| |||||||
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#38
| |||
| |||
| "HW "Skip" Weldon" <skip5700removethis[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:u7ug84llhti68l434q114tmge365fr58e7[at]4ax.com... - quote - > Another thing - I don't believe Public 457s are subject to premature
Skip, you are correct about the no early distribution penalty. That's why I> distribution penalties. Distribution is subject to separation of > service, and the funds themselves may involve surrender fees, but > there is no age 59.5 rule for 457s. want to leave the money in the 457 until he turns 59.5. If I rollover, there will be a penalty for early withdrawal. He gets a pension, I'll start SS pretty soon, but we still need to supplement, and that money has to come from somewhere! ![]() Elizabeth Richardson ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#37
| |||
| |||
| On Jul 24, 7:47*am, "HW \"Skip\" Weldon" <skip5700removet...[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > On separation of service our State's 457 is rollable to an IRA. *Is
The rollover kills the "NO early distribution penalty" benefit of the> there something in your plan document or funds that prevent you doing > so? 457. I'm betting that's why she hasn't moved the money. ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#36
| |||
| |||
| On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:45:46 -0500, "Elizabeth Richardson" <erichktn[at]worldnet.att.net> wrote: - quote - > Yes, he worked for the local government, but no, we are both retired. Since
On separation of service our State's 457 is rollable to an IRA. Is> he is separated from service, these funds are available to us as long as we > don't transfer them to an IRA. This money is performing nearly, but not > quite, as well as some other money. Actually, I can (and should) transfer a > portion of it. I haven't yet done so because I don't feel an urgency and > also haven't yet determined how much to leave behind. there something in your plan document or funds that prevent you doing so? -HW "Skip" Weldon Columbia, SC ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#35
| |||
| |||
| On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:24:54 -0500, "Elizabeth Richardson" <erichktn[at]worldnet.att.net> wrote: - quote - > I have mutual funds invested through the mutual fund
Another thing - I don't believe Public 457s are subject to premature> company, except for some still in a 457, that needs to stay in that account > until my husband is over the age of 59.5. distribution penalties. Distribution is subject to separation of service, and the funds themselves may involve surrender fees, but there is no age 59.5 rule for 457s. If wrong, am fairly certain someone will correct me. <g -HW "Skip" Weldon Columbia, SC ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#34
| |||
| |||
| "HW "Skip" Weldon" - quote - > > I have mutual funds invested through the mutual fund
Yes, he worked for the local government, but no, we are both retired. Since> > company, except for some still in a 457, that needs to stay in that > > account > > until my husband is over the age of 59.5. > Was the 457 created when he was with public employment (city, state, > school system, etc.)? And is he still with them? he is separated from service, these funds are available to us as long as we don't transfer them to an IRA. This money is performing nearly, but not quite, as well as some other money. Actually, I can (and should) transfer a portion of it. I haven't yet done so because I don't feel an urgency and also haven't yet determined how much to leave behind. Elizabeth Richardson ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#33
| |||
| |||
| On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:24:54 -0500, "Elizabeth Richardson" <erichktn[at]worldnet.att.net> wrote: - quote - > I have mutual funds invested through the mutual fund
Was the 457 created when he was with public employment (city, state,> company, except for some still in a 457, that needs to stay in that account > until my husband is over the age of 59.5. school system, etc.)? And is he still with them? -HW "Skip" Weldon Columbia, SC ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#32
| |||
| |||
| "Gil Faver" <rowdy'sboss[at]xxyz.com> wrote in message news:ebLhk.258601$SV4.184199[at]bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net... - quote - > > > In the same vein, how about nearing the SIPC limits?
Sorry, I was thinking FSLIC. I don't use a brokerage. I don't invest in> > > > > I wouldn't put my retirement funds in bank or like-institution insured > > accounts. > In the same vein, how about nearing the SIPC limits? individual issues. I have mutual funds invested through the mutual fund company, except for some still in a 457, that needs to stay in that account until my husband is over the age of 59.5. I may be wrong, but SIPC insurance doesn't cover loss of the underlying issues anyway. Elizabeth Richardson ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#31
| |||
| |||
| "Augustine" <evandro[at]mailinator.com> wrote in message news:25d468d4-0db3-4737-9e14-35101992c7e5[at]u12g2000prd.googlegroups.com... - quote - > On Jul 22, 5:39 pm, "Elizabeth Richardson"
If this is a concern, make sure that your securities are registered in your> > > I think it would be extremely hard to go over $250k of CDs in an IRA. CDs > > are not really the stuff of a long-term retirement portfolio, rather the > > stuff from which you take income. > In the same vein, how about nearing the SIPC limits? name and not "street name". "The statute that created SIPC provides that customers of a failed brokerage firm receive all non-negotiable securities _that are already registered in their name_ ... All other so-called 'street name' securities are distributed on a pro rata basis. At the same time, ... the SIPC ... satisf[ies] the remaining claims of each customer up to a maximum of $500K." http://www.sipc.org/who/who.cfm Obviously don't keep more than $100K in a broker's cash account. (Note that a MMF is not a cash account; MM shares are securities, not brokerage debt.) Keeping securities registered in your name generally means that (a) you will not be able to buy on margin, and (b) the broker won't provide a dividend reinvestment service (e.g. converting those ETF dividends into virtual partial shares). Many brokerages carry excess insurance above the SIPC limits, though I don't believe the soundness of that insurance has been tested. Here's a longer thread (including a Herb Greenberg column) on the same subject: http://www.irvinehousingblog.com/for...ewthread/2630/ Mark Freeland nNeEwTs[at]nyc.rr.com ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#30
| |||
| |||
| "Elizabeth Richardson" <erichktn[at]worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:wOJhk.258423$SV4.5646[at]bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net... - quote - > "Augustine" <evandro[at]mailinator.com> wrote in message
In the same vein, how about nearing the SIPC limits?> news:25d468d4-0db3-4737-9e14-35101992c7e5[at]u12g2000prd.googlegroups.com... > > On Jul 22, 5:39 pm, "Elizabeth Richardson" > > > > > I think it would be extremely hard to go over $250k of CDs in an IRA. > > > CDs > > > are not really the stuff of a long-term retirement portfolio, rather the > > > stuff from which you take income. > > > In the same vein, how about nearing the SIPC limits? > > I wouldn't put my retirement funds in bank or like-institution insured > accounts. ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#29
| |||
| |||
| "Augustine" <evandro[at]mailinator.com> wrote in message news:25d468d4-0db3-4737-9e14-35101992c7e5[at]u12g2000prd.googlegroups.com... - quote - > On Jul 22, 5:39 pm, "Elizabeth Richardson"
I wouldn't put my retirement funds in bank or like-institution insured> > > I think it would be extremely hard to go over $250k of CDs in an IRA. CDs > > are not really the stuff of a long-term retirement portfolio, rather the > > stuff from which you take income. > In the same vein, how about nearing the SIPC limits? accounts. Elizabeth Richardson ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#28
| |||
| |||
| On Jul 22, 5:39*pm, "Elizabeth Richardson" - quote - > I think it would be extremely hard to go over $250k of CDs in an IRA. CDs
In the same vein, how about nearing the SIPC limits?> are not really the stuff of a long-term retirement portfolio, rather the > stuff from which you take income. TIA ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#27
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I agree, but it's not hard to go over the $250,000 insurance limit for
I'm thinking that it's a rare combination of those who have managed to> IRA's. I guess then that it's better to start funding another IRA > when one reaches $200,000, right? > TIA have high enough earnings to accrue that kind of money* in an IRA and a lack of sophistication so all their funds are in cash. To that few percent, I repeat the suggestion that they either A) buy brokered CDs at a couple different banks, B) go to a second brick and mortar bank with half their funds, or C) take a lesson from some regulars here (with a nod to Elizabeth's post on this thread) and learn to invest, not just squirrel away cash. Not to get too pedantic, you have one IRA, it may be spread across multiple accounts, but it remains one IRA. Joe *from http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/econ...05_boomers.pdf I extrapolate that about 25% of baby boomers will have over $250K in retirement accounts. A good chunk of that would be in 401(k) accounts. www.blog.joetaxpayer.com ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#26
| |||
| |||
| "Elizabeth Richardson" <erichktn[at]worldnet.att.net> writes: - quote - > "Augustine" <evandro[at]mailinator.com> wrote in message
Of course, it depends a lot on the risk tolerance and size of> news:add12599-edbb-4b06-b5e3-ad7677d5f469[at]s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com... > > I agree, but it's not hard to go over the $250,000 insurance limit for > > IRA's. I guess then that it's better to start funding another IRA > > when one reaches $200,000, right? > I think it would be extremely hard to go over $250k of CDs in an > IRA. CDs are not really the stuff of a long-term retirement > portfolio, rather the stuff from which you take income. If I were in the portfolio. But a portfolio with more than $250,000 in CDs is either very very conservative (perhaps, as we've said, dangerously so) -- or it's a very large portfolio (ie. large enough that $250,000 is not such a huge piece of it). Certainly if someone has that much in a retirement portfolio in CDs, I should hope that he or she is getting some good advice and knows about all the alternatives - and how easy it is to diversify that out, either into other investments or, if FDIC-insured CDs are the way to go, through options like the brokerage CDs. Given some of the tone of fear that has come into play in the wake of IndyMac, I hope folks will react in a moderate and thoughtful way and not worry too much - but there's still no reason to go above the FDIC limits and perhaps this is an opportunity to take advantage of the headlines as a reminder to get folks to revisit their allocations and make sure that their portfolios make the most sense for their needs. -- Plain Bread alone for e-mail, thanks. The rest gets trashed. No HTML in E-Mail! -- http://www.expita.com/nomime.html Are you posting responses that are easy for others to follow? http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#25
| |||
| |||
| "Augustine" <evandro[at]mailinator.com> wrote in message news:add12599-edbb-4b06-b5e3-ad7677d5f469[at]s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com... - quote - > I agree, but it's not hard to go over the $250,000 insurance limit for
I think it would be extremely hard to go over $250k of CDs in an IRA. CDs> IRA's. I guess then that it's better to start funding another IRA > when one reaches $200,000, right? are not really the stuff of a long-term retirement portfolio, rather the stuff from which you take income. If I were in jeopardy of exceeding the IRA limit of FDIC insured products, I'd be looking for some other place to put my future. Elizabeth Richardson ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#24
| |||
| |||
| On Jul 21, 7:02*pm, joetaxpayer <joetaxpa...[at]nospam.com> wrote: - quote - > *From 1984-1994, 1,617 banks failed, 9.14% of all banks, containing
I agree, but it's not hard to go over the $250,000 insurance limit for> 8.98% of total bank assets. I call these numbers high enough that I > direct clients to not risk having their money above the FDIC limits that > may apply to them. The effort to maintain multiple accounts seems too > minor compared to the risk of being left with uninsured funds. IRA's. I guess then that it's better to start funding another IRA when one reaches $200,000, right? TIA ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#23
| |||
| |||
| joetaxpayer <joetaxpayer[at]nospam.com> writes: - quote - > BreadWithSpam[at]fractious.net wrote:
More than fair enough. In my original response to the poster> From 1984-1994, 1,617 banks failed, 9.14% of all banks, containing > 8.98% of total bank assets. I call these numbers high enough that I > direct clients to not risk having their money above the FDIC limits who started this thread, I emphasized means of keeping the deposits under the FDIC limits. It's easy enough to do that there's really no reason not to. Especially via the easy-to-access brokered CDs. FWIW, I wasn't cherry-picking. I just didn't go back that far. -- Plain Bread alone for e-mail, thanks. The rest gets trashed. No HTML in E-Mail! -- http://www.expita.com/nomime.html Are you posting responses that are easy for others to follow? http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#22
| |||
| |||
| On Jul 21, 7:02*pm, joetaxpayer <joetaxpa...[at]nospam.com> wrote: - quote - > *Fromhttp://www.fdic.gov/bank/historical/history/vol1.html
Agreed. My posts were not meant to imply that people should not ignore> (part 1 sec 1 page 15) > *From 1984-1994, 1,617 banks failed, 9.14% of all banks, containing > 8.98% of total bank assets. I call these numbers high enough that I > direct clients to not risk having their money above the FDIC limits that > may apply to them. The effort to maintain multiple accounts seems too > minor compared to the risk of being left with uninsured funds. this potential risk. My point was to avoid taking on more likely risks while endevouring to avoid the "risk de jour". If the money is all ready at the bank, and "safe" investments match the clients risk profile, then by all means take the necessary steps to insure the funds. However, in the wake of indymac, there seemed to be multiple posts suggesting that people were flocking to "safe" investements when they otherwise shouldn't be. ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#21
| |||
| |||
| joetaxpayer <joetaxpayer[at]nospam.com> wrote: - quote - > From 1984-1994, 1,617 banks failed, 9.14% of all banks, containing
I strongly agree. My checking account has been at 6 different banks. Same> 8.98% of total bank assets. I call these numbers high enough that I > direct clients to not risk having their money above the FDIC limits that > may apply to them. The effort to maintain multiple accounts seems too > minor compared to the risk of being left with uninsured funds. account, same account number, but 6 different banks. Half of the changes were bank failures. The others were acquisitions. Since I don't keep $100K in checking <grin> , it was seamless. One day the sign over the door had one bank name, the next day a different name. But the checks cleared, the deposit flowed through. No sweat. -- Doug ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#20
| |||
| |||
| BreadWithSpam[at]fractious.net wrote: - quote - > kastnna <kastnna[at]auburnalum.org> writes:
From> > Does anyone happen to know (or know where to look for) what percentage > > of banks fail in a given time period? > Um, very very few. > http://www.fdic.gov/bank/historical/bank/index.html > The total sum of assets of all the banks which have failed > and gone to FDIC in all the years from '94 through now - > excluding IndyMac - adds up to something like $10billion. > IndyMac alone dwarfs 14 years worth. http://www.fdic.gov/bank/historical/history/vol1.html (part 1 sec 1 page 15) From 1984-1994, 1,617 banks failed, 9.14% of all banks, containing 8.98% of total bank assets. I call these numbers high enough that I direct clients to not risk having their money above the FDIC limits that may apply to them. The effort to maintain multiple accounts seems too minor compared to the risk of being left with uninsured funds. Joe ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#19
| |||
| |||
| On 2008-07-16 11:50:25 -0700, BreadWithSpam[at]fractious.net said: - quote - > kastnna <kastnna[at]auburnalum.org> writes:
In the early 80's, if someone had asked the same question about savings> > Does anyone happen to know (or know where to look for) what percentage > > of banks fail in a given time period? > Um, very very few. and loan associations, the answer would also have been "very very few." The trick is to plan for unusual and unexpected events that have never happened before. ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
| Tags |
| $100k, $260k, account, bank, fdic, insurance, limit, partitioning |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Bank solvency and FDIC insurance Will: read the brief anecdote at http://piggington.com/bank_solvency_and_fdic_worries (about half-way down the page under the header "This is... | Financial Planning | 29 | 09-04-2007 02:22 AM | |
| fdic ?--protecting bank accounts ? ryker: Didn't know how to title the subject. Not new to this, financial investing, banks, etc., and I know about the FDIC insurance. But what do most... | Financial Planning | 33 | 03-23-2007 02:42 PM | |
| Passive loss: $25K limit and $100K - $150K phaseout. John Gulbrandsen: From what I've learned passive losses from real-estate rentals can only be offset against other passive income (i.e. income from other rental... | Taxes | 3 | 05-25-2006 12:53 AM | |
| FDIC Insurance Increase to $250,000 Mark Freeland: For "self-directed retirement accounts" (IRAs, SEPs, 457s, self-directed Keoghs, self-directed 401(k)s)... | Financial Planning | 2 | 04-23-2006 10:46 AM | |
| the 100k limit for home equity interest deduction Doug: I'm probably not the first person to think of this, but please let me know what you think. Suppose you bought a house w/ a 125k mortgage. Later,... | Taxes | 7 | 04-19-2004 08:46 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |