Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Microsoft Money

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #19  
Old 12-13-2005, 11:42 PM
Don Malone
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Quicken vs. MS Money vs. GnuCash

Thomas G. Marshall wrote:

- quote -

> Without (I sincerely hope) igniting a flame war, can anyone tell me
> why they switched from one to the other, and is GnuCash ready for
> prime time?
> I know that it all depends upon what you want to use the software
> for. So here are my first pass requirements:
> Basic transaction accounting
> Download (synchronize account) activity with
> my bank without fee (possible?)
> Manage my portfolios (not required)
> Bill pay is not necessary---I do that in other ways.
> Thanks!


An open Sorce in development program that you may want to look at
http://www.boke.co.uk/money

Called Liberty Money written using Liberty Basic.

Just another option to look at, though I don't know if it is what you
are looking for.

--

  #18  
Old 07-23-2005, 02:05 PM
Gary R. Schmidt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Quicken vs. MS Money vs. GnuCash

Mark Carter wrote:

[SNIP]
- quote -

> If it isn't by now, then it probably never will be ... which is to say,
> it probably never will be.
> To be fair, I've never used GnuCash, so take what I say with a pinch of
> salt, but the website appears not to have had news for the last 2 years,
> and I've never heard Linux distros trumpeting it, so I'm assuming that
> it's a bit of a dead dog.

Umm, Mark, just _where_ did you go looking for GnuCash?

The GnuCash site, <http://gnucash.org/> has this line prominent on it:
"Announcement: GnuCash 1.8.11 Release - (2005-02-07 01:51:04)"

Perhaps your GNU-fu is on the blink? :-)

Cheers,
Gary B-)

--
__________________________________________________ ____________________________
Armful of chairs: Something some people would not know
whether you were up them with or not
- Barry Humphries
  #17  
Old 07-22-2005, 08:32 PM
Mark Carter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Quicken vs. MS Money vs. GnuCash

Martha wrote:
- quote -

> Is Quicken free?
> "H Gohel" <gohel[at]babbage.csee.usf.eduXXX> wrote in message
> news:ux64bkvLFHA.2748[at]TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > Thomas G. Marshall wrote:
> > > > *Without* (I sincerely hope) igniting a flame war, can anyone tell me why
> > > they switched from one to the other, and is GnuCash ready for prime time?


If it isn't by now, then it probably never will be ... which is to say,
it probably never will be.

To be fair, I've never used GnuCash, so take what I say with a pinch of
salt, but the website appears not to have had news for the last 2 years,
and I've never heard Linux distros trumpeting it, so I'm assuming that
it's a bit of a dead dog.

Late last year I bought MS Money. It's a full-featured personal finance
package for around 20'ish quid from Amazon. It's quite good, it even
updates your portfolio from the internet. I like freeware as much as the
next guy, but considering the price of MS Money, why dicker about?

Maybe Quicken is better, I don't know. But I'm betting that both Quicken
and Money are quite good, so you pays your money, and you takes your
choice. Neither decision will turn out to be a disasterous one.
  #16  
Old 07-22-2005, 02:29 PM
El Gee
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Quicken vs. MS Money vs. GnuCash

Whip.Pan[at]gmail.com wrote in
news:1121977687.713439.278720[at]f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:

- quote -

> Nope, sorry. But, if you want a nice, freeware money manager that I
> believe can import Quicken format files (it does import several
> standard formats), they try ACE MONEY LITE:
> http://www.mechcad.net/products/acem...dex_lite.shtml
> I like it so much I bought the SW version, which can manage multiple
> accounts.


I concur. If I actually boought software, I might as well . I still
may, since I do have the desire to have a mutliple accounts on one
tool/file.

--
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++
El Gee - www (dot) mistergeek (dot) com <> <

Did you hear the one about the dyslexic, agnostic, insomniac?
He had trouble sleeping at night, wondering if there was a dog.
Remove yourhat to reply ... but it may take a while.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++
  #15  
Old 07-21-2005, 08:28 PM
Whip.Pan@gmail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Quicken vs. MS Money vs. GnuCash

Nope, sorry. But, if you want a nice, freeware money manager that I
believe can import Quicken format files (it does import several
standard formats), they try ACE MONEY LITE:

http://www.mechcad.net/products/acem...dex_lite.shtml

I like it so much I bought the SW version, which can manage multiple
accounts.

  #14  
Old 07-21-2005, 06:45 PM
El Gee
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Quicken vs. MS Money vs. GnuCash

"Martha" <zzizith[at]youknowyahoo.com> wrote in
news:fKidnanc0q0udULfRVn-1Q[at]centurytel.net:

- quote -

> Is Quicken free?

No, it is not.


--
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++
El Gee - www (dot) mistergeek (dot) com <> <

Did you hear the one about the dyslexic, agnostic, insomniac?
He had trouble sleeping at night, wondering if there was a dog.
Remove yourhat to reply ... but it may take a while.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++
  #13  
Old 07-21-2005, 06:25 PM
Martha
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Quicken vs. MS Money vs. GnuCash

Is Quicken free?
"H Gohel" <gohel[at]babbage.csee.usf.eduXXX> wrote in message
news:ux64bkvLFHA.2748[at]TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
- quote -

> Thomas G. Marshall wrote:
> > *Without* (I sincerely hope) igniting a flame war, can anyone tell me why
> > they switched from one to the other, and is GnuCash ready for prime time?

> Thomas,
> Contrary to what has been said, GnuCash can run on all UNIX systems, not
> just Linux. A long time ago I had built the binaries for SGI IRIX which
> atleast for many years were available for download from GnuCash's web
> site.
> So I started off on GnuCash, and then exported my data to Money...I think.
> Can't remember because this was about 3-4 years ago. My issue was that
> GnuCash required too much effort to build and configure...eventually I
> reached a point where I could not build it on my aging SGI Indy and I
> decided to try out Money which was part of a freebate deal with TaxCut.
> Since then I'm using Money Deluxe.
> --
> Himanshu



  #12  
Old 03-22-2005, 03:06 PM
H Gohel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Quicken vs. MS Money vs. GnuCash

Thomas G. Marshall wrote:
- quote -

> *Without* (I sincerely hope) igniting a flame war, can anyone tell me why
> they switched from one to the other, and is GnuCash ready for prime time?


Thomas,

Contrary to what has been said, GnuCash can run on all UNIX systems, not
just Linux. A long time ago I had built the binaries for SGI IRIX which
atleast for many years were available for download from GnuCash's web site.

So I started off on GnuCash, and then exported my data to Money...I
think. Can't remember because this was about 3-4 years ago. My issue
was that GnuCash required too much effort to build and
configure...eventually I reached a point where I could not build it on
my aging SGI Indy and I decided to try out Money which was part of a
freebate deal with TaxCut. Since then I'm using Money Deluxe.

--
Himanshu
  #11  
Old 03-22-2005, 06:52 AM
Colin Smale
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Quicken vs. MS Money vs. GnuCash

Jan Musilek wrote:

<snip
- quote -

> In country where I live there is no support from banks (and from Microsoft
> too) for online statements (but we have internet banking :-) and probably I
> will fing some middleware or something like this to translate datafiles). As
> I saw configuration dialog, it will more be dependent on your bank than on
> product choosen.


Maybe http://www.mt2ofx.tk/ can help you with the data file translation
you mentioned...

<snip
Regards, Colin
--
Remove REMOVE from email address to reach me!
  #10  
Old 03-22-2005, 02:19 AM
Thomas G. Marshall
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Quicken vs. MS Money vs. GnuCash


You get similarly weighted results with /any/ question in usenet. This is
why there is no usefulness in counting the yeas and nays. The true value
comes from hearing the specific /reasons/ why people switched.



ADAM PRESSMAN coughed up:
- quote -

> Have to agree with Dick. It's painful to switch particularly when our
> choices are bad to worse. (Which vendor is which changes
> periodically).
> I also have to believe that almost all the people happy with Money
> 2005 will never see or contribute to this posting. Further, only a
> slightly larger group of those unhappy with it will work with this
> forum. Most will throw a $60 software program in the garbage before
> spending hundreds of dollars worth of time and stress trying to fix
> it like we do. You're therefore going to only survey a small fraction
> of Money users with a statistical certainty that they will be unhappy
> with the software.
> > Few switch since the barriers to doing so are high.
> > > GnuCash doesn't support classification and is exclusively Linux.
> > > "Thomas G. Marshall"

> > <tgm2tothe10thpower[at]replacetextwithnumber.hotmail.com> wrote in
> > message news:1Hp%d.12531$ed6.7185[at]trndny06...
> > > > > *Without* (I sincerely hope) igniting a flame war, can anyone tell
> > > me why they switched from one to the other, and is GnuCash ready
> > > for prime time? I know that it all depends upon what you want to use the
> > > software
> > > for. So here are my first pass requirements:
> > > > > Basic transaction accounting
> > > Download (synchronize account) activity with
> > > my bank without fee (possible?)
> > > Manage my portfolios (not required)
> > > > > Bill pay is not necessary---I do that in other ways.




--
Enough is enough. It is /not/ a requirement that someone must google
relentlessly for an answer before posting in usenet. Newsgroups are
for discussions. Discussions do /not/ necessitate prior research. If
you are bothered by someone asking a question without taking time to
look something up, simply do not respond.


  #9  
Old 03-21-2005, 11:26 PM
DGD
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Quicken vs. MS Money vs. GnuCash

I just converted from MS Money 2K Deluxe to Quicken 2005 XG. Primary
reason is that MS Money hasn't offered a deluxe version for the
Canadian Market in over 5 years and the basic version offered by MS
didn't do what I wanted it to do. Conversion to Quicken has not been
painless, however. I am still trying to enter in all of the data
accumulated in MS Money 2K into Quicken. There are no file conversion
utilities available to do this for some unknown reason.

DGD
Thomas G. Marshall wrote:
- quote -

> *Without* (I sincerely hope) igniting a flame war, can anyone tell me
why
> they switched from one to the other, and is GnuCash ready for prime

time?
> I know that it all depends upon what you want to use the software

for. So
> here are my first pass requirements:
> Basic transaction accounting
> Download (synchronize account) activity with
> my bank without fee (possible?)
> Manage my portfolios (not required)
> Bill pay is not necessary---I do that in other ways.
> Thanks!
> --

Onedoctortoanother:"Ifthisismyrectalthermometer,wh erethehell'smypen???"

  #8  
Old 03-21-2005, 11:15 PM
Sweet Andy Licious
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Quicken vs. MS Money vs. GnuCash

Victor Roberts wrote:
- quote -

> On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:32:51 -0800, "Sweet Andy Licious"
> <sweetandy[at]licious.com> wrote:
> > Thomas G. Marshall wrote:
> > > *Without* (I sincerely hope) igniting a flame war, can anyone tell
> > > me
> > > why they switched from one to the other, and is GnuCash ready for
> > > prime time?
> > > > > I know that it all depends upon what you want to use the software
> > > for. So here are my first pass requirements:
> > > > > Basic transaction accounting
> > > Download (synchronize account) activity with
> > > my bank without fee (possible?)
> > > Manage my portfolios (not required)
> > > > > Bill pay is not necessary---I do that in other ways.
> > > > > Thanks!

> > Well, Thomas. I see nothing wrong with you posting this. I have
> > tried MS Money, Quicken and GNU Cash, but both MS Money and GNU Cash
> > were awhile back. I have retreated to Quicken (currently 2004).
> > Basic reason was GNU was too primitive for my tastes and MS Money
> > took too many resources. Simple as that.

> Have you tried MoneyDance?


OOps that was it Money Dance; not GNU Cash as I see GNU cash is a Linux only
app. At the time I used it (about 1 year ago) I was considering switching to
Money, but ended up staying with Quicken as Money hogged to many resources.
--
Andy


email: sweetandylicious at eml dot cc


  #7  
Old 03-21-2005, 11:04 PM
Victor Roberts
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Quicken vs. MS Money vs. GnuCash

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:32:51 -0800, "Sweet Andy Licious"
<sweetandy[at]licious.com> wrote:

- quote -

> Thomas G. Marshall wrote:
> > *Without* (I sincerely hope) igniting a flame war, can anyone tell me
> > why they switched from one to the other, and is GnuCash ready for
> > prime time?
> > > I know that it all depends upon what you want to use the software

> > for. So here are my first pass requirements:
> > > Basic transaction accounting

> > Download (synchronize account) activity with
> > my bank without fee (possible?)
> > Manage my portfolios (not required)
> > > Bill pay is not necessary---I do that in other ways.
> > > Thanks!

> Well, Thomas. I see nothing wrong with you posting this. I have tried MS
> Money, Quicken and GNU Cash, but both MS Money and GNU Cash were awhile
> back. I have retreated to Quicken (currently 2004). Basic reason was GNU was
> too primitive for my tastes and MS Money took too many resources. Simple as
> that.


Have you tried MoneyDance?


--
Vic Roberts
Replace xxx with vdr in e-mail address.
  #6  
Old 03-21-2005, 10:50 PM
Paul Pedersen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Quicken vs. MS Money vs. GnuCash

FWIW, I switched from Quicken to Money because Money handles options trading
and Quicken doesn't. I'm using Money Deluxe 2003. It's not perfect, but I've
avoided upgrading because it sounds like I'd be inviting problems. I
download transactions from some institutions, but not others. The ones that
don't work, or don't work right, I fix by hand.




"Thomas G. Marshall" <tgm2tothe10thpower[at]replacetextwithnumber.hotmail.comwrote in message news:1Hp%d.12531$ed6.7185[at]trndny06...
- quote -

> *Without* (I sincerely hope) igniting a flame war, can anyone tell me why
> they switched from one to the other, and is GnuCash ready for prime time?
> I know that it all depends upon what you want to use the software for. So
> here are my first pass requirements:
> Basic transaction accounting
> Download (synchronize account) activity with
> my bank without fee (possible?)
> Manage my portfolios (not required)
> Bill pay is not necessary---I do that in other ways.
> Thanks!
> --
> Onedoctortoanother:"Ifthisismyrectalthermometer,wh erethehell'smypen???"



  #5  
Old 03-21-2005, 10:32 PM
Sweet Andy Licious
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Quicken vs. MS Money vs. GnuCash

Thomas G. Marshall wrote:
- quote -

> *Without* (I sincerely hope) igniting a flame war, can anyone tell me
> why they switched from one to the other, and is GnuCash ready for
> prime time?
> I know that it all depends upon what you want to use the software
> for. So here are my first pass requirements:
> Basic transaction accounting
> Download (synchronize account) activity with
> my bank without fee (possible?)
> Manage my portfolios (not required)
> Bill pay is not necessary---I do that in other ways.
> Thanks!

Well, Thomas. I see nothing wrong with you posting this. I have tried MS
Money, Quicken and GNU Cash, but both MS Money and GNU Cash were awhile
back. I have retreated to Quicken (currently 2004). Basic reason was GNU was
too primitive for my tastes and MS Money took too many resources. Simple as
that.
--
Andy


email: sweetandylicious at eml dot cc


  #4  
Old 03-21-2005, 04:13 PM
Jan Musilek
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: Quicken vs. MS Money vs. GnuCash

I use Microsoft Money 2000 for nearly 5 years. For the basic accounting it is
fine and work well. (even i have tried some demo from Quicken, I had problems
to change my habits).

In country where I live there is no support from banks (and from Microsoft
too) for online statements (but we have internet banking :-) and probably I
will fing some middleware or something like this to translate datafiles). As
I saw configuration dialog, it will more be dependent on your bank than on
product choosen.

Portfolio management is quite nice with price updates - again it works well
for US and some EU stocks. Hope that Microsoft will extend tracking
possibilities for other markets soon.



"Thomas G. Marshall" wrote:

- quote -

> *Without* (I sincerely hope) igniting a flame war, can anyone tell me why
> they switched from one to the other, and is GnuCash ready for prime time?
> I know that it all depends upon what you want to use the software for. So
> here are my first pass requirements:
> Basic transaction accounting
> Download (synchronize account) activity with
> my bank without fee (possible?)
> Manage my portfolios (not required)
> Bill pay is not necessary---I do that in other ways.
> Thanks!
> --
> Onedoctortoanother:"Ifthisismyrectalthermometer,wh erethehell'smypen???"

  #3  
Old 03-21-2005, 04:12 PM
El Gee
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Quicken vs. MS Money vs. GnuCash

"Thomas G. Marshall"
<tgm2tothe10thpower[at]replacetextwithnumber.hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1Hp%d.12531$ed6.7185[at]trndny06:

- quote -

> *Without* (I sincerely hope) igniting a flame war, can anyone tell me
> why they switched from one to the other, and is GnuCash ready for
> prime time?
> I know that it all depends upon what you want to use the software for.
> So here are my first pass requirements:
> Basic transaction accounting
> Download (synchronize account) activity with
> my bank without fee (possible?)
> Manage my portfolios (not required)
> Bill pay is not necessary---I do that in other ways.
> Thanks!


Ace Money Lite (which I guess is slightly crippled, but good none the
less..) is another option, although I do not think you will find many
(if any) freewares that will allow you to connect to your bank in
realtime. At best you will be able to export to the program you choose.

http://www.arachnoid.com/PLCash/index.html is Java based, but I do not
think it connects to banks, either.

--
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
El Gee <> <
Know Christ, Know Peace
No Christ, No Peace

Remove yourhat to reply
Home Page - www.mistergeek.com
Blog - mcwtlg.blogspot.com
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  #2  
Old 03-21-2005, 02:54 PM
ADAM PRESSMAN
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Quicken vs. MS Money vs. GnuCash

Have to agree with Dick. It's painful to switch particularly when our
choices are bad to worse. (Which vendor is which changes periodically).

I also have to believe that almost all the people happy with Money 2005 will
never see or contribute to this posting. Further, only a slightly larger
group of those unhappy with it will work with this forum. Most will throw a
$60 software program in the garbage before spending hundreds of dollars
worth of time and stress trying to fix it like we do. You're therefore going
to only survey a small fraction of Money users with a statistical certainty
that they will be unhappy with the software.

--
ADAM PRESSMAN
"Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in
message news:OIwqYkbLFHA.1472[at]TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
- quote -

> Few switch since the barriers to doing so are high.
> GnuCash doesn't support classification and is exclusively Linux.
> "Thomas G. Marshall"
> <tgm2tothe10thpower[at]replacetextwithnumber.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1Hp%d.12531$ed6.7185[at]trndny06...
> > > *Without* (I sincerely hope) igniting a flame war, can anyone tell me why

> > they switched from one to the other, and is GnuCash ready for prime time?
> > > I know that it all depends upon what you want to use the software for.

> > So here are my first pass requirements:
> > > Basic transaction accounting

> > Download (synchronize account) activity with
> > my bank without fee (possible?)
> > Manage my portfolios (not required)
> > > Bill pay is not necessary---I do that in other ways.



  #1  
Old 03-21-2005, 02:41 PM
Nathan Gutman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Quicken vs. MS Money vs. GnuCash

As far as I know GnuCash does not run in MSWindows. Please let me know
if I am wrong on that.
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 01:45:33 GMT, "Thomas G. Marshall"
<tgm2tothe10thpower[at]replacetextwithnumber.hotmail.com> wrote:

- quote -

> *Without* (I sincerely hope) igniting a flame war, can anyone tell me why
> they switched from one to the other, and is GnuCash ready for prime time?
> I know that it all depends upon what you want to use the software for. So
> here are my first pass requirements:
> Basic transaction accounting
> Download (synchronize account) activity with
> my bank without fee (possible?)
> Manage my portfolios (not required)
> Bill pay is not necessary---I do that in other ways.
> Thanks!


 
Old 03-21-2005, 12:55 AM
Dick Watson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Quicken vs. MS Money vs. GnuCash

Few switch since the barriers to doing so are high.

GnuCash doesn't support classification and is exclusively Linux.

"Thomas G. Marshall" <tgm2tothe10thpower[at]replacetextwithnumber.hotmail.comwrote in message news:1Hp%d.12531$ed6.7185[at]trndny06...
- quote -

> *Without* (I sincerely hope) igniting a flame war, can anyone tell me why
> they switched from one to the other, and is GnuCash ready for prime time?
> I know that it all depends upon what you want to use the software for. So
> here are my first pass requirements:
> Basic transaction accounting
> Download (synchronize account) activity with
> my bank without fee (possible?)
> Manage my portfolios (not required)
> Bill pay is not necessary---I do that in other ways.



 

Tags
gnucash, money, quicken
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
MS Money 2005/Quicken 2005 -> GnuCash instead ??
OrionPax: Since MS Money 2005 so far has been a wash, as well as Quicken 2005, it's either stick to 2004, or wait for 2006 so far for me. :P Meantime, has...
Microsoft Money 4 10-21-2004 04:48 PM
Quicken to Money
Chris McGranaghan: I have quicken 2004 and wa not happy so I decided to try out Money 2004. The problem is that when I convert my quicken data, all of my accounts...
Microsoft Money 1 08-11-2004 04:13 AM
quicken to money
ralph: when i ran the conversion for my trial version of money 2004 the home inventory did not come over - why? does money work with turbotax or would i...
Microsoft Money 6 02-24-2004 04:16 AM
Money VS. Quicken
Tim Koltek: How does Money compare to Quicken? Tim Koltek tkoltek@hotmail.com
Microsoft Money 16 02-01-2004 10:59 AM
Money vs Quicken ?
Zorian: Can anyone suggest which is better? Thanks!
Microsoft Money 6 07-06-2003 05:31 AM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:35 AM.