| | |||
| |||
| I don't know whether that's the case or whether they just wanted to keep a clean database design where all investment transactions have the exact same set of attributes. I'd bet this is much more of a database design problem than a code writing problem. (It's like the split in a split problem in this regard. Why can't you make a loan payment from a line on a paycheck? Because it's just too ugly to design the database to work that way.) Every other investment transaction has *one* investment, *one* per share price, and *one* number of shares. The transaction you want would need two of each, alone amongst the entire universe of Money investment transaction types. "- Bobb -" <RjSchmoe_nospam[at]netscape.net> wrote in message news:ed$l8fXQDHA.1556[at]TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... - quote - > That's what I've been doing - selling the fund to a load fund then from > there to the new one. > It's been years but I used to do this with quicken. Just couldn't see why > not with Money. Although maybe its because all the codewriters at Microsoft > have stock options and not mutual funds. It may have never occurred to them > that someone would ever want to sell one fund and buy another. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Thanks, Dick That's what I've been doing - selling the fund to a load fund then from there to the new one. It's been years but I used to do this with quicken. Just couldn't see why not with Money. Although maybe its because all the codewriters at Microsoft have stock options and not mutual funds. It may have never occurred to them that someone would ever want to sell one fund and buy another. "Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko[at]mindspring.com> wrote in message news:e#AJ#2RQDHA.3020[at]TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... - quote - > M03 still would have this issue. > You can't do it because Money won't allow two investment transactions to, > effectively, be combined in one transaction. An investment transaction has > *one* share amount, *one* share price, *one* investment, one total value > and, optionally, one account to get the money from or put the money in. > Whether it should have been designed to deal with your case or not, it > wasn't. > The secret is a thing called the associated cash account. Whether one exists > in reality, as in a Fidelity brokerage account, or not, as in a Fidelity > mutual funds account, is irrelevant. Sell to the cash account and then buy > from the cash account. > You can use any cash account, not just an associated cash account. So, if > you don't want an associated cash account, create a "virtual" account just > for purposes like these. Its balance should always be zero after these kinds > of paired transactions. > "- Bobb -" <RjSchmoe_nospam[at]netscape.net> wrote in message > news:OHx9iMRQDHA.2176[at]TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > > But I can't do this with Money ? (M2001 - will newer versions allow it?) > > Why can't I sell a money market and buy a mutual fund with the proceeds ? > > Am I doing something wrong ? ( I tried transfer - only to a cash account, > so > > not an option) |
| Tags |
| buy, fund, mkt, money, mutual, sell |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Re: Sell a money mkt to buy a mutual fund - how to Cal Learner-- MVP: In microsoft.public.money, - Bobb - wrote: >First off, with Fidelity there are load and noload funds. >Whenever I buy/sell a 3% load fund, I use... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 07-03-2003 05:11 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |