|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Thanks to everyone for their helpful comments. Since I currently use Money to pay bills online and to consolidate all accounts in one program, I decided to just install my existing copy of Money 2001. I get unlimited online banking and equity price updates, so as of now, there's no reason to change. I looked at the link showing the comparison table. Maybe one of these days I'll get around to trying out the Deluxe or Premium editions and see what I'm missing. Thanks again, Steve |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| In microsoft.public.money, Dick Watson wrote: - quote - > 2) Yes, though the time is only one year for the basic version which few
For Money 2003 "Online services" valid one or three years.> people buy. Deluxe is three years. For Money 2004 it is two or three years. http://www.microsoft.com/money/info/comparison.asp |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Subject: Lost functionality with Money 2001 to Money 2004 upgrade?
If you spent the money for a new PC you should consider spending the money to> From: sevemiller[at]hotmail.com (S. Miller) > Date: 8/12/2004 12:07 AM Eastern Daylight Time > Message-id: <ff785261.0408112007.7896249f[at]posting.google.com> I just got a new PC and am debating whether I should upgrade my copy > of Money from 2001 to 2004. I read a few posts which I can only assume > I misunderstood. Is it safe to assume that if I am doing online > banking through various institutions while using Money 2001, I'll be > able to do the same things with Money 2004 (with no charges/fees)? > Also, one of the posts mentioned that stock prices no longer get > updated after using the software for one year (if true, I assume it's > a pretty lame way for MSFT to get users to upgrade when they otherwise > wouldn't need to do so). Is this correct, meaning quotes from > different brokerages won't be updated in Money in one year unless I > upgrade? Please tell me MSFT isn't that bad. > If the issues above aren't true, is there any lost functionality from > Money 2001 to Money 2004? > Thanks in advance, > Steve update Microsoft Money every year or two also. You want the ability to upload and download data for investments and or banking. Well, all this costs someone money to produce and they do expect the consumer to pay for it. You should not experience any problems updating if you do it at least every two or three years and you back-up your data every week. Good luck. Steve |
| | |||
| |||
| Answers to questions in order: 1) Yes. 2) Yes, though the time is only one year for the basic version which few people buy. Deluxe is three years. 3) Some people think the M02 and subsequent changes in scheduled transactions amount to lost functionality. This isn't really true. It's just different and some functionality has been gained. I do think it's lame that those changes created even more types of transactions that can be entered but not scheduled in an identical manner. See http://umpmfaq.info/faqdb.php?q=34. "S. Miller" <sevemiller[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news:ff785261.0408112007.7896249f[at]posting.google.com... - quote - > I just got a new PC and am debating whether I should upgrade my copy > of Money from 2001 to 2004. I read a few posts which I can only assume > I misunderstood. Is it safe to assume that if I am doing online > banking through various institutions while using Money 2001, I'll be > able to do the same things with Money 2004 (with no charges/fees)? > Also, one of the posts mentioned that stock prices no longer get > updated after using the software for one year (if true, I assume it's > a pretty lame way for MSFT to get users to upgrade when they otherwise > wouldn't need to do so). Is this correct, meaning quotes from > different brokerages won't be updated in Money in one year unless I > upgrade? Please tell me MSFT isn't that bad. > If the issues above aren't true, is there any lost functionality from > Money 2001 to Money 2004? |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I just got a new PC and am debating whether I should upgrade my copy of Money from 2001 to 2004. I read a few posts which I can only assume I misunderstood. Is it safe to assume that if I am doing online banking through various institutions while using Money 2001, I'll be able to do the same things with Money 2004 (with no charges/fees)? Also, one of the posts mentioned that stock prices no longer get updated after using the software for one year (if true, I assume it's a pretty lame way for MSFT to get users to upgrade when they otherwise wouldn't need to do so). Is this correct, meaning quotes from different brokerages won't be updated in Money in one year unless I upgrade? Please tell me MSFT isn't that bad. If the issues above aren't true, is there any lost functionality from Money 2001 to Money 2004? Thanks in advance, Steve |
| Tags |
| 2001, 2004, functionality, lost, money, upgrade |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Money 2004 fails to upgrade 2001 file Glenn: I have installed Money 2004 on my computer but it will not upgrade my data files. I get the following error message. Money cannot locate... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 05-14-2004 02:23 AM | |
| Upgrade from 98 - 2004 (expenses lost) Brian: I opened a .mny file from Money 98 in Money 2004 Deluxe. It seems to have retained my income information, but all of my debt and expenses... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 01-11-2004 10:15 PM | |
| Equity option functionality in Money 2004 Eric: Can anybody tell me how the improved equity option functionality in Money 2004 works or where I can get more info on it? Thanx, Eric | Microsoft Money | 1 | 10-18-2003 11:31 PM | |
| Money 2004 missing old functionality? Jack: On the Bills and Deposits page in the UK version of Money 2001 it showed every re-occurring bill and deposit in the future. I upgraded to Money... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 08-16-2003 07:37 PM | |
| Money 2001 to 2004 upgrade Anton Kohler: When installing Money 2004, it reports that my 2001 backup files were made by an incompatible version, and as such cannot make use of my 2001... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 08-09-2003 03:32 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |