|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Of archiving? 1) The archive file is NOT for a limited time period. It's everything. Data in the archive overlaps the main file left behind. Most people don't expect that. 2) There's no way to undo it. 3) It doesn't help file size or performance as much as most people expect. 4) All of the logic to reset account beginning balances is not perfect. 5) Many things don't get archived because of things like implications to capital gains tracking. 6) Once you've done it, there's never any way to look at the data set as a a whole for trending, payee history, etc. "Rob" <rwguy36[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news:wbadnYsNEdT5_yLZnZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d[at]adelphia.com... What is the consequence? |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| But that's still an accurate statement of what Archive portends to do. It doesn't mention any of the side effects/consequences like no turning back. Nor does it mention treatment of investments--of course there weren't any back then... "Glyn Simpson, MVP" <glyn[at]serf.org> wrote in message news:eHwy$%23PqGHA.4988[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... - quote - > In Money 1, the definition of the archive function was this: > [quote] > "When you archive your file, Microsoft Money backs up the complete file > for archival reference, and then removes old transactions from your > current file to keep it to a manageable size. > When you remove old transactions from the current file, it will be easier > to work with because you work with a smaller number of transactions in > your accounts. The transactions that remain are those you are currently > working with, and the starting balance of each account in the Account Book > is automatically updated to adjust for the deleted transactions." > [unquote] > It's a shame they used the word archive, and that this isn't really that > clear nowadays either |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| In Money 1, the definition of the archive function was this: [quote] "When you archive your file, Microsoft Money backs up the complete file for archival reference, and then removes old transactions from your current file to keep it to a manageable size. When you remove old transactions from the current file, it will be easier to work with because you work with a smaller number of transactions in your accounts. The transactions that remain are those you are currently working with, and the starting balance of each account in the Account Book is automatically updated to adjust for the deleted transactions." [unquote] It's a shame they used the word archive, and that this isn't really that clear nowadays either -- Glyn Simpson, Microsoft MVP - Money http://money.mvps.org See http://money.mvps.org/faq/default.aspx for tips and fixes for MS Money. To send Microsoft your product wishes see http://money.mvps.org/wishes.aspx I do not respond to any unsolicited email regarding Money "sed- -cid" <old[at]man.com> wrote in messagenews:u5zxca1pGHA.4116[at]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... - quote - > Every new version something always gets screwed up. MS should let be. > Would be nice if they spent some on developing or fixing the ARCHIVE > function. The worst thing they could have done was to have this function > from the start without informing us about the consequences of that > function. > "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in > message news:effYGVepGHA.3584[at]TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > > These guys > > http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00...lance&n=229534 > > say 7/27/06. They've had a good track record over the last several years. > > > Perhaps the better question is who cares? And why? Do you not have an > > existing version or are you expecting something special from M07? > > > "Jack" <floydwilliams[at]comcast.net> wrote in message > > news:1dqunmst28gzs.1nkcvjsjasszo.dlg[at]40tude.net... > > > When is MS2007 coming out? > > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| What is the consequence? I'm still using MS Money 2004. 2005 was HORRIBLE and 2006 was a bit strange trying to get setup. I started to move my bank account just so I could start fresh in 2006, but even then I was having some problems. Finally I just went back to 2004. -- Rob Warthen University of Phoenix Online Faculty RobWarthen[at]email.uophx.edu "sed- -cid" <old[at]man.com> wrote in message news:u5zxca1pGHA.4116[at]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...Every new version something always gets screwed up. MS should let be. Would be nice if they spent some on developing or fixing the ARCHIVE function. The worst thing they could have done was to have this function from the start without informing us about the consequences of that function. "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:effYGVepGHA.3584[at]TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... - quote - > These guys > http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00...lance&n=229534 > say 7/27/06. They've had a good track record over the last several years. > Perhaps the better question is who cares? And why? Do you not have an > existing version or are you expecting something special from M07? > "Jack" <floydwilliams[at]comcast.net> wrote in message > news:1dqunmst28gzs.1nkcvjsjasszo.dlg[at]40tude.net... > > When is MS2007 coming out? |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Every new version something always gets screwed up. MS should let be. Would be nice if they spent some on developing or fixing the ARCHIVE function. The worst thing they could have done was to have this function from the start without informing us about the consequences of that function. "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:effYGVepGHA.3584[at]TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... - quote - > These guys > http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00...lance&n=229534 > say 7/27/06. They've had a good track record over the last several years. > Perhaps the better question is who cares? And why? Do you not have an > existing version or are you expecting something special from M07? > "Jack" <floydwilliams[at]comcast.net> wrote in message > news:1dqunmst28gzs.1nkcvjsjasszo.dlg[at]40tude.net... > > When is MS2007 coming out? |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| These guys http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00...lance&n=229534 say 7/27/06. They've had a good track record over the last several years. Perhaps the better question is who cares? And why? Do you not have an existing version or are you expecting something special from M07? "Jack" <floydwilliams[at]comcast.net> wrote in message news:1dqunmst28gzs.1nkcvjsjasszo.dlg[at]40tude.net... - quote - > When is MS2007 coming out? |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| When is MS2007 coming out? |
| Tags |
| 2007 |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| MSN Billpay and Money 2007 Keganje: Does anyone know if Money 2007 will work with MSN billpay, I am trying to find somewhere that I can set up billpay, input my payment, transfers ect,... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 07-09-2006 04:52 AM | |
| Money 2007 Mark Fields: Any news about when Money 2007 will be released, or any idea what will be offered which is an improvement? I'm using '03 and it works fine but if... | Microsoft Money | 11 | 06-30-2006 04:25 AM | |
| Money 2007 Thomas Grassi: Does anyone know when it will be released? Thanks Tom | Microsoft Money | 5 | 06-14-2006 02:07 PM | |
| 2007 - earlier this year? Theorbo: So it seems that it gets earlier each year ... the release of the 'NEW AND IMPROVED' versions. Anyone who's not beta testing - they are doing a... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 05-26-2006 12:53 PM | |
| Feature request for Money 2007 Matt: I've been using MS Money since the beginning and find it an essential tool for managing my finances. But I've always had trouble with one area! ... | Microsoft Money | 12 | 11-29-2005 07:37 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |