|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "Tom G" <123mpel[at]vms.huji.ac.il> wrote in message news:exknIa4xEHA.3168[at]TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... - quote - > I recently switched. Several reasons:
I'll second that> 1) I liked the integration of the portfolio and the MSN data; the > portfolio in Quicken in terrible (IMHO) > 2) I found the interface in Money to be more pleasing. The opening screens > of Quicken are too busy for my ageing eyes. - quote - > 3) Since I have a BofA account, I wasn't prepared to continue to fork over
What a ripoff. Can't you just download qif files or ofx? Not quite as> $9.95/month to BofA to allow Quicken access. The almost $120/year yearly > charge is exorbitant. Money does it for free (actually, right now the BofA > interface doesn't work because of problems between BofA and Yodlee. > 4) Actually, if you want to use BofA AND Bill Pay in Quicken, you have to > pay twice: $9.95 to Quicken for the Bill Pay and $9.95 to BofA for Quicken > access. Of course, you can do neither and input all the information by > hand (which some prefer to do anyway) automatic, but that's what I do with my bank accounts. No way would I pay the bank's blood money. I'd switch over this too. - quote - > 5) If you do keep MSN Bill Pay it is $5.95 and not $9.95. > 6) Intuit makes you pay for tech support. Outrageous! > n.b. The cost of Money Deluxe is $48 at Costco with a $30 rebate - so it's > $18. Not bad. It also comes with a $50 gift if you open an account with > ING Direct. So with all of the savings + $30 rebate + $50 gift. It's not a > bad deal. (Actually, and incidentally, when I opened the box and saw the > $50 offer from ING Direct, I was unhappy since I already have an ING > account; the coupon specifically states: "New Account." I called ING > Direct and they just credited my account for the $50. That's service!) > tom > "R" <whiterabbi1[at]REMOVE_gmail.com> wrote in message > news:e5rr9a1xEHA.2316[at]TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > > I'm still evaluating M2004. Those of you that are money users and have > > experience with Quicken also, what sold you on Money? > > > Thanks in advance > > > R > |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "David Arnstein" <arnstein[at]panix.com> wrote in message news:cmtrcn$pvm$1[at]reader1.panix.com... - quote - > In article <e5rr9a1xEHA.2316[at]TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl> ,
I know my bank is planning to rollout QFX in a couple weeks.> R <whiterabbi1[at]REMOVE_gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm still evaluating M2004. Those of you that are money users and have > > experience with Quicken also, what sold you on Money? > I am a 9 year veteran of Quicken who is now running both Money 2005 and > Quicken 2005. My motivation to try Money was irritation with Quicken. > There were two issues: > 1. For over a year, Quicken has bungled a very simple, very important > report: investment performance. Several of my securities have an > annualized return of "N/A," according to Quicken. There is nothing > complicated or unusual about my meager collection of investments. Also, > I buy the latest version of Quicken every year (sucker). > 2. Quicken is making it harder to use .qif files. With Quicken 2006, > it will be almost impossible. I was concerned that the banks and > brokerages that I deal with would balk at this change, since they will > have to pay extra money to use Intuit's .QFX standard, which replaces > the .qif protocol. To tell you the truth, I haven't had any trouble > with financial institutions yet. Perhaps this is not as important as > I thought. - quote - > I intend to post a longish report on my experience with Money after I
Looking forward to it.> understand the program more fully. - quote - > -- > David Arnstein > arnstein+usenet[at]pobox.com |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| I switched from Quicken in extreme irritation at Intuit's policy regarding support. Wish I had never switched. I may never upgrade given what I've heard about Money 2005. I was thinking of switching back to Quicken -- wish I had kept my 2003 disk so I could go back to it, given what I've heard about what's happening with new Quicken products. I do not use online services so I have no idea how those work or the effect in Quicken or Money. After a year I've decided I really do not like Money. So, here are the things that have "unsold" me on Money. 1) Quicken correctly calculated what I owed on credit cards each month -- Money shows the average of the last three months. 2) Money does not correctly calcualte gains/losses in the portfolio -- or it uses some arcane formula that I cannot understand (shows a gain when there has clearly been a loss) 3) There is no way in Money (never did this in Quicken) to show a distribution from an IRA as income (resulting in an incorrect estimatation of taxes due). I can sort of understand this since the distribution was transferred to another account so the category was "transfer" rather than "income" 4) Working with investment accounts is quite confusing in Money. After a year I still do not understand it. I have three accounts in one investment, all have the correct stock market symbol and all are checked to download prices but the price is only downloaded into one account. I have to upgrade the prices in the other two manually. 5) Mortgage loan payments: In Quicken there was a way to increase the amount on the principal (in order to pay off a loan more quickly) and still the interest and balance were calculated correctly. There appears to be no way to do this in Money There are other reasons that I dislike Money but these are the ones that stand out. Patricia 1) it does not calculate correctly "R" <whiterabbi1[at]REMOVE_gmail.com> wrote in message news:e5rr9a1xEHA.2316[at]TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... - quote - > I'm still evaluating M2004. Those of you that are money users and have > experience with Quicken also, what sold you on Money? > Thanks in advance > R |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I recently switched. Several reasons: 1) I liked the integration of the portfolio and the MSN data; the portfolio in Quicken in terrible (IMHO) 2) I found the interface in Money to be more pleasing. The opening screens of Quicken are too busy for my ageing eyes. 3) Since I have a BofA account, I wasn't prepared to continue to fork over $9.95/month to BofA to allow Quicken access. The almost $120/year yearly charge is exorbitant. Money does it for free (actually, right now the BofA interface doesn't work because of problems between BofA and Yodlee. 4) Actually, if you want to use BofA AND Bill Pay in Quicken, you have to pay twice: $9.95 to Quicken for the Bill Pay and $9.95 to BofA for Quicken access. Of course, you can do neither and input all the information by hand (which some prefer to do anyway) 5) If you do keep MSN Bill Pay it is $5.95 and not $9.95. 6) Intuit makes you pay for tech support. Outrageous! n.b. The cost of Money Deluxe is $48 at Costco with a $30 rebate - so it's $18. Not bad. It also comes with a $50 gift if you open an account with ING Direct. So with all of the savings + $30 rebate + $50 gift. It's not a bad deal. (Actually, and incidentally, when I opened the box and saw the $50 offer from ING Direct, I was unhappy since I already have an ING account; the coupon specifically states: "New Account." I called ING Direct and they just credited my account for the $50. That's service!) tom "R" <whiterabbi1[at]REMOVE_gmail.com> wrote in message news:e5rr9a1xEHA.2316[at]TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... - quote - > I'm still evaluating M2004. Those of you that are money users and have > experience with Quicken also, what sold you on Money? > Thanks in advance > R |
| | |||
| |||
| In article <e5rr9a1xEHA.2316[at]TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl> , R <whiterabbi1[at]REMOVE_gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > I'm still evaluating M2004. Those of you that are money users and have
I am a 9 year veteran of Quicken who is now running both Money 2005 and> experience with Quicken also, what sold you on Money? Quicken 2005. My motivation to try Money was irritation with Quicken. There were two issues: 1. For over a year, Quicken has bungled a very simple, very important report: investment performance. Several of my securities have an annualized return of "N/A," according to Quicken. There is nothing complicated or unusual about my meager collection of investments. Also, I buy the latest version of Quicken every year (sucker). 2. Quicken is making it harder to use .qif files. With Quicken 2006, it will be almost impossible. I was concerned that the banks and brokerages that I deal with would balk at this change, since they will have to pay extra money to use Intuit's .QFX standard, which replaces the .qif protocol. To tell you the truth, I haven't had any trouble with financial institutions yet. Perhaps this is not as important as I thought. I intend to post a longish report on my experience with Money after I understand the program more fully. -- David Arnstein arnstein+usenet[at]pobox.com |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I'm still evaluating M2004. Those of you that are money users and have experience with Quicken also, what sold you on Money? Thanks in advance R |
| Tags |
| quicken, switch |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| This may be the year I switch to Quicken. Jason Bade: I just bought and installed Money 2005. I am not impressed. I have used Money since '97. I'm not happy with they way Microsoft has implented MSN... | Microsoft Money | 8 | 09-25-2004 03:19 PM | |
| Switch from Quicken 04 Jerry: I just switched this past weekend. From the universe of the bizarre: -Money takes over 1 minute to load. -It frequently said that it had updates... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 09-22-2004 05:39 PM | |
| Anyone going to switch to Quicken? Shorty: Fortunately I do not have the Passport problem. Somehow I turned off the Passport option sometime ago. Dumb luck. But the situation for those... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 07-30-2004 12:59 AM | |
| Switch from Quicken? Bob Newman: I'm considering making the switch. Can I save or not save when I choose with Money? Quicken saves automatically and I don't like that. I use it... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 08-16-2003 11:36 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |