|
#1
| |||
| |||
| thanks cal. you are right on all accounts - taxable account. thanks for the help "Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, rsercely wrote: > > I have an investment, ticker pbtbx, 1234.56 shares, that are a result of > > initial purchase plus many reinvestments of dividends, so there is a lot of > > cost basis history. > We infer this is not in a tax-deferred account. Otherwise the basis > of the shares is not important. > > > On jan 12, 05, "they" sold the 1234.56 shares, and bought 1277.88 shares of > > ticker bptaz. > That is not a regular ticker. Hmmm. > So this is not a taxable event? Because if it were taxable or was in > a tax-deferred account, buy and sell is the best way. > > > How do I treat it? Split is bad, because of all the fractions. Also, after > > the split, when I try to do a name change, I get an error, because the "new" > > name is already in my portolio :-( > Split is pretty much the only way to maintain the basis and history. > Here would be the process" > 1. Assuming you don't already hold "bptaz", blank its symbol. Then > change the name to something you will not want to use for another > purpose. > 2. Split the shares 10649 shares for every 10288 shares > The error factor is a negligible 1.1 parts per Billion. > 3. Change the symbol and name to that of the new holding. > 4. Record the event in the comment field of the Details. > > > I am thinking of selling all, and then buying all with the funds - the one > > problem I see - the "new" purchase, if I sell anything soon, will not figure > > cost basis as long term, which would be very messy: > > > consider that there was a reinvestment of dividend jan 12, 2004 of 1 share. > > If I were to sell the "new" shares jan 12 of 2006 - these shares would > > report as short term gains or loss, but would really be long term, right? |
| | |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, rsercely wrote: - quote - > I have an investment, ticker pbtbx, 1234.56 shares, that are a result of
We infer this is not in a tax-deferred account. Otherwise the basis> initial purchase plus many reinvestments of dividends, so there is a lot of > cost basis history. of the shares is not important. - quote - > On jan 12, 05, "they" sold the 1234.56 shares, and bought 1277.88 shares of
That is not a regular ticker. Hmmm.> ticker bptaz. So this is not a taxable event? Because if it were taxable or was in a tax-deferred account, buy and sell is the best way. - quote - > How do I treat it? Split is bad, because of all the fractions. Also, after
Split is pretty much the only way to maintain the basis and history.> the split, when I try to do a name change, I get an error, because the "new" > name is already in my portolio :-( Here would be the process" 1. Assuming you don't already hold "bptaz", blank its symbol. Then change the name to something you will not want to use for another purpose. 2. Split the shares 10649 shares for every 10288 shares The error factor is a negligible 1.1 parts per Billion. 3. Change the symbol and name to that of the new holding. 4. Record the event in the comment field of the Details. - quote - > I am thinking of selling all, and then buying all with the funds - the one > problem I see - the "new" purchase, if I sell anything soon, will not figure > cost basis as long term, which would be very messy: > consider that there was a reinvestment of dividend jan 12, 2004 of 1 share. > If I were to sell the "new" shares jan 12 of 2006 - these shares would > report as short term gains or loss, but would really be long term, right? |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I have an investment, ticker pbtbx, 1234.56 shares, that are a result of initial purchase plus many reinvestments of dividends, so there is a lot of cost basis history. On jan 12, 05, "they" sold the 1234.56 shares, and bought 1277.88 shares of ticker bptaz. How do I treat it? Split is bad, because of all the fractions. Also, after the split, when I try to do a name change, I get an error, because the "new" name is already in my portolio :-( I am thinking of selling all, and then buying all with the funds - the one problem I see - the "new" purchase, if I sell anything soon, will not figure cost basis as long term, which would be very messy: consider that there was a reinvestment of dividend jan 12, 2004 of 1 share. If I were to sell the "new" shares jan 12 of 2006 - these shares would report as short term gains or loss, but would really be long term, right? |
| Tags |
| conversion, stock |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Issue with Stock Options in Conversion from 2004 to 2005 davesas: In my 2004 standard version I have 5 stock option grants. After conversion to 2005 standard not all the grants show up in the Portfolio Manager. In... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 02-21-2005 03:24 PM | |
| Stock commission is greater than proceeds of stock sale. go3049: I recently sold 2000 shares of stock for $0.0001 per share. Gross proceeds were $0.20. Commissions for the sale were $29.95. Net proceeds were... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 01-13-2005 02:19 AM | |
| Change Stock Symbol in Stock Options Account Tom: I have a stock options account with my company. However, about mid-yar theyy changed their name and therefore their stock ticker symbol. I need to... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 11-21-2004 04:51 PM | |
| Stock Name Conversion Chuck: I just received a stock rename in my Money from my brokage and it sold and buy 400 shares and applied no basis to the new stock name. So now it... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 02-27-2004 04:40 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |