|
#25
| |||
| |||
| Money 2004 has the Outlook Contact Import / Export feature. 1 down, many more to go ^^ -- Chris Tilley HPC:Factor - http://www.hpcfactor.com/ HPC:Factor SETI Group - http://www.hpcfactor.com/seti/group/ "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mindspring.com> wrote in message news:O7twJnvQDHA.3700[at]tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... - quote - > You only have to put this data in Money if you want it there. Except for > online banking stuff, none of it is ever used by anybody but you. Money > certainly doesn't need it or do anything with it besides show it to you. If > you are in the habit of using Outlook Contacts for this sort of thing, use > 'em and skip putting it in Money, I'd say. > "Bob Becnel" <rgb2[at]cec.wustl.edu> wrote in message > news:Pine.SOL.3.96.1030704232058.10654B-100000[at]hilton.cec.wustl.edu... > > > > I'm not lobbying for Outlook integration, mind you. This is just the > stuff > > > that some users have said they'd like to see integrated with Outlook. > > > > I would. I get tired of re-entring the same data multiple times. Every > > payee has to have an address, website, phone number. This same > > information is probably in your contacts in Outlook for many of the > > payees. Let us also not forget the same information is asked for each > > bank or broker in Money. |
|
#24
| |||
| |||
| Have the ROI column reflect REAL percentages. For instance, in one account I bought into Fidelity LP stock on 6/26/03. In another account, I've held it for years. When I view MY PORTFOLIO, under the 2 listings for LP Stock it shows : ROI 4Weeks , ROI 3 Months columns: 3.4 % 22.5% for the long holding, AND 4.7% 4.7% for the newly bought. If I did not have the long holding, it would appear that the fund is only up 4.7% for 3 months. In fact it's up 3.4% for 4 weeks and 22.5% for 3 months. For that second holding, it SHOULD show N/A for 4wks and 3 months since I've only owned it for 3 weeks. I don't have a 3 month 4.7% ROI in the second holding: that implies that I've OWNED it for 3 months. It does show the 4.7% gain in the GAIN column as it should. That's where it should be - not in the quarterlies. |
|
#23
| |||
| |||
| GST support-Quicken fully supports it, but money doesn't. Also maybe a Australian version (with full localisations) "- Bobb -" <nospam87[at]netscape.net> wrote in message news:O5Cv9XBSDHA.1556[at]TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... - quote - > "A.A. Fussy" <amarks[at]austarnet.com.au> wrote in message > news:benf37$2ei$1[at]austar-news.austar.net.au... > > GST asupport, easy tax return prep (ATO tools/.advice center?)-for > > austraisan /NZ uasrs. > Mr/Ms Fussy, > It's Friday evening, have you had a few pints ? > As the sentence went on, the spelling got worse. ;-) > > "Chris Tilley - HPC:Factor" <chrisNOSPAMPLEASE[at]hpcfactor.com> wrote in > > message news:OXEqmh0RDHA.3768[at]tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > > > Well thats certainly a diverse range of opinions and ideas on the > subject, > > I > > > wonder what Microsoft thinks to it all. I've had no reply. (Not that I > > > really am expecting one). > > > > > Anyone got any other features ideas? > > > > > -- > > > Chris Tilley > > > HPC:Factor - http://www.hpcfactor.com/ > > > HPC:Factor SETI Group - http://www.hpcfactor.com/seti/group/ > > > > > "- Bobb -" <nospam87[at]netscape.net> wrote in message > > > news:#CZvRvMRDHA.2008[at]TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > > > > I still ask for (since '99) basic items that most users may use: > > > > > > > give me the ability to CREATE an asset class - such as "savings > bonds", > > " > > > > Income Property #1", etc > > > > so that I don't have to call my income property MUTUAL FUNDS, or my I > > > bonds > > > > 'CDs'. I would actually then have more asset classes than the 6 they > > > > provide. > > > > > > > and then to MODIFY it - so that when I leave / transfer my account > from > > > one > > > > company to another, I can change the account number rather than > > > > closing/transferring the assets (at an unknown cost basis) (See my > > recent > > > > posting regarding this) > > > > > > > As for mutual funds, when I download info on them, fill in the blanks > as > > > to > > > > whether they are International, small cap VALUE funds, large cap > GROWTH, > > > etc > > > > to better analyze my data. Or, if not automatic, at least let ME input > > > that > > > > info. I cannot now: now only Small,Mid,Large, cash, money mkt , > bonds, > > > > other. > > > > > > > Speaking of mutual funds, use the category that Morningstar uses. > > > > Why can't I put my Oakmark International Mutual fund in an > > INTERNATIONAL/ > > > > GLOBAL group rather than OTHER > > > > A lot of items don't fall into the lg,mid,sm group so they all get > > lumped > > > > into "other". So I have 23% of my money in OTHER. how useless is that > ? > > > > > > > Two enhancements to make viewing easier: > > > > 1. why not let me have money market = cash in the portfolio screen ? > > If > > > I > > > > have a few money markets, let me lump them for reporting purposes by > > > > checking a box in their setup. > > > > > > > 2. I'd like to have the left frame (the "menu area") come/go as > needed. > > > > While updating my Portfolio, a lot of my data is off-screen and I have > > to > > > > slide over to see it. Give me a shortcut key combo to toggle full > screen > > > of > > > > data vs "normal Money screen" so that when I want to see all the data > > at > > > > once (% return 1 month, 3 mo, 1 yr etc). I could just CTRL-W (or > > whatever) > > > > to see a wide view. Then do it again to get back to a "normal > portfolio > > > > page" view. > > > > > > > bobb > > > > > > > > > > > |
|
#22
| |||
| |||
| "A.A. Fussy" <amarks[at]austarnet.com.au> wrote in message news:benf37$2ei$1[at]austar-news.austar.net.au... - quote - > GST asupport, easy tax return prep (ATO tools/.advice center?)-for
Mr/Ms Fussy,> austraisan /NZ uasrs. It's Friday evening, have you had a few pints ? As the sentence went on, the spelling got worse. ;-) - quote - > "Chris Tilley - HPC:Factor" <chrisNOSPAMPLEASE[at]hpcfactor.com> wrote in > message news:OXEqmh0RDHA.3768[at]tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > > Well thats certainly a diverse range of opinions and ideas on the subject, > I > > wonder what Microsoft thinks to it all. I've had no reply. (Not that I > > really am expecting one). > > > Anyone got any other features ideas? > > > -- > > Chris Tilley > > HPC:Factor - http://www.hpcfactor.com/ > > HPC:Factor SETI Group - http://www.hpcfactor.com/seti/group/ > > > "- Bobb -" <nospam87[at]netscape.net> wrote in message > > news:#CZvRvMRDHA.2008[at]TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > > > I still ask for (since '99) basic items that most users may use: > > > > > give me the ability to CREATE an asset class - such as "savings bonds", > " > > > Income Property #1", etc > > > so that I don't have to call my income property MUTUAL FUNDS, or my I > > bonds > > > 'CDs'. I would actually then have more asset classes than the 6 they > > > provide. > > > > > and then to MODIFY it - so that when I leave / transfer my account from > > one > > > company to another, I can change the account number rather than > > > closing/transferring the assets (at an unknown cost basis) (See my > recent > > > posting regarding this) > > > > > As for mutual funds, when I download info on them, fill in the blanks as > > to > > > whether they are International, small cap VALUE funds, large cap GROWTH, > > etc > > > to better analyze my data. Or, if not automatic, at least let ME input > > that > > > info. I cannot now: now only Small,Mid,Large, cash, money mkt , bonds, > > > other. > > > > > Speaking of mutual funds, use the category that Morningstar uses. > > > Why can't I put my Oakmark International Mutual fund in an > INTERNATIONAL/ > > > GLOBAL group rather than OTHER > > > A lot of items don't fall into the lg,mid,sm group so they all get > lumped > > > into "other". So I have 23% of my money in OTHER. how useless is that ? > > > > > Two enhancements to make viewing easier: > > > 1. why not let me have money market = cash in the portfolio screen ? > If > > I > > > have a few money markets, let me lump them for reporting purposes by > > > checking a box in their setup. > > > > > 2. I'd like to have the left frame (the "menu area") come/go as needed. > > > While updating my Portfolio, a lot of my data is off-screen and I have > to > > > slide over to see it. Give me a shortcut key combo to toggle full screen > > of > > > data vs "normal Money screen" so that when I want to see all the data > at > > > once (% return 1 month, 3 mo, 1 yr etc). I could just CTRL-W (or > whatever) > > > to see a wide view. Then do it again to get back to a "normal portfolio > > > page" view. > > > > > bobb > > > > > |
|
#21
| |||
| |||
| GST asupport, easy tax return prep (ATO tools/.advice center?)-for austraisan /NZ uasrs. "Chris Tilley - HPC:Factor" <chrisNOSPAMPLEASE[at]hpcfactor.com> wrote in message news:OXEqmh0RDHA.3768[at]tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... - quote - > Well thats certainly a diverse range of opinions and ideas on the subject, I > wonder what Microsoft thinks to it all. I've had no reply. (Not that I > really am expecting one). > Anyone got any other features ideas? > -- > Chris Tilley > HPC:Factor - http://www.hpcfactor.com/ > HPC:Factor SETI Group - http://www.hpcfactor.com/seti/group/ > "- Bobb -" <nospam87[at]netscape.net> wrote in message > news:#CZvRvMRDHA.2008[at]TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > > I still ask for (since '99) basic items that most users may use: > > > give me the ability to CREATE an asset class - such as "savings bonds", " > > Income Property #1", etc > > so that I don't have to call my income property MUTUAL FUNDS, or my I > bonds > > 'CDs'. I would actually then have more asset classes than the 6 they > > provide. > > > and then to MODIFY it - so that when I leave / transfer my account from > one > > company to another, I can change the account number rather than > > closing/transferring the assets (at an unknown cost basis) (See my recent > > posting regarding this) > > > As for mutual funds, when I download info on them, fill in the blanks as > to > > whether they are International, small cap VALUE funds, large cap GROWTH, > etc > > to better analyze my data. Or, if not automatic, at least let ME input > that > > info. I cannot now: now only Small,Mid,Large, cash, money mkt , bonds, > > other. > > > Speaking of mutual funds, use the category that Morningstar uses. > > Why can't I put my Oakmark International Mutual fund in an INTERNATIONAL/ > > GLOBAL group rather than OTHER > > A lot of items don't fall into the lg,mid,sm group so they all get lumped > > into "other". So I have 23% of my money in OTHER. how useless is that ? > > > Two enhancements to make viewing easier: > > 1. why not let me have money market = cash in the portfolio screen ? If > I > > have a few money markets, let me lump them for reporting purposes by > > checking a box in their setup. > > > 2. I'd like to have the left frame (the "menu area") come/go as needed. > > While updating my Portfolio, a lot of my data is off-screen and I have to > > slide over to see it. Give me a shortcut key combo to toggle full screen > of > > data vs "normal Money screen" so that when I want to see all the data at > > once (% return 1 month, 3 mo, 1 yr etc). I could just CTRL-W (or whatever) > > to see a wide view. Then do it again to get back to a "normal portfolio > > page" view. > > > bobb > |
|
#20
| |||
| |||
| My standing list is way long. It's summarized in this thread: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...gbl%26rnum%3D2 "Chris Tilley - HPC:Factor" <chrisNOSPAMPLEASE[at]hpcfactor.com> wrote in message news:OXEqmh0RDHA.3768[at]tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... - quote - > Well thats certainly a diverse range of opinions and ideas on the subject, I > wonder what Microsoft thinks to it all. I've had no reply. (Not that I > really am expecting one). > Anyone got any other features ideas? |
|
#19
| |||
| |||
| Well thats certainly a diverse range of opinions and ideas on the subject, I wonder what Microsoft thinks to it all. I've had no reply. (Not that I really am expecting one). Anyone got any other features ideas? -- Chris Tilley HPC:Factor - http://www.hpcfactor.com/ HPC:Factor SETI Group - http://www.hpcfactor.com/seti/group/ "- Bobb -" <nospam87[at]netscape.net> wrote in message news:#CZvRvMRDHA.2008[at]TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... - quote - > I still ask for (since '99) basic items that most users may use: > give me the ability to CREATE an asset class - such as "savings bonds", " > Income Property #1", etc > so that I don't have to call my income property MUTUAL FUNDS, or my I bonds > 'CDs'. I would actually then have more asset classes than the 6 they > provide. > and then to MODIFY it - so that when I leave / transfer my account from one > company to another, I can change the account number rather than > closing/transferring the assets (at an unknown cost basis) (See my recent > posting regarding this) > As for mutual funds, when I download info on them, fill in the blanks as to > whether they are International, small cap VALUE funds, large cap GROWTH, etc > to better analyze my data. Or, if not automatic, at least let ME input that > info. I cannot now: now only Small,Mid,Large, cash, money mkt , bonds, > other. > Speaking of mutual funds, use the category that Morningstar uses. > Why can't I put my Oakmark International Mutual fund in an INTERNATIONAL/ > GLOBAL group rather than OTHER > A lot of items don't fall into the lg,mid,sm group so they all get lumped > into "other". So I have 23% of my money in OTHER. how useless is that ? > Two enhancements to make viewing easier: > 1. why not let me have money market = cash in the portfolio screen ? If I > have a few money markets, let me lump them for reporting purposes by > checking a box in their setup. > 2. I'd like to have the left frame (the "menu area") come/go as needed. > While updating my Portfolio, a lot of my data is off-screen and I have to > slide over to see it. Give me a shortcut key combo to toggle full screen of > data vs "normal Money screen" so that when I want to see all the data at > once (% return 1 month, 3 mo, 1 yr etc). I could just CTRL-W (or whatever) > to see a wide view. Then do it again to get back to a "normal portfolio > page" view. > bobb |
|
#18
| |||
| |||
| I still ask for (since '99) basic items that most users may use: give me the ability to CREATE an asset class - such as "savings bonds", " Income Property #1", etc so that I don't have to call my income property MUTUAL FUNDS, or my I bonds 'CDs'. I would actually then have more asset classes than the 6 they provide. and then to MODIFY it - so that when I leave / transfer my account from one company to another, I can change the account number rather than closing/transferring the assets (at an unknown cost basis) (See my recent posting regarding this) As for mutual funds, when I download info on them, fill in the blanks as to whether they are International, small cap VALUE funds, large cap GROWTH, etc to better analyze my data. Or, if not automatic, at least let ME input that info. I cannot now: now only Small,Mid,Large, cash, money mkt , bonds, other. Speaking of mutual funds, use the category that Morningstar uses. Why can't I put my Oakmark International Mutual fund in an INTERNATIONAL/ GLOBAL group rather than OTHER A lot of items don't fall into the lg,mid,sm group so they all get lumped into "other". So I have 23% of my money in OTHER. how useless is that ? Two enhancements to make viewing easier: 1. why not let me have money market = cash in the portfolio screen ? If I have a few money markets, let me lump them for reporting purposes by checking a box in their setup. 2. I'd like to have the left frame (the "menu area") come/go as needed. While updating my Portfolio, a lot of my data is off-screen and I have to slide over to see it. Give me a shortcut key combo to toggle full screen of data vs "normal Money screen" so that when I want to see all the data at once (% return 1 month, 3 mo, 1 yr etc). I could just CTRL-W (or whatever) to see a wide view. Then do it again to get back to a "normal portfolio page" view. bobb |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| Banks could have a xsingle statement filethat noney could hsve (say might have muktiple bank accounts). "Chris Tilley - HPC:Factor" <chrisNOSPAMPLEASE[at]hpcfactor.com> wrote in message news:OEbgdgvQDHA.3796[at]tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... - quote - > Ah!, yes I'm with you now. Good thinking, certainly something to consider. > Perhaps the FI could provide all their details in a special file which you > can pull off their web site, containing all your account details, contact > data and the such. > As for the Payee contact information, your right that would be very very > time saving! > -- > Chris Tilley > HPC:Factor - http://www.hpcfactor.com/ > HPC:Factor SETI Group - http://www.hpcfactor.com/seti/group/ > "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mindspring.com> wrote in message > news:#z0RzAqQDHA.2716[at]TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > > Oh, and have you noticed that Money has contact information just like > > Outlook? > > > I'm not lobbying for Outlook integration, mind you. This is just the stuff > > that some users have said they'd like to see integrated with Outlook. > > > I can think of many, many, things I'd rather see in Money than them trying > > to tie into Outlook. (The thought of the Money team programming this is a > > little scary, besides.) Like improving the scheduled split transaction > > morphs to paycheck feature, adding great new firewall compatibility > features > > to quotes download, and adding great new data integrity improvements for > > simultaneous access by multiple users to a Money file. And that's just > > naming three. > > > "Chris Tilley - HPC:Factor" <chrisNOSPAMPLEASE[at]hpcfactor.com> wrote in > > message news:uX39tXoQDHA.2096[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > > > I don't follow, how would synchronising your PIM data with money work > out? > > > *scratches head* > |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Chris Tilley - HPC:Factor wrote: - quote - > Its nice to have all the fields filled in, after all you only have to do it
My bank offers the ability to submit a check on-line and the bank will> once and it should stay with it in subsequent updates. The information could > have a more prevolent use in the future, perhapse as more banks offer full > banking from within money, you'll be able to use the contact data to send > transfers to people. fill out a check, put it in an evelope and stamp it using information in my payee information. Bob |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| Agreed. However, to take advantage of Money's features... My bank allows me to submit a check on-line and the bank will maill the check in an envelope and stamp it using the address from my payee information. In order to send checks to friends or utilities, I have to prepopulate Money with the same information in Outlook. I have the information in Outlook for reasons such as mailing labels or lists for Xmas cards, etc. Also, if I want to call my bank or credit card company, I put the phone numbers in Money, but if I didn't do this, I would have to open Outlook just to call my bank when I already have Money open. Not a biggie, but certainly redundant. Now, going one step further, if my bank merges or moves, I have to make sure I update my Outlook and Money payee information. You see my point. I know you don't have to do this stuff. In fact you don't have to ever put anything in Money. Just load it up on your machine and look at the nice icon. However, if you want to use essential aspects of the software, there are certain things you *have* to do. Bob *************************** Bob Becnel rgb2[at]cec.wustl.edu http://cec.wustl.edu/~rgb2/ *************************** On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Dick Watson wrote: - quote - > You only have to put this data in Money if you want it there. Except for > online banking stuff, none of it is ever used by anybody but you. Money > certainly doesn't need it or do anything with it besides show it to you. If > you are in the habit of using Outlook Contacts for this sort of thing, use > 'em and skip putting it in Money, I'd say. > "Bob Becnel" <rgb2[at]cec.wustl.edu> wrote in message > news:Pine.SOL.3.96.1030704232058.10654B-100000[at]hilton.cec.wustl.edu... > > > > I'm not lobbying for Outlook integration, mind you. This is just the > stuff > > > that some users have said they'd like to see integrated with Outlook. > > > > I would. I get tired of re-entring the same data multiple times. Every > > payee has to have an address, website, phone number. This same > > information is probably in your contacts in Outlook for many of the > > payees. Let us also not forget the same information is asked for each > > bank or broker in Money. |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| Its nice to have all the fields filled in, after all you only have to do it once and it should stay with it in subsequent updates. The information could have a more prevolent use in the future, perhapse as more banks offer full banking from within money, you'll be able to use the contact data to send transfers to people. -- Chris Tilley HPC:Factor - http://www.hpcfactor.com/ HPC:Factor SETI Group - http://www.hpcfactor.com/seti/group/ "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mindspring.com> wrote in message news:O7twJnvQDHA.3700[at]tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... - quote - > You only have to put this data in Money if you want it there. Except for > online banking stuff, none of it is ever used by anybody but you. Money > certainly doesn't need it or do anything with it besides show it to you. If > you are in the habit of using Outlook Contacts for this sort of thing, use > 'em and skip putting it in Money, I'd say. > "Bob Becnel" <rgb2[at]cec.wustl.edu> wrote in message > news:Pine.SOL.3.96.1030704232058.10654B-100000[at]hilton.cec.wustl.edu... > > > > I'm not lobbying for Outlook integration, mind you. This is just the > stuff > > > that some users have said they'd like to see integrated with Outlook. > > > > I would. I get tired of re-entring the same data multiple times. Every > > payee has to have an address, website, phone number. This same > > information is probably in your contacts in Outlook for many of the > > payees. Let us also not forget the same information is asked for each > > bank or broker in Money. |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| What you've said would be comical, if it wasn't true. I under stated the UK lottery, I think we have it twice a week these days and its set to get worse from recent reports of dwindling sales (The 'poor' as you put it are seeing sense me thinks). Their going to de-nationalise it. That aside, it seemed like a rather easy thing to implement. Just select which lottery you take part in from a service list, enter your numbers and Internet Update it for the results. I'm not saying I'd use it, but in discussion with other money users it came up so I've put it forward. Its still going to be easier to coordinate than the Stock market ;-) -- Chris Tilley HPC:Factor - http://www.hpcfactor.com/ HPC:Factor SETI Group - http://www.hpcfactor.com/seti/group/ "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mindspring.com> wrote in message news:uPzfnmvQDHA.2768[at]tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... - quote - > We have adopted a new taxation strategy here in the US that you may not have > in the UK. Don't tax rich, smart, people who can do math via the income