Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Microsoft Money

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-04-2004, 08:02 PM
Dick Watson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Performance - Big files after archiveing?

See also http://umpmfaq.info/faqdb.php?q=7.

<jim[at]hausdave.yi.org> wrote in message
news:B0031299606[at]nocmailsvc001.allthesites.org...
- quote -

> I'm using Win98 and MSmoney 2003. In order to achieve a little
> better performance I archived the MS file. Performance did
> improve a little. However, the file was 24,660KB before the
> archive and after the archive it is still over 20,000KB. And I
> archived up to the present date. The File did not get much
> smaller! My question: what makes the file so big? I assume that
> the size is proportional to the number of accounts and length of
> the account name. But there must be something else as there is
> no transactions data in the File!
> Comments appreciated.



 
Old 12-04-2004, 08:00 PM
Dick Watson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Performance - Big files after archiveing?

It probably hasn't auto-compacted the file yet. After a few more closes of
the file, Money will likely do this. Investment price history also
contributes greatly and is probably (I don't know/am guessing) not removed
by archiving.

For many reasons, I do not recommend archiving and do not practice it.

<jim[at]hausdave.yi.org> wrote in message
news:B0031299606[at]nocmailsvc001.allthesites.org...
- quote -

> I'm using Win98 and MSmoney 2003. In order to achieve a little
> better performance I archived the MS file. Performance did
> improve a little. However, the file was 24,660KB before the
> archive and after the archive it is still over 20,000KB. And I
> archived up to the present date. The File did not get much
> smaller! My question: what makes the file so big? I assume that
> the size is proportional to the number of accounts and length of
> the account name. But there must be something else as there is
> no transactions data in the File!
> Comments appreciated.



  #-1  
Old 12-04-2004, 07:51 PM
jim@hausdave.yi.org
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Performance - Big files after archiveing?

I'm using Win98 and MSmoney 2003. In order to achieve a little
better performance I archived the MS file. Performance did
improve a little. However, the file was 24,660KB before the
archive and after the archive it is still over 20,000KB. And I
archived up to the present date. The File did not get much
smaller! My question: what makes the file so big? I assume that
the size is proportional to the number of accounts and length of
the account name. But there must be something else as there is
no transactions data in the File!

Comments appreciated.

 

Tags
archiveing, big, files, performance
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
V2003 - performance
scotty@hausdave.yi.org: I'm using V2003. The box it came in says the program requires a computer with 166 mhz (min). I don't believe it will run on 166mhz computer (too...
Microsoft Money 4 11-23-2004 12:14 AM
Archiveing 98
Gregg: When I archived my records from last year not al of them went to the archive file. How do I get them all to archive?
Microsoft Money 2 01-24-2004 07:40 PM
Performance
John Payne: Anyone know of a way to improve Money 2002 performance when accessing / sharing a money file ? We have 2 PC's and have decided to share one file....
Microsoft Money 1 01-03-2004 04:26 AM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:13 AM.