Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Financial Planning

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #19  
Old 06-19-2008, 12:18 AM
Elle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: buy then bail strategy

"Douglas Johnson" <post[at]classtech.com> wrote
- quote -

> Everyday ethical behavior rarely gets much publicity.

I guess we could dispute "everyday," but whistle blowers are
almost by definition ethical. They often get an enormous
amount of publicity. From the CIA's Valerie Plame (and
husband; Iraq etc. WMD), to Enron's Sherron Watkins, to the
FBI's Coleen Rowley (Sept. 11 intelligence bungled), to the
Naval Academy's Gwen Dreyer (handcuffed to a urinal), to
NYPD's Robert Leuci ("Prince of the City"). Problem is, they
are generally washed up after helping set things straight at
XYZ organization. Though perhaps it is cultural, and this
can change, especially within individual professions. At
least, recent studies on medical doctors who admit fault,
apologize sincerely, offer appropriate compensation for
actual harm and explain what happened to the patient are far
less likely to be sued. Maybe not unlike that recent report
we had here of the financial advisor who made a tax advising
mistake, admitted it, apologized, and offered some
compensation?

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

  #18  
Old 06-18-2008, 09:33 PM
Don
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: buy then bail strategy

On 2008-06-18 12:56:31 -0700, Douglas Johnson <post[at]classtech.com> said:
- quote -

> In my mind, corporations are no more or less ethical than the people in
> them. So
> corporations are ethical in about the same percentage and degree as people.
> It is not hard to find examples of unethical behavior by either. That's what
> makes the news. Everyday ethical behavior rarely gets much publicity.


No argument from me about that. Of course, what is "ethical" means
different things to different people. I am saying that from the
standpoint of financial planning, investing, tax paying, and making
various financial plans, individuals and corporations should be judged
by the same standards.

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

  #17  
Old 06-18-2008, 07:56 PM
Douglas Johnson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: buy then bail strategy

Don <dwzimm[at]telus.net> wrote:

- quote -

> On 2008-06-17 16:21:09 -0700, Chip <chip.wood[at]ieee.org> said:
> > That has rarely stopped corporate America. If their lawyers say they
> > can hide it, get away with it, postpone it until you are retired, or
> > you have bought enough congress-critters to write a new law getting you
> > off the hook or even get more corporate welfare- Go for it.

> True. Ethics is not a high priority in corporate America.


I think you are painting with far too broad a brush. I have worked for some
very ethical corporations. Ethics was and is a high priority for them.

In my mind, corporations are no more or less ethical than the people in them. So
corporations are ethical in about the same percentage and degree as people.

It is not hard to find examples of unethical behavior by either. That's what
makes the news. Everyday ethical behavior rarely gets much publicity.

-- Doug

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

  #16  
Old 06-18-2008, 03:24 AM
Don
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: buy then bail strategy

On 2008-06-17 16:21:09 -0700, Chip <chip.wood[at]ieee.org> said:

- quote -

> That has rarely stopped corporate America. If their lawyers say they
> can hide it, get away with it, postpone it until you are retired, or
> you have bought enough congress-critters to write a new law getting you
> off the hook or even get more corporate welfare- Go for it.


True. Ethics is not a high priority in corporate America. A small
investor doing his or her best to plan for the future should not be
held to higher standards than are applied to business in general, big
or little. As far as I am concerned, financial planning for an
individual should involve taking advantage of all the tax loopholes and
using whatever legal methods can be expected to turn a profit, just as
is done by corporations.

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

  #15  
Old 06-17-2008, 11:21 PM
Chip
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: buy then bail strategy

Don wrote:

- quote -

> Agreed! It is unethical in the extreme. It should be unlawful! And if GM
> or American Airlines or any of the others did any similar self-serving
> act knowing that receivership was imminent, it would be unethical in the
> extreme. And its should be unlawful.


That has rarely stopped corporate America. If their lawyers say they
can hide it, get away with it, postpone it until you are retired, or you
have bought enough congress-critters to write a new law getting you off
the hook or even get more corporate welfare- Go for it.

Chip


======================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT:
Posters to this thread should relate comments to general financial planning.

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

  #14  
Old 06-17-2008, 08:36 PM
kastnna
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: buy then bail strategy

On Jun 15, 1:35*pm, "rick++" <rick...[at]hotmail.com> wrote:

- quote -

> For everyone of these crooks I can show a several people with six
> figure
> hospital bills from medical emergencies. *After struggling for a few
> years
> they take the only reasonable way out. *Reform both helps and hurts
> some.


Please clarify. Are you saying that bankruptcy can be a good thing
also?

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

  #13  
Old 06-17-2008, 08:25 PM
Don
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: buy then bail strategy

On 2008-06-13 16:15:08 -0700, Will Trice <wtrice[at]notmonitored.com> said:

- quote -

> Many moons ago I had a co-worker who had gotten herself in over her
> head to the point of needing to declare bankruptcy. Given that the
> bankruptcy was imminent, she and her husband when on a protracted
> vacation, including a trip to Disneyland, on credit with the clear
> intent that this would be a "free" trip (what the heck, might as
> well!). Yes, I consider this unethical behavior.


Agreed! It is unethical in the extreme. It should be unlawful! And if
GM or American Airlines or any of the others did any similar
self-serving act knowing that receivership was imminent, it would be
unethical in the extreme. And its should be unlawful.

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

  #12  
Old 06-15-2008, 06:35 PM
rick++
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: buy then bail strategy

On Jun 13, 5:15 pm, Will Trice <wtr...[at]notmonitored.com> wrote:

- quote -

> Many moons ago I had a co-worker who had gotten herself in over her head
> to the point of needing to declare bankruptcy. Given that the
> bankruptcy was imminent, she and her husband when on a protracted
> vacation, including a trip to Disneyland, on credit with the clear
> intent that this would be a "free" trip (what the heck, might as well!).


For everyone of these crooks I can show a several people with six
figure
hospital bills from medical emergencies. After struggling for a few
years
they take the only reasonable way out. Reform both helps and hurts
some.

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

  #11  
Old 06-15-2008, 12:13 AM
Coffee's For Closers
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: buy then bail strategy

In article <4852F198.3020609[at]notmonitored.com> ,
wtrice[at]notmonitored.com says...
- quote -

> Don wrote:
> > On 2008-06-13 08:30:19 -0700, Mark Bole <makbo[at]pacbell.net> said:
> > > The real point was, since the borrower knows ahead of time they are
> > > about to trash their credit record, they can take advantage of that
> > > knowledge.
> > > > Corporations and other businesses do stunts like this all the time.

> > Somehow when an individual person takes advantage of loopholes in the
> > law or the tax code or whatever, it is viewed as a terrible, unethical,
> > immoral thing, but when a big company does it it is O.K., just business.



- quote -

> Many moons ago I had a co-worker who had gotten herself in over her head
> to the point of needing to declare bankruptcy. Given that the
> bankruptcy was imminent, she and her husband when on a protracted
> vacation, including a trip to Disneyland, on credit with the clear
> intent that this would be a "free" trip (what the heck, might as well!).
> Yes, I consider this unethical behavior.



Not just unethical. It is called, "load-up," and constitutes
fraud. It can result in a creditor challenging whether that debt
should be discharged or not, in the bankruptcy. And can
potentially lead to criminal charges. Although the
debtor/petitioner probably got away with it quite often, under
the old BK rules.

I suspect that there will be a lot less such behaviour under the
new rules, with more people being pushed to Chapter 13 repayment
plans, instead of a straight liquidation.


--
Get Credit Where Credit Is Due
http://www.cardreport.com/
Credit Tools, Reference, and Forum

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

  #10  
Old 06-14-2008, 11:54 PM
kastnna
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: buy then bail strategy

On Jun 13, 6:15*pm, Will Trice <wtr...[at]notmonitored.com> wrote:
- quote -

> Many moons ago I had a co-worker who had gotten herself in over her head
> to the point of needing to declare bankruptcy. *Given that the
> bankruptcy was imminent, she and her husband when on a protracted
> vacation, including a trip to Disneyland, on credit with the clear
> intent that this would be a "free" trip (what the heck, might as well!).


Unethical spills over into fraud if the debtor has no intention or
reasonable expectation to pay the debt? I'm surprised nobody involved
in the bankruptcy process didn't notie the dates and raise a fuss
about this.

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

  #9  
Old 06-14-2008, 09:23 PM
Will Trice
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: buy then bail strategy



Mark Bole wrote:

- quote -

> It's odd that she could have had "imminent" bankruptcy and yet the
> credit card company had no clue?


Why? How many banks knew (and if they knew, acted on the knowledge) of
imminent foreclosures? I'm not saying she had filed before doing this.

- quote -

> Pacific Gas and Electric, one of the larger investor-owned energy
> utilities in the country, declared bankruptcy in the aftermath of some
> questionable energy price "crises" in California at the beginning of
> this century, also right after re-organizing itself into a holding
> company and various subsidiaries (how convenient). Shares lost 60% or
> so in value but since then have rebounded back as high as ever.


Yes, this was very good for those of us (like me) who picked up shares
of PG&E after the fall (and Edison International who had similar issues
but did not go bankrupt).

-Will

william dot trice at ngc dot com

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

  #8  
Old 06-14-2008, 04:20 PM
Gil Faver
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: buy then bail strategy

- quote -

> Pacific Gas and Electric, one of the larger investor-owned energy
> utilities in the country, declared bankruptcy in the aftermath of some
> questionable energy price "crises" in California at the beginning of this
> century, also right after re-organizing itself into a holding company and
> various subsidiaries (how convenient). Shares lost 60% or so in value but
> since then have rebounded back as high as ever. The second most-screwed
> person after the taxpayer is the utility rate payer, pardon my lack of
> objectivity.



The energy price crises at that time, were not of PG&Es doing. And the
state of California basically said "screw PG&E". and the governor (since
recalled) said "there is no energy problem. there is no energy price
problem. Don't bother to conserve." And then the state tried to take away
one of the most lucrative portions of PG&E. the company really had no
alternative than declaring bankruptcy, getting things back in order, and
making everyone whole.

bad example, here.

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

  #7  
Old 06-14-2008, 10:26 AM
jIM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: buy then bail strategy


- quote -

> Walking away doesn't discharge your debt.

eventually a poor credit score would catch up with person in 7-10-15
years... assuming they needed credit again.

My take is that if a person needs credit twice or three times, they
will usually need it over and over and over.

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

  #6  
Old 06-13-2008, 11:51 PM
Mark Bole
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: buy then bail strategy

Will Trice wrote:
- quote -

> Don wrote:
> > On 2008-06-13 08:30:19 -0700, Mark Bole <makbo[at]pacbell.net> said:
> > > The real point was, since the borrower knows ahead of time they are
> > > about to trash their credit record, they can take advantage of that
> > > knowledge.
> > > > Corporations and other businesses do stunts like this all the time.

> > Somehow when an individual person takes advantage of loopholes in the
> > law or the tax code or whatever, it is viewed as a terrible,
> > unethical, immoral thing, but when a big company does it it is O.K.,
> > just business.

> Many moons ago I had a co-worker who had gotten herself in over her head
> to the point of needing to declare bankruptcy. Given that the
> bankruptcy was imminent, she and her husband when on a protracted
> vacation, including a trip to Disneyland, on credit with the clear
> intent that this would be a "free" trip (what the heck, might as well!).
> Yes, I consider this unethical behavior.


It's odd that she could have had "imminent" bankruptcy and yet the
credit card company had no clue? Of course, the bank probably
appreciated those hefty finance charge profits they had been collecting
all along...

(My original example did not include bankruptcy).

Pacific Gas and Electric, one of the larger investor-owned energy
utilities in the country, declared bankruptcy in the aftermath of some
questionable energy price "crises" in California at the beginning of
this century, also right after re-organizing itself into a holding
company and various subsidiaries (how convenient). Shares lost 60% or
so in value but since then have rebounded back as high as ever. The
second most-screwed person after the taxpayer is the utility rate payer,
pardon my lack of objectivity.

-Mark Bole

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

  #5  
Old 06-13-2008, 11:24 PM
Coffee's For Closers
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: buy then bail strategy

In article <x_a4k.7970$xZ.153[at]nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com> ,
makbo[at]pacbell.net says...
- quote -

> I read an interesting article from the WSJ about homeowners who are
> under water on their mortgage. While their payments are still current
> and their credit record unblemished, they get a decent mortgage on a new
> house, at today's much more reasonable prices, and *then* bail on the
> old house (short sale, foreclosure, whatever).
> Lenders are trying to block this by requiring evidence that mortgage and
> tax payments can be made on both properties before granting the loan, so
> if you were legitimately trying to turn you old house into a rental, I
> suppose you would have to have a signed lease agreement in place before
> moving out -- not very practical.



Well, you could move out of the old house, and into a cheap
rental apartment (on a month-to-month lease), while getting set
up with a new tenant in the old house. Then apply for the
mortgage on the new house. Less pressure on all levels, since
you would have more time to shop around.


- quote -

> I wonder when we are going to see a similar strategy from owners of
> late-model SUV's and other gas-guzzler vehicles. Buy an economical car
> first, then walk away from the old one.



I wonder if auto lenders might start doing something like the
credit card "universal default" idea. Which is when Bank A
(which issued your credit card) notices that you are delinquent
on a card from another bank, and then jacks up your interest
rate.

Plenty of mortgages are already on variable interest rates. So
perhaps auto lenders might start offering the equivalent of an
ARM. With the risk of fine print authorising a risk-based
increase similar to the credit card issuers?


--
Get Credit Where Credit Is Due
http://www.cardreport.com/
Credit Tools, Reference, and Forum

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

  #4  
Old 06-13-2008, 11:15 PM
Will Trice
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: buy then bail strategy



Don wrote:
- quote -

> On 2008-06-13 08:30:19 -0700, Mark Bole <makbo[at]pacbell.net> said:

> > The real point was, since the borrower knows ahead of time they are
> > about to trash their credit record, they can take advantage of that
> > knowledge.

> Corporations and other businesses do stunts like this all the time.
> Somehow when an individual person takes advantage of loopholes in the
> law or the tax code or whatever, it is viewed as a terrible, unethical,
> immoral thing, but when a big company does it it is O.K., just business.


Many moons ago I had a co-worker who had gotten herself in over her head
to the point of needing to declare bankruptcy. Given that the
bankruptcy was imminent, she and her husband when on a protracted
vacation, including a trip to Disneyland, on credit with the clear
intent that this would be a "free" trip (what the heck, might as well!).
Yes, I consider this unethical behavior.

-Will

william dot trice at ngc dot com

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

  #3  
Old 06-13-2008, 08:23 PM
Don
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: buy then bail strategy

On 2008-06-13 08:30:19 -0700, Mark Bole <makbo[at]pacbell.net> said:
- quote -

> > Walking away doesn't discharge your debt.
> True, unless it's a non-recourse loan, or maybe a lease (I'm not
> familiar with the terms of most car loans). Also, depending on the
> amount, the lender may find it cheaper to write off the bad debt
> instead of leaving it on the books, this happens often enough.
> The real point was, since the borrower knows ahead of time they are
> about to trash their credit record, they can take advantage of that
> knowledge.


Corporations and other businesses do stunts like this all the time.
Somehow when an individual person takes advantage of loopholes in the
law or the tax code or whatever, it is viewed as a terrible, unethical,
immoral thing, but when a big company does it it is O.K., just business.

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

  #2  
Old 06-13-2008, 03:30 PM
Mark Bole
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: buy then bail strategy

Ron Peterson wrote:
- quote -

> On Jun 12, 11:15 am, Mark Bole <ma...[at]pacbell.net> wrote:
> > I wonder when we are going to see a similar strategy from owners of
> > late-model SUV's and other gas-guzzler vehicles. Buy an economical car
> > first, then walk away from the old one.

> Walking away doesn't discharge your debt.


True, unless it's a non-recourse loan, or maybe a lease (I'm not
familiar with the terms of most car loans). Also, depending on the
amount, the lender may find it cheaper to write off the bad debt instead
of leaving it on the books, this happens often enough.

The real point was, since the borrower knows ahead of time they are
about to trash their credit record, they can take advantage of that
knowledge.

-Mark Bole

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

  #1  
Old 06-13-2008, 03:55 AM
Ron Peterson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: buy then bail strategy

On Jun 12, 11:15*am, Mark Bole <ma...[at]pacbell.net> wrote:

- quote -

> I wonder when we are going to see a similar strategy from owners of
> late-model SUV's and other gas-guzzler vehicles. *Buy an economical car
> first, then walk away from the old one.


Walking away doesn't discharge your debt.

--
Ron

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

 
Old 06-12-2008, 04:48 PM
Elle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: buy then bail strategy

Sometimes the free market is darned entertaining. Home
lenders let visions of wealth overwhelm the reality that
sizable downpayments tend to keep people from walking out on
mortgages. Now they get their comeuppance. Ha ha, re car
financiers! With their typically ridiculous interest rates,
they too may get their comeuppance. Though I am thinking
that car loans have "preventive measures" in them to ensure
payment or at least getting every cent possible out of the
borrower, including going after assets.

OTOH, this all tends to promotes chaos, and that's not good
for the economy as a whole. Hurting these businesses hurts
many a stock portfolio.

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

 

Tags
bail, buy, strategy
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
RMD strategy
DLC: We are thinking ahead to when we must begin the required minimum IRA distributions. At present, our expenses are covered by social security and...
Financial Planning 9 04-26-2007 08:58 AM
HSA / IRA Strategy?
njoracle: A 45 year old single female in relatively good health has an HSA and an IRA. She can afford to contribute about $2000 a year to both (not each) the...
Financial Planning 5 03-24-2007 01:35 PM
Tax strategy for next 2007
kyle@kylebeck.com: I am trying to get everything in order for planning my tax strategy for this year, and wanted to double check something... Last year I made...
Taxes 3 02-20-2007 10:57 PM
What do you think of this strategy?
Gary: I have, over a lifetime of being a saver, accumulated significant amounts in IRAs, 401Ks, etc. I am now age 72. Each year the government requires...
Financial Planning 8 01-27-2006 07:52 PM
Tax strategy for Houses
Daddio - redhonda50_nojunk@yahoo.com: I hope this question/problem is not out of line for this group. My wife and I are 56 years old and would like to eventually retire in Flordia. ...
Taxes 6 07-06-2005 04:00 AM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:33 PM.