|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Thanks for your responses. I've been using expenses & income for a while now, not really satisfied with it. I'll try using a Reimburseables account for a while, see how that works out. "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:uN1d2CRUFHA.228[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... - quote - > Comments inline. > "Paul Pedersen" <no-reply[at]swen.com> wrote in message > news:e2HwJCOUFHA.3392[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > > > "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in > > message news:OImnEmAUFHA.1796[at]TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > > > Assuming you had an expense category and added the expenses, Money also > > > "overstates" your expenses. That sounds like a wash to me. > > > Except that they often come in different periods. > True. But this is still good data. I want to know if I'm unbalanced in a > period on this stuff and need to track where the money is. > > > As to using the same category, that's surely another way some people > > > use. > > > Money complains but you can tell it to get over it, or you can turn off > > > the > > > complaining forever in Tools|Options. > > > I'd prefer to do that only for that one category, but it doesn't seem to > > be possible. > You can't selectively tell it to quit whining. But you can tell Money you > really do want to categorized inceom as expense or vice versa every time > you do it with one enter key. > > > As to the reimbursable receivables account, this is another way. > > > That also serves the purpose of reminding me when reimbursements are > > falling behind. > So does the imbalance in expenses to income. > > It's kind of annoying to set up what should be an expense category as a > > transfer instead, but it can be done. > True enough. Or, as noted above, you can just use the expense category in > the first place. This is why I do this with reimbursibles like this. > > > There is no One Right Answer. Each method has plusses/minuses. Whichever > > > works best for you is what you should do. > > > IOW, no "good" answer. But either would be usable. I still remember > > entering "negative salary" in Quicken to account for payroll deductions > > (15 years ago). > What's good? Honest accounting? Use the expenses and income. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Comments inline. "Paul Pedersen" <no-reply[at]swen.com> wrote in message news:e2HwJCOUFHA.3392[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... - quote - > "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in
True. But this is still good data. I want to know if I'm unbalanced in a> message news:OImnEmAUFHA.1796[at]TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > > Assuming you had an expense category and added the expenses, Money also > > "overstates" your expenses. That sounds like a wash to me. > Except that they often come in different periods. period on this stuff and need to track where the money is. - quote - > > As to using the same category, that's surely another way some people use.
You can't selectively tell it to quit whining. But you can tell Money you> > Money complains but you can tell it to get over it, or you can turn off > > the > > complaining forever in Tools|Options. > I'd prefer to do that only for that one category, but it doesn't seem to > be possible. really do want to categorized inceom as expense or vice versa every time you do it with one enter key. - quote - > > As to the reimbursable receivables account, this is another way.
So does the imbalance in expenses to income.> That also serves the purpose of reminding me when reimbursements are > falling behind. - quote - > It's kind of annoying to set up what should be an expense category as a
True enough. Or, as noted above, you can just use the expense category in> transfer instead, but it can be done. the first place. This is why I do this with reimbursibles like this. - quote - > > There is no One Right Answer. Each method has plusses/minuses. Whichever
What's good? Honest accounting? Use the expenses and income.> > works best for you is what you should do. > IOW, no "good" answer. But either would be usable. I still remember > entering "negative salary" in Quicken to account for payroll deductions > (15 years ago). |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:OImnEmAUFHA.1796[at]TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... - quote - > Assuming you had an expense category and added the expenses, Money also
Except that they often come in different periods.> "overstates" your expenses. That sounds like a wash to me. - quote - > As to using the same category, that's surely another way some people use.
I'd prefer to do that only for that one category, but it doesn't seem to be> Money complains but you can tell it to get over it, or you can turn off > the > complaining forever in Tools|Options. possible. - quote - > As to the reimbursable receivables account, this is another way.
That also serves the purpose of reminding me when reimbursements are fallingbehind. It's kind of annoying to set up what should be an expense category as a transfer instead, but it can be done. - quote - > There is no One Right Answer. Each method has plusses/minuses. Whichever
IOW, no "good" answer. But either would be usable. I still remember entering> works best for you is what you should do. "negative salary" in Quicken to account for payroll deductions (15 years ago). Thanks. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Assuming you had an expense category and added the expenses, Money also "overstates" your expenses. That sounds like a wash to me. As to using the same category, that's surely another way some people use. Money complains but you can tell it to get over it, or you can turn off the complaining forever in Tools|Options. As to the reimbursable receivables account, this is another way. There is no One Right Answer. Each method has plusses/minuses. Whichever works best for you is what you should do. "Paul Pedersen" <no-reply[at]swen.com> wrote in message news:uytwpg$TFHA.1896[at]TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... - quote - > One problem with that approach is that it makes Money overstate your income > (even if it's non-taxable and doesn't show up on tax reports). For instance, > last month was unusual in that expense reimbursements were more than double > my income, and Money seems to think I made three times as much as I actually > did. (Would that it were true.) > If I create an expense category "reimburseable expenses" and try to add > reimbursements to that category, Money complains that I'm treating income as > an expense. > Would it be better to have a "Reimburseables" account, and treat everything > as a transfer in or out of that? |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| One problem with that approach is that it makes Money overstate your income (even if it's non-taxable and doesn't show up on tax reports). For instance, last month was unusual in that expense reimbursements were more than double my income, and Money seems to think I made three times as much as I actually did. (Would that it were true.) If I create an expense category "reimburseable expenses" and try to add reimbursements to that category, Money complains that I'm treating income as an expense. Would it be better to have a "Reimburseables" account, and treat everything as a transfer in or out of that? "bs" <bsohn[at]bigfoot.com> wrote in message news:u36Fi$0QFHA.576[at]TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... - quote - > I manage job reimbursement by using both an expense and and income > category. When I make expenditures for work, I dump them into the expense > category Job Related Expenses. When I get reimbursed from my company, I > categorize these into the income category Job Reimbursements. Neither of > these categories is tagged for taxing purposes. > I also maintain a customized report that only shows the transactions in > the above referenced categories. This allows me to see if I'm getting > reimbursed for everything that I'm spending. > Good luck, > -bs |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| I manage job reimbursement by using both an expense and and income category. When I make expenditures for work, I dump them into the expense category Job Related Expenses. When I get reimbursed from my company, I categorize these into the income category Job Reimbursements. Neither of these categories is tagged for taxing purposes. I also maintain a customized report that only shows the transactions in the above referenced categories. This allows me to see if I'm getting reimbursed for everything that I'm spending. Good luck, -bs |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 16:21:01 -0700, "Ryan" <Ryan[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: - quote - > Hi.
When you transfer money from your bank account to your wallet, your> I am having trouble categorizing transfers from one account to another, or > reimbursements from work. For example, when I transfer money from one > account, it comes across as a blank category and it isn't an expense or > income, because I have already categorizes the underlyng expenses or income. net worth has not changed. Therefore, it is not an expense or an income. It is simply a transfer. - quote - > Same idea with a reimbursement from work. I get a check from work that is
This is different. When you incurred the expense, you allocated it to> an expense account payment, and I have already spend the money, so it doesn't > fit. some category. You should enter the reimbursement as a negative expense against the same category. This way, the two will offset. (This is the same way to handle returning an item you bought for a refund.) - quote - > Now my income and expenses reports show this massive category of "unassigned." > How are other folks doing it? <<Remove the del for email> |
| | |||
| |||
| Some transfer the expenses to a cash account then transfer the reimbursements from there. Others just use Job Expense:Reimbursable (or similar) and Other Income:Job Expense Reimbursement (or similar). There is no one right answer, but either of these seem preferable to Unassigned. "Ryan" <Ryan[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:1A267E39-1583-4A73-A425-4AF8006F3F80[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > Hi. > I am having trouble categorizing transfers from one account to another, or > reimbursements from work. For example, when I transfer money from one > account, it comes across as a blank category and it isn't an expense or > income, because I have already categorizes the underlyng expenses or > income. > Same idea with a reimbursement from work. I get a check from work that is > an expense account payment, and I have already spend the money, so it > doesn't > fit. > Now my income and expenses reports show this massive category of > "unassigned." > How are other folks doing it? |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Hi. I am having trouble categorizing transfers from one account to another, or reimbursements from work. For example, when I transfer money from one account, it comes across as a blank category and it isn't an expense or income, because I have already categorizes the underlyng expenses or income. Same idea with a reimbursement from work. I get a check from work that is an expense account payment, and I have already spend the money, so it doesn't fit. Now my income and expenses reports show this massive category of "unassigned." How are other folks doing it? |
| Tags |
| categorize, reimbursements, transfers, work |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| How to categorize an account transfer mikeb: Every few weeks I transfer a portion of my income to a different checking account. How do I categorize the expense / income transactions in each... | Microsoft Money | 11 | 08-05-2005 02:13 AM | |
| categorize multiple transactions at once? Ned Flanders: I have a years worth of transactions from my bank, credit cards, etc and I'm looking for the simplest way to categorize them. I thought I could... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 01-12-2004 03:42 PM | |
| AUTO CATEGORIZE Jeffrey Sanders: Does anyone know how to set up money so that it will automatically categorize charges to a particular payee to a cateogory? Currently only some of... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 12-07-2003 02:16 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |