Re: Reconciled transactions

#3 08-15-2003, 03:12 AM

Shows you what I know.

"Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message
news:2vfojv4gv9t69cih40v6df3l00t8fc8ish[at]4ax.com...
- quote -

> In microsoft.public.money, Dick Watson wrote:
> > Maybe I need to retest this--on M04, no more M03 installed here.
> > > OK. I tested scheduling an R and an R+Flag. Both then enter into the
> > register as expected, no R, no flag.
> > > As you note, I'm too much of a curmudgeon to mess with an Epay.
> The E is Electronically cleared == downloaded.

#2 08-15-2003, 01:52 AM

Maybe I need to retest this--on M04, no more M03 installed here.

OK. I tested scheduling an R and an R+Flag. Both then enter into the
register as expected, no R, no flag.

As you note, I'm too much of a curmudgeon to mess with an Epay.

"Cal Learner-- MVP" <via_newsgroup[at]please.tnx> wrote in message
news:3e9ojv0ibqddii2atfhkf6bkj5sdg6jelt[at]4ax.com...
- quote -

> This may not be the problem you are discussing, and it would not be
> one that your style would run across. If you have a downloaded
> transaction marked E, and you add it to the bills and deposits from
> the register in Money 2003, tell Money to regularly add it to the
> register on a schedule, the transaction inherits the E. Then when
> you download that transaction, Money will not match the downloaded
> transaction up with the one in the register, and creates a duplicate
> transaction. The work-around is to not identify the register entry
> as a recurring transaction, but to enter the bill independently into
> the Accounts&Bills-> Bills&Deposits.
> Glyn Simpson has written about this. Did I get the description right
> Glyn?

#1 08-15-2003, 12:57 AM

No. It means that the problem created for an item scheduled in M02 won't be
fixed by M03--the item will still enter reconciled upon the upgrade to
M03--but M03 won't create any more like it.

"Bob Brannon" <bbrannon[at]3rivers.net> wrote in message
news:#9e$ksqYDHA.1916[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
- quote -

> Well that did the trick. Thank you for your help!
> I don't understand though, your statement in parentheses. Does that mean
in
> M03 you can enter a recurring bill to automatically reconcile and M03 will
> not override it?

> "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mindspring.com> wrote in message
> news:uWj9PDgYDHA.1680[at]tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> I don't think Microsoft ever acknowledged this, but M03 doesn't
> do it. (It also doesn't fix an item scheduled this way.)

08-14-2003, 10:29 PM

Well that did the trick. Thank you for your help!

I don't understand though, your statement in parentheses. Does that mean in
M03 you can enter a recurring bill to automatically reconcile and M03 will
not override it?

Thanks,
Bob

"Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:uWj9PDgYDHA.1680[at]tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Re-create the scheduled item, this time from an item in the register not
already marked as reconciled. This is a defect in M02: if you do an Add to
Bills & Deposits from an item already in the register, the state of the
cleared flag is stored and there is no way to change it. An item marked as
reconciled will be scheduled as reconciled and entered into the register as
reconciled. I don't think Microsoft ever acknowledged this, but M03 doesn't
do it. (It also doesn't fix an item scheduled this way.)

"Bob Brannon" <bbrannon[at]3rivers.net> wrote in message
news:OmgP9hfYDHA.1580[at]tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
- quote -

> I am using Money 2002. I have two recurring transfers set up under bills
> and deposits. They record the transfer of funds from one account to
another
> and are handled by direct debit. For some unknown reason, every time I
> record these transfers from the bills and deposits list (I don't do it any
> other way) they are marked as reconciled. Does anyone know a way I can
stop
> this from happening?

#-1 08-14-2003, 02:10 AM

Re-create the scheduled item, this time from an item in the register not
already marked as reconciled. This is a defect in M02: if you do an Add to
Bills & Deposits from an item already in the register, the state of the
cleared flag is stored and there is no way to change it. An item marked as
reconciled will be scheduled as reconciled and entered into the register as
reconciled. I don't think Microsoft ever acknowledged this, but M03 doesn't
do it. (It also doesn't fix an item scheduled this way.)

"Bob Brannon" <bbrannon[at]3rivers.net> wrote in message
news:OmgP9hfYDHA.1580[at]tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
- quote -

> I am using Money 2002. I have two recurring transfers set up under bills
> and deposits. They record the transfer of funds from one account to
another
> and are handled by direct debit. For some unknown reason, every time I
> record these transfers from the bills and deposits list (I don't do it any
> other way) they are marked as reconciled. Does anyone know a way I can
stop
> this from happening?

Similar Threads
Thread	Forum	Replies	Last Post
The Ending Balance from a reconciled statement does not carry over Bruce: I've used Money 98, then Money 2002 for the past four years without problems until several months ago. In March my statement balanced perfectly....	Microsoft Money	6	07-17-2003 12:04 AM
Auto Reconciled Glen Townshend: I uncheck it the options and yet each time I download from my bank it show the transaction a reconiled. How do I stop this from happening? Please...	Microsoft Money	1	07-14-2003 02:41 PM

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode