|
#20
| |||
| |||
| On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 11:11:06 -0500, via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx(Cal Learner-- MVP) wrote: - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, Steve wrote:
That is correct.> > As you probably know, FDRXX pays a higher rate of interest than the > > core cash account does. It probably doesn't mean peanuts UNLESS you > > maintain a large amount of liquid cash. Steve > I think Ron put "sold" in quotes to indicate he entered a Sell > transaction in Money to have the funds represented as cash in the > Cash Transactions account, but did not enter an actual Sell at > Fidelity. --ron |
|
#19
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, - Bobb - wrote: - quote - > " I see that you still have $75 fee for non-NTF funds. I've been looking
That does seem stiff. They only charge on the buy, and not on the> around and other firms are charging a lot less - schwab is $49.95, Vanguard > is $35. " sell or "exchange out". It is not clear if an "exchange" within the same pay-fund family gets a fee or not. I would guess yes. ================================================== ==== From http://flagship3.vanguard.com/VGApp/...lueContent.jsp ---------------------------- Transaction-fee (TF) funds5 Transaction fee: * Purchase: $35 per trade regardless of order size.2 * Sale: $35 per trade regardless of order size.3 * Exchange: $35 per trade regardless of order size.4 ================================================== ==== For Schwab March 2005 "Amendment and June 2004 Charles Schwab Pricing Guide for Individual Investors" It would appear that it could be higher than $49.95 each way. They call that number an "overriding minimum". http://waterhouse.com/products_servi...waterhouse.com shows a $30 each way only if the amount of the transaction is $10,000 or less. In each case, I did not notice a lower rate for outside no-load no-12b-1 fee funds for their platinum/gold/signature levels. Holding outside funds is something I would avoid in each case. But Fidelity's is the only one I noticed that only charged half of a round turn. |
|
#18
| |||
| |||
| "- Bobb -" <nospam87[at]netscape.net> wrote in message news:Oe%23cNTlhFHA.3436[at]tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... - quote - > "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message
Contents of my online email to them:> news:bvv4d1hv0itsqpe5p9ma42railo8jtsk23[at]4ax.com... > > In microsoft.public.money, - Bobb - wrote: > > > > > > Again, I'm a bit anal and think it's much better for them it fix it, than > > > for us to have to "make it work". > > > I applaud your optimism. << sinpped > > My next goal - to get them to reduce the fee for Non-Fidelity funds from > $75 to ~$25,$35..Vanguard changes $35, why should I pay > Fidelity $75 to buy the same non-company fund ? > Wish me luck - and you can write them too !! " I see that you still have $75 fee for non-NTF funds. I've been looking around and other firms are charging a lot less - schwab is $49.95, Vanguard is $35. " I did write another re letting Cash$ = FCASH too Copied/pasted info below - quote - > > > Just let cash$ = FCASH. . I tell money when I set up > > the fund that it's a money market, give me an option > > box to "make this your default cash account?". > > AND when that is an option , don't "make it available as a new > > feature in Money 2009 " - make it a reg hack/update to download > > from website. |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| I'll think about making a suggestion directly to Fidelity. In microsoft.public.money, - Bobb - wrote: - quote - > > I would hope that when you Buy or Sell a Spartan MMF, the Buy or
If that happens also on the monthly dividend time, good. If not, you> > Sell gets downloaded. > Yeah, they come down as Dividend and BUY. might need to change that Dividend to ReinvestDividend each month. - quote - > > > I wonder if another workaround would be to let Money take the FCASH
Of course not. I was proposing to do a last Sell at $1, and then> > position data that Fidelity sends and allow the download, but to set > > the FCASH value to $0. That is to say, if it is now an MMF with a > > fixed $1 value, change it (via the tricky procedure) to a mutual > > fund with $0 value. > > I don't think you could take $10,000 and BUY 10,000 of FASH at $0 - the math > wouldn't work never bother generating another Buy or Sell of FCASH again. |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message news:bvv4d1hv0itsqpe5p9ma42railo8jtsk23[at]4ax.com... - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, - Bobb - wrote: > > > Again, I'm a bit anal and think it's much better for them it fix it, than > > for us to have to "make it work". > I applaud your optimism. I do find Fidelity to be responsive (which is why I'm still there). Last year I dropped a note explaining that I would like to see cash basis on my IRA. I told them that I understood that it didn't MATTER from a tax standpoint, but I would find it helpful " to see how I'm doing". About 2 weks later, there it was - a tab for " COST." !! I figure that they have the people on the payroll and I find that they are very reponsive when I write them. SO, while you're on Fidelity.com , if none of you click on "contact us" - try it - you may be surprised when they do what you ask. Especially if enought people mention it. My next goal - to get them to reduce the fee for Non-Fidelity funds from $75 to ~$25,$35. Vanguard changes $35, why should I pay Fidelity $75 to buy the same non-company fund ? Wish me luck - and you can write them too !! - quote - > > Just let cash$ = FCASH. Fidelity and Microsoft ought to be able to
Yeah, they come down as Dividend and BUY.figure > > that out - for all Money Market Mutual funds. I tell money when I set up the > > fund that it's a money market, give me an option box to "make this your > > default cash account?". > That not downloading of checks is a really nasty one with no > workaround other than hand entry. > I would hope that when you Buy or Sell a Spartan MMF, the Buy or > Sell gets downloaded. - quote - > I wonder if another workaround would be to let Money take the FCASH
wouldn't work> position data that Fidelity sends and allow the download, but to set > the FCASH value to $0. That is to say, if it is now an MMF with a > fixed $1 value, change it (via the tricky procedure) to a mutual > fund with $0 value. I don't think you could take $10,000 and BUY 10,000 of FASH at $0 - the math - quote - > > AND when that is an option , don't "make it available as a new feature in > > Money 2009 " - make it a reg hack/update to download from Broker/Money > > website. > The behavior you are describing is all Fidelity. Other brokers don't > have those bugs as far as I know. Yet Fidelity has some compensating > good points. > Money could offer a feature that says never to adjust the positions > of a particular holding. |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, - Bobb - wrote: - quote - > Again, I'm a bit anal and think it's much better for them it fix it, than
I applaud your optimism.> for us to have to "make it work". - quote - > Just let cash$ = FCASH. Fidelity and Microsoft ought to be able to figure
That not downloading of checks is a really nasty one with no> that out - for all Money Market Mutual funds. I tell money when I set up the > fund that it's a money market, give me an option box to "make this your > default cash account?". workaround other than hand entry. I would hope that when you Buy or Sell a Spartan MMF, the Buy or Sell gets downloaded. I wonder if another workaround would be to let Money take the FCASH position data that Fidelity sends and allow the download, but to set the FCASH value to $0. That is to say, if it is now an MMF with a fixed $1 value, change it (via the tricky procedure) to a mutual fund with $0 value. - quote - > AND when that is an option , don't "make it available as a new feature in
The behavior you are describing is all Fidelity. Other brokers don't> Money 2009 " - make it a reg hack/update to download from Broker/Money > website. have those bugs as far as I know. Yet Fidelity has some compensating good points. Money could offer a feature that says never to adjust the positions of a particular holding. |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message news:g5n3d1hd0bnrv2tb3d92gicmfsdnf9sc15[at]4ax.com... - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, - Bobb - wrote:
I did do that for a while - but I have a few money markets (Select, Spartan> > > Fidelity download / Money did not "SELL $1000 of FCASH" to generate the " > > cash " to pay this check. It just shows as -$1000 from my cash transactions, > > and since I had other info in the register, it was not until I went to > > balance my account a few months layer that I noticed the discrepancy. > This method should work for you if I understand what is happening: > If Money never downloads FCASH Buy or Sell transactions, you can let > the balance in the cash transactions register represent your cash > including your FCASH. Do one Sell of all current FCASH. Thereafter > whenever Money offers to update the quantity of FCASH, don't let it. Thanks, Cal etc) and whenever I reconciled - got that prompt to adjust. Since I'm entering the other money market info, I started doing FCASH also to keep it straight. But you're right - without writing the checks it did work fine. Again, I'm a bit anal and think it's much better for them it fix it, than for us to have to "make it work". Just let cash$ = FCASH. Fidelity and Microsoft ought to be able to figure that out - for all Money Market Mutual funds. I tell money when I set up the fund that it's a money market, give me an option box to "make this your default cash account?". AND when that is an option , don't "make it available as a new feature in Money 2009 " - make it a reg hack/update to download from Broker/Money website. Thanks again, Bobb |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| I interpret the key statement "depending on how the fund is modeled at the financial institution" to mean: The FI chooses one of the three different ways, and they configure their systems to send transactions to be consistent with the choice. And you obviously don't have a choice in the matter (that I can see). What you also do not get is a distinct indication or flag in Money that says FI#1 is implementing option 2, 'Sweep account within an investment account'. Note that FI above means Financial Institution, not Fidelity Investments. Also, that last sentence in the above paragraph is important for Fidelity, because I have yet to figure out exactly which option they use (for my accounts). And, from what I've read on here, it sounds like different people get different results with Fidelity. I'd love to get a definitive answer on this, but it remains a mystery for now. - Bobb - wrote: - quote - > Is this something that " I " can elect ? Sounds like I (and others) would > like > FCASH to = ""Sweep Account Within an Investment Account"" > Bobb |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, - Bobb - wrote: - quote - > Fidelity download / Money did not "SELL $1000 of FCASH" to generate the "
This method should work for you if I understand what is happening:> cash " to pay this check. It just shows as -$1000 from my cash transactions, > and since I had other info in the register, it was not until I went to > balance my account a few months layer that I noticed the discrepancy. If Money never downloads FCASH Buy or Sell transactions, you can let the balance in the cash transactions register represent your cash including your FCASH. Do one Sell of all current FCASH. Thereafter whenever Money offers to update the quantity of FCASH, don't let it. - quote - > > > > > My bank downloads as checks - with numbers .
If you put the contents between the equal signs below into a file> > > I'd also like to download/save Fidelity to an ofx file from their > website - > > > like my bank has. > > > Would that be so that you could munge the file before importing, or > > would it be to analyze what is happening? It is possible to have > > Money save a copy of the OFX files that it processes. > > .... Yes, and it works fine, I can select the payee from my dropdown (I > like M2001 MUCH better than M2004 for that) , the category, and import it > all easily AND I can see what happened. I dload the OFX version for M2001 > and the QBX version for M2004 - works great. (that way a doubleclick on the > file opens the correct program automatically.) > If I want to review for any reason, I have the file offline. - next time , > just overwrite them. called provlogs.reg (or any *.reg name) and run it, you will save OFX files named *rs.txt into the same directory as your Money 2004 file: ================================================== ====== REGEDIT4 [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Money\12.0\On line] "FLogProviderData"=dword:00000001 ================================================== ========= |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Is this something that " I " can elect ? Sounds like I (and others) would like FCASH to = ""Sweep Account Within an Investment Account"" Bobb "Retired Coal Miner" <...[at]...> wrote in message news:qpOdndDY27IzDk3fRVn-sg[at]comcast.com... - quote - > I'm never 100% clear on how Fidelity does it. But, I always try to > relate it to this, the model (from OFX Ver 2.0) that both Money and > Fidelity are supposed to follow: > ================================================ > 13.5 Money Market Funds > Money market funds can be handled in one of three different ways > depending on how the fund is modeled at the financial institution > - Separate account at the financial institution > - Sweep account within an investment account > - Position within an investment account > 13.5.1 Separate Account at the Financial Institution > In this case, the money market fund is in its own account with its own > account number, distinct from the investment account. In OFX, you should > model the money market fund as a separate money market bank account; see > Chapter 11, "Banking." The banking <STMTRQ> request aggregate and > <STMTRS> response aggregate will be used to download transactions. > 13.5.2 Sweep Account Within an Investment Account > OFX uses the money market as a “sweep” account, where cash is “swept” as > needed when buying and selling securities. The money market fund does > not have its own account number. The customer sees the money market fund > as an investment-account cash balance. In OFX, checks, ATMs, electronic > fund transfer, deposit, and withdrawal transactions should be downloaded > using banking transactions within the investment account. However, the > sweep transactions in and out of the money market fund should not be > downloaded to the client. > 13.5.3 Position Within an Investment Account > The customer purchases the money market fund and is held in the account > as a position. The money market fund does not have its own account > number. In OFX, the money market fund should be returned as a <POSOTHER> position in the <INVPOSLIST> , with a <UNITPRICE> of 1.00 and <UNITS> as > the current value of the position. Purchases and redemptions should be > modeled as <BUYOTHER> and <SELLOTHER> transactions with a <UNITPRICE> of > 1.00 and <UNITS> as the transaction amount. > ================================================ > I'm never sure which of the three ways Fidelity models it. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| "Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message news:nd30d1ti3qqc6kuvoaduabjll5f0civbbc[at]4ax.com... - quote - > In microsoft.public.money, - Bobb - wrote: > > I dropped an online note to Fidelity about this earlier in the week. > > For others using Fidelity, please drop them a note to complain - otherwise > > nothing will happen. > > > The real solution would be to have Money let you assign a symbol to the > > "Cash" account. > > Everyone who uses Money and has a brokerage account runs into the same > > problem - it's a nuisance. > I understand you are referring to a Fidelity only. > In an IRA, they let you use FDRXX rather than FCASH. That works > well, except that I need to convert the downloaded Dividend > transactions to ReinvestDividend transactions each month. ............ Agreed ... fine in IRA's - quote - > > I just "buy" FCASH monthly - otherwise get a statement error whenever I
........... That's how I got my balance out of whack.sync > > Money to "connect to broker -"Online Services" . > If Money wants to do an AddShares of FCASH based on the downloaded > balance, you could get into the habit of selecting the radio button > "No, do not update my account. I will make any necessary changes > myself." It adjusted my cash balance, but not the sale of FCASH to allow for checks. - quote - > While that would be extra work, would that work around the problem
no check - just this comment in the comment section of the transaction:> by letting the cash balance represent the swept funds? Or is there > some additional problem? ............... I wrote a check for $1000 - was in cash transaction but CITICARD PAYMENT-CHECK PYMT Chk# 0423 (By the way my check was not #423) - quote - > > > I recently noticed that may balance didn't match Fidelity's statement and
Fidelity download / Money did not "SELL $1000 of FCASH" to generate the "> > then realiazed that it didn't download checks that I wrote against my money > > market account . They show online - but not in download. It drove me nuts > > trying to track how/why. I've been with them for years but never wrote > > checks until a few in April. They showed as line items in my register but > > not as "spending money " - no deduction - looked like a trade - no check > > numbers. > That is weird. I would expect the checks to appear as transactions > into the Cash Transactions register, and not appear in the > Investment Transactions register. ............. cash " to pay this check. It just shows as -$1000 from my cash transactions, and since I had other info in the register, it was not until I went to balance my account a few months layer that I noticed the discrepancy. - quote - > > > My bank downloads as checks - with numbers .
like M2001 MUCH better than M2004 for that) , the category, and import it> > I'd also like to download/save Fidelity to an ofx file from their website - > > like my bank has. > Would that be so that you could munge the file before importing, or > would it be to analyze what is happening? It is possible to have > Money save a copy of the OFX files that it processes. ..... Yes, and it works fine, I can select the payee from my dropdown (I all easily AND I can see what happened. I dload the OFX version for M2001 and the QBX version for M2004 - works great. (that way a doubleclick on the file opens the correct program automatically.) If I want to review for any reason, I have the file offline. - next time , just overwrite them. - quote - > > My bank lets me view it online and then elect to download as Money or > > Quicken format. > > I download/reconcile my banks's savings , checking account in about 5 > > minutes - perfect. > On the plus side, their OFX server is very fast and reliable. |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| I'm never 100% clear on how Fidelity does it. But, I always try to relate it to this, the model (from OFX Ver 2.0) that both Money and Fidelity are supposed to follow: ================================================ 13.5 Money Market Funds Money market funds can be handled in one of three different ways depending on how the fund is modeled at the financial institution - Separate account at the financial institution - Sweep account within an investment account - Position within an investment account 13.5.1 Separate Account at the Financial Institution In this case, the money market fund is in its own account with its own account number, distinct from the investment account. In OFX, you should model the money market fund as a separate money market bank account; see Chapter 11, "Banking." The banking <STMTRQ> request aggregate and <STMTRS> response aggregate will be used to download transactions. 13.5.2 Sweep Account Within an Investment Account OFX uses the money market as a “sweep” account, where cash is “swept” as needed when buying and selling securities. The money market fund does not have its own account number. The customer sees the money market fund as an investment-account cash balance. In OFX, checks, ATMs, electronic fund transfer, deposit, and withdrawal transactions should be downloaded using banking transactions within the investment account. However, the sweep transactions in and out of the money market fund should not be downloaded to the client. 13.5.3 Position Within an Investment Account The customer purchases the money market fund and is held in the account as a position. The money market fund does not have its own account number. In OFX, the money market fund should be returned as a <POSOTHERposition in the <INVPOSLIST> , with a <UNITPRICE> of 1.00 and <UNITS> as the current value of the position. Purchases and redemptions should be modeled as <BUYOTHER> and <SELLOTHER> transactions with a <UNITPRICE> of 1.00 and <UNITS> as the transaction amount. ================================================ I'm never sure which of the three ways Fidelity models it. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, - Bobb - wrote: - quote - > I dropped an online note to Fidelity about this earlier in the week.
I understand you are referring to a Fidelity only.> For others using Fidelity, please drop them a note to complain - otherwise > nothing will happen. > The real solution would be to have Money let you assign a symbol to the > "Cash" account. > Everyone who uses Money and has a brokerage account runs into the same > problem - it's a nuisance. In an IRA, they let you use FDRXX rather than FCASH. That works well, except that I need to convert the downloaded Dividend transactions to ReinvestDividend transactions each month. - quote - > I just "buy" FCASH monthly - otherwise get a statement error whenever I sync
If Money wants to do an AddShares of FCASH based on the downloaded> Money to "connect to broker -"Online Services" . balance, you could get into the habit of selecting the radio button "No, do not update my account. I will make any necessary changes myself." While that would be extra work, would that work around the problem by letting the cash balance represent the swept funds? Or is there some additional problem? - quote - > I recently noticed that may balance didn't match Fidelity's statement and
That is weird. I would expect the checks to appear as transactions> then realiazed that it didn't download checks that I wrote against my money > market account . They show online - but not in download. It drove me nuts > trying to track how/why. I've been with them for years but never wrote > checks until a few in April. They showed as line items in my register but > not as "spending money " - no deduction - looked like a trade - no check > numbers. into the Cash Transactions register, and not appear in the Investment Transactions register. - quote - > My bank downloads as checks - with numbers .
Would that be so that you could munge the file before importing, or> I'd also like to download/save Fidelity to an ofx file from their website - > like my bank has. would it be to analyze what is happening? It is possible to have Money save a copy of the OFX files that it processes. - quote - > My bank lets me view it online and then elect to download as Money or
On the plus side, their OFX server is very fast and reliable.> Quicken format. > I download/reconcile my banks's savings , checking account in about 5 > minutes - perfect. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| I dropped an online note to Fidelity about this earlier in the week. For others using Fidelity, please drop them a note to complain - otherwise nothing will happen. The real solution would be to have Money let you assign a symbol to the "Cash" account. Everyone who uses Money and has a brokerage account runs into the same problem - it's a nuisance. I just "buy" FCASH monthly - otherwise get a statement error whenever I sync Money to "connect to broker -"Online Services" . I recently noticed that may balance didn't match Fidelity's statement and then realiazed that it didn't download checks that I wrote against my money market account . They show online - but not in download. It drove me nuts trying to track how/why. I've been with them for years but never wrote checks until a few in April. They showed as line items in my register but not as "spending money " - no deduction - looked like a trade - no check numbers. My bank downloads as checks - with numbers . I'd also like to download/save Fidelity to an ofx file from their website - like my bank has. My bank lets me view it online and then elect to download as Money or Quicken format. I download/reconcile my banks's savings , checking account in about 5 minutes - perfect. Bobb ================== "Ron Rosenfeld" <ronrosenfeld[at]nospam.org> wrote in message news:1cdvc1l2jgn662qgf90hncfm4p4q5nfvr0[at]4ax.com... - quote - > On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 21:58:34 -0500, "David" <not[at]gonnahappen.com> wrote: > > Chris, > > > Do you get FDRXX purchase and sales transactions in Money? Mine only show > > up on the Fidelity website, not downloaded to the app. My question is from > > some previous posts it looked like others were getting them, and I am not > > currently. Please let me know if you get the transactions and ignore them, > > or just don't get them at all. Thanks again for you response. > > > -David > I occasionally get them that way, and it's a real PITA. It's much easier when > the funds just go into the associated cash account. > I think the last time that happened was last March. It continued for a while > but hasn't happened in a few months. So I've "sold" my FDRXX back into my cash > accounts. Hopefully it'll stay that way. > --ron |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Steve wrote: - quote - > As you probably know, FDRXX pays a higher rate of interest than the
I think Ron put "sold" in quotes to indicate he entered a Sell> core cash account does. It probably doesn't mean peanuts UNLESS you > maintain a large amount of liquid cash. Steve transaction in Money to have the funds represented as cash in the Cash Transactions account, but did not enter an actual Sell at Fidelity. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| I don't think anyone intends to leave real cash in the core account rather than buy FDRXX, or similar. My intent is simply to ignore the buy/sell transactions in Money, because I know they're happening in the background. From my perspective those transactions are noise. A money market share with a value of $1 is still $1. The difference is the dividends earned, and I still get and record those. YMMV. -- Chris Cowles Gainesville, FL "Steve" <sjcohen730[at]aol.com> wrote in message news:1120921581.835914.163140[at]g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... - quote - > As you probably know, FDRXX pays a higher rate of interest than the > core cash account does. It probably doesn't mean peanuts UNLESS you > maintain a large amount of liquid cash. Steve |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| As you probably know, FDRXX pays a higher rate of interest than the core cash account does. It probably doesn't mean peanuts UNLESS you maintain a large amount of liquid cash. Steve |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 21:58:34 -0500, "David" <not[at]gonnahappen.com> wrote: - quote - > Chris,
I occasionally get them that way, and it's a real PITA. It's much easier when> Do you get FDRXX purchase and sales transactions in Money? Mine only show > up on the Fidelity website, not downloaded to the app. My question is from > some previous posts it looked like others were getting them, and I am not > currently. Please let me know if you get the transactions and ignore them, > or just don't get them at all. Thanks again for you response. > -David the funds just go into the associated cash account. I think the last time that happened was last March. It continued for a while but hasn't happened in a few months. So I've "sold" my FDRXX back into my cash accounts. Hopefully it'll stay that way. --ron |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| No. Only dividends. I prefer it that way, too. "David" <not[at]gonnahappen.com> wrote in message news:8pmdnTAvPeXBoFLfRVn-uQ[at]giganews.com... - quote - > Chris, > Do you get FDRXX purchase and sales transactions in Money? |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Chris, Do you get FDRXX purchase and sales transactions in Money? Mine only show up on the Fidelity website, not downloaded to the app. My question is from some previous posts it looked like others were getting them, and I am not currently. Please let me know if you get the transactions and ignore them, or just don't get them at all. Thanks again for you response. -David "Chris Cowles" <NoSpam[at]For.me> wrote in message news:OQ0KhfChFHA.1412[at]TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... - quote - > Ignore the FDRXX purchases and sales. They're just noise. You'll still > show the FDRXX income because you'll get dividend transactions. > "David" <David[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:4B445031-847E-497C-9D22-42E5188F6CB4[at]microsoft.com... > > Hi All, > > > I have recently moved all of my accounts to fidelity, and the first one > > has > > settled. THis account is a Roth IRA, and thanks to some advice from > > previous > > posts, I renamed my old account, changed the FI, and transactions > > downloaded. > > The only question I have is what happens with the Money Market Fund? > > Whenever I update, it lists all of my positions except for the FDRXX > > (Fidelity Cash Reserves). I expected money form the cash side of the > > account > > to be used to purchase MMFs. Do the core transactions come down > > automatically or do you have to enter them manually? Thanks. > > > -David |
| Tags |
| account, core, fidelity, investment, myster, transactions |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Fidelity brokerage sweep account transactions Anonymous: I do not understand how to get my Fidelity brokerage sweep account downloads to make sense in Money 2004. I have a money market fund that is used... | Microsoft Money | 8 | 06-08-2005 02:34 PM | |
| Online update of checking transactions in an investment account Robert: I have a citibank account which is a combination brokerage account and checking account. It is set up in Money as an investment account called... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 01-22-2005 10:29 PM | |
| Fidelity brokerage account setup googleguynj@yahoo.com: I have a Fidelity brokerage account set up in Money 2003 as account type "Bank". When I set up online services in Money, it says "This downloaded... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 12-04-2004 06:56 PM | |
| Investment account's, Cash Transactions Q's Mike: Hello, My question is related to the MS Money investment account's, " CASH TRANSACTIONS" (vs the Investment Transactions). Since my brokerage firm... | Microsoft Money | 6 | 10-10-2003 01:35 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |