Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Financial Planning

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-09-2008, 06:55 AM
dapperdobbs
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Are fund managers worth their salt?

On Sep 4, 2:02*pm, nonse...[at]mynonsense.net wrote:
- quote -

> So my question is, shouldn't actual business owners be the best people
> to judge whether a company is good for investment? Why should I pay 1%
> management fees for people who can not consistently outperform random
> luck? Should I think about becoming a venture capitalist so I can
> invest in people I get to know personally?

The idea behind "Security Analysis" by Graham, Dodd, & Cottle is that
analysis of the company's business forms the basis for buying (or not)
the stock. This topic has been discussed previously on these boards,
with the general consensus (I disagree) : the average investor does
not have the time nor intelligence nor resources to analyse companies
and construct his own portfolio. Peter Lynch mentioned that with 45
minutes a weekend the average man can manage his own portfolio. Mnay
fund managers do not even know what the companies in their portfolios
do, since they "invest" on criteria such a "momentum" and "market
correlation (how the historic movement of the stock matches historic
market movement)".

Also, looking at other companies' operations may lend insight into how
to run your own company.

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

 
Old 09-04-2008, 07:05 PM
BreadWithSpam@fractious.net
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Are fund managers worth their salt?

nonsense[at]mynonsense.net writes:

- quote -

> have Phd's, but almost none have any experience with the day to day
> nitty gritty of actually running a business.


People have different skills. Someone who's a great CEO
may not be a great financial manager. Chances are that
he's got the help of a great CFO. I'd expect there to
be more in common between CFOs and investment managers.

- quote -

> How are these the kind of people to trust with your money on which
> company is going to do well? Can the complexity of a company be
> reduced to a fancy spreadsheet calculation? I run my own little


Again, you seem to be confusing "running a company" with
"managing finances". They are different (if in some places
overlapping) skill sets.

- quote -

> So my question is, shouldn't actual business owners be the best people
> to judge whether a company is good for investment?


Why would they? A guy who owns and runs a car repair shop
is probably vastly better at repairing (and knowing what
it'll take to repair) cars than he is at computing rates
of return and financial feasibility. So he consults with
his accountant, his bank, and perhaps his financing partners
before he, say, borrows a heap of cash to buy new equipment.

It's his job to convince his partners that he'll use that
equipment to profitable purpose and that he'll pay them
back. It's their job to decide whether they think he
can or not and how much to give him to do so. Different
skills.

- quote -

> Why should I pay 1%
> management fees for people who can not consistently outperform random
> luck?


Seems kind of silly. Why should you?

Of course, if they're doing more than simply failing to
outperform - if they're doing things like managing risk,
handling volatility, dealing with tax efficiency and such,
perhaps you are getting your money's worth. If not,
then, again, why should you pay them all that?

- quote -

> Should I think about becoming a venture capitalist so I can
> invest in people I get to know personally?


Sure. You have a heap of money to invest? Connections?


--
Plain Bread alone for e-mail, thanks. The rest gets trashed.
No HTML in E-Mail! -- http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
Are you posting responses that are easy for others to follow?
http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

  #-1  
Old 09-04-2008, 06:02 PM
nonsense@mynonsense.net
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Are fund managers worth their salt?

I notice most fund managers have fancy corporate titles or Ivy league
degrees but have very little street smarts business experience. They
typically have climbed to the top of the ladder of investment firms or
have Phd's, but almost none have any experience with the day to day
nitty gritty of actually running a business.

How are these the kind of people to trust with your money on which
company is going to do well? Can the complexity of a company be
reduced to a fancy spreadsheet calculation? I run my own little
business, and even I can not say with any certainty what will happen
six months down the road!

So my question is, shouldn't actual business owners be the best people
to judge whether a company is good for investment? Why should I pay 1%
management fees for people who can not consistently outperform random
luck? Should I think about becoming a venture capitalist so I can
invest in people I get to know personally?

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

 

Tags
fund, managers, salt, worth
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
multi-asset managers
beliavsky@aol.com: Many financial planners first decide on an asset allocation, for example 60% stocks 40% bonds and then find mutual funds or ETFs either passive or...
Financial Planning 4 05-09-2008 12:59 AM
Report: Index Funds Beat Active Managers again for '04
Joe Weinstein: Contra Costa Times, Jan 20. Page C5 "Index Funds beat most active managers in '04" According to a report from Standard & Poor's Fund managers...
Financial Planning 1 01-20-2005 06:22 PM
Re: Load vs No-load Mutual Fund Managers
wessnjoe@netscape.net: If we consider the population that can create, run, and market a mutual fund, there is no a-priori qualification or restriction that defines who...
Financial Planning 24 12-25-2004 08:15 PM
Re: Load vs No-load Mutual Fund Managers
wessnjoe@netscape.net: I beg your indulgence, I just thought of something else. If loads are about paying the advisor, who gets the load if I just buy a fund in my...
Financial Planning 1 12-21-2004 08:59 PM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:09 PM.