|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Gerard Gold wrote: | I've got MS Money Premium 2004, and I cannot even move the window | around without the CPU usage going up to 100%. The associated | programs "mis.exe" and "misuser,exe" are also a major resource hog. | | Does anyone know if this pain in the neck goes away when one upgrades? | What's the most important component to upgrade? | | I am running on W2K with a 700 MHz Pentium-something & 128 MB RAM. | | Thank you, | Gerard Win Modems and onboard graphics can cause this behavior. 128MB of RAM is not sufficient to run W2K to its optimum. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Probably not much of one. Basically speaking, Money is slow. See http://umpmfaq.info/faqdb.php?q=4. "Gerard Gold" <gerard.gold_nospam[at]comcast.net> wrote in message news:44ydnUyi7-dx3bjfRVn-2A[at]comcast.com... - quote - > Is there a workaround that doesn't require me to increase the memory or > processor speed, or upgrade to WXP? > Could I just tune some system parameters to make MS Money friendlier? |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Is there a workaround that doesn't require me to increase the memory or processor speed, or upgrade to WXP? Could I just tune some system parameters to make MS Money friendlier? Thanks, Gerard "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:OMbKccsHFHA.588[at]TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... - quote - > By most all accounts M05 is worse than M04. For a W2K machine running 12* > MB? Memory. But it won't solve everything, especially not the 700 MHz CPU. > "Gerard Gold" <gerard.gold_nospam[at]comcast.net> wrote in message > news:K-WdnYQX75LQjrjfRVn-jw[at]comcast.com... > > I've got MS Money Premium 2004, and I cannot even move the window around > > without the CPU usage going up to 100%. The associated programs "mis.exe" > > and "misuser,exe" are also a major resource hog. > > > Does anyone know if this pain in the neck goes away when one upgrades? > > What's the most important component to upgrade? > > > I am running on W2K with a 700 MHz Pentium-something & 128 MB RAM. |
| | |||
| |||
| By most all accounts M05 is worse than M04. For a W2K machine running 12* MB? Memory. But it won't solve everything, especially not the 700 MHz CPU. "Gerard Gold" <gerard.gold_nospam[at]comcast.net> wrote in message news:K-WdnYQX75LQjrjfRVn-jw[at]comcast.com... - quote - > I've got MS Money Premium 2004, and I cannot even move the window around > without the CPU usage going up to 100%. The associated programs "mis.exe" > and "misuser,exe" are also a major resource hog. > Does anyone know if this pain in the neck goes away when one upgrades? > What's the most important component to upgrade? > I am running on W2K with a 700 MHz Pentium-something & 128 MB RAM. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I've got MS Money Premium 2004, and I cannot even move the window around without the CPU usage going up to 100%. The associated programs "mis.exe" and "misuser,exe" are also a major resource hog. Does anyone know if this pain in the neck goes away when one upgrades? What's the most important component to upgrade? I am running on W2K with a 700 MHz Pentium-something & 128 MB RAM. Thank you, Gerard |
| Tags |
| bottlenecks, performance, slowdown |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Performance John Payne: Anyone know of a way to improve Money 2002 performance when accessing / sharing a money file ? We have 2 PC's and have decided to share one file.... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 01-03-2004 04:26 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |