|
#2
10-24-2004, 06:29 PM
| |||
| |||
 Re: Money 2003 Performance I'm running MS2003 on Win98. It seems to me that MONEY2003 it is getting slower and slower. Great program but slow!! I also will appreciate comments. "Angie" <Angie[at]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:B85C4707-B2A3-4F46-8BCB-EFB0D22AEED5[at]microsoft.com... - quote - > I upgraded in March 2004 from Money 98 to Money 2003. > I was able to copy 3-4 years of transactions across, but had to setup all my > Direct Debits again. > Money went fine until the beginning of this year, but since then the > performance has been gradually getting worse and it now takes 30 seconds to > amend or add a new transaction. > I have tried archiving as suggested in other posts and also tried changing > settings again suggested in other posts but it has made no difference. > Can anyone suggest anything? > Thanks |
|
#1
10-16-2004, 06:09 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Money 2003 Performance In microsoft.public.money, Angie wrote: - quote - > upgraded in March 2004 from Money 98 to Money 2003.
There seems to me to be a lot more posts that says archiving is not> I was able to copy 3-4 years of transactions across, but had to setup all my > Direct Debits again. > Money went fine until the beginning of this year, but since then the > performance has been gradually getting worse and it now takes 30 seconds to > amend or add a new transaction. > I have tried archiving as suggested in other posts and also tried changing > settings again suggested in other posts but it has made no difference. going to speed things up. Be aware that an archive file is a copy of your Money file as it existed at the time of archiving. - quote - > Can anyone suggest anything?
See FAQ available at http://umpmfaq.info/faq.html for some ideas. |
|
10-16-2004, 09:53 AM
| |||
| |||
| RE: Money 2003 Performance Sorry for all the posts. It kept telling me the post failed every time I tried to add it. "Angie" wrote: - quote - > I upgraded in March 2004 from Money 98 to Money 2003. > I was able to copy 3-4 years of transactions across, but had to setup all my > Direct Debits again. > Money went fine until the beginning of this year, but since then the > performance has been gradually getting worse and it now takes 30 seconds to > amend or add a new transaction. > I have tried archiving as suggested in other posts and also tried changing > settings again suggested in other posts but it has made no difference. > Can anyone suggest anything? > Thanks |
|
#-1
10-16-2004, 09:49 AM
| |||
| |||
| Money 2003 Performance I upgraded in March 2004 from Money 98 to Money 2003. I was able to copy 3-4 years of transactions across, but had to setup all my Direct Debits again. Money went fine until the beginning of this year, but since then the performance has been gradually getting worse and it now takes 30 seconds to amend or add a new transaction. I have tried archiving as suggested in other posts and also tried changing settings again suggested in other posts but it has made no difference. Can anyone suggest anything? Thanks |
| Tags |
| 2003, money, performance |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| money 2003 performance Nick Biniker: I recently upgraded from money 2001 deluxe to money 2003. Money 2003 runs slowwwwwwwww compared to money 2001, particularly in the scheduled bill... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 10-21-2003 03:28 PM | |
| Money 04 Basics - BKGrnd Banking & Performance Dorando Pietri: Sychronization with MSN Money allows you to keep your banking information at Moneycentral. I suggest: take the Passport off your file. Verify... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 09-01-2003 05:04 PM | |
| Money 2003 Performance William Mahoney: Am I the only on who is having a real speed and performance problem with 2003. I have had countless times when I try to simply add a written check... | Microsoft Money | 6 | 08-08-2003 01:30 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
