|
#7
12-16-2004, 02:34 PM
| |||
| |||
 Re: MS2003 to MS2005 ?? In microsoft.public.money, Gayle Overton wrote: - quote - > It would take a little time to set up, but after the set up most of the
One of the really cool things Money does is to send schedule D> tracking that one does with MSmoney can be cone with a spread-sheet and > much faster. Because of the slowness of MS perhaps using both systems > togeather is the way to go? MSmoney for online work - spread sheet for > Records. > Comments? information to your income tax program. Another is the ability to download from brokers , banks and credit cards ("financial institutions") There are a bunch of capabilities, and each person has favorites. |
|
#6
12-16-2004, 02:04 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: MS2003 to MS2005 ?? On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 07:41:04 -0800, in microsoft.public.money you wrote: - quote - > Thread-Topic: MS2003 to MS2005 ??
It would take a little time to set up, but after the set up most of the> thread-index: AcTivHxWy2DA0+ZHRGiXdFky7i6ZCg== > X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 69.172.133.20 > From: "=?Utf-8?B?U3RldmU=?=" <Steve[at]discussions.microsoft.com> References: <B0032178284[at]nocmailsvc001.allthesites.org> Subject: RE: MS2003 to MS2005 ?? > Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 07:41:04 -0800 > Lines: 13 > Message-ID: <03908B22-F358-4225-987B-AE7A74F797C7[at]microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="Utf-8" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 > Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message > Importance: normal > Priority: normal > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0 > Newsgroups: microsoft.public.money > NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.1.29 > Path: newsfeed.slurp.net!newsfeed-0.progon.net!progon.net!news.imp.ch!news.imp.ch!so lnet.ch!solnet.ch!newsfeed.freenet.de!feed.news.ti scali.de!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!news feed.cwix.com!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.p hx.gbl!cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl > Xref: newsfeed.slurp.net microsoft.public.money:49383 > I agree totally....However no one has been able to explain to me why it is > soooooo slow. It takes 15 minutes to update stock prices whereas it used to > be 15 seconds. > "midnight[at]hausdave.yi.org" wrote: > > In reading many of the concerns herein relative to upgrading > > from V2003 to V2005, I don't think I will. However, I think MS > > should be concerned! tracking that one does with MSmoney can be cone with a spread-sheet and much faster. Because of the slowness of MS perhaps using both systems togeather is the way to go? MSmoney for online work - spread sheet for Records. Comments? |
|
#5
12-15-2004, 04:00 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: MS2003 to MS2005 ?? work sb worth "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:ezILd3r4EHA.2624[at]TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... - quote - > I don't know that they view Money power users as a charity work throwing > money at. The problem is called "business case". |
|
#4
12-15-2004, 02:50 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: MS2003 to MS2005 ?? I don't know that they view Money power users as a charity work throwing money at. The problem is called "business case". "Brent N." <unknown> wrote in message news:OM3zBqr4EHA.4028[at]TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... - quote - > Exactly, and that's what angers me. They're sitting on tens of billions of $ > they don't know what to do with; it's not like they couldn't afford to produce > better products. |
|
#3
12-15-2004, 02:41 PM
| |||
| |||
| RE: MS2003 to MS2005 ?? I agree totally....However no one has been able to explain to me why it is soooooo slow. It takes 15 minutes to update stock prices whereas it used to be 15 seconds. "midnight[at]hausdave.yi.org" wrote: - quote - > In reading many of the concerns herein relative to upgrading > from V2003 to V2005, I don't think I will. However, I think MS > should be concerned! > Comments? |
|
#2
12-15-2004, 02:26 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: MS2003 to MS2005 ?? Exactly, and that's what angers me. They're sitting on tens of billions of $ they don't know what to do with; it's not like they couldn't afford to produce better products. -- Brent Neville "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in message news:OWT$LOr4EHA.3820[at]TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... - quote - > In the greater overall scheme of things, Money doesn't do all that much. > Microsoft created Office, WinXp, SQL Server, Project, VisStudio, et al. They > are certainly capable of creating software that both does more and runs > faster. But first they have to want to. > Comments? > "A S Gaudens" <SGaudensA77[at]aol.sandvlor.ie> wrote in message > news:FCSTXGWE38336.341724537[at]si93kru1.poster... > > On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 12:49:33 +0000, in microsoft.public.money you wrote: > > > From: midnight[at]hausdave.yi.org > > > > > In reading many of the concerns herein relative to upgrading > > > from V2003 to V2005, I don't think I will. However, I think MS > > > should be concerned! > > > > > Comments? > > They are so slow. I think MS would be better off creating software that > > runs faster and does less. > > Comments? |
|
#1
12-15-2004, 01:37 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: MS2003 to MS2005 ?? In the greater overall scheme of things, Money doesn't do all that much. Microsoft created Office, WinXp, SQL Server, Project, VisStudio, et al. They are certainly capable of creating software that both does more and runs faster. But first they have to want to. Comments? "A S Gaudens" <SGaudensA77[at]aol.sandvlor.ie> wrote in message news:FCSTXGWE38336.341724537[at]si93kru1.poster... - quote - > On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 12:49:33 +0000, in microsoft.public.money you wrote: > > From: midnight[at]hausdave.yi.org > > > In reading many of the concerns herein relative to upgrading > > from V2003 to V2005, I don't think I will. However, I think MS > > should be concerned! > > > Comments? > They are so slow. I think MS would be better off creating software that > runs faster and does less. > Comments? |
|
12-15-2004, 12:12 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: MS2003 to MS2005 ?? On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 12:49:33 +0000, in microsoft.public.money you wrote: - quote - > Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 12:49:33 +0000
runs faster and does less.> Message-ID: <B0032178284[at]nocmailsvc001.allthesites.org> From: midnight[at]hausdave.yi.org > Newsgroups: microsoft.public.money > Subject: MS2003 to MS2005 ?? > Mail-To-News-Contact: abuse[at]dizum.com > Organization: mail2news[at]dizum.com > Path: newsfeed.slurp.net!newsfeed-0.progon.net!progon.net!feeder1.cambrium.nl!feed.t weaknews.nl!news.wiretrip.org!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news > Xref: newsfeed.slurp.net microsoft.public.money:49368 > In reading many of the concerns herein relative to upgrading > from V2003 to V2005, I don't think I will. However, I think MS > should be concerned! > Comments? They are so slow. I think MS would be better off creating software that Comments? |
|
#-1
12-15-2004, 11:49 AM
| |||
| |||
| MS2003 to MS2005 ?? In reading many of the concerns herein relative to upgrading from V2003 to V2005, I don't think I will. However, I think MS should be concerned! Comments? |
Linear Mode
