|
#19
| |||
| |||
| "Douglas Johnson" <post[at]classtech.com> wrote - quote - > Everyday ethical behavior rarely gets much publicity.
I guess we could dispute "everyday," but whistle blowers arealmost by definition ethical. They often get an enormous amount of publicity. From the CIA's Valerie Plame (and husband; Iraq etc. WMD), to Enron's Sherron Watkins, to the FBI's Coleen Rowley (Sept. 11 intelligence bungled), to the Naval Academy's Gwen Dreyer (handcuffed to a urinal), to NYPD's Robert Leuci ("Prince of the City"). Problem is, they are generally washed up after helping set things straight at XYZ organization. Though perhaps it is cultural, and this can change, especially within individual professions. At least, recent studies on medical doctors who admit fault, apologize sincerely, offer appropriate compensation for actual harm and explain what happened to the patient are far less likely to be sued. Maybe not unlike that recent report we had here of the financial advisor who made a tax advising mistake, admitted it, apologized, and offered some compensation? ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#18
| |||
| |||
| On 2008-06-18 12:56:31 -0700, Douglas Johnson <post[at]classtech.com> said: - quote - > In my mind, corporations are no more or less ethical than the people in
No argument from me about that. Of course, what is "ethical" means> them. So > corporations are ethical in about the same percentage and degree as people. > It is not hard to find examples of unethical behavior by either. That's what > makes the news. Everyday ethical behavior rarely gets much publicity. different things to different people. I am saying that from the standpoint of financial planning, investing, tax paying, and making various financial plans, individuals and corporations should be judged by the same standards. ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| Don <dwzimm[at]telus.net> wrote: - quote - > On 2008-06-17 16:21:09 -0700, Chip <chip.wood[at]ieee.org> said:
I think you are painting with far too broad a brush. I have worked for some> > That has rarely stopped corporate America. If their lawyers say they > > can hide it, get away with it, postpone it until you are retired, or > > you have bought enough congress-critters to write a new law getting you > > off the hook or even get more corporate welfare- Go for it. > True. Ethics is not a high priority in corporate America. very ethical corporations. Ethics was and is a high priority for them. In my mind, corporations are no more or less ethical than the people in them. So corporations are ethical in about the same percentage and degree as people. It is not hard to find examples of unethical behavior by either. That's what makes the news. Everyday ethical behavior rarely gets much publicity. -- Doug ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| On 2008-06-17 16:21:09 -0700, Chip <chip.wood[at]ieee.org> said: - quote - > That has rarely stopped corporate America. If their lawyers say they
True. Ethics is not a high priority in corporate America. A small> can hide it, get away with it, postpone it until you are retired, or > you have bought enough congress-critters to write a new law getting you > off the hook or even get more corporate welfare- Go for it. investor doing his or her best to plan for the future should not be held to higher standards than are applied to business in general, big or little. As far as I am concerned, financial planning for an individual should involve taking advantage of all the tax loopholes and using whatever legal methods can be expected to turn a profit, just as is done by corporations. ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| Don wrote: - quote - > Agreed! It is unethical in the extreme. It should be unlawful! And if GM
That has rarely stopped corporate America. If their lawyers say they> or American Airlines or any of the others did any similar self-serving > act knowing that receivership was imminent, it would be unethical in the > extreme. And its should be unlawful. can hide it, get away with it, postpone it until you are retired, or you have bought enough congress-critters to write a new law getting you off the hook or even get more corporate welfare- Go for it. Chip ======================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT: Posters to this thread should relate comments to general financial planning. ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| On Jun 15, 1:35*pm, "rick++" <rick...[at]hotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > For everyone of these crooks I can show a several people with six
Please clarify. Are you saying that bankruptcy can be a good thing> figure > hospital bills from medical emergencies. *After struggling for a few > years > they take the only reasonable way out. *Reform both helps and hurts > some. also? ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| On 2008-06-13 16:15:08 -0700, Will Trice <wtrice[at]notmonitored.com> said: - quote - > Many moons ago I had a co-worker who had gotten herself in over her
Agreed! It is unethical in the extreme. It should be unlawful! And if> head to the point of needing to declare bankruptcy. Given that the > bankruptcy was imminent, she and her husband when on a protracted > vacation, including a trip to Disneyland, on credit with the clear > intent that this would be a "free" trip (what the heck, might as > well!). Yes, I consider this unethical behavior. GM or American Airlines or any of the others did any similar self-serving act knowing that receivership was imminent, it would be unethical in the extreme. And its should be unlawful. ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| On Jun 13, 5:15 pm, Will Trice <wtr...[at]notmonitored.com> wrote: - quote - > Many moons ago I had a co-worker who had gotten herself in over her head
For everyone of these crooks I can show a several people with six> to the point of needing to declare bankruptcy. Given that the > bankruptcy was imminent, she and her husband when on a protracted > vacation, including a trip to Disneyland, on credit with the clear > intent that this would be a "free" trip (what the heck, might as well!). figure hospital bills from medical emergencies. After struggling for a few years they take the only reasonable way out. Reform both helps and hurts some. ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| In article <4852F198.3020609[at]notmonitored.com> , wtrice[at]notmonitored.com says... - quote - > Don wrote: > > On 2008-06-13 08:30:19 -0700, Mark Bole <makbo[at]pacbell.net> said: > > > The real point was, since the borrower knows ahead of time they are > > > about to trash their credit record, they can take advantage of that > > > knowledge. > > > > Corporations and other businesses do stunts like this all the time. > > Somehow when an individual person takes advantage of loopholes in the > > law or the tax code or whatever, it is viewed as a terrible, unethical, > > immoral thing, but when a big company does it it is O.K., just business. - quote - > Many moons ago I had a co-worker who had gotten herself in over her head > to the point of needing to declare bankruptcy. Given that the > bankruptcy was imminent, she and her husband when on a protracted > vacation, including a trip to Disneyland, on credit with the clear > intent that this would be a "free" trip (what the heck, might as well!). > Yes, I consider this unethical behavior. Not just unethical. It is called, "load-up," and constitutes fraud. It can result in a creditor challenging whether that debt should be discharged or not, in the bankruptcy. And can potentially lead to criminal charges. Although the debtor/petitioner probably got away with it quite often, under the old BK rules. I suspect that there will be a lot less such behaviour under the new rules, with more people being pushed to Chapter 13 repayment plans, instead of a straight liquidation. -- Get Credit Where Credit Is Due http://www.cardreport.com/ Credit Tools, Reference, and Forum ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| On Jun 13, 6:15*pm, Will Trice <wtr...[at]notmonitored.com> wrote: - quote - > Many moons ago I had a co-worker who had gotten herself in over her head
Unethical spills over into fraud if the debtor has no intention or> to the point of needing to declare bankruptcy. *Given that the > bankruptcy was imminent, she and her husband when on a protracted > vacation, including a trip to Disneyland, on credit with the clear > intent that this would be a "free" trip (what the heck, might as well!). reasonable expectation to pay the debt? I'm surprised nobody involved in the bankruptcy process didn't notie the dates and raise a fuss about this. ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Mark Bole wrote: - quote - > It's odd that she could have had "imminent" bankruptcy and yet the
Why? How many banks knew (and if they knew, acted on the knowledge) of> credit card company had no clue? imminent foreclosures? I'm not saying she had filed before doing this. - quote - > Pacific Gas and Electric, one of the larger investor-owned energy
Yes, this was very good for those of us (like me) who picked up shares> utilities in the country, declared bankruptcy in the aftermath of some > questionable energy price "crises" in California at the beginning of > this century, also right after re-organizing itself into a holding > company and various subsidiaries (how convenient). Shares lost 60% or > so in value but since then have rebounded back as high as ever. of PG&E after the fall (and Edison International who had similar issues but did not go bankrupt). -Will william dot trice at ngc dot com ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Pacific Gas and Electric, one of the larger investor-owned energy > utilities in the country, declared bankruptcy in the aftermath of some > questionable energy price "crises" in California at the beginning of this > century, also right after re-organizing itself into a holding company and > various subsidiaries (how convenient). Shares lost 60% or so in value but > since then have rebounded back as high as ever. The second most-screwed > person after the taxpayer is the utility rate payer, pardon my lack of > objectivity. The energy price crises at that time, were not of PG&Es doing. And the state of California basically said "screw PG&E". and the governor (since recalled) said "there is no energy problem. there is no energy price problem. Don't bother to conserve." And then the state tried to take away one of the most lucrative portions of PG&E. the company really had no alternative than declaring bankruptcy, getting things back in order, and making everyone whole. bad example, here. ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Walking away doesn't discharge your debt.
eventually a poor credit score would catch up with person in 7-10-15years... assuming they needed credit again. My take is that if a person needs credit twice or three times, they will usually need it over and over and over. ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Will Trice wrote: - quote - > Don wrote:
It's odd that she could have had "imminent" bankruptcy and yet the> > On 2008-06-13 08:30:19 -0700, Mark Bole <makbo[at]pacbell.net> said: > > > The real point was, since the borrower knows ahead of time they are > > > about to trash their credit record, they can take advantage of that > > > knowledge. > > > > Corporations and other businesses do stunts like this all the time. > > Somehow when an individual person takes advantage of loopholes in the > > law or the tax code or whatever, it is viewed as a terrible, > > unethical, immoral thing, but when a big company does it it is O.K., > > just business. > Many moons ago I had a co-worker who had gotten herself in over her head > to the point of needing to declare bankruptcy. Given that the > bankruptcy was imminent, she and her husband when on a protracted > vacation, including a trip to Disneyland, on credit with the clear > intent that this would be a "free" trip (what the heck, might as well!). > Yes, I consider this unethical behavior. credit card company had no clue? Of course, the bank probably appreciated those hefty finance charge profits they had been collecting all along... (My original example did not include bankruptcy). Pacific Gas and Electric, one of the larger investor-owned energy utilities in the country, declared bankruptcy in the aftermath of some questionable energy price "crises" in California at the beginning of this century, also right after re-organizing itself into a holding company and various subsidiaries (how convenient). Shares lost 60% or so in value but since then have rebounded back as high as ever. The second most-screwed person after the taxpayer is the utility rate payer, pardon my lack of objectivity. -Mark Bole ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| In article <x_a4k.7970$xZ.153[at]nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com> , makbo[at]pacbell.net says... - quote - > I read an interesting article from the WSJ about homeowners who are > under water on their mortgage. While their payments are still current > and their credit record unblemished, they get a decent mortgage on a new > house, at today's much more reasonable prices, and *then* bail on the > old house (short sale, foreclosure, whatever). > Lenders are trying to block this by requiring evidence that mortgage and > tax payments can be made on both properties before granting the loan, so > if you were legitimately trying to turn you old house into a rental, I > suppose you would have to have a signed lease agreement in place before > moving out -- not very practical. Well, you could move out of the old house, and into a cheap rental apartment (on a month-to-month lease), while getting set up with a new tenant in the old house. Then apply for the mortgage on the new house. Less pressure on all levels, since you would have more time to shop around. - quote - > I wonder when we are going to see a similar strategy from owners of > late-model SUV's and other gas-guzzler vehicles. Buy an economical car > first, then walk away from the old one. I wonder if auto lenders might start doing something like the credit card "universal default" idea. Which is when Bank A (which issued your credit card) notices that you are delinquent on a card from another bank, and then jacks up your interest rate. Plenty of mortgages are already on variable interest rates. So perhaps auto lenders might start offering the equivalent of an ARM. With the risk of fine print authorising a risk-based increase similar to the credit card issuers? -- Get Credit Where Credit Is Due http://www.cardreport.com/ Credit Tools, Reference, and Forum ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Don wrote: - quote - > On 2008-06-13 08:30:19 -0700, Mark Bole <makbo[at]pacbell.net> said:
Many moons ago I had a co-worker who had gotten herself in over her head> > The real point was, since the borrower knows ahead of time they are > > about to trash their credit record, they can take advantage of that > > knowledge. > Corporations and other businesses do stunts like this all the time. > Somehow when an individual person takes advantage of loopholes in the > law or the tax code or whatever, it is viewed as a terrible, unethical, > immoral thing, but when a big company does it it is O.K., just business. to the point of needing to declare bankruptcy. Given that the bankruptcy was imminent, she and her husband when on a protracted vacation, including a trip to Disneyland, on credit with the clear intent that this would be a "free" trip (what the heck, might as well!). Yes, I consider this unethical behavior. -Will william dot trice at ngc dot com ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| On 2008-06-13 08:30:19 -0700, Mark Bole <makbo[at]pacbell.net> said: - quote - > > Walking away doesn't discharge your debt.
Corporations and other businesses do stunts like this all the time.> True, unless it's a non-recourse loan, or maybe a lease (I'm not > familiar with the terms of most car loans). Also, depending on the > amount, the lender may find it cheaper to write off the bad debt > instead of leaving it on the books, this happens often enough. > The real point was, since the borrower knows ahead of time they are > about to trash their credit record, they can take advantage of that > knowledge. Somehow when an individual person takes advantage of loopholes in the law or the tax code or whatever, it is viewed as a terrible, unethical, immoral thing, but when a big company does it it is O.K., just business. ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Ron Peterson wrote: - quote - > On Jun 12, 11:15 am, Mark Bole <ma...[at]pacbell.net> wrote:
True, unless it's a non-recourse loan, or maybe a lease (I'm not> > I wonder when we are going to see a similar strategy from owners of > > late-model SUV's and other gas-guzzler vehicles. Buy an economical car > > first, then walk away from the old one. > Walking away doesn't discharge your debt. familiar with the terms of most car loans). Also, depending on the amount, the lender may find it cheaper to write off the bad debt instead of leaving it on the books, this happens often enough. The real point was, since the borrower knows ahead of time they are about to trash their credit record, they can take advantage of that knowledge. -Mark Bole ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| On Jun 12, 11:15*am, Mark Bole <ma...[at]pacbell.net> wrote: - quote - > I wonder when we are going to see a similar strategy from owners of
Walking away doesn't discharge your debt.> late-model SUV's and other gas-guzzler vehicles. *Buy an economical car > first, then walk away from the old one. -- Ron ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
| | |||
| |||
| Sometimes the free market is darned entertaining. Home lenders let visions of wealth overwhelm the reality that sizable downpayments tend to keep people from walking out on mortgages. Now they get their comeuppance. Ha ha, re car financiers! With their typically ridiculous interest rates, they too may get their comeuppance. Though I am thinking that car loans have "preventive measures" in them to ensure payment or at least getting every cent possible out of the borrower, including going after assets. OTOH, this all tends to promotes chaos, and that's not good for the economy as a whole. Hurting these businesses hurts many a stock portfolio. ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
| Tags |
| bail, buy, strategy |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| RMD strategy DLC: We are thinking ahead to when we must begin the required minimum IRA distributions. At present, our expenses are covered by social security and... | Financial Planning | 9 | 04-26-2007 08:58 AM | |
| HSA / IRA Strategy? njoracle: A 45 year old single female in relatively good health has an HSA and an IRA. She can afford to contribute about $2000 a year to both (not each) the... | Financial Planning | 5 | 03-24-2007 01:35 PM | |
| Tax strategy for next 2007 kyle@kylebeck.com: I am trying to get everything in order for planning my tax strategy for this year, and wanted to double check something... Last year I made... | Taxes | 3 | 02-20-2007 10:57 PM | |
| What do you think of this strategy? Gary: I have, over a lifetime of being a saver, accumulated significant amounts in IRAs, 401Ks, etc. I am now age 72. Each year the government requires... | Financial Planning | 8 | 01-27-2006 07:52 PM | |
| Tax strategy for Houses Daddio - redhonda50_nojunk@yahoo.com: I hope this question/problem is not out of line for this group. My wife and I are 56 years old and would like to eventually retire in Flordia. ... | Taxes | 6 | 07-06-2005 04:00 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |