|
#3
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > A MEC is what happens if you put "too much" into a life insurance
A Life policy can become a MEC, even when you are> policy up front rather than making payments year by year. making REGULAR premium payments. The designation MEC, is used when the Cash Value Acct., surpasses the limits set for that policy, for that year, by IRS.... Cal Lester CLU ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| oprah.chopra[at]gmail.com wrote: - quote - > I am 31, net work around 450k and projected to grow at 100k/ year. > A life insurance agent is trying hard to rope me into a plan where I > can contribute large amounts to a relatively small policy ( ~1-1.5 > million ). He mentioned something about MEC, where you can not > contribute too much to abuse the system. > Is it a good idea to use life insurance as a way to avoid estate > taxes? I have already maxed out 401k, roth IRA, and traditional IRA. > I plan to open a SEP IRA next. Well hang on...is the sole reason for getting life insurance the estate tax? You do realize the estate tax scheme in the US is very much in flux at the moment, yes? And that even in a rollback to the old levels you aren't anywhere close to the level of paying it? Perhaps state taxes depending on your choice of heirs and home state, but not federal estate taxes. Ask the agent what assumptions he's making about a) your net worth trajectory b) the future estate tax scheme and c) your marital, family, charitable, and gifting plans when selling this policy. I can't imagine how he's framing a case for a 31 year old who is well below the level where the estate tax is even a consideration. Sure, you're building wealth, but given that you are very early in the process of accumulating it, minimizing estate tax is an odd goal. Unless you know that you are coming into a pot of money that you believe is certain to exceed the level where your estate would be taxed - is that the case? And even then...estate planning - factoring in the estate tax issues - begins with your will, any trusts, etc. If you haven't addressed that you're putting the cart before the horse. Insurance agents aren't estate planners, attorneys are...most people address that piece, and then see if life insurance fits into the estate plan. Yes, "if". -Tad ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| On Apr 23, 10:48*am, oprah.cho...[at]gmail.com wrote: - quote - > I am 31, net work around 450k and projected to grow at 100k/ year.
I You have quite a unique situation. What you need is financial> A life insurance agent is trying hard to rope me into a plan where I > can contribute large amounts to a relatively small policy ( ~1-1.5 > million ). He mentioned something about MEC, where you can not > contribute too much to abuse the system. planning that might or might not eventually involve estate preservation life insurance. $450k net worth plus 100k annual increase [at]6% growth for 29 years (to age 60) gives you an estate of almost $10,000,000, At first glance I would say you definitely need estate preservtation life insurance. But not the one being recommended. MEC is short for modified endowment contract. Simply put, MECs are life insurance policies that are overfunded to the point that the IRS no longer considers them insurance, but rather an investment. As such, the death benefit is still income tax free, but the cash value loses its tax advantages. My main concern is that the nature of MEC policies is to build-up large cash values, which IS NOT what you need. You already stated that estate tax liquidity and preservation are the primary purposes of the coverage. Utilizing the cash value is contrary to those goals, so why pay for something you don't intend to use. You need death benefit, not cash. Besides, insurance is pretty low on the list of cash building vehicles. If you need insurance, and I believe you do, then guaranteed universal life insurance should suffice. Guaranteed UL is permanent insurance, but builds almost no cash value. It's essentially the cheapest method available to secure permanent insurance. The only drawback is that if you ever decide to surrender the insurance you won't get much for it (but surrendering is also contrary to your stated goals). Term won't do because the statistics heavily favor you will outlive its coverage period and leave your heirs with a huge estate tax bill (which they may or may not have the liquidity to cover). Term's main purpose is to cover liabilities and dependents that are expected to disappear over time. This is not the case for you. One alternative to the guaranteed UL: get a short term policy now (like level 10 year term) just to "lock-in" your presumably good health. If in the next 10 years, your future financial forecasts have not changed, you can convert it to guaranteed universal life. If it turns out your estate will not be so huge, at least you didn't spend a lot on insurance. The drawback is that converting is done at your age when converted, so you may end up paying slightly more in the long run. - quote - > Is it a good idea to use life insurance as a way to avoid estate
Insurance is one of the best ways to avoid estate taxes, but the best> taxes? I have already maxed out 401k, roth IRA, and traditional IRA. > I plan to open a SEP IRA next. method is through estate planning. Properly designed Trusts can protect many generations of your family from creditors, estate taxes, greedy ex-spouses, etc, etc... and will pay for themselves many times over. ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
| | |||
| |||
| oprah.chopra[at]gmail.com writes: - quote - > I am 31, net work around 450k and projected to grow at 100k/ year.
A MEC is what happens if you put "too much" into a life insurance> A life insurance agent is trying hard to rope me into a plan where I > can contribute large amounts to a relatively small policy ( ~1-1.5 > million ). He mentioned something about MEC, where you can not > contribute too much to abuse the system. policy up front rather than making payments year by year. The death benefit is still income-tax free, but if you take distributions during your lifetime, they may be hit with an extra penalty if you are below 59-1/2. - quote - > Is it a good idea to use life insurance as a way to avoid estate
It's often a good idea to avoid estate taxes, but it's> taxes? I have already maxed out 401k, roth IRA, and traditional IRA. > I plan to open a SEP IRA next. nowhere near as simple a question to answer as "is it a good idea to use life insurance to do so". The death benefit from life insurance is usually income-tax free. The proceeds may or may not be part of your estate and, thus, may or may not be subject to estate taxes - generally the issue of avoiding estate taxes on life insurance death benefits depends on who is the *owner* and who is the *beneficiary* of the policy. The trick is to make sure that the owner and beneficiaries of that life insurance policy are neither you nor your estate - *that* is how you keep estate taxes off that death benefit. And it can be achieved in a variety of ways, but little of that is particularly life-insurance dependent - generally it requires you to make *gifts* each year while you are alive. Those gifts could be anything from cash given to your kids (who may or may not choose to pay for a life insurance policy on you), or it may be given to a trust (where a trustee must still have the discretion as to whether or not to pay for life insurance premiums). Or the kids could just take the cash and piss or away or invest it on their own. All of that gets cash out of your estate. What that cash is used for (and the value of what's done with that cash by the time you die) can be anything. That all said, a common means of managing this is to set up an irrevocable trust which then owns and is the beneficiary of a life insurance policy on you. You must not be the trustee. The insurance policy held by that trust may be anything from term to a VUL. Permanent life insurance (like Whole or a VUL) may grow in value inside that trust, Term would not, but may be the most cost-efficient if all you want to do is make sure that there's a chunk of cash to take care of your dependents. It sounds, though, like you're trying to avoid taxes just for the sake of avoiding taxes, rather than figuring out what you want the money *for*. Note that if you use an ILIT, you *cannot* extract and spend any of the accumulated value of whatever life insurance is in the trust. Your trustee may do so for the sake of the beneficiaries - but it's out of your hands. And if you don't use an ILIT but rather retain ownership of the policy, while you may extract money from the policy later (loans or distributions), the benefit *is* part of your estate. Note that while there are reasonable and sensible uses for life insurance, particularly for folks of somewhat higher net worth who do have reason to set up the trusts and crank cash into the policies, at the moment, your estate is not big enough to warrant that, you haven't said anything about dependents or children or other planned beneficiaries (or a spouse), and you need to bear in mind that the life insurance salesman has a *huge* incentive to sell you a policy regardless of how much sense it really makes for you. It might make sense. But for the vast majority of folks out there (certainly not all!) - a cheap term policy is probably adequate. So you should be wary. Note that there's nothing whatsoever wrong with building up some substantial savings which is NOT in tax-favored accounts - sure, max out the 401k, Roth, SEP, etc. But you can and almost certainly should crank some cash into a regular taxable account, perhaps in fairly tax-efficient investments (low turnover funds, etc). BTW, congratulations. That net worth and level of savings at you age is astoundingly good. Keep it up, but don't forget to spend a little and enjoy yourself, too. -- Plain Bread alone for e-mail, thanks. The rest gets trashed. No HTML in E-Mail! -- http://www.expita.com/nomime.html Are you posting responses that are easy for others to follow? http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I am 31, net work around 450k and projected to grow at 100k/ year. A life insurance agent is trying hard to rope me into a plan where I can contribute large amounts to a relatively small policy ( ~1-1.5 million ). He mentioned something about MEC, where you can not contribute too much to abuse the system. Is it a good idea to use life insurance as a way to avoid estate taxes? I have already maxed out 401k, roth IRA, and traditional IRA. I plan to open a SEP IRA next. ------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the Newsgroup. |
| Tags |
| avoid, estate, insurance, life, taxes |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| real estate taxes: Avoid "dealer" status johnmolinda@yahoo.com: I have a question about real estate taxes. I understand that if you buy and flip houses, or buy and quickly sell many houses, the IRS may consider... | Taxes | 2 | 04-04-2006 07:38 AM | |
| Life Insurance & Estate tax jcoggshall@comcast.net: Father has no assets in his name. Each of his three adult children and new wife were beneficiaries of his life insurance and each received $500K... | Taxes | 6 | 05-20-2005 02:07 PM | |
| Do you pay taxes on Life Insurance? Sean B.: My Mother and Sister passed away in a car accident. My Mother had a life insurance policy with my Aunt & Uncle as the benefactors. They advised... | Taxes | 5 | 11-13-2003 07:30 PM | |
| ownership of life insurance policy and estate taxes beliavsky@aol.com: Suppose my wife and I each own life insurance policies on ourselves, with death benefits exceeding the $1 mil estate exemption of 2011 and beyond.... | Financial Planning | 16 | 09-15-2003 03:20 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |