|
#16
| |||
| |||
| What the hell were they thinking hiding the advanced budget. Lack of PocketPC support and now this is not making me a happy person with microsoft. |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
![]() And all this time I thought it was just wasted real estate. "Michael Gordon, MVP" <gordonm[at]denison.edu> wrote in message news:%23z2CKpprGHA.3940[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... - quote - > Finally a use for the URL window in Money! |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| Finally a use for the URL window in Money! -- Michael Gordon MVP "Ronald Pierce" <ron[at]pierceplace.net> wrote in message news:ndk7c29l3jil2lom89a2uiadnqbmnqkl37[at]4ax.com... - quote - > On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 14:01:34 -0500, Cal Learner-- MVP > <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote: > > With a *new* file, there is only the choice of the two non-advanced > > versions. I don't know if there is a trick to make a new file with > > the advanced budget using only Money 2007. > > Yes, there is a trick to make an advanced budget in a new MS 2007 > file. It is not readily available, but the Help file tells you to > type the following "money://navigate/newadvbgt" into the url window > in MS Money 2007. It worked on a new, test file I created. Since > there isn't a straightforward interface to the "Advanced" budget, I > would expect MS Money 2008 to have it totally eliminated. How long > can they be expected to keep a feature around that has no visible way > to get to that feature? > - Ron |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Dick Watson wrote: - quote - > Thus limiting it to people who will find any answer to any problem by faster
That's along the line that I was hypothesizing.> means (that cost Microsoft less) than by opening a support case? - quote - > "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message > news qk7c2lvqvds8k8p31g3tk1bn2cs1op5gb[at]4ax.com...> > Maybe it is a strategy to limit the advanced budget to those who can > > successfully use Help or other resources. |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| Thus limiting it to people who will find any answer to any problem by faster means (that cost Microsoft less) than by opening a support case? "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message news qk7c2lvqvds8k8p31g3tk1bn2cs1op5gb[at]4ax.com...- quote - > Maybe it is a strategy to limit the advanced budget to those who can > successfully use Help or other resources. |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Ronald Pierce wrote: - quote - > Yes, there is a trick to make an advanced budget in a new MS 2007
Nice find.> file. It is not readily available, but the Help file tells you to > type the following "money://navigate/newadvbgt" into the url window > in MS Money 2007. It worked on a new, test file I created. - quote - > Since
Maybe it is a strategy to limit the advanced budget to those who can> there isn't a straightforward interface to the "Advanced" budget, I > would expect MS Money 2008 to have it totally eliminated. How long > can they be expected to keep a feature around that has no visible way > to get to that feature? successfully use Help or other resources. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| On 23 Jul 2006 11:45:19 -0700, "Spadowski" <jschasteen12[at]cox.netwrote: - quote - > UPDATE:
help for "Advanced Budget". Select the entry on "Create a new> -You can keep your existing Advanced budget from previous versions if > you want to, but if you create a new file in 2007, you don't have the > Advanced budget as an option. Yes you can create an advanced budget in a new 2007 file, search in Advanced Budget". It tells how. Will 2008 support it? Who knows.... - Ron |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 14:01:34 -0500, Cal Learner-- MVP <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote: - quote - > With a *new* file, there is only the choice of the two non-advanced
file. It is not readily available, but the Help file tells you to> versions. I don't know if there is a trick to make a new file with > the advanced budget using only Money 2007. Yes, there is a trick to make an advanced budget in a new MS 2007 type the following "money://navigate/newadvbgt" into the url window in MS Money 2007. It worked on a new, test file I created. Since there isn't a straightforward interface to the "Advanced" budget, I would expect MS Money 2008 to have it totally eliminated. How long can they be expected to keep a feature around that has no visible way to get to that feature? - Ron |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| I bet there is one--we just need to find out what it is. RegHack, maybe? Haven't gone looking there just yet... "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message news ah7c21v6afl4r7r9cro33vddqsgut7895[at]4ax.com...- quote - > I don't know if there is a trick to make a new file with > the advanced budget using only Money 2007. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| This is not a new trend... "William R Wood" <secret[at]???.net> wrote in message news:eRsEnnorGHA.1508[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... - quote - > Why would MSFT dumb down the real Money? I want a product written for > grown-ups who handle personal finances in a > responsible manner. I don't want my hand held and I certainly don't want > my hands tied. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, William R Wood wrote: - quote - > Are you saying that the original poster's description of the Budget tool
If by "version" you mean type of budget, there are three types that> refers to some basic version, not the advanced version and that the advanced > version does not have these limitations? There is only one version in > M2002. Money 2007 can handle. He was referring to the newest one called spending and expenses. There is "essentials", and "advanced" is available to converted files. Money 2007 will continue to use the advanced budget if you convert an earlier file that used the advanced budget. I believe you can try a different one and resume your "advanced" one. With a *new* file, there is only the choice of the two non-advanced versions. I don't know if there is a trick to make a new file with the advanced budget using only Money 2007. This does not change the conclusion that you will stay with Money 2002-- only the premise. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Incidentally, I still cannot believe what MSFT has done to Money. If they want to create a Money for Dummies version and sell it separately, fine. Why would MSFT dumb down the real Money? I want a product written for grown-ups who handle personal finances in a responsible manner. I don't want my hand held and I certainly don't want my hands tied. Regards, Bill Wood "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message news:vu97c2hq7com8mru1j0j7v3co86bc6lf52[at]4ax.com... - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, William R Wood wrote: > > Based on your review I am not even going to bother looking at Money 2007. > > > I use Money 2002 and the Budget Tool is the most important feature to me. > > None of your complaints about 2007 exist in 2002 which works perfectly and > > lets me create my budget anyway I like. Also the Cash Flow tool works > > perfectly so that I have total control of my budget and cash flow. > > > I cannot believe what MSFT has done to Money. > William appears to have drawn an inaccurate inference in concluding > he would lose his advanced budget by converting his file to Money > 2007. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Cal, Are you saying that the original poster's description of the Budget tool refers to some basic version, not the advanced version and that the advanced version does not have these limitations? There is only one version in M2002. Bill Wood "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message news:vu97c2hq7com8mru1j0j7v3co86bc6lf52[at]4ax.com... - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, William R Wood wrote: > > Based on your review I am not even going to bother looking at Money 2007. > > > I use Money 2002 and the Budget Tool is the most important feature to me. > > None of your complaints about 2007 exist in 2002 which works perfectly and > > lets me create my budget anyway I like. Also the Cash Flow tool works > > perfectly so that I have total control of my budget and cash flow. > > > I cannot believe what MSFT has done to Money. > William appears to have drawn an inaccurate inference in concluding > he would lose his advanced budget by converting his file to Money > 2007. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| UPDATE: -You can keep your existing Advanced budget from previous versions if you want to, but if you create a new file in 2007, you don't have the Advanced budget as an option. -According to the help files, the cash flow calculates the cash flow based on "Information from your Advanced Budget, if you have one, or data calculated from your past spending, if you don't use an Advanced Budget." So, this is why my cash flow is all messed up now that I switched to the Spending and Savings budget. I'm going to have to switch-off the trending that is done on the Cash Flow and just have the Cash Flow show my bills and deposits. Cash Flow just became a whole lot less useful for those who don't continue to use the Advanced Budget! I can't see how this trending from previous spending adds any value to the Cash Flow projections. In fact, its down right inaccurate! Just to give some examples: 1) The Cash Flow is trending in my cable tv expenses from past expenses to that category. It is also figuring in my scheduled cable tv bill. Yeah, it counts it twice. 2) Its trending in my one-time state tax return from months ago as a monthly income. This is useless. It looks like I can right click on these trended entries and remove them. But, that doesn't change the fact that unless the forcasted Cash Flow uses your budget amounts it is really not useful. Spadowski wrote: - quote - > I installed the trial version because I wanted to see how they changed > the budgeting tool. I've never been very happy with how they handled > budgeting. My first impressions are that this is a step in the right > direction, but it is not integrated very well with scheduled bills and > deposits which is a big disappointment. There also appears to be a big > problem with how my cash flow is calculated. > Comments: > -There are six main budget groups that cannot be changed. They are > Income, Committed Expenses, Fun, Irregular Expenses, Savings & Debt, > and Retirement. You are not allowed to change these, but you can move > individual categories between them. For example, most of the > categories defaulted into the Committed Expenses group, but I wanted > them in the Irregular Expenses group (e.g. Gifts:Christmas, etc.). > Moving about, oh, 40 to 50 of these was a painstaking one-at-a-time > process! > -When you first set up the budget, you enter your total gross income, > and then adjust the percentage that is allocated to each group. By > default, all the categories in the group have zero planned expenses for > them, but the actual expenses are tracked as you enter transactions in > your account registers. > -It does allow you to change the planned amounts for each category, but > the group total amount does not adjust when you change the dollar > values of the subcategories unless the group total is less than your > subcategory totals. Instead, the difference goes into an "unallocated" > category. When you're done allocating your planned expenses for each > category in a group, you must manually adjust the group dollar > allocation to subtract out the value in the unallocated category. > (Otherwise, you have, well, unallocated dollars and that is a budgeting > no-no.) This really bugs me because it is opposite the way I do my > budgeting! I would much prefer if the group totals automatically > summed what I specified in my categories. > -I think it boils down to the overall budgeting process. Looks like > Money 2007 is taking a top-down approach whereas I do my budgeting from > the bottom up. Money wants you to allocate percentages to each group > and then adjust your categories within that group to spend the money > you allocated. > -I'm very disappointed that the categories in the budget are not linked > to my bills and deposits. Why they didn't do this is a mystery to > me. Now, instead of my budget worksheet automatically changing when I > change a bill, I've got to manually change my budget to see how my > electric bill impacted my budget. > This wouldn't be so bad if I could right click on the category and see > previous transactions so I could ball-park it. Unfortunately, when > looking at previous transactions the period is the current month, thus > nothing historical is shown. I expect that when I'm doing my budget > each month, I'm going to be going back and forth between the new budget > page and the bills and deposits page quite a bit. > Question for Microsoft: What is the point in my putting in all my > scheduled bills and deposits if you're not going to integrate that > into the budget? > Other thoughts: > - The budgeting page uses pretty small text and tightly packed rows. > Even with my young eyes I find it a challenging page to use. > - At first I didn't like the groups, but I kind of like them now. I > do like how it shows the % that you're spending in each of them. > - I'd like to see a change that allows users to add to the major > groups. One group that would be very helpful would be one called > "Giving". I'd separate the "Saving & Debt" group. > - The Spending Tracker is still the same, except that now there is also > one for the major groups. (I wish they would dedicate a whole page to > the spending tracker and make it so the bars are scaled based on the > budgeted amounts. Basically something that represents the same > information as what is on the budget worksheet page.) > - CASH FLOW - This is very messed up at the moment and I've not yet > figured out why. Instead of just factoring in my budgeted expenses, it > is trending in all kinds of things from the past that don't apply to > my budget anymore. Hopefully they can release a fix for this because I > use the cash flow all the time. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, William R Wood wrote: - quote - > Based on your review I am not even going to bother looking at Money 2007.
William appears to have drawn an inaccurate inference in concluding> I use Money 2002 and the Budget Tool is the most important feature to me. > None of your complaints about 2007 exist in 2002 which works perfectly and > lets me create my budget anyway I like. Also the Cash Flow tool works > perfectly so that I have total control of my budget and cash flow. > I cannot believe what MSFT has done to Money. he would lose his advanced budget by converting his file to Money 2007. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Based on your review I am not even going to bother looking at Money 2007. I use Money 2002 and the Budget Tool is the most important feature to me. None of your complaints about 2007 exist in 2002 which works perfectly and lets me create my budget anyway I like. Also the Cash Flow tool works perfectly so that I have total control of my budget and cash flow. I cannot believe what MSFT has done to Money. Regards Bill Wood Fountain Hills, AZ "Spadowski" <jschasteen12[at]cox.net> wrote in message news:1153597935.205907.11370[at]i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... - quote - > I installed the trial version because I wanted to see how they changed > the budgeting tool. I've never been very happy with how they handled > budgeting. My first impressions are that this is a step in the right > direction, but it is not integrated very well with scheduled bills and > deposits which is a big disappointment. There also appears to be a big > problem with how my cash flow is calculated. snip |
| | |||
| |||
| amen brother. -- Wayne Miller Pecan Deluxe Candy Company "Spadowski" wrote: - quote - > I installed the trial version because I wanted to see how they changed > the budgeting tool. I've never been very happy with how they handled > budgeting. My first impressions are that this is a step in the right > direction, but it is not integrated very well with scheduled bills and > deposits which is a big disappointment. There also appears to be a big > problem with how my cash flow is calculated. > Comments: > -There are six main budget groups that cannot be changed. They are > Income, Committed Expenses, Fun, Irregular Expenses, Savings & Debt, > and Retirement. You are not allowed to change these, but you can move > individual categories between them. For example, most of the > categories defaulted into the Committed Expenses group, but I wanted > them in the Irregular Expenses group (e.g. Gifts:Christmas, etc.). > Moving about, oh, 40 to 50 of these was a painstaking one-at-a-time > process! > -When you first set up the budget, you enter your total gross income, > and then adjust the percentage that is allocated to each group. By > default, all the categories in the group have zero planned expenses for > them, but the actual expenses are tracked as you enter transactions in > your account registers. > -It does allow you to change the planned amounts for each category, but > the group total amount does not adjust when you change the dollar > values of the subcategories unless the group total is less than your > subcategory totals. Instead, the difference goes into an "unallocated" > category. When you're done allocating your planned expenses for each > category in a group, you must manually adjust the group dollar > allocation to subtract out the value in the unallocated category. > (Otherwise, you have, well, unallocated dollars and that is a budgeting > no-no.) This really bugs me because it is opposite the way I do my > budgeting! I would much prefer if the group totals automatically > summed what I specified in my categories. > -I think it boils down to the overall budgeting process. Looks like > Money 2007 is taking a top-down approach whereas I do my budgeting from > the bottom up. Money wants you to allocate percentages to each group > and then adjust your categories within that group to spend the money > you allocated. > -I'm very disappointed that the categories in the budget are not linked > to my bills and deposits. Why they didn't do this is a mystery to > me. Now, instead of my budget worksheet automatically changing when I > change a bill, I've got to manually change my budget to see how my > electric bill impacted my budget. > This wouldn't be so bad if I could right click on the category and see > previous transactions so I could ball-park it. Unfortunately, when > looking at previous transactions the period is the current month, thus > nothing historical is shown. I expect that when I'm doing my budget > each month, I'm going to be going back and forth between the new budget > page and the bills and deposits page quite a bit. > Question for Microsoft: What is the point in my putting in all my > scheduled bills and deposits if you're not going to integrate that > into the budget? > Other thoughts: > - The budgeting page uses pretty small text and tightly packed rows. > Even with my young eyes I find it a challenging page to use. > - At first I didn't like the groups, but I kind of like them now. I > do like how it shows the % that you're spending in each of them. > - I'd like to see a change that allows users to add to the major > groups. One group that would be very helpful would be one called > "Giving". I'd separate the "Saving & Debt" group. > - The Spending Tracker is still the same, except that now there is also > one for the major groups. (I wish they would dedicate a whole page to > the spending tracker and make it so the bars are scaled based on the > budgeted amounts. Basically something that represents the same > information as what is on the budget worksheet page.) > - CASH FLOW - This is very messed up at the moment and I've not yet > figured out why. Instead of just factoring in my budgeted expenses, it > is trending in all kinds of things from the past that don't apply to > my budget anymore. Hopefully they can release a fix for this because I > use the cash flow all the time. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I installed the trial version because I wanted to see how they changed the budgeting tool. I've never been very happy with how they handled budgeting. My first impressions are that this is a step in the right direction, but it is not integrated very well with scheduled bills and deposits which is a big disappointment. There also appears to be a big problem with how my cash flow is calculated. Comments: -There are six main budget groups that cannot be changed. They are Income, Committed Expenses, Fun, Irregular Expenses, Savings & Debt, and Retirement. You are not allowed to change these, but you can move individual categories between them. For example, most of the categories defaulted into the Committed Expenses group, but I wanted them in the Irregular Expenses group (e.g. Gifts:Christmas, etc.). Moving about, oh, 40 to 50 of these was a painstaking one-at-a-time process! -When you first set up the budget, you enter your total gross income, and then adjust the percentage that is allocated to each group. By default, all the categories in the group have zero planned expenses for them, but the actual expenses are tracked as you enter transactions in your account registers. -It does allow you to change the planned amounts for each category, but the group total amount does not adjust when you change the dollar values of the subcategories unless the group total is less than your subcategory totals. Instead, the difference goes into an "unallocated" category. When you're done allocating your planned expenses for each category in a group, you must manually adjust the group dollar allocation to subtract out the value in the unallocated category. (Otherwise, you have, well, unallocated dollars and that is a budgeting no-no.) This really bugs me because it is opposite the way I do my budgeting! I would much prefer if the group totals automatically summed what I specified in my categories. -I think it boils down to the overall budgeting process. Looks like Money 2007 is taking a top-down approach whereas I do my budgeting from the bottom up. Money wants you to allocate percentages to each group and then adjust your categories within that group to spend the money you allocated. -I'm very disappointed that the categories in the budget are not linked to my bills and deposits. Why they didn't do this is a mystery to me. Now, instead of my budget worksheet automatically changing when I change a bill, I've got to manually change my budget to see how my electric bill impacted my budget. This wouldn't be so bad if I could right click on the category and see previous transactions so I could ball-park it. Unfortunately, when looking at previous transactions the period is the current month, thus nothing historical is shown. I expect that when I'm doing my budget each month, I'm going to be going back and forth between the new budget page and the bills and deposits page quite a bit. Question for Microsoft: What is the point in my putting in all my scheduled bills and deposits if you're not going to integrate that into the budget? Other thoughts: - The budgeting page uses pretty small text and tightly packed rows. Even with my young eyes I find it a challenging page to use. - At first I didn't like the groups, but I kind of like them now. I do like how it shows the % that you're spending in each of them. - I'd like to see a change that allows users to add to the major groups. One group that would be very helpful would be one called "Giving". I'd separate the "Saving & Debt" group. - The Spending Tracker is still the same, except that now there is also one for the major groups. (I wish they would dedicate a whole page to the spending tracker and make it so the bars are scaled based on the budgeted amounts. Basically something that represents the same information as what is on the budget worksheet page.) - CASH FLOW - This is very messed up at the moment and I've not yet figured out why. Instead of just factoring in my budgeted expenses, it is trending in all kinds of things from the past that don't apply to my budget anymore. Hopefully they can release a fix for this because I use the cash flow all the time. |
| Tags |
| 2007, budget, money, review, tool |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Money 2007 Savings and Spending Budget Brook Buchanan: I am using the new Savings and Spending Budget in Money 2007. Is there some way to add or rename a budget group? It looks like you can only change... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 07-29-2006 02:34 AM | |
| Where is the loan comparison tool in Money 2006 Troy Ankersen: In my previous versions of money (2004 for sure, i thought 2005 as well), there was a nice tool that would allow me to compare 2 loans in order to... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 07-23-2005 01:32 PM | |
| What tool development are user to make money? Jose Luis: Regards Jose | Microsoft Money | 2 | 11-21-2004 02:13 AM | |
| Review Budget Status Problems Meagan: The "Review your current budget status" screen shows incorrect amounts in the Budgeted column. However when I click on "Edit Budget" and go through... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 11-27-2003 02:09 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |