|
#13
| |||
| |||
| FWIW, I don't use passport... "JohnA" <John[at]TheAtas.org-spamguard> wrote in message news:upuYdndBGHA.1008[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... - quote - > I upgraded from M2004.. > . > -- John > <mattreidy[at]gmail.com> wrote in message > news:1135106159.917290.275180[at]g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > John, > > > Did you start using Money 2006 with a brand new file or did you upgrade > > from a previous version? > > > -Matt > |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| <mattreidy[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1135215189.916879.159450[at]g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... - quote - > One more learning...
I'm not sure the link you describe is correct (correlation<> causation), but> Apparently, there is also a link between associating a Passport with your > Money file and this issue. I do not have a Passport on my account, for what it's worth. By not having one I'm unable to download a very limited set of accounts, none of which are important to me. I use online banking extensively, and most of the banks I do business with support Money directly. Also by not having one I'm not sending my data to Microsoft's (or Yodlee's?) servers, and do not have automatic background data updates. The latter point is an advantage to me, irksome to others. -- Chris Cowles Gainesville, FL |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| One more learning... Apparently, there is also a link between associating a Passport with your Money file and this issue. The test Money file I created was not associated with a Passport, and during troubleshooting, I removed the Passport from my real Money file as well. I "fixed" my issue by doing what I described in the previous post, but later re-associated my Passport and the issue returned. I can live without, and think I actually prefer not to have, my complete personal financial information in the hands of Microsoft. I'll stick with a Money password-protected file on my server for now. I would like to know if what worked for me works for others as well. -Matt |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| <mattreidy[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1135178963.580876.265980[at]f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... - quote - > After a lot of tinkering I've solved my problem and maybe this will
Glad that worked for you. Be careful when doing that, though. Existing bills> help others too. > Basically, what I did was to stop using online services with my bank in > Money 2006 and then re-enable them. Once I did that, the epay due date > remains as the date in the register (assuming you keep the option to > record the processing date off). > Use the Manage online services option under the Account Tools drop-down > menu to make these changes. You don't have to delete your account(s), > just "Stop using online services" and then set them back up. > I tried this after creating a new Money 2006 file from scratch, setting > up the same bank account for online services, and verifying that this > problem did not exist in the new file. not canceled before disabling online services no longer will be linked to the transaction from the bank. Also, if you have existing APays scheduled, they will remain scheduled and you can't revise or cancel them from within Money. Your bank customer service can cancel those with a phone call, of course. -- Chris Cowles Gainesville, FL |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| After a lot of tinkering I've solved my problem and maybe this will help others too. Basically, what I did was to stop using online services with my bank in Money 2006 and then re-enable them. Once I did that, the epay due date remains as the date in the register (assuming you keep the option to record the processing date off). Use the Manage online services option under the Account Tools drop-down menu to make these changes. You don't have to delete your account(s), just "Stop using online services" and then set them back up. I tried this after creating a new Money 2006 file from scratch, setting up the same bank account for online services, and verifying that this problem did not exist in the new file. -Matt |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| I upgraded from M2004.. .. -- John <mattreidy[at]gmail.com> wrote in message news:1135106159.917290.275180[at]g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... - quote - > John, > Did you start using Money 2006 with a brand new file or did you upgrade > from a previous version? > -Matt |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| I've got the same problem and logged an error report with MicroSoft. Got an email from tech support telling me to "uncheck" processing date. It wasn't checked and I'm waiting for further instructions. I'm really taken back by the fact that my Money 2003 was working fine and that I had to upgrade to this Money 2006 in order to pay my bills online with Money, only to run into these kinds of ridiculous problems. New versions should be building on old versions to be stronger and better. This is nonsense. -- Paulie...boogie boarding in retirement! "mattreidy[at]yahoo.com" wrote: - quote - > I've recently upgraded from Money 2003 to Money 2006 and for some > reason, Money 2006 insists on using the processing date vs. the due > date, regardless of how the "Enter electronic payments in the register > with the processing date" is set. > I have confirmed that my bank, Wachovia, does not withdraw funds from > my account until the payee actually deposits the check, so there's no > reason for Money to be using the processing date. > It seems like a bug to me and I'm interested to know if others have the > same issue and or any way around it. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| I tend not to keep more in my checking account than necessary, so expecting to get paid on the 15th and 30th of each month and expecting to pay large bills on those same days is problematic when Money insists on showing the bills being paid early. Looking at the register implies that I've lost my float, when if fact, I haven't. Money is not working as designed and it's a matter of figuring out why at this point. I've got a case open with Microsoft, but so far they've not told me to do anything I haven't already thought of and tried... |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| John, Did you start using Money 2006 with a brand new file or did you upgrade from a previous version? -Matt |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| I'm wondering if this is related to upgrading/converting an existing file from a previous version of Money. As a test, I'm going to create a new file, setup my checking account from scratch and test an epay to see what happens. As an aside, I actually bought Quicken the other day in case I can't get Money to behave, but after playing with it for a day or two I've requested a refund because I think the user interface is absolutely terrible. It's at least a decade behind when it comes to layout and look-n-feel. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Hi, I'm using M2006 and am set up to use the date initially setup in the transaction, not the processing date when the transaction cleared. I've had no problems doing this. -- John <mattreidy[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1134927705.453493.301310[at]f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... - quote - > I've recently upgraded from Money 2003 to Money 2006 and for some > reason, Money 2006 insists on using the processing date vs. the due > date, regardless of how the "Enter electronic payments in the register > with the processing date" is set. > I have confirmed that my bank, Wachovia, does not withdraw funds from > my account until the payee actually deposits the check, so there's no > reason for Money to be using the processing date. > It seems like a bug to me and I'm interested to know if others have the > same issue and or any way around it. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| In Tools --> Settings under Online Investing Settings, there is a checkbox there that says "Enter electronic payments in the register with the processing date". Checking that should make Money use the "processing date" (supposed date that funds would need to be withdrawn, or date cash is committed to a check). If it's not checked, Money should use the date you specify (due date) in the register. This worked as expected in Money 2005. It seems to have no effect in Money 2006. Hopefully, there's another way. It's a huge irritant to me. -- L. T. "Chris Cowles" wrote: - quote - > "LT" <ltinfo(remove this)[at]comcast.net> wrote in message > news:760C4806-ED66-4186-9D32-DB90AC2F5344[at]microsoft.com... > > > Maybe someone, somewhere will see these questions and tell us how to fix > > them. > That assumes there exists a means to change the way it does that. I don't > know of one, and I use online banking extensively. > Personally, I'm not concerned by a 2 or 3 day variation in posting date. > -- > Chris Cowles > Gainesville, FL |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "LT" <ltinfo(remove this)[at]comcast.net> wrote in message news:760C4806-ED66-4186-9D32-DB90AC2F5344[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > Maybe someone, somewhere will see these questions and tell us how to fix
That assumes there exists a means to change the way it does that. I don't> them. know of one, and I use online banking extensively. Personally, I'm not concerned by a 2 or 3 day variation in posting date. -- Chris Cowles Gainesville, FL |
| | |||
| |||
| Matt, I posted pretty much the exact same question on 12/11. Unfortunately, I have yet to receive a response from anyone. It really bugs me that Money is working this way (I upgraded from Money 2005 and it didn't work this way). Maybe someone, somewhere will see these questions and tell us how to fix them. I sure hope so; it's about to drive me to looking into that other financial software package. -- L. T. "mattreidy[at]yahoo.com" wrote: - quote - > I've recently upgraded from Money 2003 to Money 2006 and for some > reason, Money 2006 insists on using the processing date vs. the due > date, regardless of how the "Enter electronic payments in the register > with the processing date" is set. > I have confirmed that my bank, Wachovia, does not withdraw funds from > my account until the payee actually deposits the check, so there's no > reason for Money to be using the processing date. > It seems like a bug to me and I'm interested to know if others have the > same issue and or any way around it. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I've recently upgraded from Money 2003 to Money 2006 and for some reason, Money 2006 insists on using the processing date vs. the due date, regardless of how the "Enter electronic payments in the register with the processing date" is set. I have confirmed that my bank, Wachovia, does not withdraw funds from my account until the payee actually deposits the check, so there's no reason for Money to be using the processing date. It seems like a bug to me and I'm interested to know if others have the same issue and or any way around it. |
| Tags |
| date, due, electronic, payments, processing, register |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| BillPay Processing Date in Check Register Eric Koch: This feature is just awful. As a user, I can accept that I need to cancel "in advance" of the delivery date. Does anyone have any suggestions on... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 02-13-2005 04:35 PM | |
| EPays w/ Processing Date Larry: I've been using MM for a number of years and have had relatively few problems...until now with MM05. I've searched this NG and FAQ web site but... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 01-08-2005 04:24 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |