|
#4
| |||
| |||
| I'll check it out. Thanks! "Chris Cowles" <spam_magnet[at]remove-me-bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:OYsbusPYGHA.3532[at]TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... - quote - > "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in > message news:%23Oy9FLDYGHA.2208[at]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > > The answer to quite a number of your issues is contained in > > http://umpmfaq.info/faqdb.php?q=171. > Dick, at least one of the links to Yodlee on that page is broken: > http://corporate.yodlee.com/company/...10_28_roi.html Seems like > maybe it was moved to > http://corporate.yodlee.com/company/...ation_can.html |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:%23Oy9FLDYGHA.2208[at]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... - quote - > The answer to quite a number of your issues is contained in
Dick, at least one of the links to Yodlee on that page is broken:> http://umpmfaq.info/faqdb.php?q=171. http://corporate.yodlee.com/company/...10_28_roi.html Seems like maybe it was moved to http://corporate.yodlee.com/company/...ation_can.html |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:%23Oy9FLDYGHA.2208[at]TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... - quote - > The answer to quite a number of your issues is contained in
Thanks so much for the link! That explains everything that I wanted to> http://umpmfaq.info/faqdb.php?q=171. know. This is definitely a real eye opener. Thanks again. - quote - > "Isaac" <nospam[at]nospam.net> wrote in message > news:H%O%f.10$513.4[at]trndny05... > > I do not understand how all my financial institutions have a problem at > > the same time. I might be able to get updates to my checking account if > > I try the update button five or six times. Another problem with > > Microsoft's program is how MoneyCentral has to download the information > > first then pass it along to me. Is this really necessary? Why can't > > money just connect directly with my bank? |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| The answer to quite a number of your issues is contained in http://umpmfaq.info/faqdb.php?q=171. "Isaac" <nospam[at]nospam.net> wrote in message news:H%O%f.10$513.4[at]trndny05... - quote - > I do not understand how all my financial institutions have a problem at > the same time. I might be able to get updates to my checking account if I > try the update button five or six times. Another problem with Microsoft's > program is how MoneyCentral has to download the information first then > pass it along to me. Is this really necessary? Why can't money just > connect directly with my bank? |
| | |||
| |||
| We call it bloated software in the IT/DP business. The true cost of software is maintenance and not development. I can theorize many reasons for having a centralized rather than distributed processing (as it was hyped ages ago) paradigm for talking to financial institutions, such as: 1. Single point for programming changes between the FI and the application. Distributed is a PITA when you do now own the distribution network or distributed nodes. 2. Security. Easier to control if you know only known fixed connections and authorized interfaces. arthur == On Fri, 14 Apr 2006 15:14:47 GMT, "Isaac" <nospam[at]nospam.net> wrote: - quote - > I will save a ton of money upgrading software from this point forward. Each > version of Money is worse than the one preceding it. I would just be happy > if the program would download the updates from my institutions on a > consistent basis. I do not understand how all my financial institutions > have a problem at the same time. I might be able to get updates to my > checking account if I try the update button five or six times. Another > problem with Microsoft's program is how MoneyCentral has to download the > information first then pass it along to me. Is this really necessary? Why > can't money just connect directly with my bank? Another problem is how > duplicate transactions get crested over and over again. How many times does > one have accept something before it disappears? Like I said before, I will > save a lot of money because I am never buying a newer version again. I > could care less if Microsoft takes away my online account access in a year > and a half because it doesn't work to begin with. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I will save a ton of money upgrading software from this point forward. Each version of Money is worse than the one preceding it. I would just be happy if the program would download the updates from my institutions on a consistent basis. I do not understand how all my financial institutions have a problem at the same time. I might be able to get updates to my checking account if I try the update button five or six times. Another problem with Microsoft's program is how MoneyCentral has to download the information first then pass it along to me. Is this really necessary? Why can't money just connect directly with my bank? Another problem is how duplicate transactions get crested over and over again. How many times does one have accept something before it disappears? Like I said before, I will save a lot of money because I am never buying a newer version again. I could care less if Microsoft takes away my online account access in a year and a half because it doesn't work to begin with. |