tax. > Don't have federal services. Just shift the burden to the states. (Call it > "state's rights" or some such.) Then, the states--which already had > regressive tax schemes--decided to shove the burden off on the poor people > who can't do math. We call it the lottery. Most every state now has one or > several forms. It's a lot bigger than just 7 2 digit lottery numbers twice a > week here in the states. > "Chris Tilley - HPC:Factor" <chrisNOSPAMPLEASE[at]hpcfactor.com> wrote in > message news:%23O6bXevQDHA.2176[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > > He already coordinates several hundred different stock exchanges, so 7, 2 > > digit lottery numbers once a week shouldn't be too hard |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| You only have to put this data in Money if you want it there. Except for online banking stuff, none of it is ever used by anybody but you. Money certainly doesn't need it or do anything with it besides show it to you. If you are in the habit of using Outlook Contacts for this sort of thing, use 'em and skip putting it in Money, I'd say. "Bob Becnel" <rgb2[at]cec.wustl.edu> wrote in message news:Pine.SOL.3.96.1030704232058.10654B-100000[at]hilton.cec.wustl.edu... - quote - > > I'm not lobbying for Outlook integration, mind you. This is just the stuff > > that some users have said they'd like to see integrated with Outlook. > > I would. I get tired of re-entring the same data multiple times. Every > payee has to have an address, website, phone number. This same > information is probably in your contacts in Outlook for many of the > payees. Let us also not forget the same information is asked for each > bank or broker in Money. |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Ah!, yes I'm with you now. Good thinking, certainly something to consider. Perhaps the FI could provide all their details in a special file which you can pull off their web site, containing all your account details, contact data and the such. As for the Payee contact information, your right that would be very very time saving! -- Chris Tilley HPC:Factor - http://www.hpcfactor.com/ HPC:Factor SETI Group - http://www.hpcfactor.com/seti/group/ "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mindspring.com> wrote in message news:#z0RzAqQDHA.2716[at]TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... - quote - > Oh, and have you noticed that Money has contact information just like > Outlook? > I'm not lobbying for Outlook integration, mind you. This is just the stuff > that some users have said they'd like to see integrated with Outlook. > I can think of many, many, things I'd rather see in Money than them trying > to tie into Outlook. (The thought of the Money team programming this is a > little scary, besides.) Like improving the scheduled split transaction > morphs to paycheck feature, adding great new firewall compatibility features > to quotes download, and adding great new data integrity improvements for > simultaneous access by multiple users to a Money file. And that's just > naming three. > "Chris Tilley - HPC:Factor" <chrisNOSPAMPLEASE[at]hpcfactor.com> wrote in > message news:uX39tXoQDHA.2096[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > > I don't follow, how would synchronising your PIM data with money work out? > > *scratches head* |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| He already coordinates several hundred different stock exchanges, so 7, 2 digit lottery numbers once a week shouldn't be too hard -- Chris Tilley HPC:Factor - http://www.hpcfactor.com/ HPC:Factor SETI Group - http://www.hpcfactor.com/seti/group/ "Bob Becnel" <rgb2[at]cec.wustl.edu> wrote in message news:Pine.SOL.3.96.1030704231628.10654A-100000[at]hilton.cec.wustl.edu... - quote - > If we are going to ask Bill Gates to coordinate 50 different lotteries > plus those that are international, then shouldn't we ask him to pull in > the latest lines from Vegas. Also, what about all of the greyhound, > jai-lai and horse races that are available in this country alone? > Where do you draw the line? > *************************** > Bob Becnel > rgb2[at]cec.wustl.edu > http://cec.wustl.edu/~rgb2/ > *************************** > On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Chris Tilley - HPC:Factor wrote: > > Currency rates, they are already in it if you look, you have to go into the > > options menu to get at them though. As this data is already being sync'd, > > making it available on the home page just adds better use for it. I very > > well know that they change every day, hence when you sync with the internet > > they are updated for you with your stock data. > > > I *could* watch the tv for the lottery draw, I *could* go get a news paper, > > I *could* goto the national lottery web site, but if money can pull the > > numbers down when it does the internet update and flash a popup if I've won > > something the user would have one touch access to more tools. I mean on that > > logic I could go and check my shares outside of money too, but I don't want > > to ;-) > > Its an XML world, everything's ASCII, It just needs to know what to do with > > it. > > > As for the HPC support, why do you think I'm asking for a new client. If > > there was a working one, I wouldn't need to ask :-) > > The old 2000 / 2001 client was only made available for US and Canadian > > versions of Money and this was of no use to me here in the UK. If people > > don't ask for these things, they don't get written, so it can't hurt to ask. > > (again... and again... and again lol) > > > Chris Tilley > > HPC:Factor - http://www.hpcfactor.com/ > > HPC:Factor SETI Group - http://www.hpcfactor.com/seti/group/ > > > "NickKnight" <NickKnightonFKNOSPAM[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:9f2cgvknnod354feb92dmu8330110ba7se[at]4ax.com... > > > On "Chris Tilley - HPC:Factor" > > > <chrisNOSPAMPLEASE[at]hpcfactor.com> wrote: > > > > > > Currency rates: > > > > At the moment if you want to see the currency rates you have to go into > > > > options to list them. Being able to display a customisable list of them > > as > > > > an entry on the home page, or on the portfolio page would be useful. This > > > > information is already being synced anyway - likewise - > > > I would not put this into Money. Currency rates fluctuate > > > on a daily basis, if you check > > > http://money.cnn.com/markets/currencies/ you''ll find rates > > > change every business day. > > > > > > Lottery Numbers: > > > > Simple this one. Enter your lottery numbers in a form (for users who play > > > > the same numbers) or in a box for random number players and have it check > > > > them for you against on-line service results. > > > But then you colud do the same oustide of money. They > > > publish them in the newspaper, many TV Radio and newspapers > > > publish them on their webistes. > > > > > > A updated Windows CE based Handheld PC client (in currencies other than > > > > US/CAN $ this time please) > > > Guess what? Money stopped supprting the Handehdl platform > > > like the HP680 years ago. Now they only suppoprt the PPC. > > > > > > > ------------ > > > To send me e-mail exorcise NO Spam from > > > my e-mail address. > > > > > > > -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- > > > http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! > > > -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- > > > |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I'm not lobbying for Outlook integration, mind you. This is just the stuff
payee has to have an address, website, phone number. This same> that some users have said they'd like to see integrated with Outlook. I would. I get tired of re-entring the same data multiple times. Every information is probably in your contacts in Outlook for many of the payees. Let us also not forget the same information is asked for each bank or broker in Money. Bob |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| I for one would decline to buy the new version of Money if it tracked Lottery bets. ------------ To send me e-mail exorcise NO Spam from my e-mail address. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Oh, and have you noticed that Money has contact information just like Outlook? I'm not lobbying for Outlook integration, mind you. This is just the stuff that some users have said they'd like to see integrated with Outlook. I can think of many, many, things I'd rather see in Money than them trying to tie into Outlook. (The thought of the Money team programming this is a little scary, besides.) Like improving the scheduled split transaction morphs to paycheck feature, adding great new firewall compatibility features to quotes download, and adding great new data integrity improvements for simultaneous access by multiple users to a Money file. And that's just naming three. "Chris Tilley - HPC:Factor" <chrisNOSPAMPLEASE[at]hpcfactor.com> wrote in message news:uX39tXoQDHA.2096[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... - quote - > I don't follow, how would synchronising your PIM data with money work out? > *scratches head* |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Or the racing form? How about a bingo picker? Live off-track betting? "NickKnight" <NickKnightonFKNOSPAM[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news:u4ecgvcbvkbs2fltin10b4raufp8hac702[at]4ax.com... - quote - > But why would you want it in Money? Money is for keeping > track of your checking accts, etc. The lottery doesn't > really belong in there. If they put lottery in there will > they also put in the ability to track your bets for Mach > Mandness? |