|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "Jonathan" wrote: - quote - > I am on Money 2003 which I found to be rock-solid. Last year I tried > out 2005, but rejected it due to reasons you are all well aware of. > I know about access being potentially cut-off to me in 6 weeks, but > whether or not they will follow through on that remains to be seen. > Besides that, is there any other reason to do an upgrade now? I cannot > think of any, but am open if anybody actually recommends it. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Some comments inline. "Jason" <cfjraz[at]cox.net> wrote in message news:ulA5I%23mjFHA.3332[at]TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... - quote - > "You can run 2006 in a mode that fixes several bugs in 2003 and does not
Comparison reports were in M04. Even if Essential Budget stinks, you can> introduce any new ones." > Could you please provide a little more detail here? > I've been a Money user since 98. I upgraded every year through 2003, and > then stayed there. I don't remember why I skipped 2004 anymore, but the > inability to list categories and subcategories separtely when entering > transactions was a deal breaker for me in 2005. > I've downloaded and tested the 2006 trial, and I see that the category issue > is fixed, but it is also still fine in 2003. There are a couple things I > like a little better here and there in 2006, like the ability to show both > bank and local balance on the accounts home page (instead of a couple clicks > deeper in 2003), and the essential budget doesn't stink, I guess. > Comparrison reports are also a mild plus. Just Say No to Essential * and use Advanced * instead. - quote - > Overall though, it seems like there is more wasted space at the top of the
There are problems here, but I don't know what all of the limitations are.> screen, and I don't like that half the links on the 'bottom' toolbar are > really links to internet content. I can find this content just fine in a > web browser, thank you very much. Also, I still have no interest in > syncronization of my own data with MSN money, or the ability to enter > transactions from anywhere. > In fact, I remember pretty clearly the way 2004 users who used passport were > locked out of their own data just before 2005 came out. > I know that if I ultimately move to 2006 I can continue to avoid using a > Passport, but does anybody know if it is possible to access the data stored > in a 2006 file protected by a MS Passport if you know the username and > password, but the MS servers, or your own internet connection are down? There is a way to login "offline" to a local file with cached Passport credentials. (Th summer 04 case had these credentials getting invalidated after an online authentication attempt.) But why do Passport authentication in the first place if you need nothing that Passport authentication enables? - quote - > In a product like this, it just makes no sense to me to require remote
I'm betting that more legitimate users--data owners--have been locked out of> authentication for access to local data, potential for file cracking > programs notwithstanding. For me, this is really one of the top 2 biggest > disincentives to Money's new directions. their own Money data than intruders have been locked out of somebody else's Money data by either of the authentication schemes Money makes available. Also, don't forget that the strategic direction is almost surely to eliminate the "local data" part of this problem. And as much as I don't like it, I'm not sure that's a bad thing ***for the users in the center of the target they are aiming at***. Many of these users can't/won't backup, don't understand where their data is stored, don't implement even mediocre data protection/security practices, don't know what version they are running, can't remember where the CD is with that version, and so forth. Can MSN be a worse place for their data than their home machine? - quote - > On balance, I think I'd actaully continue to stay with 2003 if possible, but > if 2003 really does stop working in 6 weeks, I guess it'll be a pretty > simple decision, and yes, I think that does stink. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "You can run 2006 in a mode that fixes several bugs in 2003 and does not introduce any new ones." Could you please provide a little more detail here? I've been a Money user since 98. I upgraded every year through 2003, and then stayed there. I don't remember why I skipped 2004 anymore, but the inability to list categories and subcategories separtely when entering transactions was a deal breaker for me in 2005. I've downloaded and tested the 2006 trial, and I see that the category issue is fixed, but it is also still fine in 2003. There are a couple things I like a little better here and there in 2006, like the ability to show both bank and local balance on the accounts home page (instead of a couple clicks deeper in 2003), and the essential budget doesn't stink, I guess. Comparrison reports are also a mild plus. Overall though, it seems like there is more wasted space at the top of the screen, and I don't like that half the links on the 'bottom' toolbar are really links to internet content. I can find this content just fine in a web browser, thank you very much. Also, I still have no interest in syncronization of my own data with MSN money, or the ability to enter transactions from anywhere. In fact, I remember pretty clearly the way 2004 users who used passport were locked out of their own data just before 2005 came out. I know that if I ultimately move to 2006 I can continue to avoid using a Passport, but does anybody know if it is possible to access the data stored in a 2006 file protected by a MS Passport if you know the username and password, but the MS servers, or your own internet connection are down? In a product like this, it just makes no sense to me to require remote authentication for access to local data, potential for file cracking programs notwithstanding. For me, this is really one of the top 2 biggest disincentives to Money's new directions. On balance, I think I'd actaully continue to stay with 2003 if possible, but if 2003 really does stop working in 6 weeks, I guess it'll be a pretty simple decision, and yes, I think that does stink. J... "Art McClinton" <art[at]nova.org> wrote in message news:G4WDe.78435$%Z2.15520[at]lakeread08... - quote - > You can run 2006 in a mode that fixes several bugs in 2003 and does not > introduce any new ones. 2006 does not require that you set up using a > passport and MSN Moneycentral downloads. Likewise you do not have to set > up automatic downloads from your Financial Institutions if the require the > third party Yodlee package if you wish to continue using the FI website > access to manually download the OFX files. The code to cut you off from > the 2003 downloads is running on your system so MS has no way to not cut > you off at that time. Also with the rebates at COSTCO and other places > going away within 6 weeks you might just want to get the new version. > Art > Jonathan wrote: > > I am on Money 2003 which I found to be rock-solid. Last year I tried > > out 2005, but rejected it due to reasons you are all well aware of. > > > I know about access being potentially cut-off to me in 6 weeks, but > > whether or not they will follow through on that remains to be seen. > > > Besides that, is there any other reason to do an upgrade now? I cannot > > think of any, but am open if anybody actually recommends it. > |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| IF that's true--and I suspect it has to be for bank downloads but maybe not for quotes--then it should be hack-able, no? We've got a bunch of bright people here... (Sets me to thinking.) "Art McClinton" <art[at]nova.org> wrote in message news:G4WDe.78435$%Z2.15520[at]lakeread08... - quote - > The code to cut you off from the 2003 downloads is running on your system > so MS has no way to not cut you off at that time. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| You can run 2006 in a mode that fixes several bugs in 2003 and does not introduce any new ones. 2006 does not require that you set up using a passport and MSN Moneycentral downloads. Likewise you do not have to set up automatic downloads from your Financial Institutions if the require the third party Yodlee package if you wish to continue using the FI website access to manually download the OFX files. The code to cut you off from the 2003 downloads is running on your system so MS has no way to not cut you off at that time. Also with the rebates at COSTCO and other places going away within 6 weeks you might just want to get the new version. Art Jonathan wrote: - quote - > I am on Money 2003 which I found to be rock-solid. Last year I tried > out 2005, but rejected it due to reasons you are all well aware of. > I know about access being potentially cut-off to me in 6 weeks, but > whether or not they will follow through on that remains to be seen. > Besides that, is there any other reason to do an upgrade now? I cannot > think of any, but am open if anybody actually recommends it. |
| | |||
| |||
| It is rumoured that 2006 has improved over 2005 but.... Yes they WILL stop downloads and that is everything - shares, direct from you bank, etc etc -- Regards Bob Peel, Microsoft MVP - Money For UK tips & fixes see http://support.microsoft.com/default...d=fh;EN-GB;mny. For wishes or suggestions see http://register.microsoft.com/mswish/suggestion.asp or for UK wishes http://www.microsoft.com/uk/support/money/feedback I do not respond to any emails that I have not specifically asked for. "Jonathan" <bartlettjonathan[at]gmail.com> wrote in message news:1121981499.916531.206300[at]g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... - quote - > I am on Money 2003 which I found to be rock-solid. Last year I tried > out 2005, but rejected it due to reasons you are all well aware of. > I know about access being potentially cut-off to me in 6 weeks, but > whether or not they will follow through on that remains to be seen. > Besides that, is there any other reason to do an upgrade now? I cannot > think of any, but am open if anybody actually recommends it. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I am on Money 2003 which I found to be rock-solid. Last year I tried out 2005, but rejected it due to reasons you are all well aware of. I know about access being potentially cut-off to me in 6 weeks, but whether or not they will follow through on that remains to be seen. Besides that, is there any other reason to do an upgrade now? I cannot think of any, but am open if anybody actually recommends it. |
| Tags |
| 2003, reason, upgrade |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| When launch of Money 2005? Is there any reason to wait? (nfm) Grover: Thanks | Microsoft Money | 4 | 06-28-2004 05:17 PM | |
| Any Reason to Upgrade? ezorn33: Hi all, I've just started using Microsoft Money to manage my finances, and I'm using Money 2001 (which came on my computer). Is there any real... | Microsoft Money | 6 | 03-03-2004 02:26 AM | |
| Reason & For MSMoney 2000 Gone in 2004 x: Is it true the reason & for categories are gone in 2004? I was going to upgrade to 2004 but noticed those transaction classifications missing. Is... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 02-16-2004 05:40 PM | |
| Any reason to upgrade? JunkMonkey: A couple of days ago, (maybe a week) I posted a question asking what would I gain or lose by upgrading from Money 2001 std to 2004 std. A couple... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 07-28-2003 02:07 PM | |
| trying to upgrade Money 99 to 2003 Paul: When Money 2003 trys to convert the 99 file it says that it is not a compatable version, how can I upgrade my 99 file to be compatable with 2003 | Microsoft Money | 1 | 07-05-2003 01:33 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |