|
#3
| |||
| |||
| I ran Money 2003 on a 300 MHz computer. It was a while ago, but if you have to do it, then you will need to: 1) put as much memory in the machine as you can. 2) turn off the budgeting features. I can not remember exactly where it was found but I went through each account and said "do not include this account in the budget" I even went throught the budget to turn it off. 3) Turn off the alerts. You do not need it performing any background analysis. Thus you can do basic accounting on the muesum antique that you own. But for a very few dollars you can find upgrade to a machine that will support the new features in 03, 04, or 05. scotty[at]hausdave.yi.org wrote: - quote - > I'm using V2003. The box it came in says the program requires a > computer with 166 mhz (min). > I don't believe it will run on 166mhz computer (too slow). > Any Comments! |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| M03 is two versions obsolete. (Not that M05 is way faster or anything.) The Money Team claims they work performance very hard. They are probably constrained by their choices of core technology to build this on that don't come from the Money group. Who actually tries to us a 166 MHz Pentium to run it? (Not that it's blinding on the fastest hardware money can buy.) "Bing" <BingC[at]american.com> wrote in message news:1xgyq9cm6meam.1s5d16nxs43vz.dlg[at]40tude.net... - quote - > I agree with Dick. It's too slow. Is MS concerned? |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 15:53:55 -0700, Dick Watson wrote: - quote - > From: "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mind-enufalready-spring.com> References: <B0011999072[at]nocmailsvc005.allthesites.org> Subject: Re: V2003 - performance > Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 15:53:55 -0700 > Path: newsfeed.slurp.net!newsfeed-0.progon.net!progon.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gb l > Xref: newsfeed.slurp.net microsoft.public.money:48027 > Many of us don't believe it, either. Well, maybe don't believe is too harsh. > But if you had a monthly bill to enter, it might be ready after entering > last month's in time for entering this month's. > <scotty[at]hausdave.yi.org> wrote in message > news:B0011999072[at]nocmailsvc005.allthesites.org... > > I'm using V2003. The box it came in says the program requires a > > computer with 166 mhz (min). > > > I don't believe it will run on 166mhz computer (too slow). > > > Any Comments! > I agree with Dick. It's too slow. Is MS concerned? |
| | |||
| |||
| Many of us don't believe it, either. Well, maybe don't believe is too harsh. But if you had a monthly bill to enter, it might be ready after entering last month's in time for entering this month's. <scotty[at]hausdave.yi.org> wrote in message news:B0011999072[at]nocmailsvc005.allthesites.org... - quote - > I'm using V2003. The box it came in says the program requires a > computer with 166 mhz (min). > I don't believe it will run on 166mhz computer (too slow). > Any Comments! |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I'm using V2003. The box it came in says the program requires a computer with 166 mhz (min). I don't believe it will run on 166mhz computer (too slow). Any Comments! |
| Tags |
| performance, v2003 |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Password recovery product for v2003 Susan K: Does anyone know of a product for password recovery that works with Money 2003 version? | Microsoft Money | 2 | 06-10-2004 09:02 PM | |
| Performance John Payne: Anyone know of a way to improve Money 2002 performance when accessing / sharing a money file ? We have 2 PC's and have decided to share one file.... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 01-03-2004 04:26 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |