|
#5
10-11-2005, 02:03 PM
| |||
| |||
 Re: Loss of features in Money 2006 from 2004 MoneyDance, AceMoney and GNUcash to name three. They can be googled. <Paul> wrote in message news:eA7gQimzFHA.904[at]tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... - quote - > Are there any other products besides Money and Quicken? |
|
#4
10-11-2005, 01:35 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Loss of features in Money 2006 from 2004 Are there any other products besides Money and Quicken? "Chris Cowles" <NoSpam[at]For.me> wrote in message news:OSEqCdfzFHA.2072[at]TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... - quote - > Spend some time in alt.comp.software.financial.quicken before making a > decision. > -- > Chris Cowles > Gainesville, FL > "Mike" <me[at]home.com> wrote in message > news:dicerf$2s83$1[at]si05.rsvl.unisys.com... > > \Based on the intial upgrade problem I have experienced - i.e. 2003 to > > 2006, I might not continue to use Money....might move to Quicken > > instead!! |
|
#3
10-11-2005, 12:03 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Loss of features in Money 2006 from 2004 Spend some time in alt.comp.software.financial.quicken before making a decision. -- Chris Cowles Gainesville, FL "Mike" <me[at]home.com> wrote in message news:dicerf$2s83$1[at]si05.rsvl.unisys.com... - quote - > \Based on the intial upgrade problem I have experienced - i.e. 2003 to > 2006, I might not continue to use Money....might move to Quicken instead!! |
|
#2
10-10-2005, 05:16 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Loss of features in Money 2006 from 2004 Unfortunately, BOTH Money and Quicken made similar DISASTERS with their 2005 editions and Money has carried forward. I would be sure to read reviews of Quicken BEFORE you buy it, unless they have a trial version also. You might look at the reviews on Amazon. "Mike" <me[at]home.com> wrote in message news:dicerf$2s83$1[at]si05.rsvl.unisys.com... - quote - > "John Barnes" <jbfoofy[at]email.net> wrote in message > news:O29ZPRNzFHA.1040[at]TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... > > Unfortunately 2004 was the last good Money. Starting with 2005 it is > > horrible. By the time I got thru with the tech service, it was a matter > > of having to re-enter all the new items I had posted in 2005 or try to > > live with a crappy product. The fix they put out only fixed some of the > > problems, I still live with the rest (like random backwards posting of > > investment transactions and no automatic updating of bank accounts on > > startup - has to be done manually or leave it running for hours). > > > \Based on the intial upgrade problem I have experienced - i.e. 2003 to > 2006, I might not continue to use Money....might move to Quicken instead!! |
|
#1
10-10-2005, 01:11 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Loss of features in Money 2006 from 2004 "John Barnes" <jbfoofy[at]email.net> wrote in message news:O29ZPRNzFHA.1040[at]TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... - quote - > Unfortunately 2004 was the last good Money. Starting with 2005 it is
I might not continue to use Money....might move to Quicken instead!!> horrible. By the time I got thru with the tech service, it was a matter > of having to re-enter all the new items I had posted in 2005 or try to > live with a crappy product. The fix they put out only fixed some of the > problems, I still live with the rest (like random backwards posting of > investment transactions and no automatic updating of bank accounts on > startup - has to be done manually or leave it running for hours). \Based on the intial upgrade problem I have experienced - i.e. 2003 to 2006, |
|
10-09-2005, 01:21 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Loss of features in Money 2006 from 2004 Unfortunately 2004 was the last good Money. Starting with 2005 it is horrible. By the time I got thru with the tech service, it was a matter of having to re-enter all the new items I had posted in 2005 or try to live with a crappy product. The fix they put out only fixed some of the problems, I still live with the rest (like random backwards posting of investment transactions and no automatic updating of bank accounts on startup - has to be done manually or leave it running for hours). "Thomas Smith" <ThomasSmith[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:6C603BDD-C50D-47BF-ABCD-0ED71F29FDCE[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > It appears that Microsoft has removed from the 2006 version of Money some > features I found helpful. In liability/credit card registers, the credit > limits used to be displayed on the lower left side of the screen. In > investment accounts, the corresponding cash account balance would be > display. > Now however, the system does not display this data nor can you turn it on. > Customer support said they removed this feature from 2006. I think that is > a > mistake. Are there others out there that use to make use of this feature? > Support did say (I've not verified it yet) that they have restored the > selective archiving that existed prior to 2004 but was removed from the > 2004 > and later versions due to customer complaints (of which I was one) since > users who wanted to clear old transactions early in the new year archiving > created a myriad of recon issues as uncleared as well as cleared > transactions > were deleted. > ---------------- > This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the > suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I > Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow > this > link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then > click "I Agree" in the message pane. > http://www.microsoft.com/communities...t.public.money |
|
#-1
10-06-2005, 08:48 PM
| |||
| |||
| Loss of features in Money 2006 from 2004 It appears that Microsoft has removed from the 2006 version of Money some features I found helpful. In liability/credit card registers, the credit limits used to be displayed on the lower left side of the screen. In investment accounts, the corresponding cash account balance would be display. Now however, the system does not display this data nor can you turn it on. Customer support said they removed this feature from 2006. I think that is a mistake. Are there others out there that use to make use of this feature? Support did say (I've not verified it yet) that they have restored the selective archiving that existed prior to 2004 but was removed from the 2004 and later versions due to customer complaints (of which I was one) since users who wanted to clear old transactions early in the new year archiving created a myriad of recon issues as uncleared as well as cleared transactions were deleted. ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://www.microsoft.com/communities...t.public.money |
| Tags |
| 2004, 2006, features, loss, money |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Upgrade from 3.0 and 2006.X Features Not Cutting Edge: Where can I find a TEXT listing of Money 2006 features so I know which version to upgrade to? I find version 3.0 doesn't run well on XP machine. ... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 09-06-2005 02:21 PM | |
| Loss of features in 2005?? Casey: OK, I purchased Money 2005 on-line. Had some problems in 2004, so I figured I'd update to the newest... Did the download, installed, had a few... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 10-27-2004 08:39 PM | |
| Features of Money 2004 for Pocket PC Dan Rice: Can anyone tell me the list of features that the Pocket PC version of Money that comes with 2004 has? Does it have more than what was in the... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 12-26-2003 05:59 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
