|
#2
| |||
| |||
| On 2009-03-04, Douglas Johnson <post[at]classtech.com> wrote: - quote - > Igor Chudov <ichudov[at]algebra.com> wrote:
I have decided to not do anything drastic. In the light of the latest> > Based on a gut feeling and without deep analysis, it would seem that > > it permits the bank to collect full 4.875 interest on my entire > > balance, and hold my extra money for free. > Isn't that nice of them. So kind. > > So, my thinking goes, I would benefit from asking the bank to instead > > apply this surplus to my principal. The downside is that after doing > > so, I would no longer be able to defer my payments in case of, say, > > job loss. > If your emergency fund is adequate, there is no point in making an > interest free loan. If the emergency fund is a little light, > perhaps you could ask the bank to return the surplus and add it to > the emergency fund. big economic deterioration, I think that I will be better off with extra cash than with prepayment on the house. I also tend to be biased towards believing that inflation is coming. Therefore, I will simply skip several bank payments to get myself roughly on track with payments schedule. In a few months, I will have a cash surplus about equal to my earlier prepayments. I will consider the relatively minor cost of this mistake to just be considered to be the cost of my disorganization. -- Due to extreme spam originating from Google Groups, and their inattention to spammers, I and many others block all articles originating from Google Groups. If you want your postings to be seen by more readers you will need to find a different means of posting on Usenet. http://improve-usenet.org/ |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Igor Chudov wrote: - quote - > For the last year, I have been adding a little bit of extra to
The payments should have specified you were pre-paying principal.> my house payments. I have a 15 year fixed rate mortgage that I > obtained at 4.875% a few years ago. > When I carefully looked at my statement from the loan servicer, I > realized that the next "due date" is June 1. Banks usually don't advance the due date after a series of partial payments, but you should question them to understand how the interest accrues. My first mortgage was written as a Home Equity Loan, fixed rate, and I carefully did the math and watching the account concluded that making advanced payments in fact lowered the interest accruing. So by paying a year ahead, I effectively earned the mortgage rate on the funds instead of having that money earn 1% at the same bank. Most mortgages do not calculate this way. Joe |
| | |||
| |||
| Igor Chudov <ichudov[at]algebra.com> wrote: - quote - > Based on a gut feeling and without deep analysis, it would seem that
Isn't that nice of them. So kind.> it permits the bank to collect full 4.875 interest on my entire > balance, and hold my extra money for free. - quote - > So, my thinking goes, I would benefit from asking the bank to instead
If your emergency fund is adequate, there is no point in making an interest free> apply this surplus to my principal. The downside is that after doing > so, I would no longer be able to defer my payments in case of, say, > job loss. loan. If the emergency fund is a little light, perhaps you could ask the bank to return the surplus and add it to the emergency fund. -- Doug |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| For the last year, I have been adding a little bit of extra to my house payments. I have a 15 year fixed rate mortgage that I obtained at 4.875% a few years ago. When I carefully looked at my statement from the loan servicer, I realized that the next "due date" is June 1. So, it appears, that the way mortgage lender treats my extra payments is to just permit me to pay next payment later. Based on a gut feeling and without deep analysis, it would seem that it permits the bank to collect full 4.875 interest on my entire balance, and hold my extra money for free. So, my thinking goes, I would benefit from asking the bank to instead apply this surplus to my principal. The downside is that after doing so, I would no longer be able to defer my payments in case of, say, job loss. I called the bank about it yesterday, and the employee told me that yes, I have an option of applying this surplus find to the principal. -- Due to extreme spam originating from Google Groups, and their inattention to spammers, I and many others block all articles originating from Google Groups. If you want your postings to be seen by more readers you will need to find a different means of posting on Usenet. http://improve-usenet.org/ |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Tradeoff Between Mortgage Prepayments and Tax-Deferred Retirement Savings BreadWithSpam@fractious.net: Another interesting data point. Thanks to Greg Mankiw's blog for the link. http://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2006/09/fund-your-401k.html It is... | Financial Planning | 1 | 09-06-2006 03:57 PM | |
| Deducting mortgage interest-house not in my name jwilder987@yahoo.com: Hello I recently 'bought' a house and my husband and I live in it. Due to our low credit, we had to put the house in my mother's name. She got... | Taxes | 11 | 01-16-2006 03:14 AM | |
| Lender will not let me make Bi-monthly payments??? Frank Burns: I just bought a house and so we all know you can take off a good hand full of years (6) off a 30 year fixed mortgage, by making payments twice a... | Financial Planning | 12 | 07-23-2004 11:05 PM | |
| Buying a house with 100% cash vs. getting a mortgage Paddy: Hi, I would appreciate ur responses to my question. We have 2 million dollars (80% in money market fund and 20% in mutual funds and individual... | Financial Planning | 8 | 07-18-2004 09:50 AM | |
| Is Lender paid PMI deductible? Robert: I bought a new home on 4/25/2003 and financed it 80-10-10. That is, I have a first mortgage for 80%, a second mortgage for 10%, and put 10% down. ... | Taxes | 3 | 01-10-2004 06:24 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |