|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Thanks for your note. I find it impressive that Money 2004 will open and import the Money 3.0 file. I to have found that the removal of options and the clutter of new "features" has led to a program that is difficult to operate in the simplest of modes like the original concept. The BLOG that someone posted where the current developers talk about how the goal is to keep the user on the internet and sell him some other service appears applicable. I actually started tracking every penny using a Fortran based program I wrote in the 60's. I switched to a DBASE program in the early 80's and finally to Simple Money 1.0 which worked prior to switching to Money 3.0. I liked 3.0 but unfortunately I have upgraded each version since. Each time I have seen massive growth in data base, slower operation, and more features I do not use. I have found that by turning off the budgeting capabilities that it speeds up the system. Many of the features you were looking for I have found how to do with reports or reports and export to Excel spreadsheets. But I liked the original simple version best. Art McClinton ps - developers want to build a new version and the company wants to sell a new version so each year they must find something to add. But for some reason the bugs or features only desired by a perceived small group of users remain. Doug Klunder wrote: - quote - > What Have They Done To My Program?!?! > by Doug Klunder ..... > Doug |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Money 3.0 is well out of support now. Perhaps you could try to open the file in the latest version (download a trial), then at least you'll be able to export the data as QIF (try it on another machine if you can). -- Glyn Simpson, Microsoft MVP - Money http://money.mvps.org Check http://money.mvps.org/faq for tips and fixes for MS Money. To send Microsoft your product wishes see http://money.mvps.org/wishes.aspx I do not respond to any unsolicited email regarding Money "Bente" <Bente[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:49C7D1ED-27E6-4ACD-9538-584B95DE0E37[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > Hello Doug, > I'm replying to you because you at least know about the early versions and > Microsoft can't help me. > The problem: I can't get into my Money (I believe it's 2.0.0.0) and they > can't help me. > I have used this program since forever and it serves me just fine for my > checkbook, it's nice and easy to read and not at all cluttered as you > refer > to in the newer versions. When I switched computers and programs in early > 2002 to XP I just copied the program and it worked just fine except for > the > following message: > 16 bit windows subsystem > C:\Progra~1\Symantec\s32EVNT1.DLL. An installable Virtual Device Driver > failed Dll initialization. Choose 'Close' to terminate the application. > If I chose ignore it would open. Oh, and the sound didn't work either but > who needs it. I also would get that weird error in the reconcile bank > statement area, but I just deleted that. So for the past 3 years it has > worked just fine for me in XP so late as the beginning of this week. Then > suddenly yesterday it came up with a second 16 bit windows subsystem box > with > the following message in it: > C:\Windows\System32\Autoexec.NT. The system file is not suitable for > running > MS-DOS and Microsoft Windows applications. Choose 'Close' to terminate the > application. > This time neither Close nor Ignore does the trick, I simply can't get in. > I > have run Spybot, Ad Aware and checked for viruses with no luck. I'm not > computer savvy enough to fix this one. I will upgrade if I have to but I > sure > would like to rescue my data as I need it for our small business. And no, > I > didn't back up the data. HMMMmmm. > Hope you can help. > "Doug Klunder" wrote: > > What Have They Done To My Program?!?! > > by Doug Klunder > > > [If you just want a possible fix to the ALC<402c> problem, skip to the > > bottom -- I'm going to rant first.] > > > First, an introduction. I started using Microsoft Money on an almost > > daily > > basis over 14 years ago. Yes, that's well before Money 1.0 was released, > > or > > even in beta. I was the technical lead for the development of both Money > > 1.0 > > and Money 2.0, and was a strong believer in the theory that developers > > should actually use their own products -- it's a strong incentive to make > > useful features and fix bugs when it's going to affect you personally. So > > I > > will admit to a personal bias towards the early versions of Money -- but > > I > > think the bias is more than justified by looking at more recent versions. > > > I used Money 1.0 prerelease, continued its use after release, and > > upgraded > > to Money 2.0 (probably in the early stages of development well before > > release, though I don't remember exactly when). I left Microsoft in 1992 > > after the release of Money 2.0, so I didn't upgrade to Money 3.0 until > > after > > its release. I have been using Money 3.0 ever since. And I'm compulsive > > enough that I enter essentially every penny that I spend. I wouldn't be > > surprised if I'm the only person (short of a tester) that has actually > > reached the limit on number of transactions in a file -- it took me close > > to > > 10 years of almost daily use to hit that limit; my Money data file is > > over 3 > > MB. > > > I looked at upgrading to Money 95 when it came out, but saw that some key > > features had been removed, and decided against the "upgrade". I kept > > worrying that one day I would be forced to upgrade, but Money 3.0 -- > > although developed for Win 3.1 -- continued to run just fine on Win 95 > > and > > Win 98. A couple of months ago, however, I got a new computer, with Win > > XP > > on it. > > > Unfortunately, Money 3.0 has some problems with XP. For example, bringing > > up > > the Investment Summary window often crashes Money, as does trying to > > change > > loan information. I haven't had any luck using a Money file over a > > network; > > it frequently crashes or hangs. Cascading menus don't automatically open > > (you need to click on the menu item); the account dropdown doesn't open > > in > > the Account Register window when viewing multiple accounts. > > > And, perhaps most noticeably, many dialog boxes (including Reconcile) > > come > > up with ALC<402c> or something similar appearing in some of the edit > > boxes. > > The worst situation is if you enter a value for Service Charge or > > Interest > > when reconciling an account, and then Postpone the reconciliation. When > > you > > try to resume reconciling, the dialog has ALC<402c> in the edit boxes, > > they're grayed so you can't change them, and when you try to Continue, > > Money > > complains about an improper value -- in other words, you're stuck. (See > > below for a fix to this.) > > > Although I can work around most of these problems, it got me to thinking > > that I should maybe break down and upgrade to a modern version of Money. > > Surely the valuable features removed in Money 95 had been restored in the > > intervening decade. So I gave it a shot last night, and fired up Money > > 2004. > > Surprisingly, it was able to convert my Money 3.0 file, even though it > > was > > many versions later. > > > That was the last good news. The look of the screens is incredibly > > cluttered, and with ads on top of the clutter. I could do without Money > > literally talking to me. And the supposedly helpful information Money > > gave > > me was just plain worthless, incorrect, and/or annoying. But more > > importantly, some very basic functions that I use all the time in Money > > 3.0 > > simply don't exist in Money 2004. For example, you're very limited in the > > types of views available for the register. In Money 3.0, you can view > > multiple accounts mixed together -- either all accounts or a subset. You > > can > > also choose to view only transactions in a specific category. For that > > matter, you can be very specific -- show only transactions from accounts > > A > > and B, with Category C or D, entered between September and October, that > > have amounts greater than $100, for example. I use this type of view all > > the > > time -- it can be used to find a specific transaction, or have the same > > effect as generating a mini-report, or enable quickly changing the > > accounts > > or categories of a set of transactions, etc. But not in Money 2004... > > > The reports are equally screwed up, and limited in customization > > possibilities. For example, I like to view my budget in several separate > > reports, divided up by categories for some personal preferences for how I > > interpret budget numbers. (As an example, I interpret my food budget, > > which > > happens on a regular basis, quite a bit differently than my computer > > budget, > > which comes in big chunks but only every few years.) Money 2004 has no > > way > > to do this. You have to see all categories in each report. And it gives > > no > > subtotals by category, but instead only by "category group" (none of > > which > > exist in an upgraded file). This defeats the whole purpose of > > subcategories! > > Call me weird, but I'm interested in seeing not just how I'm doing on > > groceries individually and on dining out individually, but also on my > > total > > for food, since the two are related (the more I eat out the less I spend > > on > > groceries). > > > On Investment Performance reports, Money 2004 seems to think that I'm > > still > > interested in stocks I sold a decade ago. If I want to see my performance > > last month, it includes all stocks I've ever owned in that account, > > showing > > a starting and ending balance of 0, but with Buy, Sell, and Income from > > times way back when, not last month. Why? Beats me -- and it sure didn't > > happen back in Money 3.0. > > > Those three things by themselves were enough to convince me not to > > upgrade. > > Sure, there are a few handy features (such as automatic download of stock > > quotes), but it's not worth it. I would rather work around the problems > > in > > Money 3.0 -- which are not in my high frequency usage -- than give up > > basic > > features that I depend on. > > > How did this happen? Do none of the current developers actually use the > > program for their personal finances? Are they just so deficient in > > imagination that they can't imagine how these features would be used? Did > > they even look at older versions of Money and evaluate the features that > > were removed? I just don't get it... but I sure understand why Money > > hasn't > > made significant inroads into Quicken's market share. I haven't looked at > > Quicken in years, and wasn't that impressed way back when, but it's hard > > to > > believe Quicken is more deficient in basic account handling than Money > > 2004 > > is. > > > The final insult came after I exited the program and took a look at the > > data > > file that Money 2004 had converted. My Money 3.0 file is roughly 3.5 > > MB -- > > huge for Money 3.0 standards, but still manageable. The exact same data, > > once converted by Money 2004 was now over 40 MB!! What the heck is Money > > 2004 doing that requires 10 times as much space as Money 3.0 to handle > > the > > same data?!?! > > > It is sad to see a program that I worked so hard on be degraded to this > > extent. Aren't things supposed to get better, not worse? > > > Enough for my diatribe. I now offer my thoughts on the ALC<402c> issue. I > > honestly don't remember where this came from (it's been over a decade, > > after > > all), but my guess is that this was some kind of code that was > > interpreted > > by the dialog processing code, perhaps to specify formatting of the edit > > box, or set the default value, or something. The dialog processing code > > must > > have changed between Windows 3.1 and Win XP (not surprising). Or perhaps > > it's some other now-obsolete feature. At any rate, the key is to get rid > > of > > the ALC codes. This involves editing the application file, msmoney.exe, > > and > > replacing the ALC codes with spaces. The following process seemed to work > > for me, but I obviously can't guarantee it. And since you're patching the > > application file, the risk is certainly there to harm things. > > Accordingly, > > your first step should be to copy msmoney.exe and save the copy. > > > The next step is to open a command prompt window (Start / Programs / > > Accessories / Command Prompt). Yes, we're going to use an old DOS program > > to > > edit the file. Change to the directory/folder where Money resides (e.g., > > "cd > > \msmoney"). Now type "edit /54321 msmoney.exe" (the /54321 could use > > another > > number, but I happen to know this number works to find all instances of > > the > > ALC codes). This brings up a DOS editor, and will show all kinds of funny > > graphic characters corresponding to the binary data in the application > > file. > > Don't bother looking at it or scrolling; we're just going to run a couple > > of > > commands and exit. Run Search/Replace; in the dialog enter "ALC<402c> " in > > the Find What field, and " " in the Replace With field (of > > course, > > don't enter the quote marks). That's 9 spaces -- make sure you use > > exactly > > that number of spaces, so you're neither expanding nor contracting the > > file. > > Then click Replace All, and click OK when it says complete. Repeat, > > entering > > "ALC<4024> " and then repeat again with "ALC<411c> ". Then run File/Exit, > > and > > click Yes to save the edited file. At this point, you should have a new > > msmoney.exe file which is exactly the same size as your saved copy; for > > me, > > that size is 1,303,776 bytes. And this new version of Money seems to work > > for me; instead of the ALC codes, it defaults some dialog values to > > spaces, > > which works fine. But I can't guarantee the results for you. > > > If anybody has suggestions to get around the other problems -- especially > > the crashing over a network -- I'd love to hear them. > > > And for those of you who have only been introduced to Money with Money 95 > > or > > a later version, you might consider checking out Money 3.0. Sure, it's > > missing a lot of the newer online features, but it's a lot more useful > > for > > basic account management... > > > Doug > > > > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Hello Doug, I'm replying to you because you at least know about the early versions and Microsoft can't help me. The problem: I can't get into my Money (I believe it's 2.0.0.0) and they can't help me. I have used this program since forever and it serves me just fine for my checkbook, it's nice and easy to read and not at all cluttered as you refer to in the newer versions. When I switched computers and programs in early 2002 to XP I just copied the program and it worked just fine except for the following message: 16 bit windows subsystem C:\Progra~1\Symantec\s32EVNT1.DLL. An installable Virtual Device Driver failed Dll initialization. Choose 'Close' to terminate the application. If I chose ignore it would open. Oh, and the sound didn't work either but who needs it. I also would get that weird error in the reconcile bank statement area, but I just deleted that. So for the past 3 years it has worked just fine for me in XP so late as the beginning of this week. Then suddenly yesterday it came up with a second 16 bit windows subsystem box with the following message in it: C:\Windows\System32\Autoexec.NT. The system file is not suitable for running MS-DOS and Microsoft Windows applications. Choose 'Close' to terminate the application. This time neither Close nor Ignore does the trick, I simply can't get in. I have run Spybot, Ad Aware and checked for viruses with no luck. I'm not computer savvy enough to fix this one. I will upgrade if I have to but I sure would like to rescue my data as I need it for our small business. And no, I didn't back up the data. HMMMmmm. Hope you can help. "Doug Klunder" wrote: - quote - > What Have They Done To My Program?!?! > by Doug Klunder > [If you just want a possible fix to the ALC<402c> problem, skip to the > bottom -- I'm going to rant first.] > First, an introduction. I started using Microsoft Money on an almost daily > basis over 14 years ago. Yes, that's well before Money 1.0 was released, or > even in beta. I was the technical lead for the development of both Money 1.0 > and Money 2.0, and was a strong believer in the theory that developers > should actually use their own products -- it's a strong incentive to make > useful features and fix bugs when it's going to affect you personally. So I > will admit to a personal bias towards the early versions of Money -- but I > think the bias is more than justified by looking at more recent versions. > I used Money 1.0 prerelease, continued its use after release, and upgraded > to Money 2.0 (probably in the early stages of development well before > release, though I don't remember exactly when). I left Microsoft in 1992 > after the release of Money 2.0, so I didn't upgrade to Money 3.0 until after > its release. I have been using Money 3.0 ever since. And I'm compulsive > enough that I enter essentially every penny that I spend. I wouldn't be > surprised if I'm the only person (short of a tester) that has actually > reached the limit on number of transactions in a file -- it took me close to > 10 years of almost daily use to hit that limit; my Money data file is over 3 > MB. > I looked at upgrading to Money 95 when it came out, but saw that some key > features had been removed, and decided against the "upgrade". I kept > worrying that one day I would be forced to upgrade, but Money 3.0 -- > although developed for Win 3.1 -- continued to run just fine on Win 95 and > Win 98. A couple of months ago, however, I got a new computer, with Win XP > on it. > Unfortunately, Money 3.0 has some problems with XP. For example, bringing up > the Investment Summary window often crashes Money, as does trying to change > loan information. I haven't had any luck using a Money file over a network; > it frequently crashes or hangs. Cascading menus don't automatically open > (you need to click on the menu item); the account dropdown doesn't open in > the Account Register window when viewing multiple accounts. > And, perhaps most noticeably, many dialog boxes (including Reconcile) come > up with ALC<402c> or something similar appearing in some of the edit boxes. > The worst situation is if you enter a value for Service Charge or Interest > when reconciling an account, and then Postpone the reconciliation. When you > try to resume reconciling, the dialog has ALC<402c> in the edit boxes, > they're grayed so you can't change them, and when you try to Continue, Money > complains about an improper value -- in other words, you're stuck. (See > below for a fix to this.) > Although I can work around most of these problems, it got me to thinking > that I should maybe break down and upgrade to a modern version of Money. > Surely the valuable features removed in Money 95 had been restored in the > intervening decade. So I gave it a shot last night, and fired up Money 2004. > Surprisingly, it was able to convert my Money 3.0 file, even though it was > many versions later. > That was the last good news. The look of the screens is incredibly > cluttered, and with ads on top of the clutter. I could do without Money > literally talking to me. And the supposedly helpful information Money gave > me was just plain worthless, incorrect, and/or annoying. But more > importantly, some very basic functions that I use all the time in Money 3.0 > simply don't exist in Money 2004. For example, you're very limited in the > types of views available for the register. In Money 3.0, you can view > multiple accounts mixed together -- either all accounts or a subset. You can > also choose to view only transactions in a specific category. For that > matter, you can be very specific -- show only transactions from accounts A > and B, with Category C or D, entered between September and October, that > have amounts greater than $100, for example. I use this type of view all the > time -- it can be used to find a specific transaction, or have the same > effect as generating a mini-report, or enable quickly changing the accounts > or categories of a set of transactions, etc. But not in Money 2004... > The reports are equally screwed up, and limited in customization > possibilities. For example, I like to view my budget in several separate > reports, divided up by categories for some personal preferences for how I > interpret budget numbers. (As an example, I interpret my food budget, which > happens on a regular basis, quite a bit differently than my computer budget, > which comes in big chunks but only every few years.) Money 2004 has no way > to do this. You have to see all categories in each report. And it gives no > subtotals by category, but instead only by "category group" (none of which > exist in an upgraded file). This defeats the whole purpose of subcategories! > Call me weird, but I'm interested in seeing not just how I'm doing on > groceries individually and on dining out individually, but also on my total > for food, since the two are related (the more I eat out the less I spend on > groceries). > On Investment Performance reports, Money 2004 seems to think that I'm still > interested in stocks I sold a decade ago. If I want to see my performance > last month, it includes all stocks I've ever owned in that account, showing > a starting and ending balance of 0, but with Buy, Sell, and Income from > times way back when, not last month. Why? Beats me -- and it sure didn't > happen back in Money 3.0. > Those three things by themselves were enough to convince me not to upgrade. > Sure, there are a few handy features (such as automatic download of stock > quotes), but it's not worth it. I would rather work around the problems in > Money 3.0 -- which are not in my high frequency usage -- than give up basic > features that I depend on. > How did this happen? Do none of the current developers actually use the > program for their personal finances? Are they just so deficient in > imagination that they can't imagine how these features would be used? Did > they even look at older versions of Money and evaluate the features that > were removed? I just don't get it... but I sure understand why Money hasn't > made significant inroads into Quicken's market share. I haven't looked at > Quicken in years, and wasn't that impressed way back when, but it's hard to > believe Quicken is more deficient in basic account handling than Money 2004 > is. > The final insult came after I exited the program and took a look at the data > file that Money 2004 had converted. My Money 3.0 file is roughly 3.5 MB -- > huge for Money 3.0 standards, but still manageable. The exact same data, > once converted by Money 2004 was now over 40 MB!! What the heck is Money > 2004 doing that requires 10 times as much space as Money 3.0 to handle the > same data?!?! > It is sad to see a program that I worked so hard on be degraded to this > extent. Aren't things supposed to get better, not worse? > Enough for my diatribe. I now offer my thoughts on the ALC<402c> issue. I > honestly don't remember where this came from (it's been over a decade, after > all), but my guess is that this was some kind of code that was interpreted > by the dialog processing code, perhaps to specify formatting of the edit > box, or set the default value, or something. The dialog processing code must > have changed between Windows 3.1 and Win XP (not surprising). Or perhaps > it's some other now-obsolete feature. At any rate, the key is to get rid of > the ALC codes. This involves editing the application file, msmoney.exe, and > replacing the ALC codes with spaces. The following process seemed to work > for me, but I obviously can't guarantee it. And since you're patching the > application file, the risk is certainly there to harm things. Accordingly, > your first step should be to copy msmoney.exe and save the copy. > The next step is to open a command prompt window (Start / Programs / > Accessories / Command Prompt). Yes, we're going to use an old DOS program to > edit the file. Change to the directory/folder where Money resides (e.g., "cd > \msmoney"). Now type "edit /54321 msmoney.exe" (the /54321 could use another > number, but I happen to know this number works to find all instances of the > ALC codes). This brings up a DOS editor, and will show all kinds of funny > graphic characters corresponding to the binary data in the application file. > Don't bother looking at it or scrolling; we're just going to run a couple of > commands and exit. Run Search/Replace; in the dialog enter "ALC<402c> " in > the Find What field, and " " in the Replace With field (of course, > don't enter the quote marks). That's 9 spaces -- make sure you use exactly > that number of spaces, so you're neither expanding nor contracting the file. > Then click Replace All, and click OK when it says complete. Repeat, entering > "ALC<4024> " and then repeat again with "ALC<411c> ". Then run File/Exit, and > click Yes to save the edited file. At this point, you should have a new > msmoney.exe file which is exactly the same size as your saved copy; for me, > that size is 1,303,776 bytes. And this new version of Money seems to work > for me; instead of the ALC codes, it defaults some dialog values to spaces, > which works fine. But I can't guarantee the results for you. > If anybody has suggestions to get around the other problems -- especially > the crashing over a network -- I'd love to hear them. > And for those of you who have only been introduced to Money with Money 95 or > a later version, you might consider checking out Money 3.0. Sure, it's > missing a lot of the newer online features, but it's a lot more useful for > basic account management... > Doug |
| | |||
| |||
| I don't remember Money 3.0 all that fondly, and there are ways around many, but certainly not all, of the issue you cite with M04. Too bad you didn't try M05. I think the diatribe would have been about 10x longer... "Doug Klunder" <klunder[at]comcast.net> wrote in message news:wHwvd.257840$R05.114819[at]attbi_s53... - quote - > What Have They Done To My Program?!?! > by Doug Klunder > [If you just want a possible fix to the ALC<402c> problem, skip to the > bottom -- I'm going to rant first.] > First, an introduction. I started using Microsoft Money on an almost daily > basis over 14 years ago. Yes, that's well before Money 1.0 was released, > or even in beta. I was the technical lead for the development of both > Money 1.0 and Money 2.0, and was a strong believer in the theory that > developers should actually use their own products -- it's a strong > incentive to make useful features and fix bugs when it's going to affect > you personally. So I will admit to a personal bias towards the early > versions of Money -- but I think the bias is more than justified by > looking at more recent versions. > I used Money 1.0 prerelease, continued its use after release, and upgraded > to Money 2.0 (probably in the early stages of development well before > release, though I don't remember exactly when). I left Microsoft in 1992 > after the release of Money 2.0, so I didn't upgrade to Money 3.0 until > after its release. I have been using Money 3.0 ever since. And I'm > compulsive enough that I enter essentially every penny that I spend. I > wouldn't be surprised if I'm the only person (short of a tester) that has > actually reached the limit on number of transactions in a file -- it took > me close to 10 years of almost daily use to hit that limit; my Money data > file is over 3 MB. > I looked at upgrading to Money 95 when it came out, but saw that some key > features had been removed, and decided against the "upgrade". I kept > worrying that one day I would be forced to upgrade, but Money 3.0 -- > although developed for Win 3.1 -- continued to run just fine on Win 95 and > Win 98. A couple of months ago, however, I got a new computer, with Win XP > on it. > Unfortunately, Money 3.0 has some problems with XP. For example, bringing > up the Investment Summary window often crashes Money, as does trying to > change loan information. I haven't had any luck using a Money file over a > network; it frequently crashes or hangs. Cascading menus don't > automatically open (you need to click on the menu item); the account > dropdown doesn't open in the Account Register window when viewing multiple > accounts. > And, perhaps most noticeably, many dialog boxes (including Reconcile) come > up with ALC<402c> or something similar appearing in some of the edit > boxes. The worst situation is if you enter a value for Service Charge or > Interest when reconciling an account, and then Postpone the > reconciliation. When you try to resume reconciling, the dialog has > ALC<402c> in the edit boxes, they're grayed so you can't change them, and > when you try to Continue, Money complains about an improper value -- in > other words, you're stuck. (See below for a fix to this.) > Although I can work around most of these problems, it got me to thinking > that I should maybe break down and upgrade to a modern version of Money. > Surely the valuable features removed in Money 95 had been restored in the > intervening decade. So I gave it a shot last night, and fired up Money > 2004. Surprisingly, it was able to convert my Money 3.0 file, even though > it was many versions later. > That was the last good news. The look of the screens is incredibly > cluttered, and with ads on top of the clutter. I could do without Money > literally talking to me. And the supposedly helpful information Money gave > me was just plain worthless, incorrect, and/or annoying. But more > importantly, some very basic functions that I use all the time in Money > 3.0 simply don't exist in Money 2004. For example, you're very limited in > the types of views available for the register. In Money 3.0, you can view > multiple accounts mixed together -- either all accounts or a subset. You > can also choose to view only transactions in a specific category. For that > matter, you can be very specific -- show only transactions from accounts A > and B, with Category C or D, entered between September and October, that > have amounts greater than $100, for example. I use this type of view all > the time -- it can be used to find a specific transaction, or have the > same effect as generating a mini-report, or enable quickly changing the > accounts or categories of a set of transactions, etc. But not in Money > 2004... > The reports are equally screwed up, and limited in customization > possibilities. For example, I like to view my budget in several separate > reports, divided up by categories for some personal preferences for how I > interpret budget numbers. (As an example, I interpret my food budget, > which happens on a regular basis, quite a bit differently than my computer > budget, which comes in big chunks but only every few years.) Money 2004 > has no way to do this. You have to see all categories in each report. And > it gives no subtotals by category, but instead only by "category group" > (none of which exist in an upgraded file). This defeats the whole purpose > of subcategories! Call me weird, but I'm interested in seeing not just how > I'm doing on groceries individually and on dining out individually, but > also on my total for food, since the two are related (the more I eat out > the less I spend on groceries). > On Investment Performance reports, Money 2004 seems to think that I'm > still interested in stocks I sold a decade ago. If I want to see my > performance last month, it includes all stocks I've ever owned in that > account, showing a starting and ending balance of 0, but with Buy, Sell, > and Income from times way back when, not last month. Why? Beats me -- and > it sure didn't happen back in Money 3.0. > Those three things by themselves were enough to convince me not to > upgrade. Sure, there are a few handy features (such as automatic download > of stock quotes), but it's not worth it. I would rather work around the > problems in Money 3.0 -- which are not in my high frequency usage -- than > give up basic features that I depend on. > How did this happen? Do none of the current developers actually use the > program for their personal finances? Are they just so deficient in > imagination that they can't imagine how these features would be used? Did > they even look at older versions of Money and evaluate the features that > were removed? I just don't get it... but I sure understand why Money > hasn't made significant inroads into Quicken's market share. I haven't > looked at Quicken in years, and wasn't that impressed way back when, but > it's hard to believe Quicken is more deficient in basic account handling > than Money 2004 is. > The final insult came after I exited the program and took a look at the > data file that Money 2004 had converted. My Money 3.0 file is roughly 3.5 > MB -- huge for Money 3.0 standards, but still manageable. The exact same > data, once converted by Money 2004 was now over 40 MB!! What the heck is > Money 2004 doing that requires 10 times as much space as Money 3.0 to > handle the same data?!?! > It is sad to see a program that I worked so hard on be degraded to this > extent. Aren't things supposed to get better, not worse? > Enough for my diatribe. I now offer my thoughts on the ALC<402c> issue. I > honestly don't remember where this came from (it's been over a decade, > after all), but my guess is that this was some kind of code that was > interpreted by the dialog processing code, perhaps to specify formatting > of the edit box, or set the default value, or something. The dialog > processing code must have changed between Windows 3.1 and Win XP (not > surprising). Or perhaps it's some other now-obsolete feature. At any rate, > the key is to get rid of the ALC codes. This involves editing the > application file, msmoney.exe, and replacing the ALC codes with spaces. > The following process seemed to work for me, but I obviously can't > guarantee it. And since you're patching the application file, the risk is > certainly there to harm things. Accordingly, your first step should be to > copy msmoney.exe and save the copy. > The next step is to open a command prompt window (Start / Programs / > Accessories / Command Prompt). Yes, we're going to use an old DOS program > to edit the file. Change to the directory/folder where Money resides > (e.g., "cd \msmoney"). Now type "edit /54321 msmoney.exe" (the /54321 > could use another number, but I happen to know this number works to find > all instances of the ALC codes). This brings up a DOS editor, and will > show all kinds of funny graphic characters corresponding to the binary > data in the application file. Don't bother looking at it or scrolling; > we're just going to run a couple of commands and exit. Run Search/Replace; > in the dialog enter "ALC<402c> " in the Find What field, and " " in > the Replace With field (of course, don't enter the quote marks). That's 9 > spaces -- make sure you use exactly that number of spaces, so you're > neither expanding nor contracting the file. Then click Replace All, and > click OK when it says complete. Repeat, entering "ALC<4024> " and then > repeat again with "ALC<411c> ". Then run File/Exit, and click Yes to save > the edited file. At this point, you should have a new msmoney.exe file > which is exactly the same size as your saved copy; for me, that size is > 1,303,776 bytes. And this new version of Money seems to work for me; > instead of the ALC codes, it defaults some dialog values to spaces, which > works fine. But I can't guarantee the results for you. > If anybody has suggestions to get around the other problems -- especially > the crashing over a network -- I'd love to hear them. > And for those of you who have only been introduced to Money with Money 95 > or a later version, you might consider checking out Money 3.0. Sure, it's > missing a lot of the newer online features, but it's a lot more useful for > basic account management... > Doug |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| What Have They Done To My Program?!?! by Doug Klunder [If you just want a possible fix to the ALC<402c> problem, skip to the bottom -- I'm going to rant first.] First, an introduction. I started using Microsoft Money on an almost daily basis over 14 years ago. Yes, that's well before Money 1.0 was released, or even in beta. I was the technical lead for the development of both Money 1.0 and Money 2.0, and was a strong believer in the theory that developers should actually use their own products -- it's a strong incentive to make useful features and fix bugs when it's going to affect you personally. So I will admit to a personal bias towards the early versions of Money -- but I think the bias is more than justified by looking at more recent versions. I used Money 1.0 prerelease, continued its use after release, and upgraded to Money 2.0 (probably in the early stages of development well before release, though I don't remember exactly when). I left Microsoft in 1992 after the release of Money 2.0, so I didn't upgrade to Money 3.0 until after its release. I have been using Money 3.0 ever since. And I'm compulsive enough that I enter essentially every penny that I spend. I wouldn't be surprised if I'm the only person (short of a tester) that has actually reached the limit on number of transactions in a file -- it took me close to 10 years of almost daily use to hit that limit; my Money data file is over 3 MB. I looked at upgrading to Money 95 when it came out, but saw that some key features had been removed, and decided against the "upgrade". I kept worrying that one day I would be forced to upgrade, but Money 3.0 -- although developed for Win 3.1 -- continued to run just fine on Win 95 and Win 98. A couple of months ago, however, I got a new computer, with Win XP on it. Unfortunately, Money 3.0 has some problems with XP. For example, bringing up the Investment Summary window often crashes Money, as does trying to change loan information. I haven't had any luck using a Money file over a network; it frequently crashes or hangs. Cascading menus don't automatically open (you need to click on the menu item); the account dropdown doesn't open in the Account Register window when viewing multiple accounts. And, perhaps most noticeably, many dialog boxes (including Reconcile) come up with ALC<402c> or something similar appearing in some of the edit boxes. The worst situation is if you enter a value for Service Charge or Interest when reconciling an account, and then Postpone the reconciliation. When you try to resume reconciling, the dialog has ALC<402c> in the edit boxes, they're grayed so you can't change them, and when you try to Continue, Money complains about an improper value -- in other words, you're stuck. (See below for a fix to this.) Although I can work around most of these problems, it got me to thinking that I should maybe break down and upgrade to a modern version of Money. Surely the valuable features removed in Money 95 had been restored in the intervening decade. So I gave it a shot last night, and fired up Money 2004. Surprisingly, it was able to convert my Money 3.0 file, even though it was many versions later. That was the last good news. The look of the screens is incredibly cluttered, and with ads on top of the clutter. I could do without Money literally talking to me. And the supposedly helpful information Money gave me was just plain worthless, incorrect, and/or annoying. But more importantly, some very basic functions that I use all the time in Money 3.0 simply don't exist in Money 2004. For example, you're very limited in the types of views available for the register. In Money 3.0, you can view multiple accounts mixed together -- either all accounts or a subset. You can also choose to view only transactions in a specific category. For that matter, you can be very specific -- show only transactions from accounts A and B, with Category C or D, entered between September and October, that have amounts greater than $100, for example. I use this type of view all the time -- it can be used to find a specific transaction, or have the same effect as generating a mini-report, or enable quickly changing the accounts or categories of a set of transactions, etc. But not in Money 2004... The reports are equally screwed up, and limited in customization possibilities. For example, I like to view my budget in several separate reports, divided up by categories for some personal preferences for how I interpret budget numbers. (As an example, I interpret my food budget, which happens on a regular basis, quite a bit differently than my computer budget, which comes in big chunks but only every few years.) Money 2004 has no way to do this. You have to see all categories in each report. And it gives no subtotals by category, but instead only by "category group" (none of which exist in an upgraded file). This defeats the whole purpose of subcategories! Call me weird, but I'm interested in seeing not just how I'm doing on groceries individually and on dining out individually, but also on my total for food, since the two are related (the more I eat out the less I spend on groceries). On Investment Performance reports, Money 2004 seems to think that I'm still interested in stocks I sold a decade ago. If I want to see my performance last month, it includes all stocks I've ever owned in that account, showing a starting and ending balance of 0, but with Buy, Sell, and Income from times way back when, not last month. Why? Beats me -- and it sure didn't happen back in Money 3.0. Those three things by themselves were enough to convince me not to upgrade. Sure, there are a few handy features (such as automatic download of stock quotes), but it's not worth it. I would rather work around the problems in Money 3.0 -- which are not in my high frequency usage -- than give up basic features that I depend on. How did this happen? Do none of the current developers actually use the program for their personal finances? Are they just so deficient in imagination that they can't imagine how these features would be used? Did they even look at older versions of Money and evaluate the features that were removed? I just don't get it... but I sure understand why Money hasn't made significant inroads into Quicken's market share. I haven't looked at Quicken in years, and wasn't that impressed way back when, but it's hard to believe Quicken is more deficient in basic account handling than Money 2004 is. The final insult came after I exited the program and took a look at the data file that Money 2004 had converted. My Money 3.0 file is roughly 3.5 MB -- huge for Money 3.0 standards, but still manageable. The exact same data, once converted by Money 2004 was now over 40 MB!! What the heck is Money 2004 doing that requires 10 times as much space as Money 3.0 to handle the same data?!?! It is sad to see a program that I worked so hard on be degraded to this extent. Aren't things supposed to get better, not worse? Enough for my diatribe. I now offer my thoughts on the ALC<402c> issue. I honestly don't remember where this came from (it's been over a decade, after all), but my guess is that this was some kind of code that was interpreted by the dialog processing code, perhaps to specify formatting of the edit box, or set the default value, or something. The dialog processing code must have changed between Windows 3.1 and Win XP (not surprising). Or perhaps it's some other now-obsolete feature. At any rate, the key is to get rid of the ALC codes. This involves editing the application file, msmoney.exe, and replacing the ALC codes with spaces. The following process seemed to work for me, but I obviously can't guarantee it. And since you're patching the application file, the risk is certainly there to harm things. Accordingly, your first step should be to copy msmoney.exe and save the copy. The next step is to open a command prompt window (Start / Programs / Accessories / Command Prompt). Yes, we're going to use an old DOS program to edit the file. Change to the directory/folder where Money resides (e.g., "cd \msmoney"). Now type "edit /54321 msmoney.exe" (the /54321 could use another number, but I happen to know this number works to find all instances of the ALC codes). This brings up a DOS editor, and will show all kinds of funny graphic characters corresponding to the binary data in the application file. Don't bother looking at it or scrolling; we're just going to run a couple of commands and exit. Run Search/Replace; in the dialog enter "ALC<402c> " in the Find What field, and " " in the Replace With field (of course, don't enter the quote marks). That's 9 spaces -- make sure you use exactly that number of spaces, so you're neither expanding nor contracting the file. Then click Replace All, and click OK when it says complete. Repeat, entering "ALC<4024> " and then repeat again with "ALC<411c> ". Then run File/Exit, and click Yes to save the edited file. At this point, you should have a new msmoney.exe file which is exactly the same size as your saved copy; for me, that size is 1,303,776 bytes. And this new version of Money seems to work for me; instead of the ALC codes, it defaults some dialog values to spaces, which works fine. But I can't guarantee the results for you. If anybody has suggestions to get around the other problems -- especially the crashing over a network -- I'd love to hear them. And for those of you who have only been introduced to Money with Money 95 or a later version, you might consider checking out Money 3.0. Sure, it's missing a lot of the newer online features, but it's a lot more useful for basic account management... Doug |
| Tags |
| alc<402c>, fix, money, rant, win |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| M05 rant from a curmudgeon Dick Watson: Summary: more cluttered, less productive, more ads, more MSN vectoring that's harder to avoid, most of the same old bugs, and at least one... | Microsoft Money | 14 | 09-19-2004 11:32 PM | |
| ALC<402c> : Whenever I start to balance my accounts, I get the message "ALC<402c>" in both the service charge and interest earned boxes. To continue I need to... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 08-27-2004 12:51 PM | |
| Rant: no 60 day cashflow forecast! Gary: Okay, it's a rainy day, I'm inside paying bills, and I feel like ranting. :-) Does anybody else find it silly that Money2004 has a 30 and 90 day... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 05-02-2004 07:12 AM | |
| the code ALC<402c> appearing in balancing money 3.0 bev: Posted yesterday and it was suggested I update the program. I don't want to do that unless I absolutely have to. Problem again. The above code... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 10-24-2003 01:03 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |