|
#2
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Driver wrote: - quote - > Cal - You may have mis-understood me. I have done the transaction that you
Yes, I misunderstood.> described in step 1 but my problem is when the credit card company receives > the transaction and reports the payment as two separate transactions that > total the payment. > They report the principle as one transaction and the interest as another > transaction - the two transactions equal the payment. > I can match one of the two against the original payment, but when I try to > match the second transaction against the payment, the payment is unavailable > to match to. It sounds like method 2 would be a good one for you. It is easier too. In your variation, there would be one transaction in the checking account and two in the credit card account as long as you are paying interest. - quote - > "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > > In microsoft.public.money, Driver wrote: > > > > I pay a credit card from one account and the credit card reports the > > > tranasaction as 2 separate transactions, one for interest and the other for > > > principle. The sum of the 2 transactions equals the 1 payment transaction. > > > How can I match the one payment transaction against the 2 credit > > > transactions? > > > > Here are three ways I like: > > > 1. When you process the first transaction of the credit card > > payment, set the category as a transfer to the other ( credit card > > or bank account), or use the equivalent "SPECIAL Credit Card > > Payment" category. When you process the second transaction,Money > > should match it. Be careful to not just Accept if Money did not > > find the match on its own for some reason. Click Change and match > > it to the transfer you already made if Money did not match it for > > you. I would consider this the classic of the ways I like. > > > 2. In method 2, don't handle credit card payments as transfers or > > the pre-defined "Credit Card Payment Instead create one category of > > "CC payment" or some such. If you define the category as an > > expense category, expect a warning when you use it to represent the > > payment within the credit card account -- if you have the warning > > enabled. Just click Yes in response to the warning. The category > > should net at zero in reports across accounts, and you can still > > customize to ignore the category if you like. [this is Bonnie > > Synhorst's favorite method.]. This method is relatively simple with > > the least impact if you neglect to change the category. > > > 3. Create a suspense account. > > I have one I call "In Transit", and I called it a "cash or other" > > account. Change each of the downloaded transactions into transfer > > to/from that account. That account will normally have a zero > > balance except while funds are in transit. Make your credit card > > payments as transfers to and from that account. This method will > > appeal to the desire for best representing what is happening. > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Cal - You may have mis-understood me. I have done the transaction that you described in step 1 but my problem is when the credit card company receives the transaction and reports the payment as two separate transactions that total the payment. They report the principle as one transaction and the interest as another transaction - the two transactions equal the payment. I can match one of the two against the original payment, but when I try to match the second transaction against the payment, the payment is unavailable to match to. "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, Driver wrote: > > I pay a credit card from one account and the credit card reports the > > tranasaction as 2 separate transactions, one for interest and the other for > > principle. The sum of the 2 transactions equals the 1 payment transaction. > > How can I match the one payment transaction against the 2 credit > > transactions? > Here are three ways I like: > 1. When you process the first transaction of the credit card > payment, set the category as a transfer to the other ( credit card > or bank account), or use the equivalent "SPECIAL Credit Card > Payment" category. When you process the second transaction,Money > should match it. Be careful to not just Accept if Money did not > find the match on its own for some reason. Click Change and match > it to the transfer you already made if Money did not match it for > you. I would consider this the classic of the ways I like. > 2. In method 2, don't handle credit card payments as transfers or > the pre-defined "Credit Card Payment Instead create one category of > "CC payment" or some such. If you define the category as an > expense category, expect a warning when you use it to represent the > payment within the credit card account -- if you have the warning > enabled. Just click Yes in response to the warning. The category > should net at zero in reports across accounts, and you can still > customize to ignore the category if you like. [this is Bonnie > Synhorst's favorite method.]. This method is relatively simple with > the least impact if you neglect to change the category. > 3. Create a suspense account. > I have one I call "In Transit", and I called it a "cash or other" > account. Change each of the downloaded transactions into transfer > to/from that account. That account will normally have a zero > balance except while funds are in transit. Make your credit card > payments as transfers to and from that account. This method will > appeal to the desire for best representing what is happening. |
| | |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Driver wrote: - quote - > I pay a credit card from one account and the credit card reports the > tranasaction as 2 separate transactions, one for interest and the other for > principle. The sum of the 2 transactions equals the 1 payment transaction. > How can I match the one payment transaction against the 2 credit > transactions? Here are three ways I like: 1. When you process the first transaction of the credit card payment, set the category as a transfer to the other ( credit card or bank account), or use the equivalent "SPECIAL Credit Card Payment" category. When you process the second transaction,Money should match it. Be careful to not just Accept if Money did not find the match on its own for some reason. Click Change and match it to the transfer you already made if Money did not match it for you. I would consider this the classic of the ways I like. 2. In method 2, don't handle credit card payments as transfers or the pre-defined "Credit Card Payment Instead create one category of "CC payment" or some such. If you define the category as an expense category, expect a warning when you use it to represent the payment within the credit card account -- if you have the warning enabled. Just click Yes in response to the warning. The category should net at zero in reports across accounts, and you can still customize to ignore the category if you like. [this is Bonnie Synhorst's favorite method.]. This method is relatively simple with the least impact if you neglect to change the category. 3. Create a suspense account. I have one I call "In Transit", and I called it a "cash or other" account. Change each of the downloaded transactions into transfer to/from that account. That account will normally have a zero balance except while funds are in transit. Make your credit card payments as transfers to and from that account. This method will appeal to the desire for best representing what is happening. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I pay a credit card from one account and the credit card reports the tranasaction as 2 separate transactions, one for interest and the other for principle. The sum of the 2 transactions equals the 1 payment transaction. How can I match the one payment transaction against the 2 credit transactions? |
| Tags |
| entries, match, transaction |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| M2006 transaction match problem JohnA: Hi, Every few weeks, my money file gets into a strange state where the only transactions that are presented to be matched are in the future... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 12-27-2005 02:45 AM | |
| Re: Manual Transaction Match Michael Gordon, MVP: "Michael Gordon, MVP" <gordonm@denison.edu> wrote in message news:... > The change only appears before the transaction is accepted. Delete the >... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 07-29-2005 09:06 PM | |
| Manual Transaction Match Paulo Resende: Hello, I'm using Money 2005 Deluxe Edition, and I transferred money from my checking account to a broker account, in another bank. Money did not... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 07-28-2005 10:20 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |