Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Financial Planning

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #3  
Old 05-20-2008, 06:43 PM
rick++
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Managed Payout Mutual Funds

As a historical note, I believe this was the original
concept of "hedge fund" - a payout higher than
long term government bonds by investing both long
and short. In recent years hedge has taken on
the nefarious meaning of any sort of cowboy
investing one can get away with as long as one
have few enough investors to hide from the SEC.
And most of those dont do true hedging anymore.

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

  #2  
Old 05-12-2008, 11:54 PM
Ron Peterson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Managed Payout Mutual Funds

On Apr 26, 11:43 am, Lon <alonzotan...[at]yahoo.com> wrote:
- quote -

> Though these new funds by "Vanguard" & "Fidelity" have the element of
> risk as do all investments,
> they could work much better for many than annuities. As a retiree for
> the past 17 years and now required to take Mandatory Distribution of
> my IRA, I will be transferring into one of these funds.


> http://socialize.morningstar.com/New...d/2447021.aspx


A joint life time annuity for a 70 year old couple would return about
7.6% with the cost of the policy amortized over 160 months for tax
purposes. That is assuming paying for the annuity outside of an IRA.

If you really don't want the income from the IRA, convert it to a Roth
IRA which has no mandatory distribution requirements. You may want to
do the conversion in parts to avoid a high tax burden. Your AGI would
have to be under $100,000 for a couple to do the Roth conversion. In
2010, the AGI requirement is scheduled to disappear in 2010.

--
Ron

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

  #1  
Old 04-26-2008, 08:46 PM
Lon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Managed Payout Mutual Funds


- quote -

> It sounds like you are mixing issues. Those funds may or may not
> distribute enough to meet your RMD figure in year 1, but most certainly
> won't a few years down the road. Do you need the funds from your RMD? If
> not, you can just transfer the shares from your IRA to your cash account
> to satisfy the RMD, you don't need to change your asset allocation in
> anticipation of RMDs.
> Sorry, those funds you referenced sound too gimmicky for my liking.
> Comparing to annuities is apples to oranges, completely different
> investment.
> Joe


The only comparison Joe, is monthly income. I have dealt with Vanguard
for a long time and feel very comfortable with their expertise, and no
I really don't need the distribution. It so happens however that on
one of the options, which provides 5% of the principal (payable
monthly) is sufficient to meet my RMD. In years that it is not, I can
take the balance at the end of the year. In either case, I would have
it disbursed to their Money Market account. Unlike annuities, there is
access to your account balance as well as the potential for growth. I
am not anti annuity. I think annuities are perfect for some
situations, but this new concept has appeal to some, in my view.

Lon

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

 
Old 04-26-2008, 05:48 PM
joetaxpayer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Managed Payout Mutual Funds

Lon wrote:

- quote -

> Though these new funds by "Vanguard" & "Fidelity" have the element of
> risk as do all investments,
> they could work much better for many than annuities. As a retiree for
> the past 17 years and now required to take Mandatory Distribution of
> my IRA, I will be transferring into one of these funds.


It sounds like you are mixing issues. Those funds may or may not
distribute enough to meet your RMD figure in year 1, but most certainly
won't a few years down the road. Do you need the funds from your RMD? If
not, you can just transfer the shares from your IRA to your cash account
to satisfy the RMD, you don't need to change your asset allocation in
anticipation of RMDs.
Sorry, those funds you referenced sound too gimmicky for my liking.
Comparing to annuities is apples to oranges, completely different
investment.

Joe

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

  #-1  
Old 04-26-2008, 04:43 PM
Lon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Managed Payout Mutual Funds

Though these new funds by "Vanguard" & "Fidelity" have the element of
risk as do all investments,
they could work much better for many than annuities. As a retiree for
the past 17 years and now required to take Mandatory Distribution of
my IRA, I will be transferring into one of these funds.

http://socialize.morningstar.com/New...d/2447021.aspx

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

 

Tags
funds, managed, mutual, payout
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Working with Managed Allocation Funds
BrianLeonard: Are there any recomendations for working with managed allocation funds that don't have ticker symbols, but are made of up funds that do. For...
Microsoft Money 3 08-22-2008 05:26 PM
Which styles of actively managed stock mutual funds outperform?
beliavsky@aol.com: Rational Cross-Sectional Differences in Market Efficiency: Evidence from Mutual Fund Returns by PAUL H. SCHULTZ University of Notre Dame -...
Financial Planning 16 01-25-2008 01:15 AM
actively managed vs. indexed REIT funds
beliavsky@aol.com: Real Estate Funds: Pilot or Autopilot? By VIVIAN MARINO New York Times Published: June 25, 2006 "The Lipper data show that for a longer period...
Financial Planning 1 07-01-2006 02:55 PM
California LLC: any tax consequences from changing from member-managed to manager-managed LLC?
streetfilm@charter.net: My dad and I have an LLC in California. We are bringing in an investor and want to convert our LLC to a Manager-managed LLC so I may be the sole...
Taxes 6 06-29-2005 03:52 PM
Mutual funds merging with other mutual funds
Rod: In Money 2000 Deluxe, how do you record when a mutual fund company combines with another mutual fund? I had 200 shares of fund a, which was...
Microsoft Money 1 12-09-2003 12:28 PM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:02 PM.