|
#1
| |||
| |||
| comments inline "- Bobb -" <bobb[at]netscape.net> wrote in message news:elywYhIdGHA.564[at]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... - quote - > I did read the blog and although I've read before that this is were they
With MSN? Well, maybe in the sense that business "users" are advertisers.> WANT to head ...doesn't MS aim primarily at the business user ? - quote - > We've spoken before about the MS biz model and I know your side of it,
I can't say whether it would fly. I'd hope that consumers would reject it> and kind of agree - but - having gotten the industry from mainframe/dumb > terminal to client/server, do you think the customers really want to now > go back to terminal services ? So Money 200x ( and others) would be an > online app ? With MS as the mainframe !! Do you think that would fly ? totally. But I'm not entirely sure this is true. I try never to misunderestimate how the "average" user can abused. - quote - > Given a choice, I'd much rather have Larry Ellison's netPC concept. (
Not much argument here. But my prime concern would be abusive targeted> which is where Mr Gates came up with the idea) At least Oracle understands > how to handle lots of data. Even though he's pretty obnoxious, I would > trust Oracle to keep the site up and running ( And they'd use HP / EMC > etc not Windows ) marketing and having 100% control over my data. - quote - > "...He ( Ballmer) said the company will invest $1.1 billion in MSN and
Whoever has money and can be interested in the product. I don't think> $6.2 billion in research and development, and that the company will push > adoption of its MSN adCenter and Windows Live services....", > "will push adoption " upon who(m) ? adCenter is aimed at us consumers. I don't know much about Windows Live; to the extent this includes stuff like security services, I'd suspect they'll target the consumer. - quote - > I (and a lot of folks I know) have never used MSN and although I've seen
Can't say for Windows Live. For MSN, I think they will keep expanding the> Windows Live (and I do like local.live.com) , and where they want to go, I > think that their primary target is offline users - business people who > generally are not online 24x7 envelope 'til they find something for everyone. That's tehir goal anyway. It's back to the cable TV analogy. Do they really care what it is they put on? Hell, no. It's all just honey to atttract progressively smaller bee colonies. - quote - > . Do you think that they're gonna toss that model assuming ( maybe with
From my tries, Microsoft search is useless. I almost always go to google> wifi) that everyone will be online all the time ? BTW I only use Portfolio > related part of Money so I don't see ads there now. > as for: > Ballmer: Microsoft's Search Engine Makes Big Gains > Same thing - I have never used IE SEARCH and right now - it's BUILT INTO > IE. Generally MS tries to throw a wrench into their code to trip up the > competition ( like they did with IE/Netscape compatability, Sun java). > I'll stay with Google ( or Yahoo) unless/until they slow down > significantly. next and get better reuslts. Even when the subject is, as is frequent for me, something to do with Microsoft stuff. But sooner or later they'll get a clue. I don't see the "built in" IE issue you see, but I know the underpinnings let you wire it away from MSN if you want to. I do think taking OUT the toolbar extensibility was aimed straight at Yahoo/Google. Ironic, isn't it? For years people have given Microsoft crap for all of the extensibility stuff because it leads to things like Windows integration and security exposures. Then they remove an extensibility hook and there's great outrage. - quote - > For these reasons I haven't bought MSFT stock. I do like the new Office > model. I WAS thinking about it - thinking that Vista is coming , but > unless/until big biz buys into it I don't see the $$ flowing into MSFT's > bank account. I think Vista (with its aerowindows) may be a hit with > retail consumers but that's a tiny bit of their income. |
| | |||
| |||
| "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:uaHvtorcGHA.2188[at]TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... - quote - > Borrowed from
Hi Dick, (where'd you get that email/alias ? )> http://www.windowsitpro.com/windowsp...ott_50213.html. > [Ballmer] said the company will invest $1.1 billion in MSN and $6.2 > billion > in research and development, and that the company will push adoption > of its > MSN adCenter and Windows Live services. ... "Our number one priority > is > software as a service." > Remembering that Money falls in the MSN family of ever-amorphous > vehicles to > attract eyeballs to ads, draw your own conclusions. I did read the blog and although I've read before that this is were they WANT to head ...doesn't MS aim primarily at the business user ? We've spoken before about the MS biz model and I know your side of it, and kind of agree - but - having gotten the industry from mainframe/dumb terminal to client/server, do you think the customers really want to now go back to terminal services ? So Money 200x ( and others) would be an online app ? With MS as the mainframe !! Do you think that would fly ? Given a choice, I'd much rather have Larry Ellison's netPC concept. ( which is where Mr Gates came up with the idea) At least Oracle understands how to handle lots of data. Even though he's pretty obnoxious, I would trust Oracle to keep the site up and running ( And they'd use HP / EMC etc not Windows ) "...He ( Ballmer) said the company will invest $1.1 billion in MSN and $6.2 billion in research and development, and that the company will push adoption of its MSN adCenter and Windows Live services....", "will push adoption " upon who(m) ? I (and a lot of folks I know) have never used MSN and although I've seen Windows Live (and I do like local.live.com) , and where they want to go, I think that their primary target is offline users - business people who generally are not online 24x7. Do you think that they're gonna toss that model assuming ( maybe with wifi) that everyone will be online all the time ? BTW I only use Portfolio related part of Money so I don't see ads there now. as for: Ballmer: Microsoft's Search Engine Makes Big Gains Same thing - I have never used IE SEARCH and right now - it's BUILT INTO IE. Generally MS tries to throw a wrench into their code to trip up the competition ( like they did with IE/Netscape compatability, Sun java). I'll stay with Google ( or Yahoo) unless/until they slow down significantly. For these reasons I haven't bought MSFT stock. I do like the new Office model. I WAS thinking about it - thinking that Vista is coming , but unless/until big biz buys into it I don't see the $$ flowing into MSFT's bank account. I think Vista (with its aerowindows) may be a hit with retail consumers but that's a tiny bit of their income. Bobb |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Borrowed from http://www.windowsitpro.com/windowsp...ott_50213.html. [Ballmer] said the company will invest $1.1 billion in MSN and $6.2 billion in research and development, and that the company will push adoption of its MSN adCenter and Windows Live services. ... "Our number one priority is software as a service." Remembering that Money falls in the MSN family of ever-amorphous vehicles to attract eyeballs to ads, draw your own conclusions. |