|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Yes you can. JohnA wrote: - quote - > What happens when 2 or more downloaded transactions match to the same > transaction? Are you allowed to unmatch the incorrect one but keep the > correct one matched? If so, this might actually be an improvement. |
| | |||
| |||
| What happens when 2 or more downloaded transactions match to the same transaction? Are you allowed to unmatch the incorrect one but keep the correct one matched? If so, this might actually be an improvement. "Shane" <Shane[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:AB7D6F7A-3BBD-407B-ABBE-3E788EBD14AE[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > One of the things Money 2006 touts is better transaction matching. Well, > based on my experience with the trial version that statement couldn't be > further from the truth. I recenlty downloaded an OFX statement from my > bank > and Money 2006 managed to match three downloaded trasactions to a single > transaction that was already in my register. None of those three > downloaded > transactions even had the same date as the existing tranaction they were > matched to. But, there were three existing transactions with the same > amounts and dates that Money 2006 didn't find matches for. Does that > sound > like better transaction matching too you??? It appears to me that it got > worse instead of better. > I've been a supporter of Microsoft's for years, but Money is some of the > worst software they have released in recent years. Forutnately for > Microsoft > I hear Quicken hasn't done much better. > I think Microsoft is more about making money (pun intended) on this > product > than it is about getting it right. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| One of the things Money 2006 touts is better transaction matching. Well, based on my experience with the trial version that statement couldn't be further from the truth. I recenlty downloaded an OFX statement from my bank and Money 2006 managed to match three downloaded trasactions to a single transaction that was already in my register. None of those three downloaded transactions even had the same date as the existing tranaction they were matched to. But, there were three existing transactions with the same amounts and dates that Money 2006 didn't find matches for. Does that sound like better transaction matching too you??? It appears to me that it got worse instead of better. I've been a supporter of Microsoft's for years, but Money is some of the worst software they have released in recent years. Forutnately for Microsoft I hear Quicken hasn't done much better. I think Microsoft is more about making money (pun intended) on this product than it is about getting it right. |
| Tags |
| 2006, @#$%, matching, money, transaction |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Matching a transaction to Multiple No Name: Hi All, I was wondering if anyone has figured out a solution to this one... I go the bank and deposit a few checks. At home, I record each of... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 01-13-2005 11:41 AM | |
| Transaction matching NOT Scott Jones: What are the "rules" for money's matching transactions? I find that it constantly mismatches items when the name is different and the amount is... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 10-13-2004 01:11 AM | |
| M2005- No Transaction Matching Gregg: I can manually enter a transaction into my Bank of America Checking register and then synchronize and exact matching transactions are entered as new... | Microsoft Money | 10 | 10-05-2004 01:07 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |