|
#9
| |||
| |||
| I think there's more of that in the 401k business than could really stand the light of day. Think of a 0.0001% handle on the trillions held in 401k plans. It's too big a number for even honest folk to resist. "Chris Cowles" <spam_magnet[at]remove-me-bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:%23bGhhSWeGHA.3792[at]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... - quote - > "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in > message news:uOQEXGOeGHA.5040[at]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > > plus some cash for liquidity less some "administrative expenses". > In other industries that's called 'skim'. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:uOQEXGOeGHA.5040[at]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... - quote - > plus some cash for liquidity less some "administrative expenses".
In other industries that's called 'skim'.-- Chris Cowles Gainesville, FL |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| For some plans, even those institutional classes of the fund aren't exact because the 401k "fund" holds one of those plus some cash for liquidity less some "administrative expenses". "Ray" <raybosley[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news:eirO%23oNeGHA.3888[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... - quote - > You're right that the program doesn't really leave you much choice. I've > looked at these funds further and some of them have up to seven or eight > "equivalents" probably for different institutional classes. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| You're right that the program doesn't really leave you much choice. I've looked at these funds further and some of them have up to seven or eight "equivalents" probably for different institutional classes. I'm going to let it ride and do my manual price updates for now (like I have a choice). Luckily the 401K on-line site posts the daily price updates so I do have access to the prices and don't have to wait for a statement. Thanks for the info and the advice. Ray "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:exITz0BeGHA.1276[at]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... - quote - > If you want the data correct for these private funds, your only choice > over the long haul is to remove the symbol. If you want, add the > underlying public fund to your watch account with its symbol. (You end up > with two Investments defined: "My 401k's XXXXX fund" with no symbol and > lots of holdings and "XXXXX fund" in the watch account with a symbol and > news and so on but no holdings.) > I know this doesn't solve everything, but these private funds leave little > other choice. Were I designing the product, I'd allow an Investment to be > derived from another for purposes of news and, especially, performance > comparisons to the underlying investment and so forth. But I guess nobody > at Microsoft has ever been in a 401k (most of them) that work this way. If > it's any consolation, a Portfolio at Morningstar has the same limitation. > "Ray" <raybosley[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:ecQzPIBeGHA.1208[at]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > > True, I suppose I could track these without a symbol, but Money still > > seems to pull good information on the Mutual Fund Characteristics for > > Portfolio Analysis. > > > I'm just dealing with it for now as I have learned to turn off > > Auto-Updates for any new funds right away. Its just the initial group > > that retains some On-Line Pricing. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| If you want the data correct for these private funds, your only choice over the long haul is to remove the symbol. If you want, add the underlying public fund to your watch account with its symbol. (You end up with two Investments defined: "My 401k's XXXXX fund" with no symbol and lots of holdings and "XXXXX fund" in the watch account with a symbol and news and so on but no holdings.) I know this doesn't solve everything, but these private funds leave little other choice. Were I designing the product, I'd allow an Investment to be derived from another for purposes of news and, especially, performance comparisons to the underlying investment and so forth. But I guess nobody at Microsoft has ever been in a 401k (most of them) that work this way. If it's any consolation, a Portfolio at Morningstar has the same limitation. "Ray" <raybosley[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news:ecQzPIBeGHA.1208[at]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... - quote - > True, I suppose I could track these without a symbol, but Money still > seems to pull good information on the Mutual Fund Characteristics for > Portfolio Analysis. > I'm just dealing with it for now as I have learned to turn off > Auto-Updates for any new funds right away. Its just the initial group > that retains some On-Line Pricing. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| True, I suppose I could track these without a symbol, but Money still seems to pull good information on the Mutual Fund Characteristics for Portfolio Analysis. I'm just dealing with it for now as I have learned to turn off Auto-Updates for any new funds right away. Its just the initial group that retains some On-Line Pricing. Thanks again, Ray "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:%239a1JEPdGHA.3908[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... - quote - > Have you deleted the symbols (for investments that you don't actually own > since the 401k plan really is offering a derivative) from the investments > in question? > "Ray" <raybosley[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:Owl7BeOdGHA.3632[at]TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > > I've been trying to delete all the prices tagged Online one-by-one as > > these are the prices that don't match the 401K quoted prices. I've been > > leaving in the ones with Buy or Update as I have added those myself and > > their prices match correctly. > > > The Online prices I delete just seem to keep coming back. Its not a huge > > deal, just slightly annoying. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Have you deleted the symbols (for investments that you don't actually own since the 401k plan really is offering a derivative) from the investments in question? "Ray" <raybosley[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Owl7BeOdGHA.3632[at]TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... - quote - > I've been trying to delete all the prices tagged Online one-by-one as > these are the prices that don't match the 401K quoted prices. I've been > leaving in the ones with Buy or Update as I have added those myself and > their prices match correctly. > The Online prices I delete just seem to keep coming back. Its not a huge > deal, just slightly annoying. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| I've been trying to delete all the prices tagged Online one-by-one as these are the prices that don't match the 401K quoted prices. I've been leaving in the ones with Buy or Update as I have added those myself and their prices match correctly. The Online prices I delete just seem to keep coming back. Its not a huge deal, just slightly annoying. Thanks, Ray "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:OyLP4xCdGHA.3952[at]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... - quote - > I re-read this differently. > You say you've deleted previous on-line price updates. How so? Price > history, one-by-one? (The only way I know of besides Update quote > list|Clear historical quotes which is not symbol selective--it gets > everything that was in there from quotes before a certain date but not > everything as I'm about to note.) > IF NAVs for the symbols in question were used as NAVs in transactions > (Buys, Reinvests, Sells, etc.) then they are getting in price history from > these. That will be a lot harder to fix after the fact because your > shares/units will get all screwed up. > Example: > I buy 100 shares of XYZ at $10 per share for a $1000 contribution. That's > a $10 per share history point without downloading ANYTHING. > I decide that it really wasn't $10 per share, but $67.75 per unit. > Fixing what's in history as a quote now requires changing the 100 shares > of XYZ at $10 per share to be 14.760148 units of (the fund with no symbol) > at $67.749998170750049389748666476786 per unit. > "Ray" <raybosley[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:uD1EWbCdGHA.3632[at]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > > I have run the Clear Historical prices and everything else I could find. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I re-read this differently. You say you've deleted previous on-line price updates. How so? Price history, one-by-one? (The only way I know of besides Update quote list|Clear historical quotes which is not symbol selective--it gets everything that was in there from quotes before a certain date but not everything as I'm about to note.) IF NAVs for the symbols in question were used as NAVs in transactions (Buys, Reinvests, Sells, etc.) then they are getting in price history from these. That will be a lot harder to fix after the fact because your shares/units will get all screwed up. Example: I buy 100 shares of XYZ at $10 per share for a $1000 contribution. That's a $10 per share history point without downloading ANYTHING. I decide that it really wasn't $10 per share, but $67.75 per unit. Fixing what's in history as a quote now requires changing the 100 shares of XYZ at $10 per share to be 14.760148 units of (the fund with no symbol) at $67.749998170750049389748666476786 per unit. "Ray" <raybosley[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news:uD1EWbCdGHA.3632[at]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... - quote - > I have run the Clear Historical prices and everything else I could find. |
| | |||
| |||
| You need to remove the symbol from the investment details. For two reasons. The first reason is it will prevent the investment from updating price. The second reason is the answer to your first question. Many 401k plans tell you (at the surface) they are investing in fund XYZ. But when you read the fine print, what they are really investing in is a "fund" that owns mostly XYZ and has some cash floating around for liquidity and has some administrative expenses of its own. The problem is that the latter fund isn't publicly available and doesn't quote by symbol. For this reason, using the symbol of the underlying fund won't work. It won't track the private fund's cash float and expenses. "Ray" <raybosley[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news:uD1EWbCdGHA.3632[at]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... - quote - > I have a 401K that tracks NAV of the funds differently than the prices > auto-downloaded by Money for the same symbol (don't ask me why???). I have > turned off Auto-Update of those funds so I can manually update the fund > prices myself. > The problem is that no matter how many times I try to delete previous > on-line price updates, they remain with the Fund. This is kind of minor, > but also kind of annoying. I've learned when I add a new fund to this > account to disable price updates before my next update and this works for > new fund additions, but the old funds are still maintaining those on-line > price updates. What's weird is a lot of the prices are from dates before > I even initially purchased the funds in the account. > I have run the Clear Historical prices and everything else I could find. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I have a 401K that tracks NAV of the funds differently than the prices auto-downloaded by Money for the same symbol (don't ask me why???). I have turned off Auto-Update of those funds so I can manually update the fund prices myself. The problem is that no matter how many times I try to delete previous on-line price updates, they remain with the Fund. This is kind of minor, but also kind of annoying. I've learned when I add a new fund to this account to disable price updates before my next update and this works for new fund additions, but the old funds are still maintaining those on-line price updates. What's weird is a lot of the prices are from dates before I even initially purchased the funds in the account. I have run the Clear Historical prices and everything else I could find. Thanks, Ray |
| Tags |
| 401k, fund, manual, mutual, price, updates |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Mutual Fund Price Updates Wally: Money 2006 Canadian Edition I have noticed that since the beginning of the New Year none of my mutual funds (Canadian) are getting their prices... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 01-10-2006 01:15 PM | |
| Mutual Fund Price $0 The Merg: I am using MS$2004 Deluxe. Today I noticed that a fund in my portfolio is showing a price of $0. Looking at the price update history of the fund, it... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 07-17-2005 12:47 AM | |
| How to classify closed-end bond funds correctly ?, Why is manual asset allocation of mutual fund always cleared? Darren: I'm using Money 2005. I have some closed-end bond funds that are traded on the NYSE. For the purpose of correctly classifying them in my asset... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 11-27-2004 04:27 PM | |
| 401K Manual Updates Ann: I have recently converted from Quicken to MS Money Deluxe 2004 and find it more user friendly. My problem: I like to enter the number of shares/... | Microsoft Money | 7 | 01-25-2004 06:50 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |