| | |||
| |||
| The short answer is no. For the long answer, please see the thread from late last week titled "DO NOT ARCHIVE THE MONEY FILE". There is no practical "full" Money file. At least not one so full that archiving is the solution to anything associated with it. "Joe" <Callaj[at]swbell.net> wrote in message news:%23iINUtyDGHA.2912[at]tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... - quote - > I recently upgrade to Money 2006 from 2004. My primary data file is full > and I'm wanting to archive 2004 and 2005 respectively into two separate > files leaving me with virtually an empty file for 2006. Everything seems > to work fine EXCEPT for Checking Account transactions that involve my > mortgage and payroll transactions. For some reason during the archive > process, transactions with the 2004 date that should be archived are > remaining in the primary file. If subsequently deleted, they alter the > Mortgage account as if the payment was never made. The same is true if I > delete the payroll deposits - it wipes out the related 401K contributions > from my investment account. > Is this normal? Is there any way to not alter the historical balances of > investments and loans but to eliminate the driving transactions? |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I recently upgrade to Money 2006 from 2004. My primary data file is full and I'm wanting to archive 2004 and 2005 respectively into two separate files leaving me with virtually an empty file for 2006. Everything seems to work fine EXCEPT for Checking Account transactions that involve my mortgage and payroll transactions. For some reason during the archive process, transactions with the 2004 date that should be archived are remaining in the primary file. If subsequently deleted, they alter the Mortgage account as if the payment was never made. The same is true if I delete the payroll deposits - it wipes out the related 401K contributions from my investment account. Is this normal? Is there any way to not alter the historical balances of investments and loans but to eliminate the driving transactions? Thanks, Joe |
| Tags |
| archiving, confusion |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Product confusion (cont.) Bill: Further question to my earlier post: Is this correct: MoneyCentral changed to MSN Money. Then Money changed from free, to a purchased product. ... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 12-08-2004 06:07 PM | |
| Product confusion Bill: I am confused. Several years ago I began using MoneyCentral to manage my investment portfolio. Then it changed to Money. I set up everything to... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 12-08-2004 05:05 PM | |
| Activation confusion... WMJ: I am really frustrated and confused over Microsoft's activation policy on Money 2004 Deluxe Upgrade from Trial. I have attempted to reinstall... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 12-11-2003 02:04 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |