna Bruce Chastain wrote: - quote - > "Chris Cowles" <spam_magnet[at]remove-me-bellsouth.net> wrote in message > news:%23Xr7nGeuGHA.2036[at]TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > > Maybe I'll find S&S adequate, but it will be awhile. > Yes, I'm not switching yet. I'm doing all my playing and experimenting in a > test file. They promote it as a "better way to budget" but I'm no where > near being convinced of that. > > One negative affect is how it interacts with Cash Flow Forecast. If you > > know how the CFF works, you scheduled predictable bills, and keep an > > accurate budget, CFF can be pretty accurate. I suspect the S&S budget will > > throw that into question. > Yes, I keep my Bills and Advanced Budget accurate and have been impressed > with just how accurate the CFF can be. I'lll never switch from Advanced > Budget if it means losing the CFF. > Another big downside for me is that it seems that the Savings & Spending > Budget isn't in any way linked to the scheduled Bills. If I change the > amount of a scheduled bill, that change isn't reflected in the S&S Budget as > it was in the AB. > > A positive affect is that it allows savings tracking better. Play around > > with including 'net savings' (or whatever they call it) to see the > > improvement there. > Thanks for your thoughts Chris. > Bruce. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Chris Cowles" <spam_magnet[at]remove-me-bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:%23Xr7nGeuGHA.2036[at]TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... - quote - > Maybe I'll find S&S adequate, but it will be awhile.
Yes, I'm not switching yet. I'm doing all my playing and experimenting in atest file. They promote it as a "better way to budget" but I'm no where near being convinced of that. - quote - > One negative affect is how it interacts with Cash Flow Forecast. If you
Yes, I keep my Bills and Advanced Budget accurate and have been impressed> know how the CFF works, you scheduled predictable bills, and keep an > accurate budget, CFF can be pretty accurate. I suspect the S&S budget will > throw that into question. with just how accurate the CFF can be. I'lll never switch from Advanced Budget if it means losing the CFF. Another big downside for me is that it seems that the Savings & Spending Budget isn't in any way linked to the scheduled Bills. If I change the amount of a scheduled bill, that change isn't reflected in the S&S Budget as it was in the AB. - quote - > A positive affect is that it allows savings tracking better. Play around
Thanks for your thoughts Chris.> with including 'net savings' (or whatever they call it) to see the > improvement there. Bruce. |
| | |||
| |||
| My impression from using it a bit is that it's a blend of the simple (or whatever they call it) budget, and advanced. I sometimes question whether I really need all the details I put into the advanced budget, but I know for sure I need more than the basic one. Maybe I'll find S&S adequate, but it will be awhile. One negative affect is how it interacts with Cash Flow Forecast. If you know how the CFF works, you scheduled predictable bills, and keep an accurate budget, CFF can be pretty accurate. I suspect the S&S budget will throw that into question. A positive affect is that it allows savings tracking better. Play around with including 'net savings' (or whatever they call it) to see the improvement there. -- Chris Cowles Gainesville, FL "Bruce Chastain" <bachastain[at]XNOSPAMXsbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:esMCDOauGHA.1272[at]TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... - quote - > I've been spending a couple of hours playing with the Savings and > Spending Budget (converted from a Advanced Budget) in a test file, but > I'm still not sure if I like it more than the AB or not. It seems to > have positives but may be too oversimplified compared to AB. It's > different but I'm not sure if that means better in this case. I'd > probably have to run them side by side for a couple of months before I > could be sure. > I've noted that they've made creating a new AB more difficult, which is > discouraging for the future of the AB. > I'm wondering if there is anyone here that has spent more time with it, > perhaps in the beta program, and what you think of it? Is it worth the > time to learn, or will you be sticking with your AB? > Bruce. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I've been spending a couple of hours playing with the Savings and Spending Budget (converted from a Advanced Budget) in a test file, but I'm still not sure if I like it more than the AB or not. It seems to have positives but may be too oversimplified compared to AB. It's different but I'm not sure if that means better in this case. I'd probably have to run them side by side for a couple of months before I could be sure. I've noted that they've made creating a new AB more difficult, which is discouraging for the future of the AB. I'm wondering if there is anyone here that has spent more time with it, perhaps in the beta program, and what you think of it? Is it worth the time to learn, or will you be sticking with your AB? Bruce. |
| Tags |
| budget, savings, spending |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Savings and Spending budget Chris Cowles: What experience does anyone here have with it? One thing I found is that it's better at track savings. It's weaker in other ways. It doesn't link to... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 08-04-2006 09:18 PM | |
| Money 2007 Savings and Spending Budget Brook Buchanan: I am using the new Savings and Spending Budget in Money 2007. Is there some way to add or rename a budget group? It looks like you can only change... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 07-29-2006 02:34 AM | |
| Budget vs Spending Report Luigi: Hello, I am using Money 2005 (Int. trial version). I would like to know how to exclude the transfers from the report. All the movement between the... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 05-19-2005 01:44 PM | |
| Savings reflection in Budget Lawrence: Hi Folks! I have an automatic transfer setup in Money 2004 to take out a set amount of money from another account once a week. I want to know... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 10-11-2004 12:31 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |