|
#11
| |||
| |||
| yes, how you think and approach as someone more experienced with the product gives me insight and a feel for appraoching the problem |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| On 2005-02-16, jmoeller18 <jmoeller18[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > here someone is reporting my same problem. microsofts solution is to
Deleting the duplicate downloaded paycheck is a fine solution.> simply delete the duplicate transaction > http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;152687 Deleting the paycheck entry that has all of your detailed information is not. - quote - > however, you brought up a great point about the internal mechanism that
I made a typo in that post that I didn't catch before I sent it.> does or does not allow the transactions to show up or now show up again > when the statement has been reimported. it would be nice to have that > feature as an advanced option I hope you understand that I'm just guessing (based on experience) as to how it's done. I could be completely wrong about it. |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| On 2005-02-16, jmoeller18 <jmoeller18[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > however, with the next paycheck i added into the register, i no longer
The only time that I ever see the "change" button is on a downloaded> seem to have the "change" option on the right click for the original > statement item. i instead marked it "void" for now. transaction before I've accepted it. What you're changing is the match. The only reason to do this is if Money incorrectly matched the downloaded transaction. There's no reason to change a non-downloaded transaction. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| it seems that the "change" feature is about "matching" transactions it seems as if this matching is an automatic software feature and the only related way to affect that i found was following these instructions: change online service settings http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;832772 a search on the microsoft site using "money match" will bring up a number of related search results here someone is reporting my same problem. microsofts solution is to simply delete the duplicate transaction http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;152687 however, you brought up a great point about the internal mechanism that does or does not allow the transactions to show up or now show up again when the statement has been reimported. it would be nice to have that feature as an advanced option |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| thanks for all the details and support! i have successfully moved past my need to "re-do" anything however, with the next paycheck i added into the register, i no longer seem to have the "change" option on the right click for the original statement item. i instead marked it "void" for now. I am going to try the balancing bank account feature once i get through the entire bank statement http://www.microsoft.com/money/suppo...ey05/ch6p6.asp |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| On 2005-02-13, jmoeller18 <jmoeller18[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > now i wonder if i should delete the previous registry entries,
I would recommend against this.> re-import and re-register and change so i have a perfect history... 1) I don't know about M05, but with M04, if I delete a transaction that I've already downloaded, it has a tendancy to not download that transaction again. Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't and I completely figured out the scenarios when it behaves this way and when it doesn't. I *THINK* keeps a list of OFX transaction ID's that it's already downloaded, and if it sees that transaction ID again, it simply ignores it - but this is just a guess (that could be completely wrong). 2) You already have a perect history. Whether a manually entered transaction in your register is matched to a downloaded transaction does not determine the perfection of your history. What determines that you've got a perfect history is if you can reconcile the accounts with your bank statements. I might just think about downloaded transactions differently than you. For me downloaded transactions serve two purposes. The first is to let me know about a specific transaction that I didn't know about. E.g. my wife went to Citgo two days ago. I'd beter categorize that transaction. But with my paycheck, downloading serves a different purpose. I've already entered all of the details of the transaction in the register. THAT's the information that I want, not the downloaded information. When I download that transaction, what I get is information that the transaction has cleared the bank. That's it. Imagine I download a paycheck transaction that doesn't auto-match my manually entered paycheck. If I accidentally deleted the downloaded transaction, I wouldn't care. Because I already have all of the information that I need. I have the details of my gross paycheck and where all of the different splits went to. And I know it cleared the bank. In such a case I would simply mark the manual paycheck "reconciled" and forget about it from that point forward. The only time a downloaded transaction trumps a manual transaction is if the amounts are different. Which occasionally happens with my paycheck. For some reason, every few paychecks, one or the other of my tax line items will be off by $.01. The fact that the downloaded transaction has a different amount is my clue to go look at my paystub to figure out where the error is. IMHO, as long as the total transaction amounts match, don't fret too much about deleting a downloaded transaction that represents a manually entered transaction. DO fret about deleting previously accepted downloaded transactions and manual transactions. $.02 |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| it works perfectly, i actually just tried it ( i shouldn't post until i have actually tried it...) now i wonder if i should delete the previous registry entries, re-import and re-register and change so i have a perfect history... i don't think leaving the first couple tries will hurt anything, i just don't want it coming back to haunt me... |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| thats it! thanks! yes i have M05 and that is very familiar from M04 i see the change option on the right click |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| On 2005-02-13, jmoeller18 <jmoeller18[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > this is exactly my problem! when i enter a transaction into the
I don't remember if you're using M05. I use M04. In that version> register, it does NOT match the transaction that is already there from > the previous import of the bank statement. is there a setting some > where? please advise (and at least a couple of earlier versions) it's easy to manually match a transaction that didn't automatically match. Just select the transaction that you downloaded and click the "Change" button. In the next screen there's an option to match the transaction to an existing transaction in the register. Click that option and choose the transaction from the list of transactions available. Let me know if I'm still not understanding the problem and/or what you're trying to accomplish. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| the good news is, it seems that re-importing my bank statement was successful in that i did not get a duplicate transaction for the registery entry. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > a) duplicate transactions that don't allow your register balance to
<<<match your bank balance. this is exactly my problem! when i enter a transaction into the register, it does NOT match the transaction that is already there from the previous import of the bank statement. is there a setting some where? please advise |
| | |||
| |||
| On 2005-02-12, jmoeller18 <jmoeller18[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > however, i was hoping it would be able to match the registry entry with
If you're worried about matching the a downloaded transaction to the> the transaction that was downloaded from the bank. > since both my wife and i, have the same net pay distribution to our > joint checking account, the statement line item both reads "ELECTRONIC > DEPOSIT". fortunately the memo line holds a partial match of the > employers name so i know which is which if they both fall on the same > day. unfortunately i can't use the payee name variation in the payee > rules manager to search the memo field. wrong register transaction, I would suggest that it doesn't matter. This is on the premise that the amounts are exactly the same. If they are then it shouldn't matter. What you want to avoid is: a) duplicate transactions that don't allow your register balance to match your bank balance. b) uncategorized transactions c) downloaded transactions that match a transaction with a different amount. - quote - > i am assuming my only recourse is to delete the original because i of
I thought I understood what the problem is, but I don't understand> course am more interested in the register version with its full set of > details. this recourse. So I'm very confused. Could you help me understand? - quote - > do you concur that this is the situation i live with until the payee
I don't think that I concur, but I need more info.> name rules manager adds a payee name variation search on the memo > field? |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| now that we've went over the paycheck conceptially, i've actually attempted to use it. i must say i appreciate that i'm able to create a reoccuring transaction for the one net pay distribution that is a stable number. however, i was hoping it would be able to match the registry entry with the transaction that was downloaded from the bank. since both my wife and i, have the same net pay distribution to our joint checking account, the statement line item both reads "ELECTRONIC DEPOSIT". fortunately the memo line holds a partial match of the employers name so i know which is which if they both fall on the same day. unfortunately i can't use the payee name variation in the payee rules manager to search the memo field. so i have a scheduled transaction in bill summary and i select the "enter in the register" to enter a particular paycheck into the account. now in my joint checking line items, i have the orignal net pay distribution line item labeled "ELECTRONIC DEPOSIT" and i have the new version from entering it into the register. i am assuming my only recourse is to delete the original because i of course am more interested in the register version with its full set of details. and show later, after deleting the original line item, i want to re-import that months bank statments back in, i will have to go re-delete the original line item. do you concur that this is the situation i live with until the payee name rules manager adds a payee name variation search on the memo field? Thanks in advance! -Jeff |
| Tags |
| part, paycheck |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Synchronization Problem Part 2 J MacQuarrie: I posted an email several days ago indicating I was having trouble with accessing my money data on the web. The problem I've been experiencing is... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 02-17-2004 02:22 PM | |
| print all or part of the account register Hardin: Is there a way to print part or all of the account register? | Microsoft Money | 2 | 01-09-2004 12:29 AM | |
| Separating the Budget part from the Checkbook part James: Hello, How do I disengage the Budgeting part of Money from the Checkbook part? I want to keep the two separate. Thank you. | Microsoft Money | 1 | 01-05-2004 07:21 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |